Oh, oh. forgot to immediatly back-up obviously

In short ordre i might try to reconstruct some of the sentences on my last post.

The situation of the fort is thus: There are some obvious factors playing in the area;
Technical players, police-departments etc., are generally operating professionally and not very diverted. However there is an intense campaign of influencing with prejudices going on,
and as these seem to appeal the most to the lower echolons, some things may be happening.
The population, concerned as it is, is like wax, to the argument of the day.

Interesting ranges of sentiments, (the interim playing a secondary christmas quarrel etc.,)
compromise the misty view. The huge discrepancy between theoretical possibilities and actual situation confuses even the housing-activists. It's obvious that a completely different approach would be the more rewarding. However under constant fire of backdoorpolitics, constraint,
plotting and the exploit of prejudices, the presisting course had set score.

Meanwhile, outside , the world has changed. And not only for the better. The actual burocratics that pull lines on the very project, transgress to diluting the international reality now they are mobilised. The good news is people just have better looks, tv and adds. appear more fashionable.

On the awkward side international impolitics are more outspoken and thus polarising, and the national media-trend is apt to light out differences. One only good notice there: much of it is :
been there seen that, and it surely always will.
(examples, pro-israel bias of UScongress, unwill to release syria of threat, negating somalian negotiation, the huge anti putin/chavez, whoever else might be socialist, blair, rhetorics)