600000 bullets a day

I rili don't feel like doing this, but here goes some more critics on UN.

What we actually see on play in media and politics these months is something that should stop. Obviously people still have great hopes for a better future of their society's . When kenya happened, and to our not small surprise usia ceded short before actual recidivist genocide, the obvious situation that the palestineans will
be repressed into some support, and last and foremost Obama.

The nepalese elections having delivered a maoist majority is no small surprise in times of electional fraude, that butan abolishes monarchy is always a promise, people are writing constitutions evrywhere, and another 4 million ppl nation, paraquai will enjoy some more freedom and justice. What i think is these are small cookies.

anyway it should not be enough to give up hope, but what stands against it.
Against it stands the usian elections, that as always are turned in a parade of bias and fears. The obvious situation that perhaps not even obama can get the neocons out of irak, the huge problem with foodshortages, and the enduring pressure from the west on africa.

Situations have become rather obsessed. there is a small minority shouting tibet should go above evrything, hardly needed because it would be above evrything anyhow,
the media represent it extremely well. It's obviously as well planned as the games in peking are. Now the tibetans are just having bad luck. they are a usefull pawn
in the hands of the antichinese, happening to be the same that want to stay in irak.

as such they have become a ridicule of international relations, wich is not quite the greatest service their sponsors offered. Then again.. generally spoken you would sympathise with the tibetans, wich could be a reason to voice discontent, i do wonder wat wud happen if usia hosted these games, i fear i would well be willing to disturb their ridiculous flame run. Since china already grants the tibetan province cultural autonomy, asking more would be encrouching on their territorial integrity.

I must say the reports i hear about chinas behaviour in tibet are shocking to my norms, well aware that i am that shocking things like these happen in many places of the world certainly also under usian (and nato, even un) flag.

So its a very hypocrit story to preach independance for tibet, when actually the chinese society as a whole is modernising and the attention at the olympic games could also be a more sincere attempt to promote human rights in general.
I guess that is not on the agenda, becus they are not so sure they want to be pointed at human rights all the next olympics.

Then there is the mugabe affair.
Very long brittain has resisted to let go of zimbabwe before independance. it resulted in one more bloody conflict, that was complicated through SA interference,
special quads of other nations operating, english, fighting, massive human rights infringements (mostly by the whites) and a radiation of civil warlike armed conflicts in the area. Allthough that was ofcourse regionally mutual, in all these cases SA and western foreign policy played a role.

at one point the situation in zim could not anymore be held, and as one of the last it decolonised. Immediatly ridiculous claims were brought by whites who thought they still owned the land and positions they stole. Not only that, sanctions and boykots were brought into effect, and have been there ever since.
Now there is MDC and morgan tsvangirai. He is quite an amable guy himself, however he is representing the obvious surrender option. He is regarded as someone who has close ties to the english, every diplomatic move SA or angola makes shows they are under great international pressure themselves. That means : africa is not decolonised yet, strangely indeed SA better economy hardly helps the poor, and so its hard to sympathise with the opponents of mugabe. It wudnt introduce normal relations with the western world, but assymetrical ones.

Now in the media robert mugabe is depicted as a brute, a hideous dictator and perpetrator of every evil deed and even genocidal actions. His better sides kept in the shadow as ever since independance. The zim people are actually not that excited as we are all made to think. Chances are all this anti mugabe diplomatics are basically spilled on the zim populace and actually more will vote for mugabe.

That besides the camp remains very split, about half of the ppl supporting mugabe, the rest vying for morgan or any iniative. Normalisation of the relations with zimbabwe could also now be done, without morgan tsvangirai. It is very doubtfull if this priority with presidents is so usefull anyhow, considering that a democracy is supposed to be ruled by its parliament.

actually the west says: we want our own dictator there. that is a big risk to take.
Zimbabwe will never be all slave and downtrodden attitude again, and a great change in national politics not rarely escalates into violence.
iotw, if morgan wins he has to take some care in not destroying to much of the existing structures fast or the result will imediatly be a repressive situation.

So thats a dirty case. Tibet is a dirty case, zimbabwe is one, now what is next on the war and hate agenda of the western media....
Ill tell you. it is georgia. The nato has now deployed the un against georgia.
i think its a dirty soup they are steering in, at a dirty time in history.

about dialogue

Dialogue is essential in every social process.Probably all political failure is partly a failure of dialogue.However after things get mixed up, the arguments become unveiled in a different way, people incorporate some ideas so far they might even fail to recognise them in others, and strong arguments are often countered with lies or confusing , in an attempt to defuse, a situation.
As a result of that, for example irak can hardly be viewed through the window for dialogue, the reality there is polluted.

