uncensored dutch

2012 and more

2012-01-28T00:59:00.003Z

yeah what 2012 and action, 2012 and direct action, 2012 and culture, 2012 and drugs, 2012 and crime, 2012 and each of the industrys, 2012 and capitalist illusions, 2012 and climate catastrophe, 2012 and emancipation, 2012 and xenophobism, 2012 and disarmament, 2012 and hereditary despots, 2012 and guided democracys, 2012 and boko haram?

really don't know where to start.

boko haram?

seems like a usefull topic. jonathan opened up for negotiations. now that is reason for carefullness.

nigeria is a us client, because of the oil. the typical thing would be to blame islamism. up in the north, in the maghreb there are a few desolate islamic desert tribes, that once persisted on trading stufss trhough and thro said magreb, but these days have difficulty paying their satelite internetties and wider universitary tutelage from the incomes.

so thats easy, blame the difference, tell people those are insane fanaticals, kill a couple of people with bombs or other means, and.. the mullahs are to blame.

wich mullahs is a second, in this case it would be the sunnite ones that give the shia minoritys such a hard time. you would say there we have iran riot in the middle, an ideal partner..

shiism is a bit boko haram ofcourse, i don't quite get the peculiars but it has ado with the old fashioned rites and refering of several uncles of prophets who are not really, or perhaps it just doesn't matter, as important as uncles of prophets happen to be sometimes, for other mullahs.

so it may be a point, who is the prophet so to say, but it won't solve a thing.

nigeria is a staled faith, is the problem. it used to be you send out a white bishop every once and a while, to enjoy theirselves with the little sizzies, that would keep half of the people happy.

then you gave 'm batons, and teargas and the oil would continue flowing. but not anymore, second hand cars and cheap fuel have had the nigerian economy booming, the former christians are now car owners. ofcourse that diabolic tool spoiled their saintly minds, and like everywhere we didnt have to wait for the airbag for them to become extremely dangerous.

all of nigeria meanwhile went with the flow, more and more modern, bigger and bigger cars, higher and higher rises, and more and more police. it got quite messy with not enough roads even to accomodate all the police. roadblocks sprung up every remote location, and the newly employed security industry went loose with all the illuster methoods of the african continent.

send your daughter to islam school on saterday? forget it, at the second roadblock she would be broke and have to turn around in the hopes at getting at least back home again without another payment.

saterdays were good days for the industry in nigeria. not on sundays, on sundays the soldiers and police hold to their bases, so that every young boy can visit the sunday school.

it doesnt happen there in the north, but that is only because they are no christians.

there is not a lot they can learn without getting a problem, security industry? an obvious no.
petrochemical industry? well no.. it obviously destroys nigeria, no future there, burocratical education? well no, they are only good to send out the security industry, so there is nothing to learn either. finances? no need to ask. farming? impossible.

nothing to learn. all you can learn is doing so much damage, it is just better if people don't get into the kind of bussiness.

so.. you have to be a bit carefull when negotiating. what is it really about?

is it about keeping northern nigeria an empty space? distribution of wealth? positions? all of it?

about the police state and the neccesary poor to maintain one? about institutes buying up the land? about that couscous from a magnetron tastes way worse than from a woodstove?

we need to know it all.

updated, alltho i do not agree to all what was said, i was told that the wish to live on in the traditional way is very much behind most unrest in africa. that 'traditional ways' means ways of sustenance, way of life and i assume the cultural patterns to go with it.
complicated, so it is really about magnetron or woodstove, not wanting to do with big bussiness meaning it is good if women carry water for many hours a day etc., etc.

the obvious conclusion would be that sustenace and to live a (quasi) natural life need to be considered, you would say that is not hard to meet. but apparently the opposite is true. it gets easier to understand (i figure) if you look for example at african (or in similar poor nations) metropoles.
eg. great poverty and lack of opportunity promise no great results of modernising society.

i was also told most african struggles are fought by people not really a voluntary part of the forces (i only accepted that after concerning social pressure, 'control'). a personal sidenote there: if you leave a modern army to stop being a murderer you also get courtmartial, it is not surprising militias need to claim similar absolute loyalty then.

2012 transparancy or nothing

2012-01-19T17:03:00.005Z

for some reason the word "transparancy" has not yet become completely obfuscated.(intransparanted)

it is coming, attempts to do the turnaround trick have already been succesfully promoted,
quite possible in laws, in legislature,

ofcourse it happens on that line as well as in shimmery financial promotions, ofcourse that is "organised", and ofcourse it is mediawise (and criminal as so surpisingly often with the legislature's acceptance of malversation, but it is not yet criminal, people go unpunished for the kind of 'product' for a 'market'.) selling lies, spreading lies, malversations, once under a corporate (lets put it shortly: financial) guise they are a product.

that is not so with truth. truth is a "secret", and can be censored.
because people tell truth and corporations want to lie

(as thus instituted by those 'judges' of no value at all).

it is really important we all realise how little avail the law will be with a struggle for justice,

it is an intrinsically complicit and extravagant tool of corporatism,

with only one but, just like their friends with the pretty jobs, that want to foul, control, devastate, keep the people poor for cheap labouring, and probably often the fun to see them suffer,

at least humiliation is the receipe for me at courts,

they are people. they do it for theirselves.

they believe in their outrageous systems of repression and degradation, control and lie,
manipulation and secret, because it benefits them. they are well off, with their cosy friends high up, who can lie and cheat and pollute and steal and resist taxes, falsify any paper, publish anything contrary to facts, steal the fruit of people's minds, have their servants,

their yes and sir etc. sayers.

just people. horrible awfull people, the only group in society of wich you can say, exactly the past 30 or so, years once again : "they did this".

wars? allowed by law. pollution? allowed by law. taking poor people's bread? allowed by law.
promoting more pollution? allowed by law. promoting stupiditys as benefit is only in production?
allowed by law.

sanctified actually. prepared.. again and again

so. perhaps, you would like to know what they know about you?

how about we would know all they know of us?

secret.. you are not allowed to know (well from now on you probably are) that the supermarket scans your faces, films your every step. that actually you are filmed a huge part of the day.
that your medical file is there, that your secret services files will never be released to you, no matter what you or they pretend, every incident with police, and for the older for example the school, for younger people it is ofcourse a bit more.

that besides they probably have all the phonenumbers you ever called, especially since 1996.
if anything you say is interesting in any way, they have it. if you speak openly about yourself they'd keep it.

that is because nowadays most of it can be checked by computers. before that it was of not as much value.
every email you send, every tax you payed, or didn't pay, every 50 , 100 or much more they stole from you (dare to doubt that tho), all that.

every time you have been rapported about, school or medical, psychological or social, by police or undercover , and quite a few more, is or could very well be there. and probably so is most of what you ever said in a public building. well unless you really have nothing of interest to tell.

nothing against war, nothing against poverty, nothing against injustice, nothing about the rich, nothing about a whole lot of things, and explosives.

i dont know how they deal with weapons, i suppose they don't go by phone.

in fact it has been confirmed every email or post you make is saved and checked. every stupid act you do on internet, and every keystroke and it's specific rhytms or rhymes, in windhoos proper. and thus in apple(would otherways be illegal in usia), and go figure available under linux(2).

next they register everything you buy or pay for, (and obviously whatever they can you don't)
and all of them engage in making deceiting phonecalls from illegal lists, probably police compiled hacks that standard land in your mailbox, under the most proper of guises) ;)

and every other method.

wich is one reason they want to force more passes on us. pas for this, that and more and more and more

the best they like it if you put invisible cash in them. invisible cash wooow.
(3)

that system's judges will clique against any change, massively.

now, talking about transparance, really we could have so much more of it.

(2) or perhaps don't. it's networks after all.
(3) bank accounts for example are just not at all safe against the interference of services in any way.

2012 solidarity or nothing

2012-01-18T18:28:00.004Z

earth's endurance is limited and people are just vulnerable, whole nations are at steak, and the whole lot of the world is getting toasted radioactively yet by the war industrys.

blind, egotist, reactionairy, sociopath predators, popularly guised for employers, for reasons hard to understand (but psychologically perversely simple), extract great tolls of habitation, and inhabitants alike , for that clueless 'profit' and that mindless 'greatness'.

that is just one such industry. there is a security complex (split people in proprietary's soldier ants and prisonslaves).
the pharmaceutic: it is likewise closer to the military industrial complex that it's ruthlessly disgarding a future and medical consequence, the dead road they are walking is like in the war industry, not that unclear from within.

relatedly there is the biotechnologic industrial complex. that one is perhaps not yet an industry of it's own but an accumulation of abuses by the other branches of industry, a complex of it's own but only in the making.

there is the nuclear industry (one utterly hellbound and catastrophal beyond description)

the oil industry (related enough to the petrochemical industry to perhaps be better considered only one, but also in action to contain concurring markets , and overtake energy related pollutionism in the other industrys.)

there is an attempt at water monopolisation going, with the drinks and food industry involving.

railroads are being neglected, now owned by the other industrys, phones and internet became nominally corrupt in the hands of 'private property' (theft).

and the housing rip finally burst. exposing once more the greedy credits that form the vampiric fundament of the 'financial industry'.

all of those are served by an educational erosion that is also corporate, and a media industry that is a full 100% ready and set to lie, and influence everything from the events to the subconscious.

the traditional complaint, that the burocratic industry and legislature is the responsible and greatest infiltrator and cheater, the class-justice, is phenomenal in the not anymore public transports, if there is a reason to fly, we could fly equal. if there is a reason to train, it is to pay the empty 1st classes. my whole life long.

it is not that *i* did not notice.

2012 apocalypse now.

2012-01-01T15:02:00.003Z

jay this was a great celebration. i love the sound of explosions, and the orchestration of our new years party was fascinating and creative. all through the evening , here and there, now and then, big bangs started a new universe, made me think of all these poor kids to lay wake for hours after been put to bed to early.

the mood was very positive.. i thought: well now we scared away the evil spirits..., repeatedly.

the fireworks that regularly went of that tad to early to make it an interesting evening, instead of an interesting and expensive ten minutes, made it almost fairy tale like.

around 12 fireworks of every kind and color sprung up, and from my viewpoint, everything was painted in colorfull lights of many kinds.

still a waste of money, but amazing how it was as if all the people together turned our everyday reality into a film, a rather moody one, of joy, future and togetherness.

it made me wonder so much if other people (so, forgive the curse, other nations) also managed to achieve this effect. this has nothing to do much with my usual topics, yet i really liked it a lot.

solsticea 2011 99.8

2011-12-30T14:26:00.005Z

recently i have commented quitte a lot about the usian presidential elections. useless perhaps and overly ambitious, but it is smeared on the media so widely, it offers excellent cases to reply in the negative.

obama's change? well there is change, but to say it is a very great or speedy one... if it happenned, it happenned almost casually. sideways.

what changed is the political landscape inside and outside usia. what did not change is the trend to take from the poor and give it to the rich. the only really notable kind of change.

oh, i don't think it deserves to much negativity. what was to be expected? to emancipate any and all straight from the most primitive of projections?

perhaps we and obama are doing just fine in all our powerlessness.

more and more i am convinced i will 'root for obama'. not a guarantee for succes i admit, but it worked last time. and i think he stands a good chance. because still he is the symbol, the very justifiable and often isolated symbol, of emancipation. and by virtue of coincedence, (he should really do away with those weird yellow sunglasses of his), it is there for everyone to see.

racism really goes pretty deep. ron pauls weird pink sunglasses for example make no impression on me at all.. so true..

no wait. it is actually not true, i love ron pauls pink sunglasses... obviously..

no wait, that is also not true. i hate it we all need sunglasses as a short term protection instead of the everlasting ozone layer we destroyed.

anyway. ron paul stands accused of being a racist. i did an experiment that i will describe hereafter to test if he was truly a bad guy in the respect.

he is very old over 73, and i dont trust people that age to be in touch with modernity, with reality so to say.

don't want to say they all wear the wrong color sunglasses, but usually they do. they have no grip on what is playing before their very eyes, because they stuffed their brains full of campaignpromises of eras long gone and try to make the politics their own fathers never managed. it ends up not uncommonly to be hugely outdated and out of touch policy's.

that is what i have against ron paul in the person to start with.

but..

he signed a bunch of rather crappy and unfortunately rather pretentious papers, that form a collection of rants, in the racist, in the homophobiac, (so that is why he loves those pink glasses??), and in the antisemite (or so it says, i am not sure, i didnt read that years 1990s garbage). the descriptions have not been descriptive enough for me to judge if it was plain antisemitism, or subttle, moderated, historic revisionism, wich is imho a different thing.

that besides the intentions with what it was written may matter. it is easy ofcourse to overdo things.

anyhow. since i dont have those papers and am not particularly interested either in the kind of talk that is apparently supposed to engage white supremacists etc., i did the 'ron paul racism test,'

science is not reliable without the method. this test however allows not to only test ron paul for racism, it allows to test nearly everyone to their measure of racism.

it goes like this.

first you try not to be a racist, child off, for some 35 years. after that you manage to become "less of a racist then average" and you get a certain leverage with other non racist (ie. colored minority's) groups to be considered seriously interested ' not a racist seeking new rants and barter'

well that is easy ofcourse, life is a dedication somehow.

after you did all this the test is simple. you go to a place where people from a random minority are overrepresented, the kind of place you fear if you never tried for antiracism that is perhaps..

then you think, and talk a bit about the subject (is ron paul a racist?)

the answer will come, in the form of sad looks, sad expressions, noone yet accused anyone of being a most despisable thing aloud in such enlightened company.

they can tell two things.

1: i am looking sad because he is not a racist how could you think such a thing?.

1 is the outcome most preferred by everyone, but not the most common.

2: unfortunately we know he is a racist.

unfortunately ron paul is one. we .... "know". (i know since yesterday:().

solsticea 2011.. 99

2011-12-27T00:37:00.005Z

people sometimes say i could be more productive. since what i do really , would really, would really love to, would be

about direct action, civil disobedience, transparance, human rights and dignity,
in short about what i think i certainly must still try to contribute to #occupy

purely technically spoken they are riot.

yet in some way, that i really do not completely understand myself, it is not ''that' easy,

i am familiar with it, ofcourse, i can be pretty neurotic about a few things, not only about producing these thoughts that were materialising with that topic in mind,

i destroy alarms, mh, that one mind you , i do not mind. independently very much if i sleep, for example. and if i don't want to go somewhere my bicycle can just be flat, so i dont allways have to do a lot about what does get me nervous, sometimes it does it for me.

administrative post is my great weakness. it gets me down, depressed, sad and angry. i tend and try for years now not to open any. it was just allways horrible, and very often so utterly useless and injust,
because that is how poor people are treated.

and exactly that hit me in full force when halliburnton was allowed in the full open, attempting to put the blame on anyone

destroyed the evidence.

these sunny ideas? about non-violent change and emancipation of civilian participation in decission making processes..?

dead as a radiated germ in a fresh mango pulp.

i will still try (and make perhaps this year), but i guarantee not the vindication and brilliance i planned it with.

sorry. humans are limited, humans have flaws, and humans make errors.

there's a flaw, here's a flow.

another tricky excuse i suppose people innocently enjoy in the secret even if it is all so plain.

so of all that..
and that is a lot..

basically none of it is "true", something to have a 'faith' in, or justice.

none of that is smart. it is human, and it is 'flaws'

ask the budha in it's endless incarnation of our own joy, and she will answer you:

ice skating? never heard of that.

brrr. ltr.!

solsticea 2011.98

2011-12-26T06:08:00.005Z

what stupifyingly major year.

my last years weather prediction for example. exactly to the point. at least overhere.
locally so to say. the very, very dry river here.

and no matter what chaos in the climate.. that is becoming more structural.

we had more sunny days then usual. 9 of them in summer. mhpf. (grumpf, growl) it's few.

fukushima.

i had a look recently. not close or so, no human wave policy's from mine, confirmative or not that much.

not that good. arny gunderson worried, or actually not so much , about driftwood.
but the real problem is , agreed, probably with the food chain.

there is the 20 msv per japanese child story,
a gross estimate would put their surplus cancer risks at some 500% i think. and the impossibillity to clean the playgrounds or houses. (2)

there is that the evicted from fukushima still pay the mortgages from the housing bubble.
there is a promotion for them to go back. tokyo was once again noticed for being a tad worse then already unadmitted. really, all that and jazz. (3)

sipdis from the yakuzi so to say, labour union stuff. that you know a small detail. a certain phantom in tepco's concept for example.

or just a random 220m3 of some other thing. really in a drain or the other. worst? hell, how relative is that, the 4th and only in one nation shown nuclear explosion at the site?

and the same mantra. 'eventually worse than chernobyl'. mark they planary hold against me the art, imprecise use of language.

eventually worse 12th of february (did it burn the riot date in the mind ..:S i don't think so.

but say it was the 12th. and o0:00 that earthquake put an end to the rusty, unmaintained , not any more modern , reliable or even functional. beyond expirance date emergency gear,

i dont really mind not knowing when .. conform warfogging crime downnumberedly, in those waves
but that is another thing than doomsday machines build to be prepared against the ineventual.

worse then at o0:12.. that point it got about as bad as chernobyl, heh and i that is really to pessimist, not after the second day at all.

that eventually.

12 minutes probably.

if they are not antedate, expired, wrecked, old, worn, amateurishly powered up, weirdly stashed full of cummulative calamity, in short outdated.

but that besides i am supposed to blame no one, i think. for what is basically, a predicted fraude with billions.

all of them did it.

they put it in plastic folio these days. cynical, consider it like 4 simmering nuclear bombs, packed in plastic foli, and it is not even easy, or possible to do, it's slow, and costy in human resource.

with the not that executive regards of a labour unions..

it influenced the weather,

ionised some sphere, near the ozonsphere, it's remnants, did, oloril knows what, make it colder,
thinner, with weird high clouds, that didn't rain..(1)

1 million out of 1.5 go hurray it didn't rain?

sorry to build your secure housing bubble, dust allways comes down way more persistently than rain.

so i don't freaking know. but my initial 800 yrs max, with the more probable scenarios at 600 yrs max , sorteless the moreofsuch privatisation unsutainable catastrophominems

thats is not exactly super.

netherlands has urenco, and as long as you say 'shut borselle' , you are obviously somewhat of an utter nitwitz.

borselle could never mean a tiny thing, if you don't hold a thing against urenco

don't even have to guess it's ss. state secret.
(it's in the educational murdrycullium it doesn't do a thing).

that besads, that besads.

k that is one thing need sad. 2011

ltr.

(1) months after i stopped my engagemnt for sheer frustration of the lak of advance trhough denial, lies from the fraud, corruption, greed etc.. instead of a maximal attempt at starting safer energy,

the dogs told me, and birds as well, the atmosphere appeared to still be quitte ionised.
when they asked me to pay attention i could indeed still observe some faint differenc in the violet or what is close to that,

for some of them the whole skie has been looking perfectly out of ordre and scary,

allthough, they know not only fukushima, but also: occupy.

(2) up to 5 per 1000 newborn in the americas eg.

(3) brave japanese hunted by the corporate police feed the starving pets that people were misleadingly told they could retrieve little later.

spy vs. spy

2011-12-24T21:46:00.009Z

an eventfull year, i will write a bit still, my last post i mentioned what an ordeal it is if there is a despise, a contempt for justice in the system we live in. it is still a depressing thought.

it can be reflected on almost anything that is happening, well happening, relevant and in the media. egypt and "tahrir!" basically a dispute about class justice and the violence of the uniformed side.

egypt post tahrir, pretty much the same dispute. a blogger in prison for years already and that is only the most outspoken tip of an iceberg of injustice.

syria? what other thing then a contempt for justice in the sense of 'human riots' is held against assad?

ow i am concerned. the situation became terribly muddy by now. the traditional thing the camel does to it's followers is happening, the closed doors, muslims only understand repression reasoning.

well it is not really the camel perhaps, but it is terrible. and what is happening?

the reaction of the west, including aljazeera is to shamelessly portray even pro assad rallys as demonstration, what should you still believe is riot here?

the reaction of the arab world, to send 'monitors' is in itself a quite phantasmagoral idea, generals, used to pacify warzones .. in luxurious cars talk to spokespeople of the interior ministry, ok it need to be done, so far so good, opposition jumps high and low. but the point is,

do i really believe something in the sense of "true justice" will be done by them? i don't even think they have the faintest to start an attempt. it need not be a lack of will. (1)

just a lack of justice.

so do i have that against anyone else in particular? the states, not just any states, also the usian states , that trademarker of liberty.

because obviously the proceedings against manning are finally(?) taking place after months of abuse of the person of bradley manning, reportedly to turn him against assange that is still and almost openly manipulated against by usian and other states representatives.

hardly dare to say it, but it is encouraging the english courts take the story serious, where will it end, i allways see the ship of justice strand on those cliffs of money and influence.

so, why not talk a bit more than i already have about this trial of the century that is going on, what is perhaps the most important trial so far of this century.

it is not i have no gossip..

the trial of bradley manning.

ok i know this, it has been documented that the department at what the preceding 'judge' (perhaps military person is way more appropriate) is working , (doj) , is bussy with proceedings against assange. all confidentially probably and 'way secret',

so the judge considered himself .. unbiased, now that would still be tested, in the longer term for an appeals hearing, and perhaps i should not be so pessimistic as to be opportune about that, what more is known is that this doj, department of justice, has been working at the case against bradley manning in person..

reportedly in the 'actual shaping of a plea bargain to be used against assange'.
and it means he is a hero, that despite solitary confinement and brutal treatment, that is officially regarded torture under human rights criteria including expressions of those united states in (the) americas in international diplomacy, including such as referred to the security counsil, ie. cases of war and peace, life and death on a scale and measure of international justice, he is the one person that did not turn into a traitor of anyone.

i saw a very fatty senator, he thought i(we?) would like him, for his smile. over manning i think, not a bad smile, but if you think that is where reliability is..

he said he didn't 'like' bradley manning, that he had only defended his rights to still be humanely treated, he didn't follow that up, wich would be a juridical common sense, with that it invalidated the proceedings, no he followed it up with talk about treason or so.

yeah, get in the picture for someone's rights, and when it matters be gladly chatting about in the world 'you don't like him' or whatever counts as his reason for being guilty. no that was a setup.

what i do love is to see daniel(?) elsberg struggle for him. elsberg, and it is actually the one glimmer of light in the whole case, is referred to as the "most comparable case in usian history".

his weaker statement is: ofcourse the material i relayed was more topical in a way. i think that is a bit weak. his release was about the vietnam war, and more to the point about decissions concerning in effect really millions of lives were made under circumstances that were almost criminal.

the difference is not that great, the 'secrecy' and 'millions of casualties' of these days centre around irak and the crusade against muslim lands, called 'war for terror'.

much more then, almost contrary to, the vietnam war it is an event that many nations share intimate ties and informations about. so it is not that eventfull that a wide scope of topics would be the kind of arrangement against all that confidential poking around and controlling other peoples lifes really.

people, the media for one, say: it changed the world, it is getting done with dictatorships', it finally emancipates many of the muslim nations a bit, perhaps that is only me;).

people in egypt, the occupants, the tahriri, expressed that, libyans did oftentimes and tunesians share all that intention. ok it is not done, but it started.

ellsberg was freed from prosecution, before the court martial, wich is what these hearings are referring to, so not all hope is lost.

i do not see the problem of the united states (ia), they say they want to raise the humanitarian standard of the operational realitys of this planet, manning gives the great hint that we really should and have a way to go. he is the personification of the real 'usian dream' the inspirational freedom and justice.

and personally, i think that is why he suffered in that service, even the guardian does not tell, (and it is wrong in a few cases, the reasoning of that judge eg. being what we are doing at the department is secret, so there exists no 'reasonable person knowing all circumstances' and as such he considers himself more reasonable than someone that would disagree to it.
i do not think it is reasonable, i very much assume he is part and parcel in the coming strategy around bradley manning's proceedings. just on instruction or from a selfassuredness based on vanity.)

even the guardian does not tell bradley manning tried to "whisttle blow" through the official channels about his findings, and btw. did you know the documents on his computer are not the same as those on wikileaks? it is a point the defence got on the table, so i suppose it is supposed to mean that thing it is supposed to mean.

in the public discourse the aformentioned official people state 'he just randomly with no reading passed them on', hmm but also that one of the evidences on his computer is a spreadsheet with the sipdis dbase. that pretty much means he had a specific look for each of them and may have served exaactly the reason he looked at them.

wich.. btw. was his job, and i think it was completely acceptable to hav it all on that pc.

neway, a lot of the hearing is behind closed doors, however not when that request is from the defence, who would not think he would become the victim of bias when he collects books about eg. reconstructional facial surgery on women and has a record troubled amongst things with him being gay.

so alltho the guardian suggests we should not look behind, i suggest bias is necessarilly superficial and not something worth that reference.

one more glitch of the guardian is when they seriously report some uniformed army 'jurist' instruction as 'explanation, and at that.. the whole proceedings are heavily covered with military attendees, infiltrated with them so to say. making that impression , purposedly ofcourse 'something is seriously going on'.

and not in the way they have with it, having less rights than even those from guatanamo, it is. they show off infiltration in public;)

the point is, when overhere, yet it is not the only instance for me that i had peeks into that kind of regulations, when you do that kind of work, 'intelligence' work, wich is basically spy's work etc. there are elaborate rules deciding , for the superiors or officers , and people responsible, if people are suited for the job, even if they are 'still' suited for the job.

the kind of work can be very stressfull and bearing. as a direct result of your researches life and death can be decided, perhaps has to be decided, you are in other cases a direct witness of not a few, but endless incidents that hardly credibly pass the 'rules of engagement' criteria.

lives of children, women, livelyhoods, animals, even meaningfull consequences in a far future, everything can be in the balance. that is why the regulations are rather strict.

and according to the spirit of those, in wich for example his taking a foetal stance, certainly also his whisttle blowing attempt that failed (and obviously not for only the best reasons), his being a loner in his teams, his bearing great repsonsibilitys, attacking a superior, and being adviced against beforehand should have been enough to ring the warning bells.

that the psychological symptoms of stress and dissociation, problems with loyalty etc. are so precisely known is there for a reason.

to protect that doubtfull priviliges of secrecy and undercover reality, and to protect the individual armyperson against the natural consequences of a great struggle of conscience.

here's the gossip, the mainstreaming dutch media repeat me, "(the great question is rather if they ever release him early (because would not that tell if the world has changed)".

yet without raising even a question about his conviction (let alone guilt(?)).

no unpleasant surprises for the sheeple? the general negative trending in tv comments, that is in so far i seen any, but i think the listening post on aljazeera has some..) bodes a similar preparation, and a specific spin, to do indeed that what the dutch media so casually assume.

i said it before, if it was not about people it would be rather funny. funny in the sense that arguments against so much what they hold against him in that mediacircus, are all to often easily found.

tried it a bit here.

(1) i do not think they have the theoretical underground to conceive a functional action model, i would almost hope ban ki moon provides some. not that it would suddenly help all the lack of justice , more that it might help peace prevail in syria without a bloody repression and the forthcoming prolongation of differences and pains.

ps. like i posed in the first weeks wikileaks became the hottest topic of 'news' in the sense of things people did not realise or know, it need not be true, this story.

it is not infeasible assange and bradley eg. are some sort of hoax. somehow i can't get away from the idea all those cables, and what is actually this stash of a 4 million customer confidential hobby magazine, call it for usian armed forces, pentagon, perhaps even nato secret service, what you like, ambassadorial peptalks, gossips and indeed reports, that however trended to be known from public releases in the context. admittedly not the kind of source to allow the oversight you want,
releases in these many contexts.

nevertheless if they are supposed to encourage the army servants of the corporations, they would be supposed to encourage a lot of it's clients. i never heard wikileaks released major detail about say turkey, syria even, egypt , libya or any other nation i know has recently been attempting to release confidential documents, yet it is plausible many have been send.

that would give the pentagon a lot of everything: confidential informations on plenty foreign gov's corporations etc. and the opportunity to donn every kind of scare about whisttle blowing.

plus a heap of what is basically a sales talk under the attention of people that consider themselves critical and often spend a lot of effort to find informations on plenty of the topics , in wich so many nations and people outside the united states stand stereotyped and in not to positive light.

that, i already told you, however should not be a surprise as it was already confirmed in the media when the topic was running in diplomacy, and actually ofcourse sometimes shortly thereafter.

one reason for that is that the probable briefers of the corporate media, are connected to those sipdis releases. in cases that is sure as

ps2: that roommate that did not want to talk to him i suppose also counts, it shows there was little appreciation for him, and raises the question if he asked and was denied (..) a change in that.

the possibillity of change. (occ)

2011-12-09T21:11:00.003Z

hello once again.

for what the mundane world, the big one, of euro's, hypes about someone's and none's moneys it stays hard to get optimistic, i could elaborate on greed, or the security industry in local media and necronomic offense elsewhere.

lest it suffice here is today's '*great*' example:

halliburton, one such security industrialist schooled-killer-mercenary-rent-outs , mainly and chiefly one that cheney has in his pocket for those that do not observe the news or remember what should not be worth remembering,

aptly figured i allways suppose they themselves decided on "hell-burned-on" after coalescing on the irakis safety "as being bombed", that one..

halliburton? rings a bell? figurehead in the not-so-great shamecases in the public reference for criminality between the rules of engagement?

well it also was at the party on the deep horizon spill, when they blew it up.

the day's news is : they destroyed the evidence of the failed concrete casing.

oh i remember some specifics, that they had not used the required number attachments, that it was not explained that to little cement was used, that there was every kind of indication it was somehow leaking and "compromised" from the tests and logs, and that not a very few people had been signalling the kind of warnings that predict calamity to a professional, wich went largely utterly completely and culpably ignored with the usual note, notes even, of coercion.

not that the last thiong is what i assume they destroyed as 'evidence' but the rest is.

mind you, still this year all 3 partners in the technical aspects of the fiasco have been declared guilty before a some court..

and now even if it was not only about billions, cohorts of people . substantial extinctions and the blackmail of 'the first black president' , for what matter his concerns as to general environmental measure and just as casually the illusion anything near decent could be discharged in terms of social projection, with the ****ing fukushima to add the total and utter disdain for human life and future and nature with regard only for magniminous, discrete and confidential summs of (once again as culpable) "white money".

(the illegal made through secrecy . not holding to safety measures, using dangerous material, cheating a populace, bribing a government, and then the workforce.) "white money".

probably they never even payed taxes over that huge part of the energy expenses in japan.

you think it has not do with another? those 2?

in the case of the nuclear billionaires and their bribed millionaire lobbys and politicians the "whitemail" on obama is : "if you want to go into herstory as a person who did anything remotely good for the environment ,..still, you better shut up completely about the dangers and neglect of nuclear.

since he never doubted the , by the way scientifically very dubious , i find it hard to consider someone so naive, nucleair lobby promotion, propaganda actually, advertising lies.

wich is also what the general people sort of belief because they are thrown dead with garbage confirmin such a lack of notion.

but there is more what i wonder about obama in the context, is he also aware of the complexity of the complot behind the deep horizon spill?

he was not asking for much. only a social program and healthcare. voted in on a platform of control of emissions and environmentalism.

they broke her dream. immediatly.

i'll post the pick on my 'strategy' or actually analyses of activism in the public space,
later.

let me first make my point.

a justice, a court, a department of justice, a responsible ministerium or secretariate, state institutions that define peoples lives over few ill disbegotten pennys,

and to mention.. herstorically, or is that herstorykalli?,

that allows their liason in matters misnomed as 'security', responsible for the deaths of thousands of people,

to just destroy the evidence?

that is no justice. that is no democracy. that is no transparance. that is not a party to be serious about.

