end of times

recently many of my blogs entry's center around some or other kind of social gathering.
it's not on purpose but things like protests and meetings ofcourse do ask for attention.

i am sad to even start about this subject, don't expect much, there is a limit to what one can rationalise in the face of arbitrary detention, censory and abuse of power.

it is not even a rational thing to witness, and its a long story to be told before any of you understand what i am on about. it is also the same story as the persecution of roma, 'foreigners', and in the end the jews. the laws are similar, the mechanisms the same and the judges as complicit. its really like an upperclass project hitting it's target, and the target are the free minds of the people.

so let me start with the most exceptional example of the lack of intellectual class our 'superiors' have been projecting. in the house of lords, did you even know netherlands has a such 'house of lords' where the grey and rich confer to limit every accidental progressive impact of the workings of dutch politics? in this place the senile majority has decided, that whilst freehousing is criminal, anti-freehousing must remain legal? i know why, because their retarded kids make money of the speculating with their dads empty buildings ..

even more strikingly i think it was common sense in law, that when you forbid something also the making profit from it should be considered excessive.

as far as i know there has never been a law to specifically state that to be making money anti-sth
is legal. logical at it, these exploitations of contrary feelings are not a part of the jurist preoccupation. they should neither be part of the mindset.

in fact by making an anti-something institute a legally warranted object of laws you accept the legality of the something, at least in the letter of law. civilians are not allowed to apply their own justice, no matter how injust they may be.

however that not capacity but family and loyalty are the decreeing aspects of the official life in netherlands isn't new to me.
the lipservice against racism eg. could have been easily turned into a common sense consensus on that politics is not the place to explicitly discriminate. instead of just treating the illegal practice of it to cooperate and concede , even find "compromise" shows where the flags really hang. if it's prescripted, it is organised.

we are ruled by organised criminals explicitly these days. "the worst maffia is in den haag".

so i can't say there was anything hopefull to start with, and now for umpteenth time a set of repressive measures (censoring 100's of arrests, heavy jailtime for being homeless, restricting of alternative and creative projects, they tried it many times before but it never worked for them, and so i hope it will be this time and reality will force them to concede. yet, it is "worse then ever", more censoring, more influencing, more criminalisation, and jail.

it feels like the real doom of fascism and was proudly arranged by the same instigators of the verbal abuse in media, the socalled democrat politicians. a stupid thing to indeed belief but a catchphrase often used nevertheless.

i am left wondering who will be the next subject of outrageous abuse and accusations in the organised media. i already realised it would ne a group having similaritys with ours to have an easier time applying similar abuse as people got used to. and not strange at that, allthough i don't know a set example, obviously freedom will also be the next target.

so it was nice in amsterdam, being inhabitant of the capital of repressive tolerance you can dump your waste on the citysquare with the same ease a bathhouse can get gassed to take care for having an overriding (albeit meagre) excuse for censoring the more serious attempt to protest in the political capital.

no it wasnt surprising, the only thing to surprise is really the party didnt last longer.

let's be optimist, the house of lords making laws to support their kids making profit of the needy and homeless, we are not at the deathpenalty for individuality yet, just close.

i can just hope there will in the end some mutual instead of onesided despair and denial.

yes it was ncie as ever really, straneg how we used to be the protesters to be the cleanest once,
and now young people make more mess wherever they are, perhaps it is that the environmental police has also been specifically geared(abused) to repress opinions and political action how all of the consumption society makes such a different impression.

Peace plans

One of my iraki friends remarked, everyone should start blogging peace plans.
So here is my take. Beforehand i tell you i was trying to compose a post on al jazeera on " what will the future bring to irak and what will stabilise it".

Not a simple post but i had a nice answer: always discontinuing a occupation stabilised a region.

After that it got tricky though. Because after that future will bring irak corruption and partiality. Bias and neglect most probably. Next to that
the same patriotism that the usians so much admire, would turn the now supposed terrorists in perfect buddys for the regular usian.
So you might wonder if having nationalists from US and UK fight nationalists from Irak is a bad thing. They will probably start hurting other people worse when they quit harrasing another.

That is all very lightly thought, i admit, the thought of innocent victims is very strong when i write a thing like this. Why innocent victims? It can ofcourse be an excuse, but else? I thought this: Basicly when usian nationalist fight iraki fanatics (nationalists) both partys end up frustrated. They have their racist kicks but that besides they are shooting their buddys. Their fellow-genocidals, fellow-patriots, fellow-fanatics, fellow-nationalists.

I think this causes part of the targetting of innocents. I don't get to the peace plan part much. But it could be essential to first understand what is actually going on, what is actually invoking the violence.

So actually the whole world wide dillema of nationalism and xenofobism is intertwined in the iraki situation? And there can never be peace before the world learns it's lesson? Perhaps.. it does seem so. It is either that or the oil running out.

This is why i find it so hard to say anything about peace in irak, to have a proposal. It all seems moot, irrealist. People pulling the ropes don't have the spiritual qualitys to achieve such a thing. You can't ask the irakis to press forward their work under humiliation, exploit.

I very much think US should leave, the sooner the better. Being prepared for war, is being prepared for genocide. No militairy procedure can change that.
If violence between irakis need be so gross, wich i doubt, let them genocide another, no reason to start genocide yourself.

Obviously the west will be to blame for the forthcoming crisis, it sparked it after all. But somehow i have the strange suspicion that the more provocating and attrocious ,'big booms' , events will quickly halt as soon as the US army leaves. Perhaps then that is why regions stabilise after an occupation leaves. It would not surprise me.

But is this realist? Me, i don't know. When this was all just plan and saddam was still in charge in irak (a situation of btw. rather nightmarish proportion for eg. shias in the south) i already suspected the US would go to stay. I even found out the vietnam oil was gone when the US left. Started looking from some suspect rhetorics.

No it was a biggest worry, and i have vocalised (perhaps written in some now censored place) my doubts about the intend to leave afterwards. Ofcourse in the face of total neglicence i have been asked what the iraki would think of it, and i told people they would not like to be occupied. That after you don't lift your militairy presence you perform an occupation, from the others point of view.

So the question arises, if not all that i say and write may lead to nothing.
I may tell and predict this now, but have people been wanting to see what was the reality before? So what will truth help now?
Tell me if you know.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I have also written a beautifull story, I'll post it, but my mum said it should include "she's" from the first line, and the guys in the first line were all bad guys;) so i have a problem.

Talking about bad guys i read one of the plays of this guy cheung. It is not very amusing or a very interesting story, but it describes a complex and unsolvable problem for the main person. With a bad end.
theoretically the guy must have had a some experience at around 12-13 that made him feel irreversibly betrayed, it may have been a usual trauma, or just discrimination.

Another thing that is obscure is there are no transcripts of his most recent writings, just some cretology lifted out of context. That he is unsatisfied with the standards on the school eg. is obvious but the why's are kept out of view.
(probs. discrimination innit?)

Lastly there are efforts to keep his use of 'anti-depressivica' out of the picture.
An unreasonable statue since his expression is obviously so doped that he must have been under strong influence of these medicines, that make you much more vague and inhuman then natural drugs.