It is a continuous fact that when people are allowed no peace with their own history, it is way easier to dissettle a peacefull mind. And as an example of the complexity of the iraki situation, you may perceive bush's attitude towards Iran, not only as colonialist (oil),anti-islam, (islam being a social and thus not capitalism-compatible system from the POV of capitalists), you may perceive it as putting the blame of the results of his own carnage on someone else. Someone kept out of the dialogue...

Likewise in the middle east, lebanon, palestine, denied or starved out of the dialogue, the result is unrest, so the strategy is working. Hezbollah wich is a very legitimate party in lebanon, it has shown to offer everything (their lives) for lebanon, and even halted the israeli agression to some extend, and not in the least prevented escalation into syrian territory. Because it is also obvious Syria is kept out of the dialogue.(1)
And maybe it is the natural thing to become pro-something, if the circumstances of the political reality threaten it with war and major destruction, but they are your neighbours. An example of the work of dialogue in history. Evrything is thrown on a pile, prosyrian or pro-iranian, are the same in those medias reports. Btw. a pro-iranian group is also naturally created this way, because not everyone likes other nations to suffer, and obviously such are just the people, other people in charge need to be kept our of the dialogue.

But actually the best example of dialogue is somalia. The reason for this is somalians and ethiopians have to live with a new historical reality, and their dialogues still have the freshness of discovering new standpoints, points of view, and.. because not so much is yet anticipated, new options to overcome troubles through a creative use of the factual history , as well as to just set aside most of the vengeance or regret, because the historical situation has definetly changed. So although the somalians and ethiopians are due to become radicalised to another to facilitate the invasion and possibly maintain an occupying force. Wich will be the case simply because there is no african unity over the attack on somalia, for example a proper course in darfur would already be expensive, and noone wants to understate the relevance of the kongolese or kenian, chadish or nigerian situation. While the invasion of somalia seems tactless, useless, oportunist, and largely part of the devastation of dialogue between african identity, islam and christanity .

Perhaps it is funny in this dialogue to mention that nor me nor putin nor bush are religious people. Not religious in the sense it means something in politics. It means something in the sense of development and manipulation of ethics. It is a positive and negative social control mechanism, that is related to and probably usurpated or exterminated every, ancient ethic thought or knowledge it encountered. Therefore even bush, that is undoubtedly indoctrinated into christianity, and has a hang to popularise with religion, allows himself privatly a 'heathen' interpretation of the religious complex. This he keeps out of the view and certainly the dialogue, but it is an example of unveiled truths that are not yet spoiling the possibility's of dialogue.
Generally spoken religion is a thing that has to change, that we possibly have to live with, that we definetly want to change on a faster pace then the religious do (at least in our confrontation with christian structures we expect similar in islam). Having attempted to open the dialogue, let me linger to the tempting space offered by the fresh insights in the nature of dialogue in
somalia and ethiopia.

I keep underestimating the naivity, and the ease with what that is abused, of almost each and every local rule. I could give examples, but generally the people are inapt at diplomatics, and the western diplomacy realises and abuses that all to well. (so i am angry about the stupidity and selfrighteousness of the western statements, not about the naivity or rural quality of UIC, i
think here.. there must be dialogue but there has been intrication).

So: Apparently structures are shaped such that in many (more then half at least..) 'proto-decolonised' nations, when anyone outside the scope of western interests gets to some power, they are still a product of the colonialist culture in the sense that they are kept naive and
whereas possible silly (in the eyes of the western public).

Practically out of the (international) dialogue, and not in the least through seperation and cultural interference.It is really easy to exploit a weakness in a national character.Especially if you are antagonising the culture, they will give room to negativity in their expression. To me it is obvious the somali, and ethiopian cultures share such characteristics.
Isn't that refreshing?