ACAB

social housing (5), censoring of the day

2011-11-20T15:04:00.008Z

weird, i wonder as if that is supposed to be a warning that i got a request for a google pw after i was still signed on, at least so to see.

today i replied on an article in alJ, that was in the stretch of it quite positive about economical reforms, but took quite the standard apologetic aproach and rather consistently mixed up prioritys even with perhapses.

now that is a way to censor things, you say : ok we do economical reforms, and they be.....
(some sequence in some ordre).

but if the elements of the sequence are inconsistent (eg. pensions that depends social housing),
and the ordre is wrong, people will usually start with the first element they see to remember and in their naivety to 'promote change'.

so that article *needed* to be critisised over its application of psychological repression in a propagandical way, but it didnt post.

annoyed as i was i read it all, after all assuming 'good faith' thoroughly sceptical,
and what stood out is the man prioritised the standard hit the poor, capitalist gains, and economic reform ended a remote fourth.

they allways do, the rich and settled. and the trick to mix priorities with distractions is a standard receipe. (actually the raison d'etre of conservative ada. (Also Disguised As) liberals.)

so about social housing.

the idea is that when housing is cheap, sustainable and a right plenty of the effects of crisii (nr's of crisis), can be prevailed and more easily dealt with.

housing has traditionally been a thing to span generations and it still should. a house is not an investment it is a necessity for life, so

fundamentally according to the constitutions (and damn them who don't) we have a right on life.
furthermore housing and also ground transactions are not what they used. the former aristocratical distribution of rewards for soils and parcels that was obviously also another historical case of subsidising the rich through taxing the poor, and how it transformed into a similarly lukewarm system has been wittingly changed even a few years ago, after long campaigning.

in the , lets label it "neocon" altho the 'neo' is rather superfluous, the conn allways been that,
decades of profiteering privateering called privatisation, (the with any means obfuscating ownership of anything belonging to others so as to make it appear yours only is one of that words definitions)

in that lethal killing and robbery spree of the rich, social housing has been further transformed to a farce.

even very old, very cheap, very payed off, very strong, social housing projects have formal rents that are absolutely unwarranted (actually comparing to eg big private houses).

since many people are still poor, poorer then ever even, ofcourse they cannot pay such rents.
(in the 1980s the realist precarity free (so over poverty level) acceptable rent was about 10% of a minimum income. overhere it never got closer then some 20-25, and in many cases, due to cloudy regulation , and exploits much worse.

but these high rents are for the most part artificial and partly , partly in another way that has allways been, partly a huge fraud.

the rich took everything for about nothing (privatisation), they destroyed it's workings and integrity, and worse of all, they pay themselves for it amounts we cannot even imagine.

while: regulations and purposed marginalisation of the lower classes mean the formal level of rent (pre- subsidy) is ridiculous, nevertheless the already high prices in this era of foreclosure is only intended (so far had been only so intended) to rise.

and it did, for every poor housed a corrupt rich get's the same and moreof income the township gets to maintain and (if they still ever did) perform social housing.

actually they destroyed a lot of it and replaced much of it with short term habitational complexes meant to last only 30 years (and at least 4 times to high expense for housing that mounts up to.)

so social housing and also the housing function for the poor of inner citys btw., was destroyed, fake prices were formally set, the rich payed through the taxes generally raised from the poor.

such a goose with golden eggs the capitalists (ada liberals etc etc) do not want to let go of,

rather they stare at it's arse and pretend to be decent.

collective resource (4b)

2011-11-17T13:17:00.005Z

restructuring earths wastefull economy. destruction of a capitalist and elitist system.

the juridical plan i keep unpublished for now, alltho perhaps i will need to expose more if the legal proceedings don't take some quick turns for the better. just in case.. for now i will rely on the oral tradition.

so.. just today the usian 1 percent admitted to be taxed, to actually say the least.. because to get back to a situation where taxation was in the high 90 percents for them... as opposed to the opposite at the moment...(that's herstory)

a nice start. what definitily has to change, and is more fundamental than how we fill in the exact circumstance of individuality and merit, is to abolish the right of inheritance.
-----------------------------
'largely abolish the right of inheritance'

similarly land ownership is a doubtfull one. but when starting out trying to reward still iniative but to no further expense in social circumstance, wellbeing or overall chances and prosperity,
so not in terms of 'austerity for the poor', it was striking to meet a friend that pointed out that simple point.

the standard of inheritance must be abolished. because if there is merit in accumulation of capital, as opposed to perhaps literature, or ideas, or even friendship and an occasional helping hand (..)

it would be an individual. next to the wacky royalty's and other despotes, the class of "have's" has throughout history persistently rewarded and protected only it's own claims, to the greatest misery of mankind (the have-not's).

in a world with equal rights for any none need to be feared and the merit would be in anyone's hands. obstructing the realisation of a sustainable and sustaining world by taking and keeping the bulk of the wealth and resource in few hands is definitily senseless, but worse, dangerous by now.

however little i sympathise with ideas about investments, resources need to be applied, and the collective reserve not only recaptured, but be selfexplanatory.

the huge administrative overload or, overhead, the juridical wiggling for bits and more , enough to corrupt the legal and administrative system, not to mention burden it with ambiguity, will be gladly missed.

corporations would be submitted to legal , taxing, insured (don't let them steal it through a new hoax of ww2 compensation eg., cus it is hard to maintain with the current predation by the privats) and scientifically valid. no backward produce for poor regions, but just up to date undertaking.

it is a crying shame how for example a national bank with 5b in unclaimed contos could be 'bought', in some stocks ofcourse, for 1b. and it went like that on countless occassions in netherlands, like with eg. transportation and energy and communication networks including the media.

so for the sort of services we need an international standard, not so hard, people have a right of water, roofing and food, by extension they have a right on information and education.

internet and computers offer the most comprehensive of those technology's and it must be rapidly provided, allthough at better energy expense than is now the case. it must be considered a right for all purposes, after children to start with prisons btw. the most dramatic expression of 'education'.

people also have a right on heating and other general needs, however for that perhaps we need to try to find more collective ways to provide, watching tv with more then a few people for example is a weirdly rewarding expense of energy compared to a flatscreen each.

thats all getting a bit sideways.
------------------

'cap wealth'

theoretically politics is supposed to equal philosophy, and philosophy equals the highest a human can obtain, 'spiritual' and social development.

so it makes sense to regard merit and reward in such terms. you could measure funds , developments , sales and trends as a function of personal functionality, if you could guarantee objectivity and reason, wich we cannot from here.

psychological factors and the predatory trend owing to recent neocon and older capitalism, forms of corporate imperialism, is much in the way of a clear analyses of real merits.

so my idea is to cap personal wealth. at say 1million euro , in cash and 1 million in property.

after all if you cannot spend it at your random will the use of accumulating it in heaps is less of a personal satisfaction.

that would leave the average dentist or other stressed group all the room to enjoy life, provide education and support for the kids, live in a nice place and have great hollidays, and so it would for everyone doing a respectable job.

i suppose i will freeze inflation one of these days to make sure the nrs remain simple;)
anyway..

since the greedy bastards pose such would be no incentive at all to perform, alltho i wonder if they would not for a medal;) besides dedicating corporate reserves to 'branded' provision,
and the reward of claiming science ofcourse.. we surely need more medals there;)

actually it is not hard to think of a system that such income overflows (automatically referred to destined 'funds/reserves/liabilitys' ofcourse in a transparant manner, how about people that perform overaverage get a say in the respect of their professional activity or personal interesse?

like a set percentage to a dedicated (relative to their 'work') project, or social projects that they, probably or actually hopefully with some 'intelligent' reason think worth managing.

assuming financial control and scientific approach, there is plenty lobbied that is not scientifically relevant, like eg. gun laws, or security industry etc., etc., people would actually be in a position to mean more for what they know and enact. despite, contributing largely to a wider and more social development.

all in all there is some juridical detail;) as usually and it can be an interesting testcase.

there is huge problem in the current legislature, here in usia and everywhere, in that it is strongly biased towards the interests of the proprietary class. the mechanisms through wich this performs are elitist and arrogant in nature, the focus on the intention of the law 'to protect',

is confused with an intention of the law "to manipulate", and the drawback is we do not at the moment have a valid legal check, except a dissident system within international and criminal legal representation.

for now this seems like enough ideas, obviously from this point on a lot needs to be reviewed anyhow, and allthough the difficulties with the legal systems partiality and partisan bias, for example seen how easily ridiculous arguments have industry's escape responsability's in economical as well as criminal law (bp, nigeria, gentech, bigpharm, hormonemeat, tobacco etc, etc, etc)

for now it is impossible to trust the courts and judges. our supposed representation, lawyers and jurist is usually bought, persee held to defend the prerogative, or actually the status quo, dependend of the will or unwill of the magistrates, depending likes, and not in the least part and parcel in the upper middleclass and upperclass abundance,

especially for a just legal system and justice we will have to work hard, take nothing for granted, and actually even.. start from scratch.

as a servant of the people, what the strong arm is trying to beat into our autonomous brains is not another message at all.. may it suffice.

note: it is interesting to reflect what the right of housing would amass with the no inheritance thing, you see that?

note 2: i think stocks should be abolished. attracting investment can be based on merit, need and science. stocks are another burocratic, criminally opportune, and pretty expensive overhead.

collective resource (4a)

2011-11-17T11:10:00.008Z

the moment is there.. didn't we see the endlessly repeated request to #occupy world to 'formulate *that* list of measures, a program, and probably a request to be compromised, institutionalised and marginalised?

yes we did. that the occupy is exactly about thinking for your own, questioning things from there, about what is obvious and natural in emancipation?

predictable that the gunnery laws now play the ins and outs with the (tea) party line overthere.

it is a good moment to admire usia, the people there do more than people elsewhere. start to think of their own and organise the future that has been so far denied to the majority of earthlings.

thrilling, and guess what.. the reaction is there. not only brainless request, but the abuse of law,
occupying a sidewalk.. omg. cars that pollute us and the environment way more then nicotine manages to do, even with the extra toxics mixed into the tobacco, roam freely.

drunk, or with even only a good smoke one is supposed to be a danger, yet the population drugged on pharmaceutics, noradrenaline , sleeping pills, whatever, races about unhindered.

being environmentally neutral results in one being an unwanted pedestrian.. more unwanted then pedestrian, as english law betrays it.

the usian have decided to try for health, unsurprising in a populace that has 50% taking psychiatric drugs while getting licensed to drive cars at a record young age, freezing the meek is considered health by the degenerate , lawfuck called a judge.

insult upon injury, injure civil rights, harm law, in harming freedom, expression and people.
and weirder then that a day before that mayor said he would allow the protest, like did the english.

it's humiliating how slimy and rantfully gossippy (criminalisation) the dutch media tries to unnoticedly draw back on concerned townships statements overhere. oh well let alone they did that to law in denying the first place occupied to maintain the protest in that , unfreezing, healthy manner(1).

enough about it, people of the world need to roll back the privatisations that robbed our common funds and rights, and more. when we supply the basics and allow for education what is the worry?

that we don't enjoy? there is music for that and other recreation. that we don't get the 1% richer with making hollidays? life is so simple.

(1)and keeping of the radar, since when are public actions unnewsworthy? since.. 1932??

theorems

2011-11-09T12:00:00.004Z

the past few days a new scope all to familiar pops up in the international politics. alarming,
as much as being disalarming.

cussioning.. ahmedinajaadh said 3 things basically. we would not be making 2 nuclear bombs against your 20000, it will be a monotheist state. it is about a stolen laptop from 2004, to wich they already responded in 117 pages and wich they do not hold for very reliable.

ofcourse i agree they probably would not do such a thing, curious what we will hear about the sources now, if anything ..

but that theism rubbish? monotheism is just as odd as any other kind. odder perhaps. there is plenty that goes far beyond the reach of any human's powers, the energetic content of a sun or the centre of the milkyway for example. fysically it has the looks that beyond the milkyway the next could already have a slightly different set of parameters, or at least that somewhere in the universe parameters behaved differently. wich would tell that the law of nature, this apparently supposed expression of deity behaved differently overthere, i suppose in the middle-ages they called it manifold for that.

anyway in such cases it looks more like two deity's than like one. monotheism is as wacky as the rest of the religions except for one point, it's not as risky or expensive as having sects for plenty powers that would anyhow do what they think suit. so the purpose of monotheism is the destruction of 'theisms' or it serves no purpose at all.

that is actually more probable, if it was not manufacturing advances had imposed variety's of 'authoritys', we could still do without every expression of 'beneficial ' uniformity.

as a result monotheism is only sublimate politics.

despotism.

a witch (natural human) hunt for fascism (class society).

solomon's seal (3), transigience

2011-10-24T13:15:00.007Z

really i am serious about that i will write about what we need to start with a change for the better with the future of earth, and us.

it is a tough job, if i forget a thing, will people just forget about it?
if i say something in careless way, open for lousy interpretation, will it be grabbed and hammered with like all to often?

will it be taken out of context and abused , even for years? will people with a positive approach also be misleaded in such a case? it all happened before.

next i am not even (alltho there is some trauma) capable of doing my own formality's certainly not in the senseless and repetive manner that is obligatory in the policy they call "bullying policy"

wich it is.. enjoying their powers to scr.w with the individual.. stress people untill they are vulnerable and start hurting..

these things and the broad and vast material make it hard to dare to speak out.

----------------------

transigience is an example. since evryone is dependend of laws for safety and freedom, and after all to have, shape or voice an opinion, to change the world into a sustainable system we need something like laws.

very much so, in the detail with environment, and the rights of the person.

a person has rights, logical, human rights translate into civil and individual rights.

for now i stick with the word 'rights' an alternative could be guarantees, or even accomplishments;)

however since i am expressing what could be and should be right, i am talking (1) about rights that are "real", not exactly the ones we know now to be abusive and hypocrit, but theoretical ones that would apply in an effective not in a class justice way,

transigience is only one such detail i could forget, we humans have rights 'as a person',

but.. bloodless entity's want the same rights (under the capitalist circumstance of wich their 'rights' would "massively" prevail) and they want extras if they can,

denying the inherent difference between pain and cash, the corps and institutes want to be 'persons before the law'.

we will find people ready to debate that history had it's use, you find people for everything.. if money is in the picture,
but doubt it, i think the use it had was to overtake the rights on individual (and collective of) people all the way.

so we have to get rid of such false definitions, just like violence in the law is violence persee,

violence against living beings, (well it is not yet but rumpey anounced even eu was ready to change the treaty's) a person is a person persee.

we hope some day we can freely be 'persons responsible for the law', and responsability to the law is ofcourse also inherent(2) to corporations etc.

however they are not 'person', because that is a misleading term and an inroad to abuse, abuse of people , animal, groups, nations and most pronouncedly the environment,

also in legal proceeding from transigients (those entitys before the law that cannot be a person , so the ones with no 'human' rights,) towards persons a lot needs to be changed, foremostly that the principle(s like) of proportionality and force majeur apply for every individual, far and far over any transigients, (3)

(allthough that would not so much work out between transigience's , so in the (opposite of) the laws against cartels and trusts, in the negotiations between transigients they would ofcourse tend to weigh equal (unless human causes are involved and people are represented through institutions alltho that logically follows from that in fact judges should weigh the human rights under all circumstance.)

so without much further elaboration.

there are persons. humans responsible before the law,

and transigients , institutions before the law, allowing me to end this paragraph on a note,

in fact by way of joke they are also responsible to the tax office;) so it easily follows how they so often became intransigient.

ok for today? maybe i try for more, later.
thx for all the interesse and response (even if i have not learned to fully trust the kind of it),

it will get better, more radical , more gamechanging perhaps, for the masses, and worse to need to notion for the elites. i hope it serves as an example of the legalistic nightmare i move through (here and now) and into(trying to change it), and how we need to learn, learn to apply, and actually 'live' 'good faith'.

i know it is not concise,(it's just one point and not even one of the very major perhaps_ for me it feels like an okay start, so it must be like this. that's my offhandedness with formality allover,
if it don't work like it feels good for me i just don't get myself to work.

thx. please do.

(1) in these numbered articles.
(2) is iminent a word? noone ever uses it much for this.

(3)into the detail transigents should ofcourse be dictated similarly for proportionality among another, and force majeur should be restricted to cases where 'force' has a practical meaning.
like floods (uncaused and not effected by transigients), but not like industrial accidents.
applying force majeur to eg. a board of directors would signal intransigience, they are the 'force' of a company, easy to see i do not want to deal with every detail and that things must be interpreted 'radically' because change is relatively 'radical' , and btw. because so am i, i am not trying for halfhearted compromises with any lobby or 'power that be'. i am not trying to formulate any, so don't try to find them in what i write.

i will touch on organising the judicial system in another post. alltho there is observably much wrong , justice will be 'what is just', and allthough judges are not that 'just', (actually a bunch of elitist morons but we will change that) they can for now continue and try to decide in reason,

when somewhat more of the concepts are in a 'working at' state, and probably it is essential that i first write on the plans concerning justice, it is early enough to 're educate' them judges.

a bit of an exageration, and concerning the mentalitys in transigients (a court would be one),
even optimist, my hope is systems will work out and judges will at least be willing to try for a more obvious and transparant system, go figure.. we need to free 100000s of prisoners , if even experimentally , as a test, in cases. would they like that? not if the context of 'justice' is unclear,

wich they will hold against 'it' (me) the very second they can probably, because that is what elites do, find excuse.

gl.

conspiring the death of ghadaffi

2011-10-22T01:01:00.005Z

surely in such an obvious case as the elimination of an unwanted government through also foreign means the whole idea of any sort of conspiracy is outrageous.

utterly farfetched. who would ever associate getting rid of despots with conspiracy's.
completely beyond me there are people that see conspiracy's everywhere.

let alone in such a case where the icc is fullfledgedly involved and hung to the next civic catastrophe, serajevo or sirte, what is the point to be made?

can we distract you?

so there is something uncanny about his death, it looks like an extrajudicial killing , a collector of gold guns on the run, targetted by nato, goated into the sewers, and apprehended by the next nearest unit in control.

anyway,

i don't know, habit or instinct, but as the news emerged i tried to understand what had happened,

there was no more anything tenable in the position in sirte, not for gold guns, and 75 vehicles
tried a break out, that is plausible, there have been enough desperate counteroffensives, and sirte was no exception.

it was a bit weird also the last time, where would you really break out to? the other thing would have been more or less to wait and die. the breakout initially went largely succesfull.

5km onward from the narrow frontline the nr of vehicles mentioned is still 75. allthough burned out carwrecks on tv now suggested another message.

that's a somewhat interesting detail. there is just that much suspicion. it would be a bit hard to get 75 running cars in an all out manouvre on the supposed square mile or less.

it also follows that to stay closest to the original story, 75 cars and the firepower was enough to make some impression, and a group, or unit of the ntc started to chase.

somehow it's already a bit of a strange affair, but perhaps reality was more confusing, and there were actually a few more things going on.

you could also interprete it that they broke through easily, and were not followed in another fashion then in coordination with nato , it's plane and drone.

it has been repeatedly reported to the media there were such or such advances in the coordination with ntc's forces,

especially in the kind of mixed action for example, and that most of the time past weeks nato had a presence over sirte. also that they struck on occasions.

with all that there is a continual and planned thing going on for a month. i would say nato knew what unit would follow.

actually they know much more then we think or they admit.

after the airplane struck, it "struck again against the eleven vehicles in one of wich was ghadaffi."
not against the others.

surviving the impact of that ghadaffi and still rather some of his men ran, apparently through some trees, to their last stand. the possibly so calculated irony of history.

running through trees is the one thing people like when they have just been shot at through the sky. and the cars did no more function, or perhaps even, they did no more dare to drive them.

anyway it took ages, when ntc arrived in the hot chase bridging the 3 mile gap in within 6 hours,
they located the refugees.

after some searching, nato appears to have been privvy about these sewer pipes. what does all the graffiti on them say i wonder?.
things about sewers and rats would be my first guess.

so they trim the anti aircraft guns, no that is not possible on a toyota, they train the antiaircraft guns and start firing, perhaps not in the general direction of the sewer pipes because it had no effect at all.

it's interesting to wonder what kind of effect they had been waiting for. you cant really surrender when people are firing anti aircraft guns in your general direction.

at least you would be a hero for trying. anyhow, whatever effect they expected, it failed to occur.

perhaps the ntc military was describing it's role in a slightly to positive light.

they had just been firing aircraft guns not in any direction at all. it is certain that nato nor anyone would allow for any of their embeddeds on the scene.

in that case i wonder why they stopped firing them, after all it had no effect.

next the man infiltrate.. oops i do it again,
i guess they didn't. they just got closer, not so hard i suppose when you have some 20 or 30 people in two sewer pipes and aircraft guns.

the story after this lacks depth, it allways does, you never hear the real story of the real heroes.

what he did tell was someone got out to call for surrender, that upon seeing his face (..)
started shooting at him.

thats also somehow weird, did he know his face?, but i gues it's lost in translation, the face of me or so.

what to think of that?

it's much like a clichee honestly, then again, could be, it was rather a suicidal affair all in all.

it's also the foremost excuse that applies for shooting potential prisoners on the frontline, so already news had come certain institutions were not quite happy without the live version of intolerance.

there is something about it, if it is really such a common affair, why is it the single incident singled out in the run of that story told,

beyond that, apparently the same man (the one that had dared to come out i suppose) said he had his boss muamar there and wanted to surrender.

in principle that is interesting if you want to know what has happened because it implies some interaction, on the other hand, it is also quite symbolic, it is not really a detail, 'the capture of muamar' is why the man is interviewed.

but symbolically it again need not be true, the guy that survived having started shooting in the face of an armed unit with antiaircraft guns, surrendered now for his boss.

whoever surrendered in what way, muamar was apparently seated, or more presumably lie down, wich suggests that the surrender was actually the kind of 'we inside the tube surrender to you outside the tube' and that they went in to enjoy the privilige of arrest.

(because he had a gun 'under him') so perhaps by that point indeed the ntc knew about muamar and had indeed started inspecting the (therefore wounded at his legs) prisoner.

a bit weird, since all the 24 body guards were killed.
somewhere along that way. he wasnt the last they got at, or the only, in fact mutassim has supposedly been filmed alive after that point. (couldnt tell if it is him eg.)

the really painfull point what happened with the other persons apparent is not the 'clean base for the future libya' we are talking about.

it's about killing someone from the elite, instead of a unit of common soldiers.

a warcrime.

oh yeah next? they beat him up a bit, and he dies, you can see him touch his head to get his hands in blood and watch it, how bad is it? seems.

so looks like they shot him by there, or let's say he shot his? someone shot him? maybe he was even hit in some last desperate shoot-out of the guards being 'no clean base for a future libya', and in the proces of being killed.

whatever. not what jabil or whatever his name said, if you feel it counts.
that they were shot at when they went army and all in pickups toward misrata.

because, the film that he is dead and dragged about bits so to see is at the same location where he is still alive. in the story after all next he is (dead i suppose), but in an ambulance, underway to misrata. where he is 'put in the morgue'. so no dancing on his corpse in that town.

that was all completely obvious. what was not obvious is what happened to the others,

in that context icc or nato and foreign ministry's don't impress me very much with their 'clean base for libya'. let's say that part has perhaps started after him being killed in the way so many that fought for him were.

why would a president or other member of the elite not become the same sort of warcasualty as the rest? suddenly be a warcrime?

it would be laughable if it wasn't so painfull.

what it is is exactly why we can be glad our time will not be wasted by endless verdicts on khadaffi, classjustice is a big fake and a cheat.

what a great time to set a wrong example badly. i really think they try to make up for that lost opportunity at icc.

for whatever reason and perhaps it is pretty mainstream, the usian voices appear to repeat a unified 'dictator' mantra, i suppose it doesn't really matter in the case, but how much of a fertile soil for propaganda of the kind that allows warfare through polarisation is usia still?

with that in mind there would be serious stuf to add.
mexico? iran? somehow they are out of their minds.

filtration

2011-10-18T14:48:00.003Z

why do i need to voice this?

it is because i know it is. you cannot change reality you do not witness.

whence this is not about things i like, and not an easy thing to write.

---------------------

there need not be no excuses, the filtration of political expression is to longstanding for that.
state's interesses through political file, it all exists from the days of your nations first parlementarian and long before.

who knows the freemasons are really the ones to inherit the greek scala of secret registration of possible enemy's of the elite.

don't even know if this is btw part of the array of usual or unusual transpirations on the topic, never heard it before myself.

anyway's, to call an example, the "french revolution"'s revolutionarys got thoroughly registered, followed, bribed, etc.

to give it a context.

-------------------------

what get's me suspicious.

you could say there have been two moments in dutch politics that have influenced my thought on it most.
in weighing the moral consequence of international politics that would be the former yugoslavia debacle, and in the personal life-style kind of way, having to do with activism indeed,

it was perhaps, 'encapsulation'.

"encapsulation" is a great word in dutch translation, sufficiently descriptive to be explained, i hope it is for english.

otherways it is more confusing to make a difference with 'institutionalisation', wich is only one way filtrage expresses.

encapsulation is closer to the infamous phenomenon of infiltration, the infiltrated organisation will become shielded from the outside world, and may end up completely institutionalised.

weird as it is, with it's 'market' (a wide assortiment of discontent and solidarity),
profitable in many cases. obviously not necessarilly because things "are what they seem".

how very profitable get's clear when you realise the investment in for example the line of well indoctrinated 'educated' 'workers', is actually made to get a grip on movements that might change the status quo.
----------------------------------------

since that is how smart people be, i recognise the all to often institutional infiltrate usually through that. a hesistance to like change of status quo,

but there are rather a few more indications.

selfishly i like to be creative in activism, it's quite a pretence ofcourse, but you often see the attitude not to be open for alternative (and that is where peacefull comes into the action comparison) action, more direct action, that has consumer impact eg., sometimes even the rather visible publicitary aspect, in longstanding organisations.

some of them may function in their parts, but basically they are 'institutionalised',
for example the dutch 'socialists' had a complete agreeal with the capitalist elite about organisation.

normally you would not be made known, that such was already explicitly standing out in the 1920s.

anarchists do know. for no other reason then the fear of the power of the idea, whole police and army divisions were mobilised against a meeting on that political expression.

a lot of the people institutionalised would not even consciously know they are actually preserving the status quo,

for some odd reason undercover police often are not psychologically capable of denying their uniformist admiration of authority.

it will allways stay odd, the whole group of uniformed employed has thorough psychological sensitivities with authoritive inception.

the usual freudian expression with such a symptom is 'a inferiority complex'.

that besides they feel proud at it.

otoh. they possibly also give some of these open reactions because 'they know me' (and that there is not much i can do about it). also i figure they feel still safe.

not much of a madman, perhaps i just make an acutely sane impression, but i often hint notice,
wich they do not typically psychologically receive, allthough almost allways register.

---------------------------------

so what is the situation? i think in usia .. like here, every 'organisation', every staged event,
would be as 'depoliticised' as here.

the other way around it also works, the most politicised groups, like marxists, are indeed the ones to tell a serious thing, because they will be the more ideologically correct to take it serious.

i suppose it is like being branch oriented, oftentimes organisations in a field perform admirably but all to often only for what their limited context allows them.

the illusion of power is also a great tool, in keeping people 'occupied',

so the receipe is the same, occupy yourself and stay self-occupied.

it's never been comfortable that clichees don't matter.

--------------------------------------------

on the side of gossip.. i had the first thought at the first moment it perspired 'the occupy protests' and so far they have ofcourse been, were there 'to stay', it was a damn pitty we were so close to winter.

it is also a comforting sign of obama's engagement with civil action, notwithstanding flatter would still seem baseless.

it is a wonderfull thing so many people will be thinking such great things over such important things. would it be realist and netsavvy to work at that the southern hemisphere that is unfortunately less important, for now offers the best prospects for manifestations of direct action?

or are people going to set the record straight for housing rights? it's quite possible that with the usual speculation and foreclosures and ecological tipping points (the crisis), there is plenty room,
if you have great places warm cloths help a lot for activism in winter.
------------------

conclusion, i do not think it is possible to organise a bigger movement unobserved.
tolerance for one anothers activism, hopes aspirations and dreaming is what does the trick best.

really be a bit principled about things also helps a lot.

if something 'should actually be okay'. (for damage it is proportional), it should just be okay.
hampering political expressions, and delegation of tasks are the primary instruments of institutionalised infiltration.

it has been really painfull, many people hardly know what they do, but in how they communicate, and the attitude towards people they need to make their compromise with a more resolute integrity against (for), you immediatly notice the 'attitude'.

it is not exaactly, exactly police infiltration, but institutionalisation, typically 'educating' (brainwashing) people for the job, is surprisingly related.

one respect in what police actually does not try to limit the impact of events, is the scale of the escalation. having the arms , the tools, and the repressive instrument to win all those battles, the more typical infiltrant attitude is to push for violence against persons, and actual misplaced excess against goods i would think. instigating violence is more their point.

but that would be a bit hard to judge, for a beginner and even after a while, people do have particular trauma's and experiences of their own, and by far nar not all are allways ready to
express anything very thoughtfully,

it's often the difference between 'i hate the pigs' (with not uncommonly some of all the good reason), and: let's bloodthirstily escalate.

as allways with psychology it is as much of their projection as it is the desire.

all that said. cops can 'turn'. it's a much feared thing in the establishment. it is rare, and not many are that good at it, but it is nice to respect that all humans do try for a human aspect.

forgive me the lightheartedness, but it is also funny that for example when i see these students, student cop's really quite often i think, but.. etc. etc. , conformism rewards already for students,

and i notice how relatively violent they think, it is also possible to take it serious, perhaps really violence is how a cop think would be the best way if a 'turned' person (they forget we are not like them) wanted to do something about injustice.

typical, it's really quite lighthearted, makes me think that the fbi didn't like that ambassador:)
well, thought of that immediatly:)

occupy

2011-10-17T23:34:00.004Z

a friend of mine is strongly interrested in the occupy protests worldwide. taken worldwide, apparent worldwide, talking on the matter with him is very enjoyable.

he liked it back so i was for my doing moderately flattered.

whence that comes first, i like it like mad.

