resistance worldwide

well today the paper tells the leader of columbia's farc escaped capture. in itself no news;)

had he not escaped just that attempt from the overpowerfull servants of the rich, the army of young loosers of a life..

we could almost have doubted farc still existed.

perhaps that is why they been so apt at hostage taking the last decade, to denounce the media campaign of their total demise.. sth i remember that started before the big hits against farc even took place.

so that was news, farc is very much more active and alive then has been openly admitted over a decade. i think farc is against the oil and mineral corporations that destroy south america and leave it polluted, killing terrifying and sickening the people. so eu, canada and usia, denounce farc.

bad news and has been so for some thirty years.. but thats what it allways looked like to me.

i start with this tale, perhaps to introduce how i don't feel secure about much that has been reported over libya or even syria.

still i want to write a couple of things about those two situations.

firstly there is also the mladic process going. he might be mystified, the complaint features that the nato campaign and the orchestrated tribality's of the time claimed 130k lives at least.

such a thorough underestimate on the most public of fora, we can say he witnesses the falsification of history inside out. i don't envy him, alltho for now unlike the usual lowly people, he is still alive.

he must feel his chances are dim in the context. reminds me of ocampo, not what he said even, but that he inferes anything about , was it libya, i think so, but perhaps it was an another enemy of the oil corps, beforehand and with supposed authority.. i found it weird. almost to the point i got curious about the guys assets and interests.

i think the free world is having an identity crisis that they grapple for any straw to see their opinions represented.

you know, kadaffi is " not that bad" he was part of the prisoner project eg. when usia shipped the arab suspects to egypt , libya and syria for torture, he was with "the good fellows".

also no matter how deadly he has been, a few months of strife, and perhaps not in the last the blind zeal wrapped upon the 'revolutionairy's, the few months have been deadier and bloodier then that.

i dont have an opinion, just want people to also notice that.
perhaps not for many but for some in libya it is easy to fear what is next, without kadaffi, some other ruler, family clan, system and interests, probably one related with , what is the word? imperialist? , in fact related with western security corporations, will bring to bear.

what exactly, noone knows, do we look at algeria, (what silence about this french ally??),
or say sudan? western africa? we see one despote more often replaced by a worse then anything else.

this will under any circumstance remain a worry for libya, and i would guess also for syria, for years to come. much like now in egypt we see plenty of the powers 'that be' in a reactionairy swing that may still waste it all.

in a few ways, such are the ways of the reaction, the purpose is to lay waste, the exact means are a second.

that sentence reminds me of the last line i wrote on robert gates just before he quit job. so it would be a nice last line for an article, but, and that is all only about libya, without any direct relation to bahrein, algeria or syria, or a king that rekindles his kingship in a more formal and akingly familiar way, by legitimising their own new claim through a referendum.

the referendum itself is the best proof the intents are not that democratical, a real development would not want such formal affirmation, and by speaking about it i keep it of the table in parts for decades still to come, it sticks to the mind like that.

that besides i think it is horrible, i dont know who i behind the tactical planning for the libyan rebels, and their territorial strategy's, but it is a warcriminal.

that is just an opinion, i am not even taking sides, the circumstances and methods in libya and all the other client states certainly warrant the predicate for the other sides.

but it is insane, a military insane situation and i wonder what sticks behind the predictable predictment (..) . remember how they first send a revolutionairy division (forgive the expression) over the coastal road through misurata and on?

completely miliary undoable, and with no effort to turn it far over the classical concept of Tobruk, in technical terms, one that obviously khadaffi 'd fondled.

weird. i dont accept such stuf as coincedence. the result is a horrible stalemately brotherly bloodbath, a war of attrition even. over.. over what?

people do not easily learn, they find it hard to change their ways.

rulers otoh usually pick the wrong sentiments to cling to power, these basics are beneath this civil war.

personally , speaking from the khadaffi side, i don't see how a status quo, or the fallible result of the change of it, should be so much of an excuse of dischord, and bloodshed,

no matter what, and what side wins, like bob marley said,

"to free the world they need to free their own minds."

victim of the system

in how far is being different from a political target of the system actually still the same.
and the opposite, how can being the same be a justification if it feels so much different.

my experience with victims of the system is manifold,

the first i think most of us share is how most children notice other childrens being victimised by other educaters systematics. at least i have many vague impressions left of adults that with nearly insane audacity invoked heaven, hell and whatnot, in their perceptions of reason.

to me it seemed most children were under a certain system, allways bad, but of different evilness.

bad in the sense that it was a habit. people treating other people, because it's theirs or other peoples habit. thats very egoist.

also i remember those as the most boring and awkward routines of many, and perhaps all childhoods i witnessed. deadly habits against possible creativity.

sorry i have to let that loose in a post that should be about other people.

apparently many adults think: it's a child so i can say any idiotic thing and will still be right.
as i remember it on such a habit usually, (that is if we needed to witness it) followed set escalations. ooh i stopped such experimentation when i had a decent file ofcourse.
..soon.

so in the first place i am one of those who consider everyone a victim of the system.

the circumstance of just growing up in the 60s 70s in netherlands was enough to completely convince me people were all to much reliant of systematics in their exchanges.

it suits the period btw. one thing the hippy age did was making some sort of break with the gospell and agree on some spirituality for each persons own.
not only me, but even many adults were consciously aware of the need for improvement in the relations between children and adults, and people in general.

i think these days that psychological questionmark with the whole of society's functioning is somewhat withdrawn, taboo even perhaps.

i see no other obvious reason then a further aglomeration of capital and elite, superiority ideas.
the people are supposed to be so stupid "that you will never notice",

anyhow its slightly besides the point.

victims of the system, i soon found out for instance that solidarity with the labourer was something, that in netherlands could only be desired. i found labour unions weak, in netherlands at a somewhat later age.

today it scares me, lol, tunesias revolution of the hands of labour unions, what if they disintegrate and fade into insignificance like here, or become something as incomprehensively institutional and labourer unfriendly as in usia? here they don't have many members, and the label independent is farfetched when it comes to representation.

(there have btw been a small share of romantic, political and hearthwarming exceptions, and solidarity with actions and strikes in general as well as a strong financial support at times)

but the political factor? not impressed.(1)

go victims of the system...

so the next group of victims, is a victim of victims, that logically follows, evrything significantly more precarious then an overstretched healthcareworker would be a 3fold victim even if they started working 4 yo.

for me it is somewhat important, because i can be really embarrassed and quite mad and nasty about what i know happens to people. unfortunately, the better nor the worse ones can help it all, or even a lot, they are also still their outside personality's. in fact, basking their kids and having every possible stress, tick, obsession, whatever. personality disorder if you so want.

i like that, how most peoples personality is mostly their disordres. i don't mean to say they are mostly disordered, but that they can be so dedicated to specific traits. the funny is that that "kind of personality" is very much in the way of being one.

thinks of a victim.

at one point, like bradley manning, being a victim, damages you, fiercely, or less fiercely and still mean. that proud united states, their champion of openess, has been using the word transparance, their whole todays diplomatic appeal, cannabalising bradley manning.

he might feel a victim of the system.

thinks of a victim.

...there's work to be done, laws to be changed...






(1)due respect where remaining strong on safety worked)