(1) Our media call hezbollah (and ayone else opposing siniora) pro-syrian.(they say prosyrian hezbollah always.. never just hezbollah, let alone pro-lebanese hezbollah) Actually they usually say: prosyrian hezbollah that is on the terrorism list where akso al quada and pros-iranian hamas and shia groups are on... or some such repetition with in times of crisis added... 9-11.

hate campaign methodics

MH.. So in fact we won the elections.. That is rather obvious. And ofcourse the outcome hardly represented that result. So like a goodwilling people i have been spying for the signals that betray the capitalist attitude after this new succesfull screw off the populace.
(how would they tackle their loss of credibility)

It had been somewhat surprisingly silent on that front for a day or two... I suppose they waited untill their secret polls showed 40% of the populace again believed the dull brainwash, and thought an inbring of the main cheater powers was not to risky.

Anywhere there goes, monday was this big day..... Some political guy (not officially fascist) made some statements about how the racist hate gave another (extremely impopular, officially intolerant) woman such a "good" result in the elections.

I went: aha, so that is the structure it takes... (again. its not a first) Since my analyses already revealed capitalism would promote civil war before letting go of their undemocratic power, can't say i am surprised to see them promote rasism sneakily as a reaction.

Still i am disappointed, our spirits have sunk so deep. That one 'Rutte' can get away with this.
Anything i can think of against this, is writing it down here. Not food but hate is cultivated.
Singularly for power, that is singularly an anti social power.

todays fairy tale

ppl will prolli be really interested at what goes off.
mh.. everybody has been thinking of politics or in the broader sense elektions,
for me it is really exiting, my impression everyone in the town i saw was really positive of the intention,untherways everyone smiles knowingly, many marvelous thoughts off politics whirled through everyone's head, like oh one party is all we need, and the reason for it.
Or was it the other way around, that we went for the reason of it, then realised we only need one. So the real thing on TV ... don't get me wrong could be spaced:)... however, as a result evryone is thinking of green left (really good)wing. Mh. I get to the fun of it now. Wich are the moments you realise SP would actually be better. These are quitte beautifull moments when you think labour is just labour or that it is more fun that something happens for once.

I am not soo sure, i saw kids at the voting asking people to write their votes on a paper, and said i was ok, it took me only milliseconds to realise what the propaganda could do with these things.(send the cops in to vote sumthing odd, cus they have oaths of loyalty and other stuff to corrupt them.) I don't think the church would do that, though it feels like they are well aware of the method.


So i asked whether they would see the results there as well, wich was not the case, 3 people sit behind a table.
Hand the card it gets stamped , they put a tiny paper on a stick, and there you go to stealomatron, the enemy you only encouter to proof that even an anarchist
might vote the SP. Well i can't proof it, except that i know exactly what i did.

If you 'r used to feel like the naive green have been silenced,
not to mention where the votes went, then ..

Putted on the radio.
The radio is horrible, apparently an high nr of ppl vote like 80% everywhere,
or in places. it's not put clear. The news downplays it by , resp. telling more then 50% of ppl went,and saying arab media are very interested for a man in amsterdam. Because he might be a minister , allthough i think many more people voted SP.(like most of frysia).

The next one has a solid poping for benedictus, they advise a lousy,"stemwijzer", that is misleading and bias like all of them, we checked.
Lastly some heraldic gossip, on another match, and now classics?

The less you have to lie the less it shows.. propaganda to the last seconds.
cheers:)

I'll hear what silencer has in mind in the evening. What do you think?

A day in the life off.....ntcb

Welcome dear readers,
from the relative calmth of my buro chair let me introduce you to the turbulences of dutch and international politics.(diary style)

I will prolli post on a near daily basis and even more often unless,
i find a more important intellectual obligation.

The posts you will find here written by me , will offer shocking insights in the reality behind the media. Not bcus i like sensation, but bcus it is the nature
of these realitys.

Since currently the left (my side) in the netherlands is winning largely in the polls ahead of elections i am glad to announce the possibility we, the contributors and readers of this blog will proof essential in shaping some of the future politics of the netherlands, europe, and intercontinental, interregional cooperation.

The keywords should be tolerance, joy, future and participation.
Good luck.

On with the bad news: The lasting campaign in the context of the newly organised ntcb (a new dutch secret service branch) wich aims at destroying the means of personal expression that might lead to unwanted political views, ( examples are forum contributions, blog comments, and even the rapture of the national media's headlines to silence the individual.)
One of these targetted individuals being me.
My views are unwanted often... primarily btw. because they are anti-capitalist, anti-zionist and anti racist.
On the other hand ofcourse everyone and all tries to profit from my opinions
and observations, its quitte a complicated picture for myself...

that was todays bad news.
unfortunately i have another related story to tell today...