----------------------

over the years i have allways been thinking the way change would one day allways come to be is when people unite over a goal that is not limited but diverse and that they have to carry it "themselves" a lot more then you would somehow expect or understand even in a few years.

burn out is a word, that does not fit the load. not only because it is worse, and ideological problems can be a superhuman burden, also because it is different, what change needs is the engagement of plenty, and not a great few can get/keep it organised through dedication.

action, and grassroots 'power-building', needs an informed and interested critical lot. ' a critical mass' in some theory, but is more about the numbers than about a limited weight.

they need to engage for something that is within their understanding and strangely, probably within their reach. a limited target like "peace", or a definite and often specific environmental, human rights or animal rights complaint seem not enough to have the people unite.

in the case of war and peace, this is psychological, but it is also that people appear to regard many things as out of reach. so indeed, the old (and classically anarchist) idea of fighting poverty, and the fighting the structure for poverty in society , wich perhaps too is general of the movements against the further distribution of wealth to the few, is the kind of handhold that might do.

it is hard to be definite, i get insecure of great events with a positive approach and intention. people are powerfull, but also powerless often.

ideally the people come up with all the ideas they need, but in describing events i reason from my own experiences, i am not really such a common person it feels like there can be 'the critical mass' of people similar to me.

somehow it all seems so relevant. it is so desperately relevant to be positive, whilst there is actually so and so very much to be rather edgy.

so i take an excursion into occupation.
scr.w neoconomics, and neocology will have to wait a bit more.

activism and strangely also anarchism wich is the way i politically analyse events and weigh relations (in the sense of in actuality foremostly but sometimes in the personal), have a charming dynamics of their own.

that is more intuitively for me in anarchism. but that is only subjective, activism itself generates similar associative strength.

however anarchism is to what i test the human value and quality of judgement (a very 'ethical' quality) so for you it can be activism (or in a more symbolic way of speaking 'activity', a psychality), but i would like to refer to everything within terms with anarchism.

the dynamic in activism is often absolute. it is not anyone's special thing, it works for all and everything. for example the word occupy.

keep bussy.., don't be vacant.. weird associations with a tool imperialised,

the occupied nations , and used to be people.

but within activism (and considering housing and non-housing basic rights is about the most feasible thing in anarchism), occupation is something still entirely different.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

terms with a vast impact tend to get obfuscated, confused through the application of different meanings..

there is a reason you can say : are you not occupied? are you occupied with that you are not preoccupied? or are you in fact the opposite?

because 'occupation' is an ancient, age old and powerfull tool of emancipation, that naturally and anarchistically follow to be basic freedoms of people, ancient dispositions.

it has been 'obfuscated' purposedly obscured from clear insights.

that does not mean it is no good as a tool. no, even the worst of the machiavellian (occupy every other) thinking ofcourse respects how occupation is a superefficient direct action.

we actually seen it this year, each and every side has their bias and preoccupations with the events, but that 'occupying' squares did have enough of a impact and visible aspect to change destinys is typical.

(thinks ok.. so that is where at least the definite association is from, had been wondering)

but really it is historical, the olympus is about the first sinai to been occupied, and so have symbols of power been all through the century's , from the fora to the bath houses to the roofs, and even the whole homes of the rich with the romans.

probably more burocratical institutions have been occupied then one nation singly features (said the optimist, well, reasoning there should be less institutions than people for me at least it is true).

in any case the pavements before more then any of these institutions have been occupied for plenty of the day. a usual 'capital' features usually tenfolds of protests and demonstrations, routinely ignored on windy corners of motorways, just as often on the pavement and with nearly allways some police seemingly keeping possible public at a distance.

it is a nice idea to a place like washington or brussels, (and both probably have the policys in place to prohibit) to join in a wide range and variety of protests in an organised fashion whilst you are at it in occupying the metropoles.

anyhow it is getting cold and i will get back on that, because the southern hemisphere is actually warming up.

to judge whether you can publicly as a movement or symbol of your own can join in the oftentimes specialist and remote requests of the various protests i would merely look at principle.

it is predictable that any organisation, even perhaps the small political foreign platforms, with the dear naivety to consider protest an option on a once per year or whatever base, is charmingly naive and often limited but somehow the ground cause is within a bigger concept..

for justice, against corporative power, for political freedom..

unless there is complete disagreeal with a case perhaps you do not need to be as informed or concerned as the protest , to just join in because protests actually lack power.

activism is or at least has been for me, to explore protest and action, to find new things to 'occupy' for example, to find new ways to give voice.

so that is all very absorbed, how i lived it. but somehow it is what turns in the anarchist idea, so perhaps it is just as true for activism.

i look forward to some more philosophy on the subject, more then explaining what meritocratical let alone corporate securitys would perhaps not doom the people of this planet to utter insignificance or slavery, risking being misinterpreted or face straight forward abuse.

-----------

tomorrow it will be about the negative side of todays activism, the police infiltration, the punishment or lifelong file to unfollowedly still to fool you fully, personalness and whatever.

today it suffices to remark:

anarchism is without borders, and activism is not to stick to many limits.

you can occupy a house but you can occupy a huge place to keep warm and protest.

you can occupy the police and not keep them occupied, but you can also occupy yourself and stay occupied.

don quichotte (2)

2011-10-09T11:48:00.004Z

in scared anticipation of the contination of the releases on neocology and necronomy, the capitalist marketing in our realms of perception begs for deeper crisis and more injections while we wait.

it would suit for intermezzo.

possibly it is a play into the game. after all the perspective of necronomical crises lives a life of it's own, and.. actually.. the climate is pretty f.u.

more probably it is the usual blackmail, perform so we can make a profit or we doom the poor fellows you do it for..

since concepts can be misused, and intentions hyacked, what if we'd derive an eternal motive, and who we do that for? perhaps best is to just make the straight proposals.

well-being is a distribution of wealth. it is slightly more, a distribution of what you might call pleasure or happyness, but it has been researched, if needlessly, that even in the groups with the most minimal incomes money is necessary to undertake those things that fill in the needs to be happy.

the matter is one of distribution. distribution of powers as in small scale democratical involvement and in moral obligation as dedicated through a herstory of conceptualisation of what we must call 'human rights' , or fundamental principles of justice.

not differently to be accountable.

so in a political as much as financial sense we are talking transparance.

=============

to apply what human resource extra offers, and even within constraints natural to a financial system domesticating privilige, wealth needs to be distributed.

the weirdest of all problems, 'overpopulation', is a matter of financial privilige, birth control is a financial privilige. it is fascinating to wonder how much active birthcontrol did to facilitate the necronomical spurts in china and india, and how with no means tools of the wealthy were handed to the have-nots.

in fact that active family planning is one of the advantages of the ones 'well off', before a few decades was still largely taboo.(1) researched but 'climate scepticked', so to say.

_____________________________________

the opposite is also true, there is so far no limit to contempt.

-----------------------------------------------------

k the google interface is deleting for clipboarding once more.
need to break, or the interrupted flow get's to easily corruptable.
ltr.

(1) one didn't tell poor and or uneducated people they were stupid for allowing their lives to be stressed through plenty kids, nor defend how chanceless children like that would stay.

the narratives of ecology necronomy, neoconomy and neocology (1)

2011-09-26T19:11:00.008Z

the very global ideas, currently reinterpreted as 'mondial',

for a lack of integrity in the use of the term, just like one of those neoconomic ideas i had about the need for manual task to be diverse and the people variedly engaged in production.

don't blame me, i used to call the concept 'flexibility'.

so that is against exploring the real fronteers of the social context, it get's abused long before that.

anyway nature is mercifull and benevolent, ecology is so that even in terms of jobs and "economical" , or perhaps better to think of it as just 'human' engagement, the sky is the limit and only pigs can fly.

so as to say, the idea of profit and consumption tells you you can fly, but it is easy to tell who is really the bird to fly under the umbrella of fake-"justice". it would not to be to bad to return to the double speak undo thing of the 60s. and talk about 'wrong_is'

all in all not that it would put people with their (bare) feet in the (exemplary natural) soil.
all the blessings after all come from above, as the mindless repetition requires the cultures that failed to aprehend zen. (the religious ones).

for fun value the pope, obviously german, begged the germans for obedience, yesterly,
contempt for the real light of day (today's so to say) as if anyone there would get that message, obviously a publicity stunt for the still 'to be' meeker (esp. africa and south america).
__________________

the problem in explaining basic concepts for a sustainable human society is not as much in the principle, everyone understands in principle 'most of us' would agree to ' positive developments, be they natural notwithstanding it is the absolute primary, even in the human psychology but definitily so in new ecology and thus new (in the sense of sustainable) economy.

basically there is an empiric base for "good faith" (better put : "solid sceptics").
it's very shallow in the personal respect, the individual psychology and hardly worth mentioning in institutional operative, but the basic is there unmistakebly.

in the case there is no pious reference i don't mind to explore the cultural context, and for it we would only have to look at the strong tendency of people to engage with a concept of supposed

"good against evil" like religion , or the somewhat amazing ease with that people can be couched to quitte unkowingly to the real effect or effort contribute to sponsor actions or donating.

it is not especially effective or informed and structurally more often all but generous, nevertheless consider it a symbol of the will and expression of solidarity, it is there in people and it is pretty plain to see.

so in so far i recognise ' solid sceptics' that it is there in a somewhat embryonal state.
with that i would have liked to have said enough about motivation, it's not the realist situation we run into, or become somehow placed or displaced in.

maybe it is important to note it is not 'part of', it does not add much to deny this world is full of places, or to overlook that for each of us the own individual is the one thing essential in whatever functionality or positive arrangement.

change the world, and know you have to do it with yourself.

matters of priority's ... motivation.
-------------------------

so now we are motivated i want to touch on the "history" of it. (better : "herstory")

just like motivation is uselessly debated, "herstory" is unusually unpronounced.
there is "allways two sides to a story"

not that there really allways is, but such is to keep you think that. ok, on the personal and individual psychological side there is allways two story's, except that it is not mostly fresh story's, it doesn't tell anything about facts.

take for example einsteins theory of relativity, it may be not only "relative but also more true then we yet realise. both at the same time, because simply, "the universe is bigger then that.

so for the sake of omission (you name him the guy with the two passports and a double name),
i would love to leave the debate on the herstory of profit and exploitation , overconsumption and pollution, power and victim, a debate and point of it's own, and something for another occasion.

in as far as herstory directly applies to society, "the glocal community", it is usually in the ecological context. that what people, continents and nations have available to operate within.

so if you like this to be concepts restrained through herstory (that's" half of the story that's never been told" bob m.) it is not what i will write on for neoconomy, and it is part of a different debate, one in wich it is more the diversity of human impressions and opinions then the set letter that describes the most, b.t.w.
-------------------------

d dc. the debilitating debts crises.

curently media are featuring the european community's 'financial' prospects. i figure they took some inspiration from al jazeera and then what i wrote to get in the mood.

be warned, like i mentioned for starters, neoconomical concepts are easy to abuse, based as they are on the human psychology and natural context, and for my part the juxtaposed human context and natural psychology, they apply. and with what can be applied can be worked,

so with the rather glamorous advent of the angels of the market in incarnated multicolor,
the tales about our necronomy (the dead one), the tv and multimedia era, and professional politicians and by far not only them hitching on the wave of the promises of capital forever,

whatever you will understand from me, is not what i regard as "what they have in 'mind' ".

general experience and critical reading neither have ever let up to the conclusion that: " in this world, i *must* say, this capitalist world, truthfull neoconomic future is *not* the objective of the establishment".

i.o.w: the people with the interests, near the stake, can not be trusted to be honest let alone impartial or unbiased. not when it is about the future of 'all', societys, the global community.

sorry.

anyhow the idea about 'stimulating european economy' is actually the idea to 'stimulate global wellfare/wellbeing' (motivation remember?)

this is the same as development. wellbeing. as simple as it is obvious. the earth and it's climates offer a varied amount of options to different areas. did you just get robbed of your woodcover and natural resources (the live ones), like say haiti, and it is warm, chances are you best build light, making things earthquake safe would be much more effective then making them earthquake 'proof'.

not that you need no such buildings, but for common people you must wonder if that line , not only in haiti, bodes ill. huge apartments do tend to be huge tragedys when they collapse.

when it is somewhat colder, you have no choice, and in quite a few nations the temperatures are thus people hardly have a choice but to be laborous, because you just can't sleep a whole winter even if it is dark.

so the reeling and dealings of societys differ vastly, and are bound to be strongly characterised by the context of nature and climate, it is a fascinating subject and leads just to one major conclusion and rightly so;):

people are not made for work, nature is not.

the stoopit necronomical denial is , "work is made for people", they will pretend as if not, as long you can't view inside of the financial portfolios. but the next moment it is a favorouble boast..

'we made the work', said the ones that limited development for their own 'good'. (their 'bad' actually).
---------------------

the financial detail is revolting, none of the developments the past 30 years in macronecronomical sense, have been conceived, debated or 'effectuated' with the idea it would really benefit the lot. it will be abused as an excuse still, and has allways, but it is the embryo.

the head knows most people do have a heart so the argument is to well received. the tongue arguably speaks to submit, in the institutional realms, wich is distracting, purposedly, and hardly fascinating.

'privatisation' resulted in greed and assault on even the most basic 'riots'. trickle down necronomy is such an old farce it didn't deserve mention in the whole 20 or 21st century.
'free trade' , everyone restricted but usia and it's compliants.

imf, not only grey booking the 'debt' to a taste, delving in the potential for cheap labour by deranging conditions. the eu, the carreer for the priviliged. a priviliged project with intentions of centralising absolutist, 'decission' power. 'privacy'.. the rite to fraude, be perpetually observed,
forever deridden, and distribute privilige arbitrarilly.

just a few things those past decades that did not make the mark. that indeed were also not of 'good intention'. 'good faith' only fools you blindly there.

you know what, i think a day or so more about these 'my concepts'.
i can just start next, this was most of what i felt it needed for an introduction.

--------------------------------------

because

2011-09-16T12:42:00.006Z

there is so much going on.

yet it is not anything very special, i have a few remarks on the arab spring only. libya admirably tries, but report from the african side of the continent are still in the pessimist.

israel is once over fighting all "arabs" ideas, saying it is basically an attitude against racism they have. it doesn't compute but the argument is still valid. no matter if nato or islam (and i damnedly even know about asia) racism is all to commonplace. without it, no millions would be killed in irak, kurds would not be one of the more suffering ethnics in the world, palestineans would be quite fine in israel, and probably even in the westbank and gaza, without it it wouldn't be feasible to judge whole populaces for the islamic leads they get at. etc.

racism is the big evildoer even when you don't directly notice.

remember london? completely conceived through racism, no i liked libya lauded sarkozy over cameron. remember paris?

now that actually didn't cause that much of a policestate extravaganza. (allthough i overheard i had sarkozy watching me when i visited:)

i liked the french statements in libya, it's so nice to see a nation honour the revolutionairy principle, if even in lipservice. erdogan is doing generally admirably. he is one of those, and go figure how much israel disagrees, that seems to overstep old grudges. sometimes i dislike his policy's (esp. with bombing kurds and calling them attrocious,

/from here google deleted my rather rounded posting.. asking to sign in when i was and suddenly not having saved the draft it "saved" (like every second, it stood out), and destroying the layout by inserting loads of spaces in the text./

edit: that nato, the security counsel (usia) ea. so much need this asset of racism, to manage profit in the face of climatecatastrophe

and with his willingness to attack syria (with or for nato))

ah.. well i went on about how the un veto security counsel wouldn't but that the sacrifices do require us to learn a lesson..

that nato and usia, and that counsel consider repression and racism the best guarantee to manage profit of theirselves and other rich in the face of climate catastrophe, and that is why they will most probably continue a line of downgrading and detroying 'rights'.

so much people are sacrificed we should make it worth, instead "rivers of blood flowing into an ocean of repression continued". that we should actually stand up for those rights, (not only the ones left)

that it actually boils down to racism.

note:
sorry for my public it works so well to interrupt my flow, hope to serve you better next time, but you can hardly guess how often i have to correct for example the first line of a thing i write, because it got altered.

should i be surprised when i agitate against racism this basic capitalist asset is so defended?
i hate to admit i am not. maybe i better the post still later, i am to annoyed to expect much of an effort here and now.

road to nowhere

2011-09-02T12:56:00.007Z

there's plenty of political tomtom these days.

so i' ll announce to great drums and marching music :

libya... (2)

that should do for now.

khadaffi hides and cides, he does not believe for one moment libya will be better without his family in a racist position of divide et impera.
and indeed libyans all over the line, and unfortunately more it seems even with the rebels, engage in racist acts.

acts of violence, extortion, torture, massacre, and rape..

eu aiming it's arrows at syria , what will be there?

eu is as hypocrite as can be. they neglect their allied navy/oil base bahrein's foreign intervention totally, yet they antagonise over syria.

it's amazing to see how the sheople are obsessed with hate and prejudice to perform not the slightest of nuance.

i say down with the bahreini sunni dictatorship.

about syria? i really don't know, i have the faint suspicion the syrian rebels would be every bit as racist and divided the libyans are, and that it is not very probable outside actions will help to defuse that.

dictators , but also all the other elites (fake democracy's), thrive on sowing division.

as far as i can see for the white and potentially influential public on both sides of nato's ocean, it worked.

i feel like i am living between fools drenched with hate through a system that starts the indoctrination in the kindergarten.

worse then when i was a kid, every form of rebellion is now repressed with numbing medicins.

the public should save us from worse. but they have been denied the political or common knowledge and historical background to understand.

i am sorry to say, not 1 in 10 of the average readers anywhere seem to have some collection of their witz. i am deeply pessimist about the results of a continued political engagement once more guised as a humanitarian cause, towards the dictatorships the proprietary class does not like.
(assad, iran)

as long as the western publics can't put things into proportion, we can also forget about muslims doing so, when we in the supposed so free western world don't start out to make sense, they will look for their own opinionmakers. and those, are part of the lucky few, just like here.

will no doubt do everything to betray the people and sheople, just like here.

the cataclysmic environmental destruction sees the priviliged monetary elites glasping at any blunt or delegitimised form or instrument of repression available, cause they damn well know disaster is inevitable, and they want the poor to suffer only for theirselves to survive.(1)

in between all that israeli and other (amazingly related) outfringe is stoking tension where possible.
enjoying the sheople bow to their discord like they would in churches and other centre's of
despair.

(1) wich is just as unreasonable, only to be explained by them dimming their own views, firstly to keep a secret they know better, but secondly for being in permanent denial as a matter of survival (meaning they have no apreciable estimation of the real state of earth's affairs themselves).

(2) actually the result is inconclusive, ghadaffi is out to opt for a prolonged duration of the war and terror, for his or his rich family's part untill there is no libyan left, besides them, so that is still inconclusive.

succesfull slaughter of the arrogant air

2011-08-22T09:28:00.004Z

after all the firing at and from the clouds finally it is done. libya is getting back to peace-bussiness as usual. eu and usia anounced they will 'help the rebels implement reforms over the coming months and years'.

wow, thats great news if you just lost a sun or father for lybias freedom.
in some years the nato will still promise freedom.. i would be.. well let me not tell you what i would be,

i hate people to go around with guns, be they the uniformed brutes that follow upon any order to incarcerate black people, like in usia, or camerons, or be they the libyans that perforate the skies for no obvious reason. wow its peace, let me fire a gun, makes sense? not to me.

that is only impressions, perhaps it doesnt matter, i heard story's about how (only) after ww2 the dutch got hold on plenty weapons, they emptied on, basically anything in sight that wasnt moving. nude women, shaved women or even just the other side of the river.

people are like that, in the absence of resistance they turn into great hero's.
reminds me of drones and gaza btw.

but i should be happy and thankfull, the bloodlet is over, one of these in denial of legitimate governance left the theatre, libyans will finally have the possibility to listen to vague promises of change for years to come, as predicted by eu, usia and nato statements.. wow...

will libya change for the better? i dont know, really don't, it should i think, but i am not very optimist, the nato axis is doing it very utmost to run far behind the facts " gadaffi should step down" once over according to plenty of the fatnecks, today still. and the promise of years of promises has been made.

gadaffi is still at large, personally i hope it stays like that, not that i think his last few speeches were so great, but i also don't think they have been correctly translated or quoted. only the endless repition of that last speech in itself, even when the scene totally changed and all the libyans answered khadaffi's call to go forward, forward, forward. over 24 hours it is the topic of the news on alJ. and with my experience with media so far, that wont be unique.

saif el islam is a bitch. sorry to say, but yesterday he was still inciting killing, telling they were not about to surrender and now he is caught enjoying the ever illfetched richess in a luxury resort. that it left supporters and common people bleeding and dead.. did it ever matter to him?

not yesterday.

i disliked his recent act, allthough i guess only it's excesses were made known to us.
as usual the poor have been made to suffer, and the rich to get away with it. who else but nato to blame?

moreno o campo. heh a 'judge' someone that thinks its legal to deal with racist cops, racist verdicts, inequality of justice, a fraud, someone like saif el islam.

a clown, a puppet of the wallstreet frauds that steal more in a year then the whole poor part of london can lay it's hands on.

so let's set aside the international perspective that is rubbish anyhow.

gladder now. this is great for libya. why? because as autocrats tumble the future might just become more democratic. it might not, but that risk has allways been. it may otoh. because once you threw over an autocrat that usurped power for decades, next time possibly people will prevail such a development. stop them dead in their tracks after 4 or 8 years.

i dont think it will be better for the libyans now. gadaffi wasnt half bad in distributing housing, education healthcare and other basics. he was bad in being tolerant, maybe as bad as cameron even. he was also bad in applying justice equally, much like cameron eg.

the capitalist system however has a doctrine, a religion even, that to become rich, you have to keep the poor under, punish them where and when you can, rob from them, and nato and the other archenemy's of the poor promised assistance, so will it get better? no i think.

that besides people might still starve feeling liberated, why not, the proverb is: it is better to die a free person then to live as a slave.

i figure already today the gasoline prices will fall, for example my dutch people that supposedly voted to be able to cause way worse accidents on the highways, will once again pollute like mad, spread dust and toxins through the poor people's air like there is no other day.

because no matter elections in the west are a fraude, realising you can kill even if you are middleclass gives people a good feeling. the sheer power to threaten who or what you don't like with 3 tons of metal at high speed is a good thing in the compassionate mind of the believers.

take out your revenges on those pathetical non-polluters they will think, is justice, make m die from lungcancer, only to notice tobacco is not to blame when it is to late.

whats wrong with tobacco you might ask, well people work less hard, they take breaks, their lungs function less before all of the backs are broken in the pursuit, the crusade for distinguishing wealth for the 'bosses'.

i will see in a year or two. what's libya then. no more housing, less healthcare, more poverty and starving, lots of nato trained security to lock people up for longer.

thats what i think would happen. a new clique of priviliged, taken from colonial stock will reitterate the hollow phrases of the capitalists, politics to be lost forever before it was even born into the continent, oh well should i care?

it's not as if politics is the territory of reason either way. it's possible one less sheik is enough of a result, nato get's it's guns and drones free for assad, then again the syrians this time, will bleed. assad will sit in his palaces untill the criminal court takes him in to cut into stone their version of the tale, poisoning the mind of the future generations..

so great..

the next about to fall is israel, after the unknown assailants in eilat bravely challenged it's supremacy and universal right to lock up the palestineans, suddenly in the shade of a bombing campaign, netanyahu will be referred to the criminal court, ofcourse with his hatemonging associates and admirers overhere in europe.

saif el islam will need to be sedated not to risk a lifelong sentence over singlehandedly attacking the breivicks and their admirers and instigators in the one hour of caged open air a day left for his lifetime. (he should thank me now, just to proof i am wrong they will not punish him as hard as they would like to, solidarity between the rich will rule his day, and the courts proceedings, just like so far he, gadaffi and assad are left in peace.)

brothers in bankaccounts, fellow criminals, you don't hurt these do you? people might notice it works. thumbs up libya.

V for vulnerable. make it better then it was, don't allow the rich to make it worse.

(you know this is almost as inciting civil war: don't allow the rich to make it worse?)
good for me the powerfull and their servant judges(also priviliged) won't admit.

make it better libya, can you? please try, your chances are better then egypts.

anarchism

2011-08-16T00:16:00.003Z

there is one word in politics that is the absolute recordholder in being damaged in every possible and illegal way:

anarchism.

anarchism is perhaps best expressed as the revival of ancestral ethics. "the natural philosophy"

in that sense it's rules are rather basic, do what you want unless it hurts..

hurts another person, animal, nature, common sense perhaps, and not in the least your own psyche.

there are millions of philosophical and poetical ways to put it, but for rules it suits.

literally anarchism reads "without a state". many people want to make a problem from that.

it merely shows their lack of talent.

without a state means 'no set authority' , no set religion also, historically the two were often almost unseperable.

it also means 'no violent arrests' , no police repression, no torture, and even.. no prisons.

the latter may be utopic for now, there are plenty institutions that would best be disbanded today.

all that violent, army, militairy violence, and "financial" violence, are farflung illegal in anarchism.

illegal is also psychological violence 'not to educate', 'mislead'(,propaganda, commercial (untrue) and excessive advertising).

legal is play, and fooling around. anarchism is legal,

originality, exception, disordre, daring concepts, revolutionairy changes, it's part of the practice
and theory in anarchism. ofcourse this is a simplification, but it is important to grasp the idea that a real change in society is allways, (intentionally or in effect) a "revolution".

that revolution is a great target, and tool, is also simple, it's even charmingly related with the worker solidarity that has often been a strong aspect of anarchist practice. if it works well, let's make it quickly, so it will be working soon.

freedom is the great inspiration for anarchism, it's what makes us hated and much feared by establishments and clique's. anarchists make that evaluation and are not to scared to point a finger now and then, allthough anarchists have fought the police over many minor revolutionairy causes, the motto is:" take out your tension on the real enemy". the real enemy are usually the big fish. that is what makes us feared so much, we are the only threat that directly seeks to hold the ones responsible that are in charge. the ideal revolutionairy struggle is one of all people against all bosses.

so decission making is another favorit weak spot of us to be targetted. it's a myth, usual anarchist groups decide flexibly and swift very often. it is also a myth that it would be politically unfeasable, hard or impossible to pull of. there have been many theory's and models, but with never yet the opportunity to rule people in equality there is not an established standard perhaps.

there shouldn't be. anarchism acknowledges the merit of revolution, an anarchist system should not be allergic to changes, improvement and experimenting.

the usual words for anarchist forms of debate and decissionmaking are : direct democracy, grassroots movement, participating democracy, individual representation etc. in the older days there was a strong trend towards federalism, syndicalism. nowadays (with internet, digital media) the grassroots concept seems more up to date. that concept delegates power to smaller entity's, groups decide and when needed their decission are re-evaluated in groups of delegates of groups. in times of peace there will be room to improve the structures and enhance many individuals capacity's to adequatly represent, the feedback can be more exhaustive and through more channels, it would allways become something aking to federalism.

however anarchism has never been left in peace. anarchism is the word that is abused right and left. communists also favourably and typically blame the emancipatory movements for anarchism.

in the capitalist world , capitalist violence and the sometimes unpretty results of social inequality are typically named 'anarchism', as well as any armed struggle they disagree. (somalia was attacked over al shabaab being called anarchist for a weird example).

that actually grassroots organisation is the thing that kept the overblown london riots from becoming deadly is not what you will read. a list of proprietary complaints is made, looting, fighting the police, arson (they add disobeing 'authority' on regular bases), are heaped up and called anarchism.

it's not, in the london case it is capitalism, it's their riots, anarchism has not made that, the people on the streets may often (and in principle being humans allways) be anarchists, if there was anarchism in the streets, there would be no such thing as an option to steal from the rich, let alone loot childlabour produced commercial hypes that the youth is made to stare blind on),

i have a gstar trousers since recently and it stands out, even the cops were jealous, personally i am just glad it fits and would have never guessed. the little maidens look at it, it is really a ridiculous experience.

it's beside the point but the superficial consumermentality that is forced upon the free minds of the youth came home to roost in london. great for a laugh, and with all the talk about restrictions and severity, basically any reactionairy's wet dream and no surprise in cameron, albeit still a bit disappointing, they are obviously out to make it much worse before it will get any better.

anarchism is to disagree to that. to boykot the idea of repression. the mentality of neglect and contempt, anarchism is freedom, future, development.

a friend made an old joke and said: "my political filosofy has only 3 laws:
"belief", "hope" and "bless"

a materialist expression of dissidence

2011-08-15T23:47:00.004Z

london is longgone, it's ashes cold and dead. over the burrows hoovers a shadow of contempt, a slimy morbid balloon of indignification, about to drop and glue people in their place, extract vengeance for the piles of surplus luxury that got mortgaged, gagged, burned and looted, in the name of bluntness and neglect, privacy.

nolympics, do they might feel cheated.

there is no chance without an overhaul of youthwork, and very much also the prisonsystems and juridicairy system, anything will work.

that besides love it or leave it, the pharmaceutical industry does not, humankind is out to live with drugs, seek the recreational and even psychological abuse of drugs, invent the therapy's and prolong them. all that matters is to really start only after the children are there, and to stay away from alcohol. there must be exeptions.

giving people chances means a penal system need to give them such and the rehabilitation does.
the latter has never materialised and is a favorit tool of the autocrats to sideline unwanted contenders.

changes in a penal system should be material and diverse. not the usual fuck all of you and what you stand for. to patch up the cover of petty crimes and excesses that hides the real crimes of propriatarisation not only we have to sand the tooth, we need to extract its sick roots.

thats hard. yet its all but unfathomable. for one think i endare the idea to allow prisoners to organise workingcollectives for decent wages. yet i would also love to have people professional opportunity in more creative handcraft, there is small call not to prioritise it. so money should not be the factor, in this better, more equal and more respectfull society there is obviously only more available to cure the causes of crime. its utterly challenging and fascinating and surely prisoners must be allowed responsability and redaction of projects and therapeutical resource.

in fact you would coach the bound to be druggy's to be a decent survivable druggy. but assuming people have different political or existential target, to have place for any.

with what i will start a next article about the most out of context used term ever in the history of human rights, and perhaps you should say the freedom of conviction...

anarchism

(wich translates into oh well kill this khadaffi/assad/rest of sheikifats , and where a good example sets a good following sure they don't).

nolympics

2011-08-09T22:38:00.009Z

nolympics

its a tradition in the year ahead groups get criminalised, towns and nations become bankrupted, and under the guise of universal sportivity the poor to get a beaten is what is really for.

i saw two huge blokes arrest a small guy with well visible blood at first it seemed they would harm him a bit more, but then, in what film did they do that before? the cops started to try vainly to rob something from the small guy, to just dump his belongings on the street, most of the passers by seemed perplexed at best. the guys leave with some smaller dudes.(2) (4)

probs whole of the world saw it, syria does the same, lighten up even fabricated detail, and not show the greater pictures.

i saw a white twice and two lightblue hoodys run from a police line in a crowd, on aljazeera. geesh if i see them run out of a crowd of riot cops..

i saw a similar white hoody dramatically smash a window. (dont worry they will find one now).

you know how agent provocaters work?

imagine you say, we'll have our protest 3 streets of the primary school.
the first thing they will attack is the primary school.
imagine you say, no alcohol, they will bring it.
imagine you say: dont smash small shops, they will smash small shops and make sure there is ample opportunity by keeping any security away to make sure exactly those will be targetted.(1)

otoh. they may well have set alight some empty buildings, most probably old ones to be costly renovated. or even sony, if t'is almost broke, or otherways in a malvolent aura.

all these things and plenty worse they will. they have the fantasy for better, but tiny of the inspiration.

that all occured to me i should tell.

when that occured 'everyone would retaliate'.

the consolidate of police nonplaints commisions is left out of the picture for most of the day.
yet.. it surfaces only once. after days.. isnt it important? wouldnt it be just as relevant as that
acknowledgement most complaints filed are to be shoven under the table and out of view..?

just as important as the coloured guy that was searched several times a day? nevermind statistics of the powerfull.
one alJazeera article notices that black people are have a daily experience with "targetted harrasment by the feds".

sure racism is to still be held under the table according to cameron and his greedy and corrupt bunch, it is 'uncivilised criminals', 'gangs' and bigtalk about their sadist power of making people insane. experienced stigmatising of those forlorn individuals.

i hope it does not get so far the english establishment will revel it's lust to martyr the poor and other but i would be naive to expect even modest decency.

becus that is what reactionairy stands for, and cameron stands for reactionairy.. police state.

politics is really simple once you are an anarchist.
the level police state exactly equals the social inequalitys for example.

it works in all directions, the ones that want more police, rude laws, violent laws, abusive laws, injust laws, unfree laws, animal unfriendly laws, every perversion i name it, but you are not made to think of-laws, is reactionairy.

the one thing all 'authority's' reactionairy's, and for some reason capitalists want is "police state"

in aspects(control), in pieces and bits, and in absolute terms. a complaints(denial) commision or two for the police everywhere. none of their violence and least of their killings to get in the public.. all quite officially exactly, definedly: "police state".

the violent breaking up of any peacefull protest:"police state"
and a very purposefull one, distract the integer part of the populace to vain and bloodily beaten protest and.. guess what? less protest. police state.

films of reality soap agent provocaters, worldwide on "news" : police state

so whoever burned whatever building, and whether we have to thank only the "mob" noone got killed except by police, despite people stopped firefighters when some of them started to operate in their other function.. if those also were undercovers...?

for the nolympics, or just against the poor?
in fact, bad sports
policestate.

