change the world

not a bad idea,

what a mess, today i ran into the predictable angry woman against assange, if you do not know how the case went in sweden it is all very suspect indeed, besides sexcases are creapy anyhow.

apparently the kind of libel never fails to work,
contemplate it, he had sex with two women in sweden.

ok perhaps a bit distastefull to so much enjoy your righteousness,
one was a parlementarian, an active person in wikileaks according to some sources, that is however if you concern her political background slightly implausible, a small-wrongwing political stream that is ostentiously courting usia. for favor apparently.

what that has to tell us about usian favors:S

money if no worse, we know they party the usual islamist.

it is a very smelly case, the other plaintive redrew to be only few days later redrawn in the case, it seems also there was some art of foreknowledge, that was mostly an impression, it is not a likeable job to dig through articles about sexcases, soon i found out it smelled truely i was satisfied to my knowledge.

we never hear of her, she stays out of the picture , ofcourse 'to spare her feelings' and i care.. but on the other hand i am so informed she was no alien to the practice of having sex with relative strangers.

what an awfully weak case, what is it for major swedish political forces want to push an awfully weak case contrary to the wish of prosecuters?

nuf about it, but that was nerving.

then there is turkey, merkel will notice, in greece it is no surprise,
does not she know the turks have century old cannons along the bosporus that still beat the english in the first world war?

is there any surprise they fire their rounds in every direction, and does she see how right the greek were in spending massively on french and german weapons?

she ought to know greek, sorry turkish, are like that, did not they allways bombard innocent kurd villages, might not what happen, if we are serious about alexander here, if they get through and at the israeli?

assad must seem a blessed man to her today, wonder if she gets von rumpey to smile.

finally convinced of her true german identity that she ofcourse knows of she will have to return from the akropolis and it's desperate decendents,

having changed little but answered the local desire for a show off she had the most painfull experience of her life, if any ueber german really exists it is her, nobody went through that, the woman do all the suffering.

in that sense remarkably greek suddenly remind turks, you see what that occupation did to them, even merkel is needed to save them.

and.. they don't have icons in greece, noone is holy there, so what to do with a woman like that?

we will see tomorrow, greek man are reknownedly attractive.

so on with the turks, i think they are stubby, well the not the ones i like, but if you say: i like turks, i think you mean : i like man stubby.

hardly anyone dares to admit aloud they like turks, it's like saying ' i like big man', a bit odd and people can think something of it.

perhaps that is the problem with the greek, greek are fond of grace, young girls, okay they have their escapades, but not especially with stubby man, certainly not with turks, well unless in greece perhaps.

the greek turks slowly disintegrate, or so we hope, it is what they deserve, you would almost hope they would end greek orthodox in 2300.

it is a beaurifull tradition, we europeans underestimate it, but if you do one step inside greek orthodoxy it is really as if you step into a very old version of the middle ages, pittoresque to no end.

bit like tibet. religion also dictates who gets in hell and who gets a bankaccount in nations like that. usually.

greek orthodox turks would obviously rise higher than a falling star can fall, i must hope not straight into martyrdom, but i do not think greek are greedy.

except perhaps with money, what a farce, people here paying, what they can afford and the greek buying german weapons, ok nuf said.

i suppose that is the problem with the turks? hypnotised by the greek, and northsyrians now have to hear the result, let's hope at least it relieves the kurds in irak and elsewhere.

typical how carefull syria, uh turkey has allways been with artillery and foreign territory, oh well, would it have a do?

the law they have for bombing syria does.. weird that,

what would that law say? alawites are for this year considered damned kurds?

so that is where we are, obama would like to be glad with the escalation, everyone understands, rasmussen talks utter gibberish, for the informed it means, the military don't give a damn, they never, he couldn't be a general, s'pose he is.

if they don't want to give a damn, it's quite a contigency, it means they want the succes , wether for obama or the syrians or mostly theirselves, and they will not probably wait very long to become involved in any escalations.

that climate will be conductive for an ongoing turkish firework wich can be expected to now and then provocate a new mortar round.

since turkish are the most advanced of all ottoman people, they will enjoy the fireworks if for no other reason than to make sure, or at least convince themselves of the enlarged security assad will not have time to think over countermeasures, besides they are sunni.

that is a point, but anyone can be a wahabi anywhere and what is with sunni?

it's a start.
oh yes, it would be nice to follow ban ki moons course and just put a silent end to this very much much to noisy affair. for one thing noone and not assad should get away with calling huge parts of the population terrorist.

please?

the future

every day in the big world and the small (netherlands) things happen that destine the future. I don't want to say your future or our future, but also that is true.

