Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Thursday, November 22, 2012
gaza opening
the drama unfolded, accusations, blaming and demonisation struck quick and hard,
apparently bombs fell,
after a few days i searched a live stream. it happened that RT had one, it even sometimes showed a different angle , and transmitted pieces arab and chinese negotiations (thx for not translating)
live streams are anyhow a good tool, even if they sometimes have you staring at a still for hours, the situation can only still be manipulated (in the media usually) to a smaller degree.
gaza however almost fits in one camera field.
it was painfully impressive, in no time the high rise stood shaking, and would i post something a bomb would fall.
yet the first thing that occured before the bombs had time to touch the ground was what a terrible nuisance drones are.
outright incredible, i wonder completely how much of this torture the international community so far allowed.
also i wonder , and i have not the faintest, how much the same goes for pakistan and yemen, are these people also bombarded with the noise of traffic jams at high speed mixed with second worldwar aerial warfare of unknown dimension?
an everlasting airbattle? it got me sad and nervous and also ill very soon.
the next night the sound was dimmed to the point of being almost off. and i saw examples of scrambling,
strangely exactly by the parties that we just read were the victim of that practice..
what a surprise (not)
bombs still dropped, very loud ones even, as the building didnt shake they were big. and the drones were there, not probably much more distant.
a next night came, and even if i hated the view i put on the camera again, it went off-air (happens a lot with livecams, the conditions are not rarely suspect)
found another and as it was yesterdaynight, a truce was anounced (moreless the third such attempt, i feared the most)
enormous shooting was the theatre, the groundwar had broke loose, could hardly hear the drones,
claxoning, singing and cheering people made obvious this was probably a celebration,
not so hard to understand they were happy, hanya held a speech, oh i got he was satisfied with results, the air would be cleared, water sourced and borders opened.
he smiled all the way, nah not really, but was he happy!
this was still in arab, and i had seen the scene in gaza, was actually probably still watching it somewhat perplexly, so i took it that he was declaring a farfetched and great victory, wo these horrible costs and losses, only today i understood it got a bit better.
over the conditions of the cease-fire the borders , water and air, (and a few more i did not understand or hear), and ofcourse the condition of ceasing fire and hostilitys, haniya achieved another thing.
hamas was directly involved in the negotiations.
it means we are making a start with disbanding the practice of criminalising whole populaces, just because some (very rich people) say they can.
a bigger change than that we could have hoped of.
Friday, December 9, 2011
the possibillity of change. (occ)
hello once again.
for what the mundane world, the big one, of euro's, hypes about someone's and none's moneys it stays hard to get optimistic, i could elaborate on greed, or the security industry in local media and necronomic offense elsewhere.
lest it suffice here is today's '*great*' example:
halliburton, one such security industrialist schooled-killer-mercenary-rent-outs , mainly and chiefly one that cheney has in his pocket for those that do not observe the news or remember what should not be worth remembering,
aptly figured i allways suppose they themselves decided on "hell-burned-on" after coalescing on the irakis safety "as being bombed", that one..
halliburton? rings a bell? figurehead in the not-so-great shamecases in the public reference for criminality between the rules of engagement?
well it also was at the party on the deep horizon spill, when they blew it up.
the day's news is : they destroyed the evidence of the failed concrete casing.
oh i remember some specifics, that they had not used the required number attachments, that it was not explained that to little cement was used, that there was every kind of indication it was somehow leaking and "compromised" from the tests and logs, and that not a very few people had been signalling the kind of warnings that predict calamity to a professional, wich went largely utterly completely and culpably ignored with the usual note, notes even, of coercion.
not that the last thiong is what i assume they destroyed as 'evidence' but the rest is.
mind you, still this year all 3 partners in the technical aspects of the fiasco have been declared guilty before a some court..
and now even if it was not only about billions, cohorts of people . substantial extinctions and the blackmail of 'the first black president' , for what matter his concerns as to general environmental measure and just as casually the illusion anything near decent could be discharged in terms of social projection, with the ****ing fukushima to add the total and utter disdain for human life and future and nature with regard only for magniminous, discrete and confidential summs of (once again as culpable) "white money".