(1) other very common practices, violent provocative arrests. 'attacks' from quite or completely calm demonstrations (eg throwing ineventfull rubbish like tin cans, missing with stones, in some cases throwing exceptionally large objects (material escalation)). (shouting) violent (3)(encouragements, hiding protests from public view and press, hiding police agression from the same. arrests and in some cases sneaky assistance with arrests. constantly reporting to other uncercover teams, pushing, mongering fear panic and rumours. constantly telling people "what the police said" , (you must trust a few of your own to actually relay opinions still, it is not a very good method of recognition unless the cop i smore stupid then you)
they often try to interfere with people wanting to join the protest, but not very obviously.
photographing without permission, extremely violent and targetted arrests. adding a targetted touch to the randomness of policebrutality, for reasons of escalation, sheer bloodlet, sadism or some kind of drug abuse, perhaps that is also to escalate the brutality of arrests and actions of plain robocops. otoh, usual coppers in robocop fashion are incredibly scared.

there is only one way they are right to be scared, it's pleasant to be able to counter them, hold them up, hold them back or beat them. alltho it almost never happens it is a privilige to have witnessed how the courage, daring and conviction of a progressive group can sometimes withstand the enormous might of the amrsindustry incarnated, if even for a single action or two.

i am also not so knowledgeable to the kinds of texts and methods they might use with the public.
fear, lies , rumours in ordre of effectivity probably.

(2) comment speaks dramatically, stuf like: "they steal everything he has"

(no looks for his purse or more then 1 object taken it seems, it got thrown the moment i thought: "oh it's the police thats stealing everything again", they do try and materially disadvantage me more then a few times.

(3) my definition of violence is the disproportional intrusion of living beings, real talks about countermeasures can allways be quite reasonable. "they beat those guys so hard let's start a barricade, fire, destroy the traffic lights , pinch the policecars tyres ahead, etc etc.

(4)a redacted version of the same shots with most what i describe cut was reaired, you dont see the arrest or dump scene, not that it seemed they did lack time..

3X:00 censoring kicking in;) check my other politics blog (its under profile i think) for egypt

oracle

2011-08-04T00:12:00.003Z

i tried to get a picture of syria, don't like it, it is hard to get a good idea about it.

it seems like in libya, a fragile situation. i have heard only, with early on some hints of resistance, heard of non-violent protest.

what to think of that? knowing protest and police (let alone army) brutality i would actually say that is allways true.

protests are peacefull more so when they are about huge subjects, geopolitics, revolutions stuf like that. (i am somewhat from the school that holds through direct action you can claim back quite some rights and living space, if you do it smartly)

otoh.. would you resist the police at tahrir square, or the uniforms of tunesia (in whatever kinds they came, i think both), certainly , once there is the agreement that the violence from the police does not cross every boundary it meets or dreams up, a fierce riot is what does it.

is it? it looks like that. i know there is something to say for that in eg. petersburg even,

just the moment, to grab that, to once and for all overrule that desperate claim of authority
and the world changed for the better.

as soon as it takes longer it seems it gets more hurtfull. where is ivory coast now?
and what to think of bloody libya?
yemen?

i wonder if the israelis still remember how their protests made to be over housing costs , got politically abused. i do.. well did it help?

not so much. so i wonder about syria.

did you notice assad and erdogan's mouth look very much alike? maybe if they are family.

syria.. it is a political subject.
libya is: libya is oil. and oil, and uhm
oil. so libya is oil. (african oil)

syria is a bit of oil, enough for sth. like syria perhaps. and a lot of kurds. it is not easy to be a kurd. for a kurd you expect the turkish to be gratefull. we brought them civilisation you would think, we even brought them ataturk, without us, the world would have long stopped turning, at least in turkey.

turkish see that differently. i am not sure but i figure. i am not even sure why. i call it kemalism.

after there was this white bloke , that thought, lets do something odd with the relatively rich remnants of the ottoman, there came a lot of far more outrageous authoritarian people, but with less talent. kemalism.

so i like musi. just not his imams. goes with all, small wonder.

anyhow, for historical reasons syrians have very little to do with turkey. syria had just been conquered by the english, so it would be hurtfull for the ataturk national pride of the project of the time. syria is just 'off limit'.

i wudnt buy it, not even from musi, but, perhaps he wouldnt have mind it.

so turkey and syria are two different things. allthough you can't seperate easily between musi philosophy and kurdish identity.

i find that hard, i guess it's his european background.

nevertheless musi was exceptionally bad on the kurdish, typical selfhating american he be.
reminds me of mark levine.

so if we leave the foreign affairs out of the quotation, what we get is a nation of kurds that didn't have an ataturk yet.

unfortunately caliphates of the past have sought division between all the different kurds in eurasia. in syria there are at least 3 or so different races and religions of kurds.

kurdish kurdish, allahfiets, and a few. only i am not sure if they are sunni or shia, both i think.
oh yes and palestinian kurdish i suppose. and a few christian arabs, and arab jews.

but it is majorly the kurdish groups divided through the ottoman eras and english.

history of the region , famously known as the 'morning' or 'evening' land (it depended lattitude), has caused all those people to forget their true roots and history. it is very well possible kurdish people in either western syria or even southern pakistan have forgotten where they came from.

(the evening/morning land).

that is surely a problem.

you are not going to believe

2011-08-01T11:20:00.003Z

salafism takfiri wahabbi had rather nothing to do with an umbrella?

necronomy and a lively future

2011-07-27T12:04:00.002+01:00

usia is suffering from it's skyrocketing debts, so they must raise the treshold, it is great news, a struggle between obama , who wants to pay, and republicans that want to earn.

the real problem is thus out of sight, becus it is in fact the republicans that would be the ones to get payed, and the future that would be expected to again pay the republicans for paying theirselves now. a construct of balances regarded a balance of constructs.

necronomy.

the official word for it is 'economy'. a construct of fairytales based on the power of money to make every tale come true, and every truth become a tale.

there are and allways have been plenty reasons (why show my tongue's end?) to dismiss the tale of necronomy.

for one thing i cannot even remember when i got aware of ecological costs.

(ofcourse for ecology you'd get necrology.;)

i think it must have been in a past life.

that is btw an interesting aspect.
for example as the first trains (but it went with plenty mechanisations) came online, ppl complained about their effects,

the sky would darken, clouds become black, milk would become bad, and more.

ofcourse in my youth that was thought excellent for a laugh, great for necronomy to tell the kids that story. ('technological progress is only limited through bigotry')

however, in the end, nowadays the story would need to be told different to fool the kids into the necronomic state of mind.

even funnier is that implications of myths and oral history's (the spoken historys of ppl that could not write when they met us) are, people allways associated similar phenomena with the wrong kinds of exploitation of the earth.

it all boils down to: to what do you fool your children?

top blog

2011-07-25T08:36:00.002+01:00

we need to stay on top, of the fascists with all the money and all the tools that spread insanity to harvest terror.

in fact between all my sadness and disappointment i am actually proud of all of us normal and usual people(poor and middleclass), that despite all the investments , the whole might of media, and having news mostly consisting of lies, the far majority of people stayed, desinformed hard to cope with,

but saner then the hatemongers and their sponsors (amongst: all the media) would dare request even their most personal demons. worse then the nightmares that are still their nicer dreams.

is it for them where we stayed human.

love you all (well the far majority that is) stay strong, resist the propaganda,

dont believe in cover ups.

fascists uses of internet.

2011-07-25T05:57:00.004+01:00

still my personal feelings are greatly affected by the events in oslo.

why did initial articles say the premier was 'in a safe place' when it happened, to change the story into wounded? (btw after i said i was sorry for him).

i am not and will never be a willfull tool to create or confirm lies.

did they really think i would be mislead by the 'freemason' stamp? dont they know it is in front of police offices? or did they just want a laugh after the succesfull censoring on youtube of a 48 part documentary on freemasons and 'illuminati' , that does not turn up in related items even after plenty pages? (and with heaps of rubbish and even straightforward domestic violence (or so, didnt check) videos getting preference.)

like removing assange or fukushima from the most tweeted lists.

anyway here is a post al jazeera instantly refused to publish, whilst meanwhile weird manipulations with 'liked' comments, edits and my copy paste function went off.

here is that forbidden post: (i started copying them all again alltho i still forget it lots of times)

i will give another example how mainstream dutch outlets promote hate. there is a dutch site that pretends to be a newssite, (it directly fed from reuters in the past and was therefore sometimes usefull). it has a seperate site where readers "can" react. my first few reactions did not appear or got immediatly deleted thereupon. i complained high and low, it changed, recently i tried to 'vote' (it is like 'liking'). not for the first time my ip gave no response with that. so that explains why hateposts often end up with a popular status there. (nu.nl and reactions at nujij.nl).hate is made mainstream. hacking around with likes etc.obviously a system not unique to international or dutch media.

end quote.

read it think, and realise it is the liars that cheat us into war and "economy" and crisis, into poverty, destitution and illness, into debt and chanceless unfair, lawless juristical proceedings , that also promote fascism.
murder,
and hate.

since my posts, my clipboard and my files are and been habitually changed and compromised i include the warning that they will surely still try to destroy the meanings of this and my other posts, now and in the future, if such people stay in power, forever.

likewise the oslo story will be changed untill the vast majority believes a rubbish story, that is pro israel, anti muslim and xenophobiac and not at all related to what really stuck behind. its changing daily, and not for no reason, not only because of the cover up of the norwegian police and services even. its for usia, multinationals, fascism and the loyal establishment as a whole.

corrected about 10 sp. 'errors' i did not make, usually after the first couple a few new get introduced, i would so like to be just as productive as i can.

israelians call the left party an antisemite israel hating party, cus they support palestinians,
not cus they actually hate israel or started from that, they sure have reason now it seems.

guess what will show about the victims on the island, and the people that did not go, and the people now probably the ones to lead that party in the future?

'better' "christians" i figure.

bills of rights

2011-07-24T20:03:00.006+01:00

today i overheard a small part of a discussion about religion, i really didnt listen and i was terribly annoyed, i am very sorry to say, but

islam religious talk is quite as absurdly focussed on ancient right wing text, the wish to govern 'the masses' has allways been a material one.

it is maybe more intense but that could arguably be for the following,
it is terribly oldfashioned,

again i am sorry to say but it is as if i hear my grandparents (that is one of them) talk at best, and contrary to any definition i ever applied to her attachment for religious precisions i even realise she was a product of an evolution of philosophy of the human right not to be bound by any , let alone irrational, preconceptions.

and it went booom ubrahim isa and i dunno , jezus, etc. pitty they didnt mention budha, the ever quiet one, but i guess the incarnations of vishnu caused confusion.

in all it boiled down to the matter of basic law,

mh, that is not quitte true, there is certainly discomfort with the current egypt situation..
this is probably a result of several factors, the overall unwill of hierarchy to change, abuse of the army for to the adagio mubarak or say saddam, well each of the blokes, "muslims you treat hard"

(cus they react harsh on to many things to expect emancipation to come without pains, some of it however is the discomfort with a geopolitical dominance over more of africa that does not change)

concerning darfur that means ivorycoasts establishment from beneath the 10th(sortta),
has been implied in the whole lot, ranging from armed attacks on civilians to and probably the most significant, rightwing politics that prejudice the poor and advantage the rich.

with no change in sight from one side of the line the other also appears to deserve a benefit of the doubt is not it?

well thats code. darfur. for: that would be a thing to have said in darfur.in this case.

well that besides there is the idea that libya was with ghadaffi one of the more free society's in islam, and that the rebound could hardly discourage the west to take advantage from the authoritarian tendency's that are the result.

that in turn would lead to even more fanatism in religion possibly, so the disappointing pace of changes works not to well, and has a foreboding shadow over it.

that way it would rather be better to respect a folk like ghadaffi for a people like libya.

by the way anyone thinks elections are to follow.

uhm, i got distracted, oh yes,

so that comparison was drawn, like constitutional rights, (sth. eu newspeakingly tries to forget the word i'd say)

like 'a fundamental law' or perhaps a bill of rights.

indeed they assumed if and where it had to be 10 (we didnt grow smart enough for 11 yet),

they could get stuck with refer what moves people to kill.. in the first.

so besides i loved the take, and perhaps the joke, i was pissed and didnt pay attention to the rest of the repitious stuf 'of the books'. (of the religions of the book(s))

i think btw did well in explaining my discomfort wich was not ill received.

for the rest i neglected the whole thing, i was playing a boardgame maybe a bit of a pitty but it feels like the good old indoctrination of the christians to listen to the stuf, and i want to be free,

free from religion,

so whenst i get remembered the next day for two,

here is nr one,

freedom of religion means the freedom to choose to be free from religion.

if christians would go off like what went on i would evade them , would generally dismiss the subject in friendly terms, i must say i would also expect a way dumber, yet not less primitive exchange.

actually i think it doesnt deserve(1) mention, goes by it's own and shouldn't be on nr 1.

just historical interesse allows me to seriously suggest the joke.

(1) indeed also should not need

killers and uniforms

2011-07-24T11:13:00.004+01:00

hello, perhaps people expect the emotional kind of outrage and empathy, about oslo, but, in keeping with the facts, i don't allow myself those shows of emotions when i actuallly am not involved with the struck people.

how could i express more then my wish these incidents could not and were not allowed to happen.

as usually i spend some time on the evening it happened in looking through what the mainstream news brought. my experience is the first 48 hours not all the news got yet filtered or censored, not everyone that knows an extra thing yet bribed or approached by services to remain silent.

(and sometimes people got killed(or disappeared at least from view) in the follow up for expressing things unwanted to be in the eye of the public.)

however i couldn't feel so much more insecure then i do, so let me continue in the habit to light up the facts that are actually made to disappear.

sorry if i, or the manipulations to come, convince any of you i am cold, hard, or emotionless.
i am not, i feel sorry for norway, sorry for labour, sorry for socialists and even sorry for stoltenberg. sorry for europe in the first place.

let me first talk about what is perhaps my most severe suspicion, swat teams, killercops,

the first articles to appear suggested strongly that after the police approached the arms wielding uniformist he surrendered upon hearing his name called by the police,

'anders will you surrender to us' .. oh yes my friends ?

soo.. the police, the "swat" team, apparently knew him personally. suspect.

his identity has since been anounced 'known' a few days in a row, but was so to the media within hours.

he had an uniform available, bit weird, he 'got acces to the island' carrying a telescopic automatic weapon, apparently a boat was ready to set him over, about this boat, its availability and the ones to sail it, so far no mention (beside what i just told) has been made. suspect.

the Swat team , 'couldn't find a boat' , do i feel safer now? no. i hardly can believe even.

after arriving they took 15 (newer sources say 20 sometimes) minutes to 'talk to him', (newer sources don't mention 'call him by his name' anymore.)

that would mean he shot about 15-20 people with the swat watching.

the first night they had it 10 died on the island, it happened to turn out to be 100 the following day, or.. perhaps.. we shouldnt trust the police to play with numbers like that when all of ours safety is concerned?

some witnesses saw several (no conflicting reports there so..) uniformed shooters..

there has not been an interview to show light on the duration of the events from the pov of witnesses.

also the nr of hurt seems to be even bigger, todays news has it some 4 or 5 are still missing,
some and some body parts(..) (heh what difference would that make in body count so that is rubbish) are still in the ruins 'about to collapse' of the offices in oslo.

well from the pics they dont look that they might collapse any instant, and it would be most unusual for european events that they had not been searched and rescued, even under rather hard circumstances. so i don't understand that and find the logic suspect.

what horror of nr's sticks behind it?

i take it they are not only trying to fool the public, but also the victims and witnesses, whom btw. in some manner mostly have been convinced to leave oslo. that would leave less of fresh memory and less of a bulk of statements to be well explored.

unfortunately this is not all that smells , get's distorted or remains unexplained,

the media circus is quick in showing it's sympathy for rightwing murder, the usian media for example makes no notion that he admired the dutch hatemonger.

i can tell from experience unfortunately how the kill (in different manners) all
lefty's, socialists, ethnic this or that) line is a standard phrase in his admirers, tho i must admit they tend to either try and think more reasonable or at least make less of a sadist noise after we approach them to make clear we are not going to wait for nightly terror and violence passively.

actually i think my surroundings , statistically they are, are not the worst for a dutch. iow. that this kind of hate speech is even more common in most of the rest of netherlands. and to the best of my knowledge it is.

probably the guy has supporters who would not in a usual company say those kind of things, however such is not my experience on different city's and places in netherlands. albeit i never tried to investigate it more then just in what is flung at me or my closer surroundings.

so i didnt even look for it, it is just a random sample.

for completeness sake, i must add, people that admire the kind of xenophobiacs, tend to be frustrated and socially backward. politically very uneducated also. (they dont usually know more then hatespeech for supporting their points),

that besides they are quite apt at indoctrinating theirselves and others with the like hatespeech.
(first hand witness of that also) and clichees.

last to this topic, it is incomprehensible to me dutch politics would not be aware of those facts, and that riding on the waves of hate with them can only mean one thing.

terror

it is time to note that i am initimitaly aware dutch elections are fraudulent and the hate guy is pushed up in the scores because the european policy of centralism requires a numbed and intimidated (and apparently murderous) populace.

in line with that

nyt makes no mention of his admiration for this geert wilders, i have some experience with media analyses, and in my opinion that means, people overthere are plotting to hand us over to the murderers and haters.

wich does unfortunately not come a a real surprise (compare the election results fraudes),

you may wonder what is behind, i think it is simply that he is an admirer of the israelian anti arab policy's, he repeatedly expresses his support for other populists and in this case netanyahu.

i wonder if the jews do want to be free from discrimination, you would think they would not want an alliance with people of the 'kill all etc.' type. but seems they do.

i assume they havent yet grasped what that means about their own values of respect for human life. i for one thing assume the usual israeli is not only indoctrinated but thoroughly in the claws of their own indoctrinations.

so thoroughly it either clouded their reasoning or farreachingly corrupted their minds.

it may look beside the point, but i think it is what makes that usia wants so obviously to make a deal for and with him.

i also lost my trust in obama, for now, this was a bit to much at the exact wrong time, to belief the connotations of cleansing and massacre are coincedence.

i notice how the guy drawing his inspiration from hatists like wilders goes unmentioned in plenty reports overhere, and that noone dares to make the association aloud.

ok there's more, but for now, read this and don't think it will be all over now.
i may make another post about that later, writing about this is, intense.

signals are pointing to red.

Gl all. hasta la revolution siempre.

Red Alert

2011-07-23T18:11:00.003+01:00

to late to save europe from hatemongers and terror.

hitler would say to wilders. "this is the real stuf"

i hope the right wing don't succeed.
hope people realise how this is also ww3 (or perhaps 4) in the making.

hope the people reject the associates of the guys, that call themselves liberal.(the economist/capitalist right and christians)

that would have us one step ahead on them.

what's my hopes,

red alert.

personal freedom of investigation

2011-07-19T20:22:00.005+01:00

soz for the 'intimate' i thought, 'is your cat still sick ?' i dunno where you went with hollidays,(blink) but your dahlia's are nice', or 'the niece of palin just got an illicit twin' were enough to deserve the predicate intimate in english.

so over a hedgerow(or so i understood today), or in the tearooms here over the neighbours, well whereever there is a backdoor ( a joke).

thinking this much over agenda's i must start with the cops.

the first one basically said, if you are out to walk over the cops the press and the public all alike, i admit it wasnt perfect, but within some limitations, at least at my level quite a few ethical (and based on that magic asset 'trust'. we did , the press did that actually better then we as best as we could.

he does stray way from confirming the produce of those (his/mets/the press/notw/policeforces everywhere .. and politics) policy's is either dangerously badly regulated or in a manner that would appeal to a policeman formally applied.

he does acknowledge there is an errormargin.

ofcourse.
that is the natural effect of a free press, a participating journalism, and it would also be for police practice or investigation.

he does confirm that in practice that meant press corp was not the worst of candidates,

i wouldn't mention murdochs excursion to his dad's (unasked for...) motivation. but i like when commenters show sense and respect. no matter i like to be partisan.

murdoch for his part will not be forgiven for admiring a colonial outpost of corporate fascism alike singapore.

nevertheless..

both james and rebekka remembered the meeting that they were 'briefed' beforehand, and, james, met beforehand and with specific financial reference , typically about the higher bids.

this theme got repeated, luckily for james not only on his iniative,
and murdoch pronounced, 'it is ridiculous that (note) people are reduced to this.

(i agree)
so he suggests to pay politicans on some level a million or so a year, i personally doubt it makes a real difference, probably people would be more discrete.. but is that is so much of a help i hugely wonder.

much comes and goes with transparance.. the suggestion is there but in fact many mp's do have acces to plenty money to make the point suspect.

i dunno, looks to me like murdoch took good care only people of rudimentary integrity sit in the english parliament. but its a bit of an exageration i suppose.

the system itself actually allways cares for that.

'confidentiality clauses..

so this does not go good for murdoch so pls pay attention,

it is completely obvious to me that cooperation between a free press and an independent juridicairy force can be good.

both the press and the police, and probably moreso when they need help, deal with horrible stuf a lot, there would not typically be rules for every exceptional situation, it would be up to the journalist , or few, or deskmanager, and in some cases ofcourse company manager, to make decissions about payments policy's and methods.

i must say in the milly dowler case, (i repeat if that is even real) the police would use the same method, i dont believe the reord hasnt been kept, dont even believe the journalist didnt, dont understand the police found any relevance in the deleted messages. (you still have 2,45 , god knows.)

and how would the police make place, in a phone? worse i dont even know, if the police admitted hacking victims phones would the public mind that?

you better be 100% they do. (reality check)

that the police in the very least over the past few years has a near complete file of conversations and literary expression by phone on inet for years now, ok. sure they cannot check everything but the methods are typically advanced,

neccesitates a press with some acces to similar means, there would otherways be no parity in the police representing law unjustfully representing authority, and the means of professional research of actuality that is the press.

and serve the public.

so there is not so much wrong with that alliance, there is nothing wrong with the police tolerating a huge ethical input from the press for this,

(wich is closer to freedom then the opposite), where it is wrong is that the police is asked to prosecute the people that are actively engaging to find the better methods and compromises ,
and being in the defensive position of pressfreedoms , these days i would almost say:), disclose that it actually works pretty rotten with a politics that neither allows itself transparance over policepolitics, neither accepts that media will be willing to engage the unknown, and will need to defend the exercise.

i think i said enough, i was delighted to see rebekka is someone quite up to tasks, and with a way more farreaching commitment to truth, certainly in the mind of others, then murdoch.

the cake came at a great moment,

just like his tapping later did, but i would guess he does it a lot when he is on about company policy's to have his flow, i wondered in how far it was premeditated for lasting the moment , however after murdoch stating he dissolves nothing of what he knows, and james telling, no starting to refer to his legal counsel and not being in charge involved made aware etc,

the moment was that good to hardly believe that.

i considered it someone rightly making the statement singapore is actually not nice, his show of cooperation with , to name it, the police, is not well apreciated or received, and that he is most greedy in only letting us know they are all for sale, and their price is more often precisely theirs then not.

nevertheless the usual check of 700k he would see, or i suppose, have a final say.

now, what is with ethics.
there is a system in wich newscorporations sources can be in great danger, policesources can, and journalists can, not in he first place in england, but could it matter?

secondly there is a system that as if i am sorry to say it is a tabloid instead of serious politics, hunts behind the shadows, so the police could not intercept voicemails..., sorry but methods were on the internet..

people that did a job that was either professional or even up to a high standard of ethics, journalists are in danger to be arbitrary prosecuted, over methods that usually have not lead to bad results, because otherways teh police would after all have interfered, make known, their discomfort,

for the policeman you could say they failed in obtaining something like a national line, however, can that be expected from police operatives, in fact not, and the expectation is suspect for it's implication.

in that i hope english will ponder a bit and i said enough.

freedom of investigation

2011-07-18T10:22:00.007+01:00

today is madiba's birthday. 93 i think. congratulations to him and us all.

people are asked to spend some time on voluntairy work today. ill count listening to cameron and sir sth. as that. i surely didnt like the experience.

this post i write mostly to make clear what i do and might not mind in those schemes of police and politicians. i think it is all in the posts i wrote yet, but mainstream the distractions still have the overtones, wich basically means we are being screwed, (and for wich police is coresponsible).

of all the phones i so far understand they are 'hacked' (copied. bought. whatever, purposedly dissiminated) i mind none.

perhaps i mind what is done with a few. not the deleting of mollys(1) messages from a copied and loaded phone, of wich the contents are at the police (..tasty guys those)

apparently the journalist also hoped she was still alive for one thing.

so let us try not to make a single non-statement. not one point that is moot to the foreground.

celebs, i dont give a damn, hack'm. if you like to read the extravaganza they are out at. enjoy. its for what they are lifted over the masses.

9-11 and that london bombing for wich the exact schemes were handed out a month before?
good thing to investigate. tasteless to go for the victims, but maybe only the cops dont want to make you any wiser..

the victims could well be only a minor part of that targeted to dismantle that fraud. (2)

so not very tasty, but no probs, and btw, such phones could hardly reveal anything very personal or so. what is personal about aaaw i am dying? when a 100 do so?
tasteless it is, but like i said, who tells us they are not a handpicked example for disgust, all others are.

hacking politicians is also okay with me. they shouldnt have so much to hide, it will allways be and remain hard to get at their info's, and it wont work all the time, there will be plenty room for them to make backroom deals etc. still.

so that is about this exemplary 'repugnant' collection of acclaims.

obviously politicians want their backroomdealing as secure as possible. and the wanton examples of their doings, give us good reason to disagree.

i think it is obvious where the police is in all this, a willess tool. complicit in every case and each aspect. an institute for the dismantlement of the intent of the law,

give an example? r.b. was supposed to be just inquired, but went arrested, this arrest may prevail her appearing before parliament. (latest news again suggested it wont).

she has been released, but you must read well to find the 'on bail'. she was intimate with cameron, but it takes lowly mets to get it into the open...

i am wondering about sir sth.s reasons to hire a former notw hacker as an advisor, they have all the phonecalls we make, every word we produce, and if they use it don't expect the fee,

what did he need him for? a cover , payed for with a spa?
seems a bit to simple,

perhaps to be sure about the molly's, that advisor may just like most of us not show the back of his tongue, but he must have had some extra use perhaps. interesting.

you can consider the yard as something of a cia, they serve as subordinate, but also as the organisational stage for covering up that what we are not supposed to know, and telling the disgusting story's we can considering their credentials better not take seriously.

it is our duty to be critical and not believe what politicians or cops say, if you start believing them you are like a fish on a hook, believing anything they will draw you out of this sea of confidentiality, and have you suffocate in broad daylight.

beyond that, well you can still debate, and you know better, and probably with more of an impact what they are really on about behind all the smokescreens still.

concerning murdoch and his 'empire'

personally i am against monopoly's and news that is 'made' as opposed to 'happening'.

murdoch empire is a great example, yet, the real danger of monopoly's feature in oil, armstrade, pharmacy and a few, we don't hear about that. just about limitation of pressfreedom over handpicked examples of complicity (that only if you think independently).

now i am to disgusted to immediatly think on, and i dont think i can stay coherent(for you, the public) if i try.
i hope i have been of help.

would it be they name them molly cus they hate molly's? they hate resistance, at every inproper time and point? protecting what? their positions? innit. association is a powerfull tool in witless masses. ( a molly is an abb. for molotov cocktail)

(1) ok now you screw with my writing i remember she was called milly perhaps, not going to look it up. molly serves for sth.
(2) more probably (and considering murdoch) to cover it up.

sorry excuses

2011-07-17T16:14:00.004+01:00

starting with libya, i feel sorry i forgot to name el barda , misurata we can call libya antique.
the real reason to name north libya north libya is obviously because it is in the south, upper nubia and the border corridor. we can name egypt de nord de libe (how do you spell that).
the western border, so the northern neighbours of tripoli, we could call brega.

becus of todays offensive.

that way i count 6 nationalities in libya only.

we still need more enclaves to ensure everyone has a usefull share of the oilprofits. oil is ofcourse distributed underground, noone to know exactly where it really sticks, and who have we to tell.

murdoch and i,
no. wrong start,
the guardian and i, uhm..
i and the observer, (joke) the listening post(alJ), sorry,

some people, uhm
.. those past politics.

let me get this clear, cameron and i, uhm, no not cameron, gordon brown, uhm.
that would be more of the same.

okay ill make another post about it.

another post about sorry excuses (poor murdoch, wouldn't this unusual public also mistake him for the most prominent of these examples).

the only ones in this story not to deserve a sorry excuse, are the guardian, and perhaps gizberg.
so much got clear,

well perhaps the guardian gives a pitty excuse of a showing concerning the freedom of investigation.

it is about a newspaper, indeed a completely terminal market, and that the tabloid formula remained on top with that was obvious early on. rupert hates internet, no not rupert,
well maybe.

some of these journalists don't really like internet, the paperworld is collapsing, has been collapsing for twenty years, the observer has a 5 person staff.

they reason, if we are the (commercial) victim of censoring now , the internet must be regulated stronger, for our deathstruggle to last better.

that is a wrong (s.e.o.a) reasoning, but it exists, and in the mind of the financial may be all-prevailing.

at least it appears to have convinced some,

now internet regulation, but actually the more so the regulation of the networked virtual dbases and their applications is damnedly badly regulated, likewise are financial and adminastrative services. that is related, and unseparable.

yet it is completely besides the point to regulate it in other terms then freedom of investigation , freedom of expression , and , why not, the advantage of criminal liability.

my guess is that principle has not been applied to the internet in a meaningfull manner at all yet because the whole financial sector is moving in the direction of cheating and intimidating the customer under an umbrella of very fraudulent prepositions of opiniation.