Usually you would want things to have only a positive influence on the future, for some reason i think of that of others more then my own, the future of animals and plants for example.

But basically like my political theatre turned to be the international over the national, future got related with future of humans strongly. And all these humans they live in one or more future states, and apply some future rights. If anything at all.

So everything that is decided now, has an impact on these futures, and everything that is said can have a result for that future.

Basically even if i say nothing things will be said and done, "decided" that will force the future into a shape.

This makes the subject to wide however, i might as well say something because the future will anyhow have a shape.

At least i know it will, every day i am painfully aware that things said, (mine eg.),
positions taken (merkels eg.) or "decissions" made (wijnand duyvendak) have an impact on the future and i want to be pretty clear about it.

Basically for miss merkel i have this, i don't know what she is at, but the geopolitical ordre of peace and stability has considered the following things considering georgia of wich she gave no sign of noticing: (It's a long list)

the cold war is over. That is hard to cope , deal with and understand for anyone,
but from the humanist point a war that is over need not be rekindled.
If Merkel wants to fight russia over something, she could use the words and structures of the current days to fight it.

We don't fight Merkel over h. so she as a proper human would not need to fight russia over it's past. However if this is not her fear and mistake, miss merkel, she is a very different camp, we must then consider her a strawwoman then, ready to be hired for escalation.

Then considering georgia. The Nato didnt win a war , russia did, it won the war of georgians against south ossetians and probably abchazians to. As a result russia was and still is in a position to degrade georgias military capacities, a thing that concerning saaksvillis methods seems like something of a preventive measure, and considering his ambitions slightly more so. (Nato membership) well people may be a member of anything except an organisation that uses criminal eg. violent methods.(like the nato btw)There are absolutely strong signals nato is doing her best to achieve a offensive position against russia.

Not only against russia, obviously many other nations are considered potential spheres of influence, but in this case that is not the subject.

The human and economical costs that come with military action of that kind (interventions, occupations, invasions) is one that should be reduced to an absolute minimum.

A thing russia tried and to a great extend achieved if you compare the georgian situation to the usual " invasion or occupation" (saaskvilles words).

There is absolutely no doubt that the current "World ordre" much characterised by deceipt and lie, intimidation and military violence, will not be the one to bring the nations together for peeace.

To bring the world together we need a thing often called justice. justice and military alliances, intimidation and mutilated news don't go together.
not with the justice we need. (as opposed to the one there is)

Practically it means russia is left little option in the negotiations, but to somehow continue a preventive military action on georgia, that future nato state that can do anything, just because it is not with the russians, called slaves by other europeans.

The agreement for a redrawal includes an agreement that the georgians return to their bases and occupy themselves with peacetasks, it is very brutal and insane to try to apply that as a diplomatic victory over russia from nato.

It means merkel, the west, has no objections to russia killing georgians as they will only use it as the excuse they were looking for.

That is not the way russia wishes, or the world should wish to run these negotiations. For me merkel lost any inspiration, i really think she is like the dutch government, and in the case less constructive in practice then even condoleeza rice (that might have been better then the dutch "news" showed as it appeared an awkward cut, she actually really achieved that russia will try to negotiate for a situation of complete military disengagement (with georgian forces preventively, because they are preoccupied with occupying south ossetia and abchazia still.)


Merkel one of "that" side, the side of repression and intolerance, the side that with sneaky decissions not only encrouches on russia , but is also having daily repercussions on our daily european life, encrouches on us. An insignificant one it seems. Yet a dangerous tool.

That, is the matter of authority, the usual system tries to moderate society through authority (not through justice aka sense) teh rsult of that is that every of their strategys contributes to the actual state of repression,

The whole internal dutch , and ofcourse also the european policy, is much dedicated to that strong and superior position of the rule, the state , over people, one result of that is that the external policy is also authoritarian, as such it fails to improve on the world in a similar way as it fails to secure social improvement on a structural scale most anywhere.

I don't want to go into details.

we live in a ridiculous world, ruled through a sad bunch of people, that vow for blood instead of looking for a future.