(s.e.o. clear reasoning)

perhaps i dont want to be clear.
it is all about examples, 1000s of phones hacked? pitty it is about b.s., (you can't sing bullshit on listening post:D) sorry excuse of a coincedence.

it's not many, there are billions.

the listening post, and whomever happens to be in the journalist field, for one thing is most sure about that politicians and police play an unfavourable role.

at this point i don't envy rebecca brooks that has been arrested. o.t.o.h. why..
she is probably in a luxury jale, one usual people don't even are allowed to know they exist.

better then assanges mansion/palace that took him 500k to rent. or so i understand.

it should be. after all there is equality before the law and she is in a smaller place.

bbc is boasting: "intriguing" everyone is intrigued.. it almost feels like a sexscandal, rebekka brooks has been called sweet, next day she is arrested, the cops are in with the deal..

well the cops take it or leave it, they sortta promoted pressfreedom in allowing uses of their material, sortta supported the newspaperculture to stay existant,

and in all that they could not even be allowed to do that legally so, no matter the papers have apparently long been their only source for relevant phonecalls etc.

after i wondered if these parents existed they featured again in a 5th murdoch excuse,
the pittiest of excuses is 20m of compensations allready payed to a few rich guys.
(i guess for knowing the color of their toiletpaper or so)

so they are not real?

or perhaps murdoch allows himself a generous compassion in absence of the need to pay claims.
politicians and their ilk do that.

every human has emotions, not all know them.

well this was a s.e.o.a. article. i look forward to writing about basic rights, shortly.

the coffee

2011-07-16T17:37:00.003+01:00

there's a nice new show on aljazeera, the cafe. watching the first episode i dont get to understand every single line of the participants discourse, but that is mostly because i get distracted by my thoughts on the whole egyptian events, or the participants or what associates to either,

i would almost hope to see the same people again, in like a week , but i guess it is not the idea of the show.

close to how the overall performance of the egypt staterun media rate, the cafe may be bound to move to another capital.

it's not a matter of concept but of formula's. nevertheless this episode is accurate.

http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/thecafe/

it is a at least to me very inspiring video in what a lot of young people express a valuable list of priority's. so i want to write about it.

I'll start with the most significant remark,

"but what is happening in libya now is ofcourse much worse."

an eyeopener, perhaps not for everyone but for me, the man to make the remark blogs,
he is expressed. his remark has a credible messenger.

ok. there is discussion about scaf , organisation, bill of rights, secular law and constitution, it is all very interesting, utterly lovely material for me to write,

there are problems with old cadre's, police, the current denial of the older that what brought the revolution was the inspiration hope and lucid apreciation of free values, values of freedom.

completely to the point. sometimes there are alarming sounds, about repression, once again (and the muslim bro's despite all intends do the old political complicity dance there), preexisting institutions and artefacts playing their trumps of "arrivedness".

a lot to say. but these things i wont forget;)

but... libya is much worse, so now libya.

tough. i published an idea on it, that is kind of original, revolutionairy, unconventional and even to me unexpected.

i am aware the man of the remark may well be aware of the proposal/concept so here comes.

what we see in africa is a long history of repression , occupation and divisions made by 'former' colonial authority's.

even what is perhaps a succesfull and usefull example of division, north and south sudan, you cannot say it was not the policy of the 'former' colonial powers with what they complied, nor that it was definitily not the oil behind it.

taken things into consideration i suppose bashir should find a new job, it would be helpfull, and lend his effort and political line the credibility it may still need to survive the aspect of oil.

the great question may be , is democracy a nice or an equally awfull aspect of oil?

now you may say what does this have to do with libya, there is no oil there, there are hardly any muslims, let alone you can divide them along the tenth paralel.

this is true, for reasons of recognition i propose we call eastern libya southern libya, tripoli we call eastern (for reasons of nostalgia), and let me take the map. gawt, tharaji, awbari and murzuq (except the trees on the square and the big mosque that will go to eastern libya, will be south libya.

just like berlin and brussels saabha may best be an enclave , this forces an unnatural alliance with north sudan.

everything south of ghadanis and over 111 miles to the east of Qaryat, and evrything over 439 mtr of altitude in the atlas we can call north libya (becus it can be so cold).

i dont know what to do with the area south east to al kufrah. equatorial egypt appears a proper name.

is that an idea?

or perhaps we should go for 'federation of libyan nations and souvereignity's that would be most except eastern libya and the zebra territory along the northern coasts, don't forget the federally allied zones and their specific standards.

that way there will be a lot of employment, and still not much control, cus that would render the road useless.

speaking about employment.. (trumpets, dummy shots in the air) the army needs real man.
we the unreal man at the sideline don't mind, its close to a never ending jobopportunity.

where's the reward?

ok thats just jokes, you know, i could want political stuffs, bill of rights or so, but i thought i'd take it on a lighter note and split up some territory's everywhere first, make a real mess.

observation of Job's creation

2011-07-15T11:07:00.002+01:00

maybe i turn to this blog when i find no relevance in the news. i thought of it just now.
probably i do that sometimes.

the murdoch thingy is still playing out, the public (murdochs daughter) and others have requested rebbeca b. to resign. and so she does, with a nice tale. i think i kind of like the lady, btw. smart, sense of humor, and quitte sweet. perhaps i am not a bystander, and actually this week is the first time i ever heard of her, its been also years since i spend a thought on murd. himself.

i associate him primarily with some incident on the english channel, perhaps wrongfully so.

after that he is just a name that passed the screen a few times.

that is to say i have no personal opinions or sympathy's for them or anything or anyone also involved.

yet i observed a few things.

like that besides the anti internet campaign, around the girl that once disappeared, (if that happened, but i think it did) the other storys are of a similarly doubtfull content.

so some queens visits could be lauded a day earlier? ooow that is bad innit? even more public?
press planning their stays accordingly etc.? oow they sure didnt want that?

and then there is todays hike on 9 11.

hardly anyone believes in the reality of that event, well perhaps a lot of blunt people do, people of the kind that only eat fats food and get their informations from only the soaps on tv.

those believe everything, and they might be a majority, but we will get to that.

mumbai disappeared of the pages more then quick, to many people must have been asking, do we now get london or madrid, for extra convictive power?

the legitimation of the event is incorporate to its featuring. heh would an english parliament talk about something that is a false flag operation? whine about phones miraculously tapped upon incineration..? thats what they say right, "victims phones tapped". to be a victim, you might first need to be hurt.

and with all the doubts abound, media certainly had no right to investigate what went on in such a plane? or who boarded them? i wonder.

simply put, it features 'the lie', or as this ancient scriptor of some of the bible's roots put it.
it tries to kil "the lie". the lie being anything true before his writing, meant to put his kids in charge of a solid dynasty. (it didnt work well, becus like usually the offspring lacked even the talent for being a despote so at some point people turned against them.

mystical knowledge of a longgone era. romantic.

how would that be with job's?

Job do i say, yeah i am into job creation here. i am not doing any good, underpayed, unsafe circumstance, robbing of savings, and again and again a huge unemployment.

nevertheless you may consider me divine. reward me with uncountable richess.

like the reps i am from good family, and i created so many Job's, i must be holy.

murdoch vs. murdoch, debilitating debt tales, republican vampire

2011-07-13T11:39:00.005+01:00

the vampire thing is just a literary clue, don't expect much but pretence..;)

karzai was burried, relatively calmly, i am not sure, some blasts hit the city, not so much clear who blasted whom or what.

with no reports of further incident those are fireworks in prolongation merely. no, we will indeed watch curiously if indeed this 'powerbroker's absence changes a few. typically that no matter it is not obvious to me what shows the exact other dead man (even a friend and longstanding associate) is indeed the perp., as opposed to eg. the ones that shot .. ,perhaps everyone that got killed?

the official sources are not quite sure wether to shove this succes on the taliban.

and with official sources, lets give in to camerons wishes of PR policy, and admit his political fan and servant, (be it murdoch or notw) is no saviourable dish with no healthy appetite.

there is a 'this is not quite possible' side to the whole story.

closer followers of news and incidents will probably agree with me that set aside how much to contribute to the devious and more carefull aspects of major media syndication, a mainstream story is usually a story given a certain swing.

you might find (with some experience?)an item that is blatantly untrue in all cases of mainstream media produce, but that is not even easy. more often some local, or influential publication features a slightly (and not allways necc. correctly) more elaborate version.

what i want to say with that: murdoch allways publishes what the /conservatives/neocons you name it, sortta likes, the notw specialised in sex scandals (i fear i have to get back on that), and superficial celebrity stuff like football. nevertheless in between all those (quite not readworthy) lines they managed to be known as cameron's staunchest promoter.

(you would say solid conservative politics don' fit in so well with sexscandals and have more of an intellectual bearing then football, but that is obviously not the case)

now there is a system called 'pressbriefing' , it is secret. not so secret, because inside circles of media and journalists, and by extension critical research into plenty topics, now and than the subject comes into a more public view.

but it is indeed rather secret. except in a few cases, the exact services, and mechanisms are not known to me, allthough they naturally incorporate the whole spectra.

(journalists phones might be tapped, but phones, telex, oral briefings , and all kind of intimidations are known methods in the spectre, in the area.)

murdoch being a "well respected" (by the 'money' that is) magnate of mondially important news outlets, is than, a well briefed person, that has allways been rather willing to stick to official storylines.

the specifically conservatively aimed News of the World (notw) that got closed can hardly be an exception.

to take it a bit further, it is absolutely plausible to me media like that and services would research and share informations in concert. that appears more probable than not.

i would imagine those are the sources for the endless number of rather irrelevant and few more telling hacked phones, at least in part. it is also known that in the kind of sensationalist journalism security personal, and in fact everyone in the service of any such celebriness (it might be a company, or say footballclub) is a known and natural target of 'pressmosquito's'.

actually in most positions of some relevance (say liftboy) people usually get briefed, to take specific care against journalists.

that shows ofcourse most celibrities have plenty to hide, and more so the official persons..

it is indeed so that due it's intrusive character, sensationalist media are a decent source, as often by accident, in some cases you might want researched. this being a dull and humiliating job, to wrestle through such nonsense, for the possible detail to shed some different light on sth. they are not very commonly used. but i remember a few times it was the case relatively vital detail had been found in the realm.

knowing all that it struck me as special the 'kidnapped girl' story was raised and NotW apparently disappeared from the stage, before reacting explicitly to that.

Murdoch himself stated 'we have allways been in full cooperation with the police" or some such.

that was the closest i got to anything said about it from that side, and i would acces it thus: a media outlet like that is in full, and probably more farrreaching, cooperation with police and secret services.

so basically i think all that got available to them went to the departments in the first place? mh yes, and that if a journalist deleted her messages it is only harmfull because the police once more didnt preserve their own record correctly? yes, and that for some reason now it suits utterly well to blame that on , at least in aspect, "intrusive " journalism? mh yes.

i even contemplate the whole girl is just an invention, a dramatical element of the daily news skillfully played. (apparently there is a hoard of charming films of the little beauty to roll over the international screens, and let me hold my tongue to see what the next intrigue will bring..)

like i said, i will have to get back on tasteless sexjournalism of the kind that brought cameron to power. don't blame me only.

more worried am i about the possibillity the girl is both a reality and an invention. yet, that some celeb or person with a police connection (the first and most certain to acces phone dbases) and on the level that briefs a magnate like murdoch possibly in england proper a whole different detail plays, something smaller but outstanding, sth. political they accidently know for sure.

i dont know if i will research that, i wud guess services are well aware of my distaste for the sort of media. i would have to find that one scandal that goes farther and hit the public opinion, made some impression that could not anymore be erased without discrediting the whole and all of the concept of the source.

and than? i will run into another smelly story that i doubt the integrity of in every direction..

so, hopefully i find a better thing to do.

that said i dont believe a conservative 'actively politically right wing' magnate would be that through operating far from the reach of said briefings and service departments.

it may well be planned. it may also be cameron is not behaving, he'll loose the next election over it quite possibly, at least in me the association and homecoming tale would stick.

it could also be murdoch, and he has done so explicitly, makes the point of a free and investigative press, together with the 'full cooperation with the police' , that might mean, do their own with the same sources. and honestly that is where the young girl story sticks.

sorry, boring long and tasteless topic, but i cant let go of a major incident in the mainstream media if i have not to.

my idea is it is an element, and willingly so, considering the backgrounds of the exact opposite murdoch said, a censoring campaign, over awkward and distastefull example set up to destroy more of the opportunity of investigative journalism. getting the crowd to raise scandal in chorus usually serves to have their repression made felt as their way.

so thats not only a boring story but also a heap more of the usual destruction of basic rights, and people should be more critical about the aspect.

last topic.

debilitating debts and the kind of vampires that thrive on them.

the sorry excuse of a proposition (yes we scrap the navy k?) of the tea driven republicans is to raise the debt, now i see that as 'plays on reality' finance is just there or it ain't, in my opinion it does not 'belong'. the superest spender and power (usia) borrowing from,, what exactly? what is so big it could force longstanding superpowers to be in eternal and debilitating debts?

really it is only harry, a fairy tale, we . the world, dont belong to anyone, not even usians do.
believing the story, continuing the tale of eternal riches deservedly repressing the vastests of economy's into a pyramid scheme of eternal pay offs of unseen services, long as you belief it, every crisis, every austerity, and every debt raising proposal will serve to tell you you have to pay still more next. and if you pay that to sth outside that economy, it could only be, well, crime?

nevertheless i assume obama will find it hard to resist "the quick buck" he in turn might reason
"it is up to them to find out", and for simplicity's sake leave it to the future to decide for the ridiculous.

karzai's afghanistan

2011-07-12T10:56:00.003+01:00

whats the highlights. not so much, today ali karzai was shot. i don't know if it is good or bad news, it depends things i don't know. keeping in mind they are. or so i assume, the first generation of the problem, the karzais, unlike assad, the khadaffi's or husseina, i figure he was trying to help his bro. now i dont actually admire karzai, i don't even think he is quite of the right mind, but he is an example of someone who can only loose with what afghanistan looses, and his campaign against civil deaths, what to say, lacks a lot of that, to put things into perspective.

so it was stupid of mine to support karzai's election. i guess, there would have been someone that dared to speak out, and would not all to obviously show a shimmery connection to several failed and succesfull 'terror attacks'.

where is your '360 degree life fire' of a limit so to say. for ali karzai, his limit wasnt his most famous asset.

that said the heroin trade was okish. in itself not an indication of his brutality.
99% of you will probably disagree, but that is just because you know sheet. i am not even supposed to be annoyed over that, it is why humanity features teachers and even prophets.

football, and monarchs, religion even, because people are told they know sheet and will never know a lot.

murdoch being on the same page , ali's sad and doomed face, did not so much venture into the question of his sudden death, (was it really that lethal spanish bankrobber, with the many connections? did he really use the same graphical programs as the corps of justice does?)

he wondered how much it mattered another but the cia tapped the monarchs and secretary's of state.

yeah just for security, you have to be sure they don't make the wrong acquaintances i suppose.

a good question, to my distress i must say, i dont think it is that bad, karzai got shot, was it over assad? money? dope? politics? who will tell.

what is sure is it leaves a tad more room for an alternative to develop, it is not that helpfull after a while when circles centre powers around them, and karzai was not only a brother but a very powerfull governor.

and so i am stuck, when i discuss syria with friends i try to point at the bigger picture, the geopolitical interesses in both khadaffi and assad, that turkey shouldnt involve for the sake of 100000s and for its ridiculous ottoman perspectives, do me ataturk any day. so i guess that would anyhow be okay, but make it unbloody, receive the refugees, instead of going to far..

assad has to go, i wont mind, all the monarchs do, they are the symbol for the collection of wealth in as few as possible hands, and when people accept a symbol like that their thinking obviously cannot yet reach further. should i applaud clinton?

perhaps it is nicer then i apreciate when she echoes my mind on the first possible opportunity.

i grew terribly suspicious over the years, to many interests and compromises make me think clinton, and by extension obama's kind of policy's will not reach far enough, and talking about their nukeR connection, cannot even be real.

resistance worldwide

2011-07-04T10:08:00.008+01:00

well today the paper tells the leader of columbia's farc escaped capture. in itself no news;)

had he not escaped just that attempt from the overpowerfull servants of the rich, the army of young loosers of a life..

we could almost have doubted farc still existed.

perhaps that is why they been so apt at hostage taking the last decade, to denounce the media campaign of their total demise.. sth i remember that started before the big hits against farc even took place.

so that was news, farc is very much more active and alive then has been openly admitted over a decade. i think farc is against the oil and mineral corporations that destroy south america and leave it polluted, killing terrifying and sickening the people. so eu, canada and usia, denounce farc.

bad news and has been so for some thirty years.. but thats what it allways looked like to me.

i start with this tale, perhaps to introduce how i don't feel secure about much that has been reported over libya or even syria.

still i want to write a couple of things about those two situations.

firstly there is also the mladic process going. he might be mystified, the complaint features that the nato campaign and the orchestrated tribality's of the time claimed 130k lives at least.

such a thorough underestimate on the most public of fora, we can say he witnesses the falsification of history inside out. i don't envy him, alltho for now unlike the usual lowly people, he is still alive.

he must feel his chances are dim in the context. reminds me of ocampo, not what he said even, but that he inferes anything about , was it libya, i think so, but perhaps it was an another enemy of the oil corps, beforehand and with supposed authority.. i found it weird. almost to the point i got curious about the guys assets and interests.

i think the free world is having an identity crisis that they grapple for any straw to see their opinions represented.

you know, kadaffi is " not that bad" he was part of the prisoner project eg. when usia shipped the arab suspects to egypt , libya and syria for torture, he was with "the good fellows".

also no matter how deadly he has been, a few months of strife, and perhaps not in the last the blind zeal wrapped upon the 'revolutionairy's, the few months have been deadier and bloodier then that.

i dont have an opinion, just want people to also notice that.
perhaps not for many but for some in libya it is easy to fear what is next, without kadaffi, some other ruler, family clan, system and interests, probably one related with , what is the word? imperialist? , in fact related with western security corporations, will bring to bear.

what exactly, noone knows, do we look at algeria, (what silence about this french ally??),
or say sudan? western africa? we see one despote more often replaced by a worse then anything else.

this will under any circumstance remain a worry for libya, and i would guess also for syria, for years to come. much like now in egypt we see plenty of the powers 'that be' in a reactionairy swing that may still waste it all.

in a few ways, such are the ways of the reaction, the purpose is to lay waste, the exact means are a second.

that sentence reminds me of the last line i wrote on robert gates just before he quit job. so it would be a nice last line for an article, but, and that is all only about libya, without any direct relation to bahrein, algeria or syria, or a king that rekindles his kingship in a more formal and akingly familiar way, by legitimising their own new claim through a referendum.

the referendum itself is the best proof the intents are not that democratical, a real development would not want such formal affirmation, and by speaking about it i keep it of the table in parts for decades still to come, it sticks to the mind like that.

that besides i think it is horrible, i dont know who i behind the tactical planning for the libyan rebels, and their territorial strategy's, but it is a warcriminal.

that is just an opinion, i am not even taking sides, the circumstances and methods in libya and all the other client states certainly warrant the predicate for the other sides.

but it is insane, a military insane situation and i wonder what sticks behind the predictable predictment (..) . remember how they first send a revolutionairy division (forgive the expression) over the coastal road through misurata and on?

completely miliary undoable, and with no effort to turn it far over the classical concept of Tobruk, in technical terms, one that obviously khadaffi 'd fondled.

weird. i dont accept such stuf as coincedence. the result is a horrible stalemately brotherly bloodbath, a war of attrition even. over.. over what?

people do not easily learn, they find it hard to change their ways.

rulers otoh usually pick the wrong sentiments to cling to power, these basics are beneath this civil war.

personally , speaking from the khadaffi side, i don't see how a status quo, or the fallible result of the change of it, should be so much of an excuse of dischord, and bloodshed,

no matter what, and what side wins, like bob marley said,

"to free the world they need to free their own minds."

censoring toy.

2011-06-21T10:00:00.003+01:00

things are just what they appear to you, if you regard them as things that show themselves to you.

better to consider them things that appear to you to appear the things that they appear.

if then they appear something different then they appear you know what and whatfor they are.

that's with aljazeera's dos for one thing. aljazeera isn't a radical medium, not really.
it is a mainstream outlet, with only moderate emancipatory character.

it is somewhat critical at times, and has a little attention for what you might call 'talk on the street'. it doesn't shun sensationalism really. and most importantly, it is a straightforward tool of bluntly put nato/us/and such opinionism.

so such dos may serve to harness their apparent (..) credibility, if that is the case i would guess the military lobby is having something creeping in their sleeves.

however except for the reference of general say 'worldwide' credibility i didnt get any clear signal.

frost featured a mladic-like character, that wanted his ethnically cleansed territory's cus that's how nato does that, and he is as relevant as 'eastern europe and the baltic states'.

that are cheap sentiments to play. typically he still favours the platform.

~~~~

June

2011-06-20T15:35:00.003+01:00

so, back to politics. the greatest news of the day? brazil has a female chief of staff. that is,

there are no words for that,

something has changed. at the best time, (i read a feminist writer is one of her rolemodels..),
to change something.

brazil has recently been one of the more unifying factors in the world. so, that it goes with the fiction or story of a much greater brazil (i agree brazil is great , but that's not much necessary, or perhaps it is), is in one word : great.

she is a woman with a position to change things, like the feminist education of the egypt army,
such stuf.. is plainly juicy. no that is not bad news.

in egypt, i hear.., police and by extension (they are rather a lot more in charge atm.) the army,
in egypt have been prosecuting democrats. well so i hear, other voices say it is not that bad, but i would insist you cannot have any political prosecution in a state like egypt in a time like this.

first you have to regard critically your moral, next you have to make do with the false picture as it was shaped through the regime's forces before, the media haven't hardly dared to give much of the auditing to the public really, the brothers, despite their choosen words, is also a bunch of polarised traditionalists with no great perception. come or go, you don't want your emancipatory forces to burn 'places of worship' or the clients in for therapy.

just like, yeah yesterday i was promoting my freedom, now i am picking on someone else's.

i don't expect this explain anything to anyone, and i wonder how traditionalism would apply any much more this time of the year to shia than to sunni.

even that, is not of much interest, the whole subject of religion, is much like that of sexuality.
the dispute when hardly or mis-understood, has no guarantee to succeed in emancipating a person.

i find that kind of funny.

well i think i need to say that.

----------------
post.
----------------

i tried to publish a small thing on libya on aljazeera (that apparently is under enough of a dos to see favourites whiped and show provider/actually also police screens.

crazy. most of it happened before, for it and a few. wonders about his..

similarly i cant log in to a game i play through a usian server..

anyhow, it's not really the topic.

the piece i posted , i liked it, so here goes:

this seems like a good place to reopen the discussion about revolutions and control. khadaffi is a revolution, a coloured tory(1) in a state of madness, P.E.plenty reason to that, and the grip on infinite fear and incredible fortune. 1 oil for the other, you would wonder who decides for geology. the sneers clichees don't impress anyone ever, and isn't the story of egypt that the eu wants snipers on the roofs to protect her facade of cryptofascists? freedom has a price, i suspect it is called equality.

, now that discussion, allthough 'unclosed' has been dead since 20th of april.
much like any discussion on alJ since they changed the format.

but it didnt get published, i read, well i read what usia had to say after that, and gates,
said "i belief he would have went door to door in benghazi to kill everyone".

well that may be so 'bombing irak to the stone age and stuff"

and it may be gates never saw enough of the news to know noone in the world ever took khadaffi serious, and it may or may not be why they actually have the opportunity to do what they do.

(well enough of an aircontrol situation, see how the opposition is really stronger??)

nope.

and why? because khadaffi is "emancipated" (they could indeed have taken him serious when they didn't that means).

he is not emancipated in every respect, and he is quite silly in his ideas of kings or emperors, he has even been a nato client, but, compared to god knows who and what not and whatever,
still

the kind of person you might want(2) to say: and yet, in a way, in things, he is somewhat emancipated isn't he?

and the thing is, i wonder if you can say that about this gates.

moi.

oh yeah on the down side, even more obscure and outrightly ridiculous administration, railways managing to implicate theirselves all over thoroughly, with their

"obliged" (that is fucking forbidden but they did that to me), automatic payment (for a friggin wrong number of coins, in two ways). that apparently they didn't get. for wich "they send me a letter" (that i didnt get).

and another.

completely unknown so far (and i had even forgotten it again) what for. wtf. i know i once went there with someone. fuck off.
well so i know the place , but i have no idea, what it could be about, perhaps usual things (that would be bicycle fines) go through places like that. they had been supposed to take me hostage , and never did (i guess cus it would clear up they did not pay me but stole or so) for a fine,
yet,

they didnt AND send me the letter that they must.

screw them, their own words mean nothing for them.
courts.

(1) didn't post that 'h' anyway.
(2) dunno how if i would overread first and last lines.

Oh a post

2011-06-18T21:47:00.005+01:00

pooh, i owe you one, didnt yet really get to , well, there was this nice show on tv. had a decent week besides.

what can i say, it's a steady habit and a hatefull one at it of institutions to release an utmost of administrive restrict on me, for as long as i can remember in fact. well.. perhaps not quite true,

i was on the oddlist of selfshaped personality's on some secondairy school. that was a one thing that made life easier for me then the usual. just for the idea the rest was supposed to be repressed (aka terrorised, intimidated) back into a sheeplike mode of obedience.

these days schools feature abuse (currently in striking denial) and fine you if you or your kid decide it is not the best idea,

for some reason it coincides with, a certain psychiatrisation of the youth, reknownedly as where it first so suited pharmaceutically, just for the idea.

pull on the line that the supposedly guiding nation or perhaps more complementary testing case netherland in fact has the wickiest set of regulations to put individuals under authority of plenty institutions and drawing the line back you might notice something is the matter.

a few things perhaps. however that is not the story.

the story is i am contrary to the slight scraps of apparently formal nonsense i seen, not only stolen from regularly, pretty much every month in the very least, directly, through the electronic bankaccount evryone needs, (sometimes i even think it weird i would have then never received anything there besides, but that has been some time),

no its not all, they tooks the extras so much as everyone else apparently gets, the holliday money,(when the fine was payed allready) allthough 'the (i havent the faintest what for) fine, that 'has been anounced'(but not in the measure carboncopy's or whatever of that exist, i actually never seen anything,

and take it
it just went the same way as when i got my temporary railcard taken (a proof of payment) and never received a new one after payment to follow with more of the same robbery from the railways through again, denying the duration of the word year. (this time after much effort,
taking of 3 months with no reason whatsover the next year).

lol i used to make efforts for small savings, never the fuck understanding why it wouldn't untill i started calculating and remembered so many other of similar experiences. that i rather not remembered it, had i been stupid.

well long story short they don't only do that with payments, fines, income, extra's, saving, returnpayments, bills, apparently any significant acount of money that would come my way, no,

they do that with institutions and services for society as a whole starting with my person,

the first time when i first needed to take care for food for myself, for a whole year.
to my knowledge it had never been denied, and was not yet even legal to apply.

that was a year or so.
i only ate apples. i hate apples, except some tropical ones, and in juicemixes.

i didnt only eat apples, but mostly i ate apples, weeks on end, a whole winter.

well. and so it has ever been when i got into a house , or way of living, whatever, basically when i needed stuf like food. warmth, perhaps not in the least travel costs,

i didnt feel useless or so, or that any of these denying and stealing from evryone and me, (but me first if they saw the chance, and it seems to get me hated) ever did anything remotely as usefull,

so i protested, i even went to court, and lost that. why? as i am often told to have to understand it, for "i have no lawyer".

well if, i would the nitpicky tidstads from lawyers to win a proces about something obviously covered in the most repressive of constitutions, equality, i would need a lawyer, if something that is so obviously clear to me, and that i fortunately showed before a judge earlier, that i have been the individual target time and again of plenty such agression and hate of the rich,
(i think i can improvise at least ten examples without even making notes).

then, i dont need a judge.

than everyone should get a lawyer by law that loves to lick the specific kind of judges ass or whatever it takes, and they should never again bother anyone with any appeal or chance of proces.

nobody would believe that would work, so you can see the argument a judge would need a lawyer to understand a victim, "pukably 'client'". basically you can kiss my ass with your courts.

ya know if i was trying to frame an insurance or so. ok i might get that, but to judge real certain facts for real certain facts, their own fucking documents?

my ass.

pleased, i will soonish, rejoin my blog for the next topic.

the choice of weapon of sales

2011-05-24T08:25:00.003+01:00

in as much as headlines count "nato intensifies bombardment of libya".
they do target khadaffi mostly at least symbolically or so it says, mh quite, their point.

recently obama had a weird adventure, i personally assume israel has been capturing it's niche, in the media context of arab events.

perhaps not, anyhow he stated "israel must respect the palestinean souvereignety of 1967 as much as israel wants the world to respect theirs", or sth. on the line.

next he deposits the exact opposite for a few days in chorus with netanyahu, perhaps that is why i think i have a good right to say sth. not according to any sharia.

ok i know obama thinks palestineans should have somehow discernable rights, and i know he , his aipac's, and netanyahu will never really go any length into doing the palestineans a good deal.

after obama is once more bumped, snubbed, why insult upon injury, why the boring extra day of non news? propaganda, and obama is only a tool.

is it that both sell weapons? i think so, the difference between my personal destitution and persecuted status and any other people's would be that minor.

that is also a problem with the libya event, there are those in industry and governments, that love to sell weapons, giving them the opportunity allways turns wrong.

miss talk about libya

2011-05-23T15:36:00.004+01:00

i still make an ideological post, whatever should i. for libya, i have an idea, think deeply, where in the world can be the experiment of social justice? it is not up to this small tribe of libyans to fail us from there.

libyans themselves can think about the margins, even khadaffi cannot control they are making sense like this. on the funny side, i am curious if @nato would still be on the bombing.

for syria i am not happy. look at what erdogan is doing, the opposition candidates think vote counting is not anything just for tabloids still.

sick sh*t

2011-05-23T10:59:00.003+01:00

hello , this time or again. This is another, not really the first post about me.

about me? no rili it is about censoring and terror just as much. but how are you to believe that?
i dont even think my mum beliefs what happens to me all these years.

She does her best for me, or something closely aking a humans best, i love her, but to the topic
i am going to write about it isnt that much help, i get so mad, time and again being disqualified for justice, i cant have a normal discussion about it without getting mad.

justice should be real, and not for the rich by the rich. justice should be for people because otherways the law is against people,

people dont have to be lawfull, when the law is only against them.

that is why justice has a principle of equality, and laws and rights have a long tradition that they need to be correct to be applied.

starting with proof, but also a guarantee against personal prosecution, s guarantee basically for equality before the law.

if one person cannot be punished , to an extent or more, for something, also noone else should.
those kinds of principles.

i wont mention all of those instances of justice degraded to me in person beforehand, i may even write this whole story several times,

obviously i do what they want. by reacting in the public they will have opportunity to find contraptions and disqualifications they would need to otherwise learn by painfull faillure against many different people, who do not theirselves collect and have the argument.

a law that allows for no rights for me, fortunately is not internationaly allowed, not considered humane.

more on this tomorrow.

brave new world

2011-05-04T12:14:00.004+01:00

not so much new under the sun. except that after two warm weeks we have sun with uncommon cold.

the nuclear accident is damping on, this link for now works to see how we are being killed live: http://www.youtube.com/user/tbsnewsi?feature=feedlss#p/l/-ZPYlazljME

(that link held for 24 hours, other instances of it got replaced with "fog" only there is no atm)

ok.. for now interpunction works again.

tepco anounced 20mSv for babys is great. not their business ofcourse, that would be to keep rads from getting out.

the whole of jp is still in a stupor of oldfashioned respect for the bobo's. the power corps gamble for every dime. the few leaking nukeRs that were not operating are shut on now, the nr2 reactor with its leaking surpression pool (boiling steam at great pressure released underground now causes 300-400 msv 30 mtr deep. )

and what did they do? use it to sell a few million yens of electra. ofcourse that exagerates the leak, but you cant see that underground. its also out of the books because the thing was supposedly 'coldshutdown' for weeks now.

due to a rise in pressure or hydrogen, i think pressure, they had to yesterday shut it cold down after all. wich they try now, wich may work in half a year or so.

all this time rads have been , are and will be escaping at a similar rate.

20 times chernobyl might be optimistic by even a whole magnitude, million if not billions of ppl living now will develop cancer, if they dont get killed in other ways before that. my money was stolen through the bank once again, so it seems that is what they aim for. (went hungry)

yesterday i took a detour for the sole sake of being harder to get at, altho the indirect methods suggest otherwise , most of the time..

meanwhile the rich are being spared and burdens placed on the poor. inside jp and probably outside.

still today tepco had the guts to state stuf about children as if that is even remotely near their business.

jp released a more dooming prognoses, it made 12th of april. and now sticks or trys to do off on that. in reality its worse. internet censoring is at great heights. many relevant link function only for a day or even not at all.

well i am not their greatest friend they think, altho i may have saved their damn asses nevertheless.

that is enuf of an update for now. i urge people to be critical about ppl like the dutch minister maxim verhagen, he wants a billion in europe and the way to get it is jump in on the profits made through privatised and worn our nukeRs that confirm to no single rule ever perceived.

radiation will be many many times natural for eternity, and if not this one, the next accident will kill you all. do something against it.

putting evrything back into context, where does the world stand. when this went off, i was bussy with 'the arab spring' trying to get the rightwing usia croonys dethroned, bahrein, saudi arabia, and yemen. irak perhaps. ofcourse numerous deads there didnt make a difference.

when after week i checked up on the arab spring, al jazeera said:

dictators like in tunesia , egypt , libya and syria, were target...

aha the whole yemen saudi arb etc line disappeared from even there.

thx for the reality check.

rise up against the billionaires that poison you and the future people. or be doomed.

--

fuel,rads,terabecquerels

2011-04-14T22:45:00.007+01:00

BE WARNED CAN STILL NOT FORMAT TEXT.. been bussy. what a catastrophe, proportions are unclear. a lot is been said that it actually didn't get as bad as could be, another lot points quite in the opposite direction.

canada for example just shut down it's monitoring system. and indeed nothing out of the ordinairy was registered. it's full of such ostrich policy.

data about pollution not only lost two magnitudes of color but became incredibly hard to find. other data comes in a trickle, usually people go with the data tepco provides, allthough that is anything but complete and has often been misleading.

it still seems that some part of tepco management is mainly bussy evading the costs, and getting a bargain.

the whole nucleair industry is a mess without an end. endless incidents, endless leaks and endless blunders wherever you look.(1)

the raising of levels most suspicious as a cover for future releases, and the anouncing of a lvl7 ines accompagnied by statements that from what happens on the ground, really don't seem to mean a thing.

the more reliable informations are usually spoken, the real situation often remains vague on paper when the consequences have been grasped for days, melt downs, leaking surpression pools, missing sfp 'spent' fuel pools, hydrogen releases, explosions, etc etc. all such things are obvious days or even weeks before they are ever admitted.

the international reactions are not to obvious, usia is in some panic, they are with canada and japan the hardest hit. germany is carefull even frightened, russia plays cool, i suspect in a plea bargain for nucleair pollution. the eu gives no notice and shows the subservient position to internatial atomic agebcy's and their ilk. china and korea at first didnt pay much attention, but now complained about a sea , according to japan informations still pristine.

meanwhile talk is to leave the smoldering heap of deadly particles in teh open for months. this barge, that zeolite, the extra generators, fresh water, evrything goes slow, and todays news was once again one of neglect and stupidity.

making it two or three times worse instantly.

it's a great mess and if things are not changing in nucleair regulation and inspection, couple with a great heap of common sense. even if we get over this accident we have set circumstances guaranteed to blow quite as hard the very next time. so.. well so screwed.

(1)coverups, 'safety' shortcuts, political involvment, multilateral corporate interests, etc. etc.

fukushima daiichi.

2011-03-31T12:54:00.005Z

fukushima daiichi (meaning "first") is the nucleair powerplant with the meltdown. after the eartquake (EQ) and tsunami, a total of some 4 or 5 plants and some 11-12? reactors had urgent problems. fortunately none of the others escalated. well, not very much (you bet they leaked and in an ugle way at it), daiichi is the one that is tied around our all necks. so far there are a lot of mixed signals, i am still most angry at tepco, that has been collecting tons and millions (wonder what japanese and even world economy contributed so far) in the run up to the disaster, and has jp gov and media in the hands and under pressure. tepco being profit oriented whilst creating a disaster. tepco is also specifically geared to work with the banzai jp culture and has a long (perhaps uniquely impressive) history of cheap labour, and abuse. this is hard to verify , in japan also, and the lack of transparance is obvious. the un watchdog is a nonfunctional "play down industrial threats workhouse" working with such institutes as unscear (unscare), and like RT (russia today) so precisely put it , "a trojan horse of the nucleair industry". citizen vigilance is the better chance to get the info's and make sure they will get and stay in the open.(1) (oh tepco just got a 34 billion$ loan' just now, says it is not enough^^(ps)) soo instead of boring you with story's of blackhole captured photons, i will just paste some links and pics, so that you can start doing the research yourself. be carefull, norms worldwide have been raised, and figures mostly have been tempered. nevertheless: lists: http://www.worldvillage.org/fia/kinkyu_english.php http://bos.sagepub.com/content/current http://pastebin.com/7TSk68Mj http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=0803-03=&volpage=var maps etc: http://transport.nilu.no/products/browser/fpv_fuku?fpp=conccol_Xe-133_;region=NH http://db.eurad.uni-koeln.de/prognose/data/alert/cs_hem_1h_movtotal_12.gif http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/ http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/subsets/?project=aeronet&subset=NCU_Taiwan etc.: http://alligatorfarm.wordpress.com/2011/03/30/stay-indoors-japan/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgLUTKxItt4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2024633/?page=7 http://www.archive.org/details/gov.ntis.A13886VNB1 http://english.pravda.ru/world/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibePFvo22x4 http://www.besse.at/sms/matter.html http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=db0_1301461607 http://deliverrelief.blogspot.com/ japan: http://yokosonews.com/live/ http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1301489625P.pdf http://www.microsievert.net/ http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/f1-np/camera/index-j.html http://www.in.odessa.ua/nuclear/fukushima/tepco-web-cam/ http://plixi.com/p/87602513 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-23/fukushima-engineer-says-he-covered-up-flaw-at-shut-reactor.html lobby: http://www.nisa.meti.go.jp/english/ http://www.aws.org/w/a/wj/2003/09/048/index.html (1) eg. usian navy has been operating much more proactively and secure then the whole of japan. ps: hard to get this published in a decent way, some links went missing, many others were dead. re edited 3 times, will do again later, evrything not working now.

odysee dawn

2011-03-21T00:58:00.004Z

humanity's road to freedom has been a long one.

events and transformations small and big, abolishment of slavery, illiteracy, sexism, racism, colonialism, imperialism, cruelty, injustice or priviliged classes all of them long struggle's with no end near in sight.

none of the nations that took many of these steps can say they succeed. they can say they sometimes succeed. france didn't start a war on the populace with the paris riots, but managed to actually improve some of the social circumstance for minority's. dutch beat up protests, and repress opposition, but people have some freedoms, and usually none starve. germany has a somewhat stressfull and remote society, but it also embraced plenty of foreigners. usia has an awfull criminal system, but as long as you shoot your way out of it you are relatively free, and if you are lucky you can smoke a joint even.

its not the best example, perhaps it is that even if they are poor, most survive relatively easy.
climate is important, the need for elaborate housing, defines that a nation creates jobs and learns to sustain it's populace. it doesnt seem so logical, but it happened all the time.

than many nations have exhausted soils. libya is one.

10000 years ago, libya was a lush forested area. green from lake to lake and sea to river. so was most of northern africa and so was spain at that time. the whole idea of life in libya, or spain has been only so recently to live in a rocky plains it is not really in our genetics.

when the ecology gets bankrupt we adapt through making the most out of the least that is left,
not by inventing a whole new ecological niche. turning in a desert lizard or something else.

so north african nations do not easily provide for their populace and the key to their existence has long been a struggle with the elements. now the element oil turned up in libya, that and ghadaffis revolution turned it into a much wealthier nation.

since some time ghadaffi is in the neocon camp. he admits to blowing up planes, for the sake of normalising relations. pays billions for the sake of corporate extortion, bolts down on his social policy for what? imf? still supporting small african nations? his family fortune?

noone knows. we, the educated poor, think for the last thing. materialism, capitalism.
libya is a society that has been tribal since the days of Kato, the roman orator. divide et impera all the way from the onset of imperial divisions. it hasnt been so much of a regional power either, a small population, the few coastal settlements and vast desert, noone ever bothered to conquer it east to west or north to south.

not even ghadaffi. he reminded himself of alexander and napoleon, of hannibal perhaps, and started his greek colony in tripoli. securing the affiliation with the locals. so it seems. not only that, such say the tribes, next he took islam in one hand and bravoure in the other and dictated his peculiar futures to the libyans, in an ever more incredible luxury and nepotist construction.

for a while the west worked with him, untill the arab revolutions.
agents had naturally been active in libya, benghazi was carefully softened, outposts with capital interests set up. italian football teams sponsored and the foreign culture once again started to dominate parts of the northafrican coast.

people in libya and apparently primary in benghazi took a different take on things, the fertile idea of khadaffi's revolution and his encouragement of local counsels inspired the libyans to rise up for real freedoms, freedom of speech , the freedom to express rubbish, the freedom to belief anything opposite to what ghadaffi 40 yr dictator believed, etc . , etc.

the freedom to make jokes about foolish bedouins and their foolish children. once that was there
for some odd reason the people marched on tripoli.

waving a flag that reminds most of italy they marched on tripoli, an awfull omen.

by than no matter what russia today means, 100s had died. demonstrations been shot at, weaponry on the streets, hardly a means been shunned, and anti aircraft gear aimed at the populace.

they reacted with rage! armed with anything they had at hand, after the first initial days of peacefull protests, they stormed the bastillions and tanks of the power, shooting an endless hail of bullets at the sky's the clouds and the birds they were sure to frighten the dictator out of his position(dictators usually love birds). in no time almost the entire supply of cars in libya was turned technical for either side. machine guns got mounted, and it all got blown apart almost more in a matter of hours then days.

day in day out people from everywhere in libya gave their life and best efforts to peacefully convince the rest of libya to also embrace the values of tolerance that dont have you burn african looking people with sympathys for khadaffis socialism alive.

that wasn't easy. fortunately the revolutions diplomacy did a great job in pleading merci for loyalists of the khadaffi regime. there is some hope things can be arranged all peacefull and united still.

many times fighting and shooting in tripoli erupted. sky's and clouds over tripoli got perforated, and unfortunately so, an incalculable number of libyans shared the same fate. here khadaffi lost the propaganda war. trying to destroy internet and cellphone connections, disallowing and even starting to torture and shoot journalists he lost some credibility.

then, the arab league got mad!

they reasoned, stop that, just a sec., and our nations will rise up, please help us, everyone has to flee! odyssee dawn.. jasmine odysee!, how riot can you be.

land of rising steam blowing off nippon

2011-03-16T08:53:00.006Z

ofcourse the earthquake is a very sad event, and moreso the tsunami that was and remains rather lethal. all in all even assuming chronical and substantial underreporting that could have all been much worse, strict building requirements and a population prepared for tsunami alarm saved some of the day.

talking tsunamis, in the wake of this disaster, kobe earthquake has underpassed this event in deathtoll. i read there have been a calculated nr of up to 3 (now 4) such tsunamis in 3000 years, in japan.

personally i think it was rather more then less then that, but that not all of these 9-11 mtr high waves struck likewise big areas. in any case i was not surprised a second by reports of 10m high waves, they were just what i thought was to be expected with a severe earthquake near japan.

i also think that is the japanese geological assesment, it may sound vague, but hadn't such a wave been assumed beforehand damages and especially deathtoll would have been much higher still.

what occured to me is that the fears for an oceanwide tsunami appeared so exagerated.

that was also the case in chili, now fear after the south asian tsunami, that left almost 500000 people dead is understandable, so perhaps it is just well that every major quake in the pacific triggers those warnings, but i will still make the point of how i do think it really works.

in the case of chili at first i believed there would not at all be a tsunami over 3 mtrs anywhere,

it happened that there was one up to 6 m.

however it struck very locally, the vast majority of reulting deaths in only one port if i am not mistaken, catastrophical deaths are not my hobby so i could be a town or two (and than 3k victims) off.

however that has nothing to do with the mechanics. for me it is plainly obvious that any earthquake close to a major continental mass will not trigger a ocean wide tsunami of very dangerous proportions, allthough it will nearly allways at the nearest coasts.

some of the reasons for that are obvious, others are simple, and perhaps there is a complicated one i dont even think off, but i will try to explain how that is.

no matter japan is an island, it is big, and part , or at least almost part, of the eurasian landmass.

so when an earthquake more in the middle of an ocean would run out its energy in changing the floorlevel of an oceanic plate, much of the energy of a near land(continent) quake gets absorbed by a landmass, not only much less water gets displaced, (lifted in most cases so far) but it also gets displaced in way less homogeneous manners.

i think that is the main reason, also near coasts the ocean bottom is never flat, and allthough called 'continental flats', such seafloors are actually allways more or less gently sloped, an alltogether inferior circumstance for a superlarge tsunami (not to say they need be lower on the nearby coasts).

next, allthough that was much less for chili, the seabottom east of japan is very irregular and accidented, it has great depths, underwater mountains and vulcanoes(i assume) and the usual sloping. but a very pronounced one.

i think such circumstance is also much less conductive for large surface tsunamis, simply because the displacement of the watercolumn is to irregular to create such a massive waterdisplacement as a flat oceansbottom would allow.

(after this event the aforementioned 'hypotheses' have already been promoted to "science",

yet i am still the first to my knowledge to deduce this. (after i said it a couple of times it's a bit less admirable someone else comes up with the same from my pov., and with chili i also said this even before the fear of tsunamis in chili proper relinguished)

so much for tsunamis, the earthquake itself is a rather unique one, for one thing the nr of aftershocks is double or more the usually to be expected for japan. the area was not thought to even be conductive to an earthquake this scale, a 9richterscale earthquake, had been expected in japan at some point(thats why they build so well), but not here.

i didnt study the seismic or geological detail like i might have if there had been no nuclleair incidents, been to bussy trying to help prevail the worst , and trying to get a picture of what really went and goes on at the nucleair plants.

one good thing is that the other reactor park that appeared to get in trouble (some 10 or so km north of fukushima) has been stabilised as of yesterday, or so they said after i raised the question(..).

it has not been easy to get a clear picture, the resulting image is not comforting. tepco, the electricity corp that does the dirty job for the post ww2 usian investors, has been reluctant and almost greedy to share information, also at several points tepco utterly failed to effectuate the necessary measures and actions.

they brought in generators late, didnt supply them with fuel, didnt update the plants infrastructure after its designed age expired. they had no secure coolingwater reserves or resource, there is a lack of redundancy in several systems, a lack of cameras in many places, possibly the outer containers have been used to house undesigned nucleair projects and experiments, there are apparently no geigertellers at rooftoplevel, tepco kept working with a reactordesign that was recognised as dangerous,

then they provided scarce and incorrect even untrue informations, time and again technical detail was released only to be later drawn into doubt to calm the public, the dangers are downplayed, and attention is actively being drawn away from the mox/plutonium fuel (for wich the old reactor design was not even build btw.)

it went so far that one may wonder if the fire in the "spent fuel" bassin, that is actually not spent at all, but just temporary(maintainance) storage of the still functional fuelrods (all), is a coincedence or one more step to get away with the results of mox fuel future generations will now be facing.

each of the exploding reactors melted, at least partially, that was known as it happened, only since yesterday that is more or less acknowledged mainstream. conflicting and incorrect informations abound, in some cases things that belong to reactor nr2 are said to be with reactor 3, or 1, vv. doesn't seem coincedence.

there are damages to at least 2 of the inner containments, and perhaps 3, but they are now acknowedged for the nr2 (mox) plant mostly only. well that one has been steaming like mad most of the times since so it is hard to anymore deny.

perhaps the other two are only minimally damaged, but damaged they are, even for without that the housings would not have blown.

up to 5% (and perhaps more) of the mox's fuel (wrongly refered to as nr2 in cases) has disappeared, that is an amount of radioactive material twice chernobyl, not acknowledged.

distinct reports tell even different storys, part of the radioactive material would have stopped being radioactive upon arrival in northern america two days ago (hydrogen is light).
that means the mox thing has been running out of control, and allthough some of the radioactivity from the substances immediatly formed may have resided, they will be replaced by other longer term isotopes more often then have been working out.

another interesting detail is how the aircraft carrier out at sea experienced a 3000 times average radiation at 160 km. "for an hour" wich is also impossible, because it means slightly less radiation must have been experienced over at least twice that period.

tokyo was said to be thrice as radioactive when the official reading was 12 cpm, however unoffical geigertellers read the double almost at that point. (so 6 times as much radioactive material) that it is partly dust and not (airborn) gasses showed as a turning wind didnt change that much to it (as i write it is about 30cpm). insides.

however all of this is probably underestimated by me, if i go by indications, like what the chinese say, the french say, and the usians say (that had 17 radioactive cases 2 days ago when japan had only "19" yet) , or that the two missed persons have not been explained(..) that there are 5 confirmed deaths at the plant, but only in one source for now, etc etc etc. it is probably actually even worse then i here described.

what i identify as problematic is the corporations culture in japan, it seems to me management of tepco is more interested in their bolusses and tepcos unwarranted gains (that it seems majorly flow to usia immediatly) then doing the job, they seem to have thought tomorow is another day in several cases, they ran out of fuel(incredibly stupid), had problems supplying generators even after it was recognised they obviously needed many more, and last in that row they delayed the use of helicopters to pour water on top of reactor nr4 (and the rest i suppose) for almost 24 hours, facilitating even one more explosion.

for my part tesco has to be taken off this,(not to say they are allowed to stop working) the usian specialists that have been send 3 days ago, hadnt arrived per yesterday, but where still lauded to be underway,

"specialists" time and again showed their lack of knowledge and their talent for disagreeance and crap.
i didnt even bother to remember, to much to often, and to relatively unimportant.

the strategy for the nucleair disaster should be to do everything possible, as an example the helicopters may serve, when i went to bed they would still be put to use for cooling, however halfheartedly, when i woke up they hadnt used them, only to just have decided to still try it.

thats not the way to do such things, do what we can that might help, and think on between doing should be the motto. we can gladly throw away a couple of billions, just like the deathtoll of chernobyl is severely underreported everywhere since this accident, it is only from first hand accounts i know much better, the effects of this catastrophe will be terribly undereported obviously. nevertheless we are talking 100000s people and many future generations. it all adds up.

all the best of luck and be brave all. more on anything sooner then i'd wish.

hasta la revollution siempre, down with nucleair power, power to the people.

revolutionairy practice

2011-03-08T00:31:00.003Z

as with many things anarchistic, revolutionairy, revolutionaire practice has been a fashion.

as with many things it usually get's to narrowly interpreted in practice. and as with many things,
it doesn't allways matter.

basically the role of the revolution is (i think), "if they shoot we shoot back".

when it happens sudden, it achieves a lot. recent uprisings and the masses, but also the reason for militairy coups. revolution of the tiny masses, so to say.

nazism features the idea of a tiny coup btw. i would pose it is a common trait of the european nationalisms.

nationalism is crazy and weird. ideologically the northafrican people have a lot of background,
we don't have to expect to much confirmation of the usual "arab world". what is the use for them if a popular revolt for freedom would become rewarded.

it is hard to guess where the real sentiments lay here in the "west". nobody has the slightest of interventionist intentions, dumping some "diplomats" in the night in a heli might just be an okish manner to achieve a contact, the libyans apparently need organisational aid for the rebel forces.

talking about those, the numbers are somewhat obscure. the need for that is not wholly obvious.
i would guess, and hope .., some 30 deaths a day, but i figure that is completely naive.
it is quite as possible there are hundreds, i would not even know for sure at what side.

however, just sending weapons is bad strategy, weapons dont largely contribute to peace usually.
with food and other aid a similar thing is a problem, by supplying you allways create some sort of dependence.

perhaps just inherently, that you supply things that are supplied to allow "the struggle",
perhaps by the usual means, corruption, control, police, and their counterparts.
sometimes through the army, and basically allways when the infrastructure to handle those supplies is doubtfull.

however little you want to occupy a nation, it is obviously one of the most helpfull things to have enough people on the ground to deal with anything that might happen,

the rebels should, i think, but much depends wether the struggle was merely bloody or for the greater part symbolic, consolidate some of their gains, and make sure they are practiced and probably also prepared for any further events. it's not smart to waste masses of young people in offensives.

first kadaffi needs to be contained,
either through negotiation and for example exile, and next as a danger to the libyans, around him or opposed to him. the best would be if those two still can and will find agreement.

obviously that would mean there is room for one dictator less, it is also obvious it is in the interest of the libyans around khadaffi to settle for one peacefull libya.

the opposition has asked for nothing else. what good would a civil war, and large scale persecutions still bring along the north african coast?

surgical strikes can be okish. it is a transparance thing, if the concept and practice are not used beyond their purpose they can deescalate, or litterally disarm, such confrontations.

all these things and steps do need recognition. from the libyans, their neighbours, but rather the ('arab' amongst) more remote powers. otherways such interventions can be explained to any badly informed public (there is plenty) , as interventionism.

wich is not the point, but you cannot change the course of warfare without intervening.

there is still very much dishonourfull in warfare, the peacefull solution will allways be the better for all of us.

unrelaxed into the middle east

2011-03-01T00:21:00.003Z

there is a lot to complain in the personal, usually i am broke. hungry and oftentimes unrelaxed, nightmares are my part as i dont have a decent smoke, and the whole farcical status quo, the dutch and international is certainly not leading me into spheres of divine calmth with no extras.

in a few days some regional elections will take place for wich we have already been swamped, emerged and prepared to accept the incredible and unacceptable, fraude will move the dutch politics even more to the right, as if that is remotely needed. i can only hope after the middle east revolutions cause openess and educate the people the chicken will come home to roost.

talking about these i see a great need for and even a kind of vacuum of iniatives. so by and far 3 days of complaints about how hard it would be to get egyptians from tunis and likewise absurditys my conclusion must be the un commisioners are fishing for money to pocket, not to help.

that suggests a humanitarian catastrophe in the making. i dunno, perhaps they have their cards set on al kadafi, and after that, humanitarian crisis is supposed to save the saudi sheiks.

goodwill for change to be turned into undeserved pitty for exploited refugee problems. who will tell. also i feel like setting out to the task of describing a strategy to coope with some aspects of the current events, mostly the supply problem, the evacuations and also and most prominently the fear for anything alien or different that has even reasonable people in a tight grip.

such a task is no great pleasure in the absence of a good joint, decent pay, justice and even foodsecurity, but here goes anyhow. it will probably be not a masterpiece of literature that i am now bound to produce, i really don't feel too well.

it is hard not to start in the negative, so i will push the subject of western subjects subjectivity to the bottom of the page.

start with a positive note. the revolutions as they are taking place are all revolutions of solidarity, social revolutions, changes for empowerment and inclusion. obviously that is exactly what makes the elites, there and here, so wary. they don't want social changes, what is the use of them, it would be slower to oppress people, harder to hold on to fabulous wealth. more difficult to incriminate absurd laws and misdirected taxing on the divided poor. perhaps even the more blunt part of populace would become fragmentary educated, and never again deliver lipservice for the projection of xenophobia that is the ultimate powerbase of 'democratic' capitalism.

so emancipation of the masses is the elites worst nightmare, still now, in the 21st century.
to that topic i want to add how the former kadafi justice minister is supposedly (..) playing a leading role in eastern libya after he changed sides. what an awkward choice. they better check his foreign accounts first. that man rose to prominence wielding the whip of oppression. who would expect him to serve a plenar cause? not me.

these are all detail, what i think is the most important thing to say , at this moment, is that the international community should prepare to support the take-overs, the revolutions, still called "unrest " btw in mainstream dutch media. for that matter everyone abusing the word anarchism in the context these days should be blacklisted, all of those are criminalising good political intent with every step they (or we) take. blacklist them. let them clean the rooms of their masters instead of letting them etch the intelligent thought from our minds.

anarchism is secular and peacefull. that it is the target of so many lies and campaigns only proofs how extremely justice is feared by the rich.

so the heap that feels the need to confront the wrong side of the spectrum can cheaply be discarded, their sold souls will not serve a heavenly purpose or an earthly paradise. just setting out the trends of repression they are no usefull contribution in any dialogue.

lets blacklist them, media would become so much more readible.

so in my opinion the world has an obligation to serve (not to confuse) these revolutions, how?

its not that hard, quite the usual, one london libyan eg. suggested airdropping food into western libya. personally i think it is early for that, the usual capital could do a week or two, three without deliveries.

without delivery's? the crowd control / weapons embargo is not even yet active, only mouthing it has so far been done. yes foodtransports they withhold. but using choppers to kill the populace is on the everyday wishlist of the western moronocracy's, even on that of someone like obama? seems so.(clint hint)

food deliverys have a problem entering tripoli, but not tear gas, riot gear and helicopter ammunitions. so now they cooked up khadaffi must go to the icc. how convenient, for years they were all set and happy with the guy, and now suddenly they want him before their victors justice tribunal.

ok i defended khadaffis revolution some, and i still sympathise with the ideas of his green book, nevertheless he is an obvious hypocrit and obvious autocrat, and an obvious fatneck with wacky egoist interests. so with monsters like ben ali and mubarak gone, who would mind dumping him, whatever comes after need not be worse.

actually i have a great trust in the libyans (not an all encompassing trust, as in my last post i vented my conviction they are a probable bunch of racists together with the rest of northafricans) but even that, i know they will try to work at it, try to show mercy and compassion over anger and revenge (failing worst in this very respect i expect.)

the real deal is how we will support the democratic (it is no guarantee but it is a start) revolutions. how? well how about accepting refugees again into europe?
sour shins i suppose.. xenophobiacs are everywhere, not only in muslim society's.

seriously how? i think it is obvious, libya is a disaster, so medical aid, food aid, evacuation and lots of other things will need elaboration, but egypt tunesia, yemen, bahrein, jordan, etc..

they will all go the revolutionary way, and each for their own they will face particular problems of supply, a need for tools of democratic expression, even plain education, but not in the least selfesteem, to rise to the occasion. let us, the rest of the world prepare to be a helping hand.

not by destroying the planets atmosphere with more planes and flights, not by crowding our panicked high incomes at the airports, but by setting a reasonable trajectory to be of help.

the people should support people, not former ministers or upperclass nitwitz with a high salary function, just the people, the voice of women and children from the streets.

this wont be the last revolutions on arab grounds, the ultimate revolution will allways be one in wich women fought. when women do not fight, they are bound to become the victim of the male syndromes of dominance, and ptss, once again. i think no revolution that has the ladys cheering and the men bleeding will deliver completely, equality is simple, men and women are similarly capable of negative emotions, without that recognition equality is far and between.

so i reach out to promote a greater role of women in all these society's.

with some handhold to the infrastructural problems and evacuations made, what we could do next is revolutionarise our own society's and democracy as a whole. i fear this will proof a dream, but it is possible. internet and other tools are perfectly set to deliver an element of participation, and there is the daily opportunity for judges not anymore to pursue the interests of the rich exclusively, precedence, well that.....

i have low expectations there. basically i expect that the euphoria about the events elsewhere will serve as a perfect cover for hyping up more crudeness and dictatorial fake trials against the poor in the "democratic" nations.

nevertheless like evacuating egyptians from tunis by ship is an easy touch, lets try to be smart and direct when the need arises. have trust in people, who cares if they govern somewhat amateurish for a while? some talents will spring up, compromise will be found, for example in bahrein, 80% of the populace is shia and has close to zero experience with governance (they are not even allowed middleclass jobs to be exact). the sunni bias against them is complete.

why? well over iran, but iran will also fall, if not this year, the next, and hardly anyone will be sad or disturbed about that even in repressed shia community's.

the capitalists story is people are stupid, and to retrieve some of the stolen wealth, the first thing people need is selfesteem, i mentioned it before. with selfesteem it helps a great lot to get appreciation. appreciate those people.

don't think: they are as stupid as us, think: they had plenty reason to think smarter.
really protect the youth, the renewers, the democrats and yes the anarchists, because those exactly are the voice and source of renewal.

corporatism will not stop short of killing the good nr's to get back their status quo of slave society's.

take good care all. and no matter the harsh words i use, i love and admire the people of africa,
and the rest of the muslim world for the brave attempt to fight for freedoms.

ps. have an eye on africa (no, not only zimbabwe, the whole of it) the people of africa want inclusion and justice just as much, and no aljazeera, or anything else is there to represent them to the terrorised masses in the western world.

be strong, if i thought prayers'd stop bullets, i would even say 'and pray'.

work in progress

2011-02-23T19:42:00.003Z

it is some 3 days into the bloodbath in libya, censors are working overtime. gadafi's possibly not anymore quite integral speech, relativations, the ulimate lack thereoff and no insightfull information of the actual levels of repression that happened in algeria or egypt, completely downplaying nrs, whol range of stupid and awkard manipulations in the public consience going on.

skillfully and masterly groups and people can be predicted and steered with their most seperate
whims. there is close to no transparance. the actual money going around these days from the refugee and mostly still seated cliques is far more then we would be told. transparance is the only way to put an end to dictators and their puppetmasters.

back to libye, gadaffi may be crazy and have a lot of imagination, he has not been much of a puppet. he has probably taken an unfair deal of his nations wealth and progress, and also turned it into a control state.

libya has usually been a rather prosperous nation, and recently the population has grown a lot, because he has been quitte opposite to europe trying to accomodate immigrants. perhaps it explains that a greater level of poverty then before say 10 years would now be their part.

actually it is the censorship kicking in again. reasonable people also are not usually open to be informed to a much greater extend then unreasonable, or just usual people.

the average "intellectual" has not the faintest of plenty of figures they use in mediacampaigns, and discourse when it comes to nations that for some pragmatical reason or another are marked with some "different" stamp. It goes all the way, a similar superficial conception of other cultures is perfectly plausible in plenty chinese. not allways without reason even.

khadaffi is a leader of africa, sometimes clumsy, hardly ever without a sneaky side, in many discussions he was able to communicate with african people then large parts of the european and arab world, he has been humorously and i suspect rather generously supporting developments over africa, and allthough this apparently meant, a sharper division along the 10th nothing of that is necessarilly bad or his to blame. he is a president of africa, and a leader as long as he sticks to his role, humor, nonconformism, cooperation (and even tolerance i think).

he has been not a straight out disappointment for the image of north africa in the respect, however that might be subjective related to his domestic manipulations(..).

as i experienced egypt mubarak would, and the north african culture has obediently adopted any perverted kind of racism from their white masters they did not yet readily own. in the sense of measure of control(..).

ofcourse muammar is cynical about that. the public is apparently never supposed to hear about usian bombings in tunisia, and countless other aspects of these "revolutions".

nevertheless they are actually revolutions, i have been an anarchist since i discovered such a thing existed(...), and for me libya's revolution now appears to be killing her children. censoring is a bad thing, and he censors libya as a whole, screw that, noone should ever again in this world censor a nation, not people even, but certainly not a nation.

yet..

how do i know, perhaps any news not according to some policys is filtered from the outside, his speech was..

it is certainly filtered, and muammar ghadaffi , our revolutionairy colonel/clown, the man that did give the libyans, schools, healthcare and food, and tried hard to have his power and nations policy as a tool, rather to improve on the world, deserves a lot of sympathy, and even locked in his bunker, fuehrer, martyrdom syndromes, and his bad conscience for his tribe and family. (it is allways like that bro..) should step back into reality once again. he is the tool with wich europe tries to occupy the main african oil reserve, and the only he needs to seek for a way out is that.

SP and why PVDA

2011-02-12T15:36:00.007Z

with mubarak gone i have some peace of mind, not that it would last long, i pretty much hope that the world will keep a focus on all the states that change regimes and even to develop strategy's to support changes. in egypt what i think is important is fair ( and that is a very very most doubtfull thing in even many western nations , so...) and indeed well prepared elections.

quick elections is also support, yet it is of the greatest importance the process of political diversity (that might be a better guarantee for creativity and tolerance..) takes of at great speed. the former state television might serve as a progressive , and unbiased platform, but that would need a takeover. hard to say who to delegate that or even who might have a independent contribution professionally. alJazeera springs to mind, but actually, keeping in mind even that is moderated progressivity, sometimes for good sometimes for bad, you might as well slip for example english and french broadcasters into the mix of a reality marathon of dreams and conceptions.

if a thoughtfull and challenging debate can get into the open, and the inspiration of the youth that has allways been the inspiration of revolution and progress taken seriously, why not would a wonderfull people like the egyptians, and a basically rather decent and thoughtprovoking religion like islam be enough for one of those great steps on the republican track, that is much better conceived as a grassroots democracy of by now also by wire connected participants.

progress is only tolerance. new ideas have not allways been fought violently and bitter, but they have allways been the only source for progress. i hope people can think themselves of that new circumstances, (and perhaps new 'challenges') bring about new ideas.

so why SP?

the dutch elections system exist of 4 parts atm.

from my pov. the national ones are the most important, because i am very often occupied with trying international and civil laws.

someone said i already threw away this regional elections one, however immediatly finding an excuse. personally i would agree with a boycot of the elections, however it usually only serves them well. we have piles of unelected representation, so for the authority to say we did short at our obligation to vote, we still dont get empty seats, and without it it could only be even worse, sometimes people tell each other what they voted (abouts 95% of time SP or groen links(green) for me). so you get a sort of reference.

so no matter thats it is bullshit and legitimising for looks at least the hidden layers of elitist and nepotist decission making, i will try to explain why i bother with singling out one or two partys for a voting advise.

Basically the new green party (groen links) forerunner managed to say it all in one line. "U is chiquer".

right, that great inheretance, of marxism and pacifism now is "chiquer".

well, best i think that is amateuristic. But it is true they are a bunch of inconsequential liberals, and awkward at it, they hate it so much when i am critical i might expect political represailles for being against them here. liberals, and amateurs, the profs know how not to intimidate me.

that they never eached out to the plenty people supporting them has only one reason, nearly everyone in that parliament is bought. for sale, proprietary class and "academically" biased.

theres a heap of unelected ones behind the screens anyway, and i am sorry that i can't be enthusiast for the "waterschappen", to me it seems just another layer of cliquejobs, more probably in the way then aiding progress, and as things went the past years, probably armed by a own police authority to boot. might well be the final piece in a puzzel of demobilising the 90% of people that have nearly nothing.

so.. i feel sorry for not being happy with it, for some people (my mum basically) does think it can be a contribution to democracy, but i propose we first make the existing systems democratic,
quite a job, and nice material for a revolution.

basically beside a religious vote i had all the choices except for the upper class. the religious vote is an upperclass one, but people that are religious belief something different, they belief it doesn't matter as long as you belief. in fact i wonder if i would declare exactly such votes void;)

there is also the party for animals. i propose that next town elections we all vote that in zutphen,
that way we have a test.

i think it wont deliver much, even if we 80 or so & vote them, certainly not outside townlevel.

there is a simple clue of power to censoring the animal party from the results, and my fellow animalfriends, i am quite sure a few more seats in a rising trend is your actual part...

but just like the green, when it goes somewhere there is not the oversight to claim it in such results, and perhaps not the wish. (what do you think a seat pays on a swiss bank account, its not nothing).

the socialists are better at that and more professional, other partys are hardly worth mentioning. anarchism or communists that i bet never got their seats either, are not there, the rightwing is a fake, and the extreme right is not only a fake, but also exactly the kind of vote that you could actually marginalise as contrary to human rights. psychopaths may vote, buta psychopath policy is illegal. void.

so, SP has the best slogan: PROTEST.

yet the PVDA has more chance to get some actual seats. SP is somewhat less professional in the murky world of politics, and PVDA is indeed already compromised to a greater extent.

often very conservative, and btw i think has been a great partner in international politics.
i very much appreciate the many good sides of the dutch labour movement and politics,
and i will probably vote PVDA altho i campaign for SP.

because i see no credibility in the dutch political system. SP will also be defrauded from their votes to see them dumped on nazitrends "those are also protest votes" or a similar weak joke for argument.

there is really no other option, altho i'd want the SP to grow, but to vote PVDA, and be defrauded as such.

in dutch electoral politics the people lost. it's fake, fraude and complicit, (even the sp perhaps).

this nation needs a revolution so that we can have a real democracy. after that progress will slowly show that anarchism delivers the most productive ideas, but for it to come true doing away with the fake democracy would be a great start.

mubarakisation of sweden

2011-02-08T19:56:00.003Z

a transcript

damn i am angry. the whole assange case is subject to a mis,- and des information campaign,
infos disappearing, storys changed and changing

all to put him in a more negative light and cover up the political aspects.
it's a completely bankrupt thing, a showtrial even now.

there is no mention of violence (as opposed to intimity's legally ) in the swedish case
and the whole fk based his prosecution on the term, yesterday and as i understand still in court,
and as i understand it they are still to understand this in court, i can think of that i would find a few things in todays article.

montgomery was yesterday featured on wikipedia as a swedish prosecutor, or where was it, names and context disappeared that were quite obvious,

wikipedia, that i looked into to see if i thought he was usian agent
/all to perfect cover, but independently very active, so probs not
not to sure for the ideal fit/and thereby somewhat probable/ aspects of his life i expected than
came to see him as quite ok
neway

a fake trial, it never bodes much good

wish i knew what to do

they do it to us all (the "activists") and me in person all the time, faketrials

altho there have maybe been some improvements, we regard many criminal trials and much of its detail also as fake trial ofcourse, me , plenty ppl i know, several distinct groups in society.

groups - treats so strongly persons have to label themselves with it to deal, basically
not to say they are all great persons, but the experience is the same in many areas

people should be responsible in person not to break a law, since most do, by having a job and signing conditions, they are far beyond in legal justification

is that behind?
beyond i think is behind

neway. to an extent this goes for julian assange as an independent

especially since eg. the swedish at first mentioned abandonment constitutes rape, and that was an argument, i think england should decide there is no possible credible procedure,

but since that also disappeared from public sight, at least mostly, and hard to manage, (as from internet), we see there is a censoring case being made, for a procedure that has once again been called explicitly(i think) not political

.
angry

twice before this court been referred as nonpolitical. under most doubtfull circumstances,(1) ...

ridiculous

But when asked what he would have done if faced with similar allegations, Alhem said: "If I was in his shoes then I would have gone to Sweden to give my version of events".

thats such bs!

if he had been julian assange, he would now not be his lawyer, but someone who escaped a double trial, under more, different, overtly political circumstances, and the rest.

.. so he wouldnt have gone ? obviously

but hes a fat lawyer, thats probably not even in a condition to have sex with two women
so he would have done it.. yeah right?

perhaps he could have proven he was not in sweden or sth

what a ridiculous notion in an international paper (and probs sth like reuters(2)) about an english court. don't even know immediatly who made the contempt for courtS:
rereads..
the guy making the question

it doesnt tell who that was.
...
judge allying with the prosecutor..

must say judges are absolutely great in finding their own stupid little pretences

and even still , if it was a trap ...

Alhem says: afaik i would be innocent, and not fear extradition, but its not if it was him..(3)

and probs julian assange might not fear extradiction, if he wasn't someone already under stress of an illconceived prosecution.(3a)

so its a silly lawyer also

cus that is in no obvious way bad for assange (4)
well thats what i think

look , if you would have been julian assange, would you have gone to sweden for the (same..?) next prosecution?
what do you think?

i could proof i was not in stockholm you thought ?

"i could not proof that i was not in a bed with her naked after having had sex already"
or with pyamas, lol

technically she was quite prepared with the condom, or so it appears
perhaps there was a camera in the room?

tjah
i think that dubious political persona with expensive habits like that should not be to much allowed to acquire such "evidence"

interesting point.

only means less
means..

you would have to raise the treshold for criminal not lower it., under this circumstance of observation.

lowering it in public constitutes a "rape" , against fundamental, human and i think even military justice

wich is obviously "political' (5)

thus
it is
a political trial (!)

and the problem is, i dont want to read prepared lies about evrything and all, all the time just to spare few some.

some of what they and moreso the others still get inflicted on them (6)

i dont think i have to much experience with honourclaimscases (lol)

sth. julian could explain about privacy here.(7)

egypt

suleiman has to go also, what keeps a guy like him going??

he should opt for baradei, step back from the secret service and police, be explicit that baradei is "just a democrat" for the us, and give his opinion on what he thinks, will be the consequences of what he now sees as a great need for (rather fictive) security. (8)
-,

in public so people know what would have been the things they could be controlled over
then..(8b)

we will find a woman for vice president. mubarak is gone, and elections in say 3 months,
or i think that is quite feasible, two, after that.

ofcourse people will want to spoof the parliament, more precise the "government(9)" circles

i hope we have a good case study to base us on in tunesia by now.

the parliament is probably completely illegal , imo also for international law,
and as such depriving the egyptian people of rights

like flexible interpretations of privacy indeed don't work in the same way as flexibel interpretations of labour policy.

flexible labour not labour"mobility", but weird working hours
flexible privacy indeed "weird working(sic) hours". not mobility of the legal development.

illegal representation can easily be disadvantaged because theirs is no true legal base.

go egyptians, legalise yourself! go europe reaffirm your laws!

(1)(in wich i would refer to wikileaks also)
(2) compare :"political"
(3) the trial is against someone with an entirely different background and an at least very annoying experience with swedish prosecution.
(3a)political
(4) and Alhem didnt manage to follow up on it
(5)technical infringement of laws is not only political, it is even the area of politics, and not of (show) trials.
(6) in terms of gross neglect of justice
(7) applications for and against privacy turned into a specialist area , that unfortunately is mostly represented by extrajural people.
(8) he didn't, he went for the cosmetic requirement of stopping the protests.
(8b) think moderating looting and destruction of property that has uses after the revolution also.
that does not definitily include property's with a strong symbolic value , before an actual change of power materialised.
(9) an illegal shape of government: dictatorship

the great pyramid scheme.

2011-02-01T23:54:00.004Z

lol today i read sth. on mubaraks assets, so about half of everything in egypt. are they going to let him get away with his loot?

unshort interpretation of the events as they unfolded in egypt.

we are now where we got in tunesia 3 days or so earlier. and it takes long.
its like a revolution in slowmotion.

so i am going to shortly describe the things that made it last so long, so long that i as an activist start to wonder isn't it too long? repressive tolerance weighs in by minutes of violence, not by weeks.

the army was everywhere, and as i understand from the preparations the police out in power today. mubs and his fellows have been preaching the great egypt, over the past few days.

in all the tones of repressive tolerance 'peacefull manifestation' 'no disordre' (and a kick in the back of anarchism as usual). mubaraks definition of anarchism is apparently no police on the street.

i call that irresponsible government. 3 days long amidst growing reports of undercover police activitys all police was withdrawn from duty, in cairo, well.. from civil duty.

no wonder a starving mass might loot a bit more then nothing besides.

after knowing or even seeing people killed, by a police that is feared, people will even fear they have nothing to loose. and? what are they bound to loose now? later with all the juridical hocuspocus that declares human rights void, what does it promise for democray? quietude?

i am not in egypt, so i am not sure, after all facts on the ground matter, but i would think this is a setting for even deeper repression, if nothing comes of this.

okay the army declared it wouldnt kill civilians, and perhaps it didn't, but by being everywhere it also showed the people weapons are the tool that decides in 'democracy'.

a very lousy example.

to understand it we have to go back a few days. basically the situation erupted, half or whole of the world got to know about it before a severe attempt on media blackout followed.

internetservices closed, but also a withdrawn reporting in the west. no crying foul over tianan minh, for example, wich i think was less deadly even with many more chinese still then egyptians.

the double standard showed. next aljazeera that remained the most relevant bigger newssource,
did its step back, socalled 'moderate' opinions made the day. the right kind of stress on 'peacefull'
(ie. a policemonopoly on violence) and against anarchy (as if you can have anarchy with one guy getting half the money), and woooops, it worked, people became distracted.

mubaraks 'speech' for example received a load of not very critical attention.
i found it rather disgusting. didn't hold out through the great egypts, and great whatnots.
no wonder these islamists have it high in their head with such lacklustre rhetorics.

medieval rhetorics.

neway, next is the organisers, "the coalition" (of the chilling, in his time of year), sets up a million people demo, and.... a million people come, demonstrate, peacefull, and......
well i think then the elections got postponed again.

thats were we are today, mubarak didn't leave (yet), and before egypt will be safe, there are bound to be more victims, to the nr of mubaraks neglect.

more burocratic hurdles before the hoards of the pharaoh and his friends.

Suez

2011-01-29T18:33:00.004Z

things like this make me think mostly of censorship

egypt. oh yesterday i hear and read a 100 dead on one day,
and it is out of the news.
see a live tien a minh, and cut.

mubaraks hypocrit speech. insulting the peacefull protests. attacking demos, life fire.
30 years of what? regressive taxes?

al baradei reporting in wikileaks on amr moussa, intimidated, i called it, but perhaps it clouds his (A.M.'s) perceptions.

intimidated, in reading 1 line of his, i notice.

like nelson mandela, called mandeba by a clans name, i dunno what thats supposed to mean, mostly i guess the word nelson is like a most painfull memory of past imperialism. well, clans names don't really sound that post modern either.
mandeba, i remember long ago i would write mandela and omit nelson, not so much becus of teh nelson, just becus he was a celebrity, bound to get abused with filling pages of rubbish.

mr mandela is a very good person, very little rubbish came from his.

even though i must say media tried forever, i seen quite a few useless attempts on paperfilling about him, fortunately, he didnt like to make that kind of profile.

a politically usefull man even, because his person stayed real.

i guess i am more crazy then he was at this age.

when nelson mandela speaks, it hardly ever took me a few minutes to get to robbeneiland.

suez.

suez is in africa, there shouldn't be so much doubt about that.
death and maiming, and why? to push the next gestapo to the top.
the more you get to know about egypt, the more horrible it all is.

imagine all those tourist marching eyes closed through the destution, horrific picture.

and now blaming the people, calling them looters for a whole day, i start to suspect the police from trying to loot cairo museum,
start to suspect....?

not very much a scary thought like that can't be convincing.

i hope it will be like tunesia, first the ben ali admits blame by blaming his corrupt clique,
next he gets kicked.

basically what we see is terrible repression and injustice, why??
suez, capitalism, and israel. i guess it is the israel thing mostly now,
such brutality knows but one excuse.:(

why cant people admit that accepting peace and tolerance is also jewish values,
whats wrong with it?
that they will overblow their claims?
only thing you can do is start doing science then.

and its not that it helps much to be scared, or actually think you are so much different,

ok so i cant buy expensive cloths and i get discriminated 3-4 times cus they are army dump
not even really sure if not often anyhow a joke.

should i care? i got discriminated by the dutch for every day in my life i so much think. and plenty of times without even trying,
ya know at the supermarket when they immediatly throw some small note down a machine to check it?

i think i haven't seen a note go down the supermarket in years without being checked.
that feels not only as if people are rather stupid, it also feels like the are plenty stupid at discriminating at all.

its also on the train, its with police, its not allways with the army. woman can be even less socialised then man, thats because at an iq of 70 they are left to roam where man tend to get locked at say 90 and bcause they are so much protected. the usual uniformed lady i meet isn't exactly bright at treating people equally, there's not much distinction in the stereotyping between the two.(man uniform, woman uniform)

a few woman that happen to be rather nice seem to do better, but i think that..
is my bias;)

some of the man are decent as well, usually they are quite touchy on their status aspects however (exposing plenty) and i dont like that kind of people.
in uniform i think it is macabre.

a police like that attacked the people in egypt, a police worse and more adapted to violence,

considering my experiences, it is hardly a surprise you see few woman on the street.

its allways worse for woman, the combination of violence and discrimination.
but it is nowhere near pretty to experience it as a man.

--

victim of the system

2011-01-27T18:59:00.002Z

in how far is being different from a political target of the system actually still the same.
and the opposite, how can being the same be a justification if it feels so much different.

my experience with victims of the system is manifold,

the first i think most of us share is how most children notice other childrens being victimised by other educaters systematics. at least i have many vague impressions left of adults that with nearly insane audacity invoked heaven, hell and whatnot, in their perceptions of reason.

to me it seemed most children were under a certain system, allways bad, but of different evilness.

bad in the sense that it was a habit. people treating other people, because it's theirs or other peoples habit. thats very egoist.

also i remember those as the most boring and awkward routines of many, and perhaps all childhoods i witnessed. deadly habits against possible creativity.

sorry i have to let that loose in a post that should be about other people.

apparently many adults think: it's a child so i can say any idiotic thing and will still be right.
as i remember it on such a habit usually, (that is if we needed to witness it) followed set escalations. ooh i stopped such experimentation when i had a decent file ofcourse.
..soon.

so in the first place i am one of those who consider everyone a victim of the system.

the circumstance of just growing up in the 60s 70s in netherlands was enough to completely convince me people were all to much reliant of systematics in their exchanges.

it suits the period btw. one thing the hippy age did was making some sort of break with the gospell and agree on some spirituality for each persons own.
not only me, but even many adults were consciously aware of the need for improvement in the relations between children and adults, and people in general.

i think these days that psychological questionmark with the whole of society's functioning is somewhat withdrawn, taboo even perhaps.

i see no other obvious reason then a further aglomeration of capital and elite, superiority ideas.
the people are supposed to be so stupid "that you will never notice",

anyhow its slightly besides the point.

victims of the system, i soon found out for instance that solidarity with the labourer was something, that in netherlands could only be desired. i found labour unions weak, in netherlands at a somewhat later age.

today it scares me, lol, tunesias revolution of the hands of labour unions, what if they disintegrate and fade into insignificance like here, or become something as incomprehensively institutional and labourer unfriendly as in usia? here they don't have many members, and the label independent is farfetched when it comes to representation.

(there have btw been a small share of romantic, political and hearthwarming exceptions, and solidarity with actions and strikes in general as well as a strong financial support at times)

but the political factor? not impressed.(1)

go victims of the system...

so the next group of victims, is a victim of victims, that logically follows, evrything significantly more precarious then an overstretched healthcareworker would be a 3fold victim even if they started working 4 yo.

for me it is somewhat important, because i can be really embarrassed and quite mad and nasty about what i know happens to people. unfortunately, the better nor the worse ones can help it all, or even a lot, they are also still their outside personality's. in fact, basking their kids and having every possible stress, tick, obsession, whatever. personality disorder if you so want.

i like that, how most peoples personality is mostly their disordres. i don't mean to say they are mostly disordered, but that they can be so dedicated to specific traits. the funny is that that "kind of personality" is very much in the way of being one.

thinks of a victim.

at one point, like bradley manning, being a victim, damages you, fiercely, or less fiercely and still mean. that proud united states, their champion of openess, has been using the word transparance, their whole todays diplomatic appeal, cannabalising bradley manning.

he might feel a victim of the system.

thinks of a victim.

...there's work to be done, laws to be changed...

(1)due respect where remaining strong on safety worked)

likiweeks

2011-01-25T12:46:00.005Z

palileaks or rather had i wrote livnileaks, but hers being a spouse of israeli establishment she rocketed out of obscurity that much to recent.

I'll collapse the story as i know it now, because there is an indiscrepancy between western reporting and al-jazeeras. i.o.w. i expect western readers to be less informed then even me on the subject.

first this: by no means israel and the cojourning negotiations are my favourit topic. howevermuch fed it on daily, random and schemed basis, it remains distastefull and shrill, both as a factor of pali, israeli and regional politics, but also on the stage of international relations and developments.

(in fact results of all "effort" (that is if there really acually was any) and ongoing negotiations are extremely boringly minimal. there is usually rather more annoyance then less after a new "iniative")

any papers that would provide insight in what really went on in those circuits could be greatly helpfull, in shaping a picture, and would be incredibly more dense and true than all that appeared in media so far. there is a firm overrepresentation of israel and it's affairs in mainstream media, thus it would safe a lot of time to be able to read some raw data.

just at the time i think mostly of tunesia, and wikileaks shed a shimmery light of what moved the usian uniformclubs, aljazeera starts publishing abstracts of 1600 or so records on israeli - palestinean negotiations.

abbas says they turn around israeli and pali viewpoints, so perhaps they also stem from an internal briefing system. al-J publishes them, moreless integrally, so distinction can be made through interpretation and content.

bbc watches usia and steps after that, usia however portrays total conviction of the integrity of the papers detail. i am under the impression israeli officials did not yet cry foul.
(why would they, nearly evrything 'leaked' is only to their advantage)

for example erekat makes an arrogant impression, palestinean hobo's would be willing to do any farreaching concession, fatah makes a wavering impression, (for example , and its sorttof a keyfact, abbas has to draw israeli proposals on napkins)

obama gets a bite, showing less understanding then even bush, it is mostly a rightwing victory, and israel is a rightwingstate for now.

(basically if one palestinean said something a 100 years ago, it is a historical concession made to the israeli people, but if one usian official says something 4 years ago, palestineans are told not to count on it.)

so where do these papers come from? one possibility is israel recognised sipdis would at some point be usb'd, and decided to plot it's "negotiations" accordingly (the TOR, terms of reference).
i have been wondering some times how the international community held out such useless nitpicking over phrases, or actually why the f* it kept projecting positive pictures about it.
(with my wet thumb, for probably more ten years)

the napkin map would fit that, give this abbas a napkin and a map he cant have and he'll start drawing, is a probably true perception about abbas personality. later we can leak the same map and appear utterly credible is a graphic example of textmanipulation, and in between abbas ego is getting a severe beating.

well one shouldn't have an ego, (perhaps an alterego as a TOR), ego is what keeps us from a clear view, it is what gives most people so much subjectivity.
capitalist psychological philosophy ofcourse worship ego. destructive ambition is capitalism persee v.v.

actually i am not so sure however this has been prepared for so long. the mechanics of israeli negotiating points have since long suggested me they saw no point for any concession and were basically winning time, and provoking the powerless palestineans into ever more useless "agreements".

the marginalisation has a at least over the years resulted in ever less compelling PA steadfastness, that is not even precise, exactly the cadres of fatah (and thus the PA) have gone through several implosions of ambition.

perhaps they are working at their ego. my temporary conclusion is netanyahu leaked them, he is just trying to show his islamic fellow jews what it means to keep in mind alteregos usually also shape nice pictures.

we should appreciate a such ultimate statement of israeli conservatives , all leaks are equal, not one leak over another leak.

all quaida of the islamic revolution

2011-01-22T09:31:00.005Z

you can blame karzai for the title, if it's not his own political novity, he at least made me think of it.

here you can see a projected governor of the internationally reknown xenophobiac extreme right wing pro israel party of gert wilders in action. (smashing tied man in the face)

(for dutch, dat misbaksel in uniform hoort allicht bij de verwildering, bruinhemderij als weleer)

to much is happening, look at that^^

and to think that hardly any of it would be coincedence in framing elections.

how will i ever be able to explain the title of this article with so much disturbing news on my mind ?

i promise i will explain plenty al quaididas in a (soon?) to follow post.

tremendous unique nascent evolutionairy security issues aroused

2011-01-20T11:25:00.003Z

there is only room for hyperlatives.

tunesia.

what a miracle, and what a joy to see some really democratic effort in my lifetime.

i think of the people of tunesia every day and hope hard as i can they will be well.

today i saw some coverage of the protests. with some shame i admit i hadn't expected our same rhytm, the slogans for wich our police attacks tramples, gasses, drives over, and handicaps us.
the united people, battered and locked up, at least overhere.

whilst here we witness an ever eroding perception of rights and law, overthere to witness the same revolutionairy elan succesfully beat injustice, infringments, repression and nepotism, overhere we have become subdued, maddened and sullened by the mounting evidence of the purposefull betrayel of the principles so much professed by western damnocrazy's.

back to undercooled observations, have you noticed how very democratic, very explicitly pro freedom, very political, the inexperienced tunesian revolutionairy's shaped their take over?

wallah its a miracle.

there's been quite a list of miracles in tunesia in fact. the police (credit been given to the justice minister (after a 100 odd deaths...)) stopped short of a complete massacre.
a miracle.
the army decided to defend the people of the nation instead of the capitalists of the nation.
a huge miracle.
the dictators flew, leaving a trail of shimmery finanical transactions but with probably that much of a reserve (..)
at that point perhaps a bit less of a miracle.

our, usian, intellectualist, liberal influence overthere is not to bad, under the revolutionairy circumstance, internet, facebook twitter or myspace and their cousins, educated the suffering poor of tunesia more then it did the inflating bodys of the rich in the western world.

its a miracle.

tunesians are the greatest miracle of all, as they stubbornly and solidairy protest their right for a real change, not a cosmetic one, that only prepares the next fraudulent elections.

where will we go from here? i think we , the west, have no real option but to shake hands, referring the courage, and hoping for the best from what miraculous trust and desire for justice , equality and freedom the tunesians projected.

do i expect such a positive approach?

unfortunately i am not so sure, i expect paranoid manouvring, and investments in fear.
after all it is a miracle,
a *real* revolution.
something for and off the people.

no the west.. will not cope with that easily or without the objective of profit, wich apparently in north african terms translates into dictatorships.

i am not surprised by that ofcourse btw. things are as they are, and to some they seem what they are no matter how elaborately disguised and how eloquently denied.

ACAB proven once again.

our freedom of speech is not anymore as much as it even was under ben ali. you are free to speak unless you are critical of authority in this nation. (1)
for this single line even i can expect to be prosecuted, or in the least have my home attacked, being locked up in a cell to the sound of drills, and probably filed or punished in complete contraditction of our constitutions and fundamental laws once over.

all in a sneaky manner as to not let loose, it's affirming dominance. marginalising individuals in their quests for justice.

eerily i watch constitutional rights being broken down under the guise of the next scapegoat.
afer hatecampaigns and deceit, lies , insults and acquisations against the squatter movement, the next victim, the next jew for the smallminded and hatewinger, is the smoker of marihuana.

for example when recently a policeman raped and murdered a little girl, outragious claims over the effect of marihuana on that were made.

i swear even if i smoke an ounce (not "two little packages") of marihuana, and kill someone, i will remember into detail all my life.
so would anyone, even a cop.
acab

and in netherlands the judge is complicit.

so what hope is there for tunesia, with many governments like mine out for any piece of cake?

i don't know, but..

miracles have happened before.
great hurrays for tunesia.

(1)or are they? not really? acab

apocleptic

2011-01-07T08:52:00.009Z

time for some fearmongering, 2011

it feels like a tradition, start of the year i watch the climate, and sometimes current affairs, for the last i have cop of posts to go.

the winter overhere started out nice, but already lost it's sting. a little bit of suggestive cold, snow and ice was quickly followed by the usual global warming temperatures tho. winters, and frost over the melting point of water. eternal westwinds, and not as much precipation as might be expected.

last year was a wet year in netherlands, however after some years of relative drought, it was hardly noticable, all that extra water drained in instants, and not even the air stayed humid.
the summer wasn't great, i know amongst cus the weed was of low quality, and rain was usually not there when most expected.

worldwide we seen an ongoing acceleration of climate hickups, smaller and bigger droughts, and forestfires. droughts unseen in many areas, record temperatures, and a shrivelling amazon region, in a violently radiating sunlight.

nevertheless also a lot of flooding. it seems rainfall and wind react as extreme as our skins on the chaos we brought into the atmosphere.

basically our planets atmosphere is an ecological produce. hadnt nature been there it would have been completely different. and in eliminating nature, natural landscapes, and even single species we don't only kill ourselves and each other, we also kill this quality of a lifebearing planet that only came to be through billions of years.

so i may sound pessimist here, but it has been the litany to be made for decades, and all my life,
and it lost no relevance at all.

basically the projection is the cooling is not a matter, whence droughts and also floods are again to be expected. i much wonder if january will be cold, so far it ain't, overhere. in that case we could assume the trends still follow a pattern that trends to yearly regularity. if otoh it will be warm, i think we are kind of screwed, it tried to be cold..

the sun is still behaving incredibly carefull, no particles of our atmosphere get blown of extra by its usual solar spot activity, it witnesses our plight in serene and unseen calmth.

what should i care animism is undone by the great corps and other bloodsuckers in the textile of our society? it is for it told us how bad profitmaking was to begin with.

the sun is alive, and way more intelligent then any representative of our species. (even me:P)

so much about the climate, i cant judge easily if perturbations reached a treshold, but i am not overly optimistic about the chances all will be safe this year, what i wonder most is if it actually still has the flexibility to create major phenomena, or if perhaps to much of it goes up in noctilucence.

it seems that extreme events like the storm in the fillipines that fortunately just 'missed', do take some of the pressure from the regional cooker. in some form of atmospherical regulation often these events seem to come in one worst per season.

then there is the earthquakes vulcanism topic. nearly all apologips come with shaky predictions of that. in our ancient mythical traditions universally cataclism is announced it's cojourner.

and so it does, iceland gives a maximum rain minimum cosmic rays boost, with near brilliant precision (there is just one vulcano on iceland that might be able to do better for effect.)

yes planes will wear, and govs will rip us to save their shares rendements.

next indonesia blows in a 100s years record style, and so did guatemala neither of them however to the limit of their catastrophal possibilitys.
got to see that, i tried to stay informed over magnetic anomalies and polewandering, magnetic reversals and polar collapse, (not all planets that you would easily expect to do have a magnetic field),

that wasn't easy. after i read the german wiki of it with interesse and refraining from commenting all the world was dosed the story it held (and that was new to me) that polar reversal would be a millenia long proces.

i don't belief that yet, human mythology remembers differently. that besides i have more often seen explications that polar reversals must have been near instantanious. however lets hope its not , and we will see smoking vulcanoes and horrible earthquakes for a couple of millenia.

still wondering what, if anything, offset olympic mons (on mars).

so far i am not easy to convince, what do they think, magnetic field will keep tumbling at this speed to be in the negative in at most ten years (1?) and for millenia to come?

more generally we will see at least a few major problems return this year, genetically modified diseases will probs strike again, and the general load of toxins is strongly on the rise, with recent news suggesting biofuels intrisically carry dioxins.
other worrys there are nigeria . louisiana, and the chinese industry. don't fall for the usual excuse that it is coincedence and unforeseen.

i foresee it here and specialists of any kind foresee stuf like it with the same ease. this to include boards of directors with slaving research deps. at their disposal.

so i am curious to the venezolan dog flue to strike this year, or perhaps the northkorean swine cough, the sudan extraimmunal hiv virusses etc.

next we may start to see people getting ill from gentech food on an ever larger scale, perhaps not yet this year, perhaps only in the company of toxic loads like louisianas (medical reports are sure suggestive of sth. over direct contamination with only petrochemicals , no matter how deadly these be.)

it would perfectly fit the picture, irritans and destroyed genetical structure taking it's toll of darmfloras and tissue alike.

perhaps we will see sth even more odd. i almost hope so, because it will take a million madame curies to convince this world of sheep, so be it if that makes the billions to be safer.

bees are dying worldwide, and like einstein who was not a complete idiot said:
when the bees die, for the humans it will only be a matter of years. was he thinking of these fort knox and other frisco eugentical researches no doubt he was intimitly familiar with?

more familiar then you and i would ever be recognised to be??

well gl. its never been possible to counter disaster that did not strike.

anarchist fireworks

2010-12-24T09:42:00.002Z

according to some news anarchist firework bombs exploded near two embassy's in rome.

1 being the swiss embassy, the other left unmentioned, and therefore the great confidential one, the usian embassy.

in both cases an innocent person got wounded under supervision from the police that draws comparisons with a bomb containing neither explosives nor a ignition (as if that would be any use).

now what is the question is to deduce wether the honourfull exposing of lethal police strategys concerning light firworks or even non explosive materials bears any relation with anything.

perhaps after all now discontent wit the grab and hold culture of the rich is sticking it's head out of the sand all over europe and the equally fooled north american continent, where btw gentech is running thoroughly rampant these days, it is time to incriminate political correctness beforehand.

so taken some circumstances into consideration, what are the options.

an anarchist action?
an autonomous action?
a secret service action?
an otherwise organised european action?
plain old bearded osama?
old italian rightwingers?

something else?.

the way the police operates around teh action suggests perhaps an other then anarchist action is the case, they are better known to get bystanders in harms way to criminalise straightforward marxist splinters.

however the extreme inseverity of the bombs, despite the police ebst efforts noone apaprently got really seriously wounded, suggests indeed the kind of action in solidairty with greek exporters of individual pieces of fireworx.

in the case an autonomous group with anarchist inspiration is behind this obvious attack on secrecy and totalitarianism in the worldwide media and commerce, and not the police on some political gluestick tour, a word of warning is on its place.

secret services and police apparatus are perfectly well equipped to turn even the most insignificant direct action into a terrible and unlikely bloody failure. in my opinion it is best to check not only that the police can evacuate the place, but also that noone will actually be there,
certainly no low rank officers either. especially it seems when things are already constructed to do minimal harms, services would hesitate even less to try and construct a sad and populist example.

a smile here over stockholm. scandinavia is thus backward in a way they still consider it feasible to fool the public implicitly. if you know how to blow up a bomber, you know you are blowing a bomb only for the effect.

a secret service action. this is allways possible, in the case of strange and wicked actions at strange points in time, camera observation in a place like rome etc. taken into consideration.

given their unexplained presence at the scene, the option cannot be disgarded immeediatly at once.

however i think we see a youthfull autonomous action strongly bound with the freedom of expression, information and the struggle for transparancy. a firework bomb from roman and greek origin.

a classic one then;)
i do agree with the italian comrades, be they within or without the services, that leading by example in the mission for a free society is not the monopoly of anyone, should not be the monopoly of the united states, and that the idea bin Laden would be the only one to show discontent on a sad footing with repression is ridiculous.

a permanent chill

2010-12-21T06:25:00.003Z

europe got cool, i dont think it is a great sign of changing times, or any guarantee the lack of ozone wont burn a million or more people the coming year. it is actually soemwhat nice, the songs about white christmasses making sense for once, people now in their twenty's peering quite amazed out of their windows at the face of father winter.

people here, where its been cold and snowy and the whole year was rather moderate, in temperatures, at least partially and probably wholly caused by icelands vulcano. THe very obvious challenging and interesting fact is however not brought mainstream, rather that the rich europeans don't shape a definite opinion about climate change after all.

envertheless talk on the street is that , climatechange goes with extremes, and they are right. alltho i have been doubting in the past the curves would depart from an only heating direction, i never doubted at least locally it might leas to less expected effects. well we see droughts were there never were, and floods where there never were. even though they dont represent a meter of ice, they represent the indication that catastrophes in climate swing to two sides.

i am curious to what else this winter will bring. actually i am kind of hoping prolonged wintery weather will kind of bring this fueldriven roadracing madhouse that is europe to its knees.

teach m some repect for good crops, irrigation and drinking water. teach them you cannot endlessly tax the ecosystem for personal profits. it may be a disaster , but icould be the kind of disaster that teaches people something.

we seen all kind of extremes in the graphics, the statistics, but noone yet bothered to plot the incidence of them. oh now they will, and probably lie. but the incidences are amazing. except for meteorites hitting earth and like extreme occurances, i think we have never seen a thing like that, in eg. oxygen metabolism of stromatolites, to name an outpost.

indeed strange effects can already be felt. wether it is on arctic shrimps, whales, or something as essential as the whole amazone region. the good news is that the effords to reforest europe are apparently made, and do have some, but not enough yet of an impact on precipation.

netherlands was rather dry again, someone rooted here and with a climatological interesse, that means as much as half of the planet was to dry, possibly more. this i think is corroborated by the not all to transparant statistics.

there is a long standing theory that developing india and china would lead to so much emission
climate change would accelerate. that this is indeed true is predictable. however i supported still tehir development for many reasons. like egalitarism, but also my belief a technologically developed society has more chances to counter the effects and vices of the climate change we were anyhow inducing.

next came the theory that developing china would actually lead to global cooling. so much dust to get into the atmosphere, that a blanket of dust would hinder sunlight from warming the planet.

i considered that plausible, but where others were still in full swing of denial, i happened to be convinced of the reality of climate change, and ozone damage, and the farfetching implications of each of that, not in the least in the not so moderate climates.

so i actually thought, if developing china gives us an ice age, that is only a bonus.
at least frozen water doesnt depart into outer space at the same pace.

when i look at current weather trends with the same sincerity i have been watching the past decades, yes tehre is a trend. before three years we wouldn't see snow hardly. not in any measure, in the walk of twenty years ice and frost all but parted from our nation, and with that from most peoples short lived and not educatedly critical memory.

thats what you get if you bother about sexarrests and real or purported attacks on old ladys.
20 years of that and evrything you think is vile, coloured and shamefull.

how the media uses the individuals psychology against them.

so having described the current state of affairs, i am wondering what will the next two months bring for europe, and less of my responsability perhaps, the whole of eurasia.

my impression is that altho climate curves tend to be tangentially hyperbolic, and extremes to either side (drought flood, heat cold) are among the possibillity's over the whole the picture can be graphically described with just a few curves.

so allthough we seem to witness a dust impaired iceage, (where saddam, china , the industrialist past and vulcano's all contribute) the heating curve, that is perhaps overly contributed to carbon emissions (i myself think desertification and deforestation are way more prime in that then physics is prepared to recognise), will continue to rise for now. only when there are no major incidents of droughts and excessive heat we may assume the dust is winning.

the next factor as underestimated as it is underreported (i think some of the history of that rests in this blog and perhaps other censored publications of mine) is the ozone layer.

if people think that by censoring the mainstream media this phenomenon has become innocent, they couldn't be more wrong.
it will be a major factor in our climate, our being outsides, our crops and lives and health, for in the very least 70 years to come. and probably only be possibly repaired completely in the ordre of 300 years.

nevertheless a lot of people bought the story and now speak crap about the ozone layer.
not very helpfull if you want a somewhat complete picture of how to deal with climatological effects of industrialisation and population expansion.

not very helpfull where we actually now know that most of what is left to us can only still be obtained by crowdsourcing.

generally however we can just add the vulcanoes and india, china to the trend and assume a 2-3 degrees drop in temperatures this winter over the last is probable.

how that translates into ice and snow cover i dont know. it would also depend other factors, a chilly northerner wind over russia, eastern winds, in short the atmospheric conditions will define the precise outcome.

for example it is quite possible that when scandinavia are heading towards the heaviest winter almost in living emmory, enthrlands and eg. france remain greatly spared from that. where both are less influenced by the continental eurasian climate as by the atlantic. its actually quite probable that will be and it is a valuable indication about the way the trend is working this year, what will happen.

hypothesis for the next years and wether the trend towards cold winters (like past 2 years) , is a definite. or even if it is a freak, how the next hils and valleys of the amplitudal sinusses will shape. (for example perhaps we get cooling and heating in intervals, allthough my personal impression is the whole of matter that consists the earths impact on its own climate is to overwhelming to allow for that much irregularity.)

so what we probably get is hotter summers , at least in many places, (not in netherlands eg, a hotter summer for the rest of europe translates in a better chance for cloudcover here).
people in teh rich nations should be made more aware what disaster this constitutes for poorer people in poorer nations. it is also another unpleasant fact neglected mainstream, for many reasons of control.

next it seems the dust really manages to get us colder winters, (for me it is rather a hopefull event) that means in the rainier seasons we will have opportunity to collect water.

water btw, should in every case be allowed to soak the soils. there is no better protection
against droughts then soaked territory.

we will have to prioritise watering our continents soils over simple luxurys like a winter without snow. in many cases over other human requirements almost akin to humanrights, like housing, settling, recreation or abstract notions like a GNP.

on a sidenote, allthough nothing exceptional, even netherlands a nation of rain and frogs(that btw all died through a pollution related skininfection). was drier again last year. perhaps not an absolute record, but in the least showing the trend towards droughts is strongly apparent.

what we can do about a winter like that? not so much, adapt our consumption, take care heating gets delivered, and take care foodreserves will be adequate. all the rest is in the hands of fate. powers greater then us will decide. where the extremes get more extreme, there is no way to predict avalanches, snowed in isolation or traffic incidents. they will just depend on local circumstance, coincedence and the irks of winds and atmospheric phenomena.

in some 5-10 years we may (if the trend becomes a definite one) be better able to prevent some damage by mere interference. (like: russia snowed in after a hot summer last year, and so it will this year)

although russias climate is better predictable then northwestern europes, however, nothing is certain.
otoh if poland stays frozen over from now untill januar we know both russia will be very cold, and the winter will last rather long.

because with all this hassle about those 'cold' winters, we tend to forget this is the first to show signs of prolonged duration. earlier in the case, what would theoretically hint at into februar (instead of mostly januar) as well.

i am quite curious when and what the spring will bring.

on julian assange's pro and persecution

2010-12-11T02:07:00.009Z

promise is a promise even if it can't allways be held.

the history as the case unfolded to me is weird.
it started with accusations and anouncements in the media: assange had sexcharges against him, perhaps it was immediatly or else a bit later it said it concerned two swedish women.

the headlines featured everyday that assange was charged for sexcrimes.

i just waited curiously if any detail would accompany the accusations at some point.

the usual item featuring sex let alone sexual abuse get's portrayed, the usual charge described.
i have still to see a mainstream story about it, without the need to first click links and end on some faraway page i mean.

anyhow under the endless number of accusing headlines no single detail was mentioned on aljazeera.

i asked.

i kept looking, though not searching, and after some weeks of empty accusations checked wikipedia. knowing it is not very reliable, but nevertheless would outsource the nothing complete indescriptiveness the media featured,

i really got curious , if nothing is published but libel or inflammation, the story would smell far and from.

a real sexcase, certainly one involving half, whole and unwanted or wanted celebrity's and not the single juicy details? i couldn't believe my eyes. i have never seen such contrary publicity to a sexcase.

story as it stands now.

assange stayed the night with a lady, she said he raped her, at least so said the media, then she said he didnt rape her, but went naughty or bad (she didn't appear bruised or so) after.

there was another girl, later, younger, 20, suitably more anonimous, perhaps they need a kidney or so, because first she joined in, lucky find, then she stepped out of the thing, then somehow she suddenly was in again with no mention of her being out.

one story is the aforementioned older lady, "a feminist" and of some christian splinter,
(so no feminist), a parlementarian, went jealous when he quit on her, and states that abandonement constitutes rape. (wich could apparently be the case in sweden)
todays lawyer told a whiny story about rape and/or molest, not quite obvious.

her lawyer is (was?) a member of parliament, she might have another now.
an obviously political means to exert political pressure.

could be something else, a very obvious means to exert political pressure eg.

i even doubt it is lawfull, even in sweden. to have a lawyer that is an mp for a case of an mp.

isn't it confidentially forbidden to raise doubt about the persona of your nations government as a judge eg.

a very, very political case then.

now he is in jail, drugged i suppose, they often do that with bright minds.
jailed despite it is for a hearing,
probably contradicting english law.
possibly extradited, despite it is against that law, and probably many others.

a mp that wouldn't file a complaint for rape the next day, but wait untill a second 'opinion'?
thats a bad example. for an mp that boasts an interesse in womens affairs.

thats the case against him

all i know about it. and it is plenty to proof him innocent.

the docs about sweden describe the servile attitude the rightwing swedish government exposed,
we see someone aiming for a ministry, an opportunity to talk with ambassadors, and be wormly even hottie received in usia.

what would that look like ?

that kind of hospitality for a lady like that?

she'd be happy with the dug up corpse of michael jackson? or aim for a better dead?
i am curious what is the "case" now.

again something different i'd guess.

solidarity! solidarity!
free the dutch (wikileak ea.) prisoner children.

prince charles should have his plaincloths pay for interupting his right on protest.(nice trick with the paint tho, handy they came in to keep ppls hands clean), just don't shout nasty stuf at the camera and for the crowd next time.
potus they know about a millimetre through gps.

even outside of his car they gps charles. (these cars have gps standard and he has a driver with wosname, "i cant read maps mapper"?

btw it follows he was attempting to join the protest,(forever the student) so he kind of attacked his own car right??
icitement and lies abound.
nothing is below honour

haiti leakness

2010-12-10T06:38:00.003Z

the haiti institutions (and we may wonder in what relation to the un staff and international staffs available) have announced a recount.

usually when a recount is announced we see that it happens to be confirming the suspect results, to sufficient extent.

i personally don't recall any recount with a significant positive result. for one with a negative result you only have to look at gbagbo. but there are other possible negative outcomes, usually just confirming the incredible results in a slightly different manner. the negative about such cases is more in the general loss of credibility and vulnerability of democratic participation.
(if nothing helps people tend to turn uninformed slowly, unless the repression is cataclysmic.
after all what is the use of endless dry political matters that are part of domestic politics if in the end you never have a say, and your votes don't even count)

so my prediction is that the recount , in the absence of a neutral observing regulation and independend institution for that, will confirm the results as they have been announced for the major part, actually i don't know the distribution as it stands, but i can still guess what will be the result. they will either say that there have been some mistakes and irregularitys, but that the two top candidates finished with the required votes and in the announced ordre.

or they will say martell had indeed many more votes , but still just not enough to join the race.

variations on it are 'celestin had actually a few more votes.

the usual expectation in the first two cases, should be the former presidents wife will be president, (a woman as a president being not contrary to usian publicatory campaigns), but will still be forced to share power with the sitting elites. (probably not in the least to keep agents like the mofa in place).

people with international contact as a major jobaspect, that sit still in the next are usually the XXXX from wikileaks.

if after all miss X the wouldbe president was to be shown as responsable for the forthcomong economical developments , being similar to the recent past, she and her affiliates wouldn't anymore be usefull at the next elections as much.

However, that Martelli is invited, and.. un and gov support a recount, indicate another thing.

&1 haiti

Martelli has been worked to cooperate, most probably. ofcourse this depends a lot if the recount procedure is insightfull for the observers. i would guess it is not telling about circumstances at polling stations, prefilled and overfilled boxes etc., and the complaints about the difficultys for the poor to register.

if you just see a whole heap of papers being counted, the outcome ofcourse is only what the one that last had authority over them likes.

quand on vois une masse de billet comptee seulle, le resultat surement est au goute l'authorite sur ces papiers avant.

that would mean martelli has been bought. so much for the good news, and buzzing about projecting and predicting. but honesty has me write my mind.

bought in a loose sense, he will have been prepared, worked, "We will still put you in an opportunity to do some good, and maybe next time..., you don't have the people to staff it, and you know it, bc you hardly trust any of the "qualified" people. see that you don't have an option but to work with this "political establishment". and perhaps subtle and less subtle threats.

in that case the usia would feel compelled not to implement the projected relief plans, imf will not give you a loan, we have the experience that every donor flees if a sudden change of establishment...., look at madagascar, you will be isolated, you will get bitter and try to hold on to power. anyhow we offer you this or that nice position, swiss account, future possibilitys, compromise concerning cholera or quake aid... something

for many people, and not in the least the ones that are not power hungry (is he? i guess he is inexperienced in politics over powerhungry) such arguments can be hard to counter. beside that the usual poor nation does have a more flexible attitude about what would be acceptable to agree to in terms of personal advantage in the first place.

well we gotta see what happens. if all my impressions would be confirmed, the old elite will battle for their positions in a way as to appear credible.

if otoh i am wrong, martelli could explain the public how recounting offers him and us any certainty about the electoral procedures as a whole.

he will surely however attempt such a thing (now, after i wrote this) for reasons of his own credibility and possibly that of others . i personally however don't see how with procedural transparance the people of haiti could still be fooled. the resulting analyses through media outlets representation and civilians checks will at least be juicy.

so even if such an explanation would be a good sign, we will have to regard this critically.
(is it true?).

&2 ivory coast.

higher diplomacy without any cables aside, i am glad that either the general being fedup with cheating, or the pressure exerted in the context of wikileaks and (my personal among) critics, has been putting a food in the door and mouth, for gbagbo, to once again grab the power.

the expectations on the street of such a change in power are not so high, some messy events, and most probably to many compromises (coupled with existing corruption) will impair progress. however there is a sincerity in the political field there, that appears to promise a serious attempt to put ivory coast on a higher plan.

that is perceived as promising. personally i added to that, and possibly a hotly contexted next election, bc in 4(5) years usually not so much changes, not so much can be set straight, lack of information and often experience and reluctant foreign partners (aka corporations) will hamper the alternative, Oattaras camp's, proceeding.

what do you need a cia for, if you can talk about all this:).

&3 wikileaks

now for the record i will say some things about wikileaks.

central in the discussion about the leaks is the term 'political'.

the freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of conviction and even freedom of enterprise (embarrasing and fallible feature that it is) are all "politically" targetted.

there is a word for that , 'political repression'.

hacks are used, like collateral murder and targetted killings, cyber"crime" is only crime when done by the poor.(small detail that?)

it is possible there is a factor of planning in this. after all usian diplomacy was aware of the existence of the leaked sipdis dump months ago. id we add the factor of planning, the planning appears to be to further impair constitutional freedoms by actively setting precedents before legislature, thus (confidentially, secretly) bypassing the legal trajectory that would invite a lot of discussion and publicity. unwelcome because with more publicity and information people tend to rather protect their rights then those of the rich and priviliged.

being aware of that i look at wikileaks docs in 3 ways.
1st> the original circumstance, event that led to the existence of intelligence on a subject.
this is also the material check on veracity of the content as in nearly every case people are involved, as a result of wich people know and papers wrote something about, around the topic.
an example are papers about tsvangirai or zuma, that such papers exist is indeed very probable,
that they serve as a template to inform their own services is indeed also very probable.
wich is point 2
2nd> the circumstance as it is meant to be understood by the 3 million people that had acces to such papers (and felt very proud and smart for that)
this leads to some parts , statements, and perhaps whole papers, being only usefull in an archeological and forensic way. what was original about the content, and what is accidently overlooked in that proces of censorship.
3rd> possible preparation for the greater public. this can come in several forms, what papers are published in what ordre. eg. what papers make a more incredible , incomplete, incorrect. or even impossible, and substantially exagerated impression.

through all this, freudian mistakes, choice of words etc. are indications to what sticks behind.
a very good criterium is 'do they want us to know/think this. corporations over government, the situation the papers show, (is one of todays leaklike topics furtherdown), they don't want us to think/know.

thus obvious statements like weaponssales "potential" or the example i will still quote, are more probably untouched then statements about what x or y said.

It would really be very convenient for the usia if saudi arabias potentat calls iran a 'head of a snake'. wich renders the paper (esp. regarding procedure 2 and 3) a bit unreliable.
i think my impression of that paper was it was at least procedure(mod) 2.

05madrid4026 is an example of a doc i suspected was mod3, i will tell you if i find a better example, 06ryadh9095 is one i didnt even start reading, but now i peeked, and i am not sure if the first impression it is mod3 was warranted.

reading mod3 documents is only usefull if you want to find detail, and perhaps slips of the tongue etc. the content will otherways be boring and confirming mediaprojections. since slips of the tongues etc are available all through the documents there is no special challenge in looking for them in the least interesting. the mass of documents means that my individual research will mostly be limited by my own capacity of randomness and ' first impressions'

like : oh interesting topic, or well i know sth about that and it doesnt look to dumbed down lets read it. note that i can in mod3 ways still be influenced in my picks, ofcourse it is my first consideration however wether the report appears probable and reliable.

so i came to the conclusion subtantial portions of the documents are mod1 and mod2?
well i am sure many are mod2. i see to many confirmations about shadowy players and influence of banks and corps over even the usia state to assume it was all let out on purpose.

wether some are mod1 ? i am not so sure, it was cleared for sipdis after all, but i think some are mod1 (perhaps even quite a lot) because not every document appears to be altered
to be allowed to sipdis, allthough apaprently there are standard emissions.

like part 2 about zuma, or part 2 about cammara , it is often part 2 that is missing.
that means the whole set 1-3 is checked.( >= mod2) it also means part 2 is used for the more personal detail , and sipdis unsuitable detail, zuma for example in part 2 is quite a hero if i am not mistaken. 2 about camara would in the least show to much about the connections with marocco for a broader public like sipdis. (i suppose the definite assesment to his health, amongst things like his sexual activity, would be there)

by now i can just continue into the papers and round up my todays writing.

i took notes:D

&4 specific docs i worked at
i read some about spain,
after 08madrid724 and 05madrid2588 i switched topic. except that i understood the moc of gos is an agent, and what was the real deal about chavez, (usia trying to isolate him, but still sells weapons , however with known serial numbers(to usia), and perhaps inbuild selfdestructive features etc.)
also a convincing attempt to deny the venezolans military capacity.
i think there was another juicy thing somewhere in between, however the documents appear mod2 at best.

confidential may mean 2 things i think, either it means restricted circulation, or it means 'juicified' for sipdis. sipdis people kick on being in a position to read confidential matters, so the labels confidential and nofor may aim at getting a broader public there, when like in the case of the spanish armstrades, they are actually probably completely open in spain. (except the details like moc's role, that however add to the kick for sipdissers)

Molina btw plays a new kind of double role. on the one hand he is convinced he has no option but to abide, and serves (informs) usia. otoh he still represents spanish pov's in the matter,
he is seriously trying to support the deal of coastguard vessels(downtuned) and transportplanes(disallowed by usia).

the moment he sees those efforts obstructed he accepts the usian authority over the spanish.
wich sort of turns him into an agent. its just that it is made obvious for sipdis he feebly tries to represent spain (russia eg. does not follow up on the notion usia trades weapons to venezuela.)
between him and a traitor. (not that i mind much, if only there was transparance.)

migh it is a complicated job, i am not even anymore sure it wasnt mod spain to be an informer,
check it before you act. i think he was still more pragmatic but less of a contact, alltho on the obvious side(no less of an allie).

i went on to 05moscow11807, that surprisingly also considered trade with venezuela,
on manpads (..) there appears to be cooperation , wich is a suspicious thing considering the need for them if you would want to resist usia, the main antagonist of venezuela.

but on rifles , that apparently russia perceive as sth you can hardly refuse a nation, russia is sure to go forward with the deal and will not exchange serial numbers.
now this could be mod3D. in other words a militairy secret to fool venezuela. it is possible russia and venezuela cooperate to an extent that they would actually tell the usians those numbers, preparing it in this way to escape scrutiny by the venezolans (and perhaps most russians).

the uses of knowing such serial numbers are 'forensical' where else do the weapons end up. who uses them. and thus, who has been supported by chavez.

however the russians note that they perceive the usian attempts as commercial. russia finds their trade impaired and notices how seveal usian corps profit from that.

so the next:p
should be: 10moscow228
'onshore creditcard processing' now what would that be:S?

the stretch of the document is usian companys would be disadvantaged if the russians set up creditcard processing in russia.
even at first glace ofcourse that is hypocrite. why wouldnt a nation set up creditcardprocessing?

well: " Visa would no longer profit from these transactions"

allrighty, so russia is through usian diplomacy (politics) forced to guarantee visa profits??
indeed.

"
The law would set up a National Payment Card System (NPCS), which XXXX reported would likely be run by a consortium of state banks as either a non-profit entity or a joint stock, profit-making company. "

is that the problem? a nonprofit entity?

but it gets more funny:
"
5.(C) In the proposed draft of the law, if international payment card companies choose not to join the NPCS, they will have to set up on-shore processing centers. But neither Visa nor MasterCard representatives,
which together have 85% of the Russian payment card market, are willing to say whether they would be willing to do so.

so even as usia is agressivelly lobbying russia to give visa an unchallenged marketshare of russian financial transactions the givernment, and ambassadors are kept in the dark by the company's they are representing??

now who is the boss there, potus? (president of the united states) or visa.

visa obviously.

nice peek into reality.
mbeki.. they dont like him. perhaps he is a bit hard to handle, and indeed it is sad he would not retract his idiotical statements about aids, justified in so far that it would sound he acceots the official covertstory for that artifical plaque, but wrong in that it shows he is reluctant in emancipating sexuality and by extension in this context , women.

this goes for zuma as well. however they like him more then they admit, because he is smart and straight, even if he exploits political options, he hasn't betrayed his ideological vision.

he 'also keeps his composure' wich can be a very good thing, keeping your composure is a sign of staying calm and not turning violent quickly. however, zuma part two is missing, and with all he whining i saw about him, i can hardly be sure this picture is completely warranted.

the document however left me with a good impression of him. i am curious about mandelas opinion. mandela has a great deal of integrity and is a very usefull source of information as a result.

then tsvangirai. ok it is a bit nitpicky and wow what a lovely tasty juicy incorrect story about that diamondfield, nice diamonds there:p. (heey aljazeera featured that around that time...)
i don't know if mdc was involved according to that doc.

09harare1004 otoh shows a typical insight in politicians (and that tsvangirai himself is perhaps not the ideal person to adopt that attitude)

"He also acknowledged that his public statements calling for easing of sanctions versus his private conversations saying they must be kept in place have caused problems."

he lied to the public. and they tell him to shut up about it in private ('acknowledged" - admitted.. what guild he admitted? telling in private)

last remarks.
seems we are winning the cyberwar.
i admire you people, and love you for that, let's stick to our ways, for freedom and future.
tsvangirai perhaps does not deserve to be directly targetted by me, he's been beaten up before and he is only trying to be political and following his leads(uk,usia) advices.
otoh. transparance is transparance all the way. and the doc reveals his willingness to surrender business to usia and uk "do business with".

there was more noticable about the few docs i discuss here.
and there is a lot that remains to be said about julien assange's case.
indeed he deserves to be released, the foulmouthed remarks "a mischievious prankster' springs to mind, remarks from the worse of the corporations slaves, and the hot talk of former cia heads etc. notwithstanding

into the legal (and actually illegal) aspects of the case i will dig in another post.
its getting a bit much.

i wish everyone of us the best for now, and cheers and thumbs up really for showing who will win the struggle for a virtual and real future.
insist on transparance
take care
be solidair
thank you julien.

leakout ivorycoast

2010-12-07T04:40:00.003Z

what do you think will be the leakout of this?

i still have high hopes. mostly that everything gets published. however, this is a sour planet indeed. you cant make a joke, bc ppl will take it serious, and you can't be serious, bc ppl will make a joke out of it.(so i have my informers in the chinese parliament??)

i quit reading the cables for now, if really only the way to get to them will be the encrypted file, i can jump to what interests me at that point, and worse, if i dont get it working i have a lot of time to look at the remaining ones, so some of the fun is gone.

however i want to write about ivorycoast. in hindsight i am curious what dutch tv showed and said, for fun value mostly. i can guess.

the point is it feels like ivory coast is the hostage of usia.
for starters i think and wrote my suspicion is the western world wanted gbagbo to win, well with the cables still forthcoming they all decided to support Qattari.

however there is no follow up. i think ivory coast is the cia's hostage inhere.

i wonder if i say something they don't like, will they light the fire of war?
if something happens in relation to these cables they don't like, i don't mean as a result really, more in terms of continued pressfreedom..

i know how it feels to be blackmailed by machinations, and i feel like that.

so i watched when aljazeera had a topic. quality journalism i say, you don't usually see a discussion as revealing on tv. not here.

the best thing about gbagbos ambassador was his sense of humor.
basically he said, if usia can use a republican constitutional court to fraudulently elect bush it is legal. why not here? he didnt use the word fraudulently ofcourse.

next he said, the guys from the north (sorry to say for all the secret loving diplomats but my opinion their collegues are trashy when it comes about justice) come and kill.

an argument with an impact, however it lost him the debate.

a refugee, woman, pointed out he came to power through deathsquads, through intimidation, and through a coup with no elections.

i think only one thing, when will we finally start respecting african lives and people.

free the hostage, open the secrets that put dictators in charge.

leaks

2010-12-06T18:32:00.002Z

something like this tells a lot about the whole of the message ofcourse.

(C) The Qatari government's appreciation of U.S. training and technology presents numerous prospects for U.S. engagement. We know that Qatar will need trainers, assistance on selection of physical security equipment (such as delta pop-up barriers, fences and anti-vehicle berms), nonlethal weapons and tactics, and other technological equipment (CCTV, etc). Offshore protection is an area with the greatest potential;

it's diplomatical language or so it says and what sticks behind really,
let's start with GOQ 'appreciation', what if they hate it? (they don't like the claim on foreign equipment and facility usia are making)

prospects is golddigger language. engagement is: we do what we want and do that with weapons if we like. so it says, despite that qatar doesn't like our weapons programs, we see a splendid opportunity to make money, if they like it or not.

well at that point i am still curious, golddigger language okay, militairy terms for economical claims, well you have to see it even in the papers.. reads on, fences barriers:S? if they think they don't need them what is wrong with you, you might think.

they don't want qatar to look like the average muslim or qatari is an insane, certainly when the only thing really dangerous to be around tends to be the people offering to roadblock qatar.

at least i guess so. except for the ppl selling the TV's most people are not really enthusiastic to bodyscan the whole world for the sake of a misleaded christmas terrorist or the next weird story.

if its so easy to catch the craziest guys for wanting a thing like that actually you should start the therapy immediatly. if on the other hands there are no such people and only such storys, by creating a roadblocked world with gunpoints all around we are sure to get it.

incidents have allways been, and however we squirm they will as a matter of scales become larger. so even if the GOQ does like it, there might be plenty of people opposing the odd theory.

with less police on the street i like it better. i even feel safer, people are different. usians have a preoccupation with putting out stuffed up militias everywhere in nations that have never proven to cope in a political way with a normal militia. or cops or whatever.

senseless. back to the topic. selling arms. so i wondered still a bit.. after the row of prospected sales. offshore protection has the greatest potential..

potential. riot. if you blow a well they buy a vessel? potential is not anymore golddiggerlanguage.
it's explosive expert language, it's also if you put battery's into something. the machine is there, and you know it is going to work. and economically what it means is , even more money.

it's not an area to deserve attention, it's one with potential, and with CCTV they would be the only ones to enjoy the views of what really goes off.