(the illegal made through secrecy . not holding to safety measures, using dangerous material, cheating a populace, bribing a government, and then the workforce.) "white money".
probably they never even payed taxes over that huge part of the energy expenses in japan.
you think it has not do with another? those 2?
in the case of the nuclear billionaires and their bribed millionaire lobbys and politicians the "whitemail" on obama is : "if you want to go into herstory as a person who did anything remotely good for the environment ,..still, you better shut up completely about the dangers and neglect of nuclear.
since he never doubted the , by the way scientifically very dubious , i find it hard to consider someone so naive, nucleair lobby promotion, propaganda actually, advertising lies.
wich is also what the general people sort of belief because they are thrown dead with garbage confirmin such a lack of notion.
but there is more what i wonder about obama in the context, is he also aware of the complexity of the complot behind the deep horizon spill?
he was not asking for much. only a social program and healthcare. voted in on a platform of control of emissions and environmentalism.
they broke her dream. immediatly.
i'll post the pick on my 'strategy' or actually analyses of activism in the public space,
later.
let me first make my point.
a justice, a court, a department of justice, a responsible ministerium or secretariate, state institutions that define peoples lives over few ill disbegotten pennys,
and to mention.. herstorically, or is that herstorykalli?,
that allows their liason in matters misnomed as 'security', responsible for the deaths of thousands of people,
to just destroy the evidence?
that is no justice. that is no democracy. that is no transparance. that is not a party to be serious about.
ACAB
for what the mundane world, the big one, of euro's, hypes about someone's and none's moneys it stays hard to get optimistic, i could elaborate on greed, or the security industry in local media and necronomic offense elsewhere.
lest it suffice here is today's '*great*' example:
halliburton, one such security industrialist schooled-killer-mercenary-rent-outs , mainly and chiefly one that cheney has in his pocket for those that do not observe the news or remember what should not be worth remembering,
aptly figured i allways suppose they themselves decided on "hell-burned-on" after coalescing on the irakis safety "as being bombed", that one..
halliburton? rings a bell? figurehead in the not-so-great shamecases in the public reference for criminality between the rules of engagement?
well it also was at the party on the deep horizon spill, when they blew it up.
the day's news is : they destroyed the evidence of the failed concrete casing.
oh i remember some specifics, that they had not used the required number attachments, that it was not explained that to little cement was used, that there was every kind of indication it was somehow leaking and "compromised" from the tests and logs, and that not a very few people had been signalling the kind of warnings that predict calamity to a professional, wich went largely utterly completely and culpably ignored with the usual note, notes even, of coercion.
not that the last thiong is what i assume they destroyed as 'evidence' but the rest is.
mind you, still this year all 3 partners in the technical aspects of the fiasco have been declared guilty before a some court..
and now even if it was not only about billions, cohorts of people . substantial extinctions and the blackmail of 'the first black president' , for what matter his concerns as to general environmental measure and just as casually the illusion anything near decent could be discharged in terms of social projection, with the ****ing fukushima to add the total and utter disdain for human life and future and nature with regard only for magniminous, discrete and confidential summs of (once again as culpable) "white money".
(the illegal made through secrecy . not holding to safety measures, using dangerous material, cheating a populace, bribing a government, and then the workforce.) "white money".
probably they never even payed taxes over that huge part of the energy expenses in japan.
you think it has not do with another? those 2?
in the case of the nuclear billionaires and their bribed millionaire lobbys and politicians the "whitemail" on obama is : "if you want to go into herstory as a person who did anything remotely good for the environment ,..still, you better shut up completely about the dangers and neglect of nuclear.
since he never doubted the , by the way scientifically very dubious , i find it hard to consider someone so naive, nucleair lobby promotion, propaganda actually, advertising lies.
wich is also what the general people sort of belief because they are thrown dead with garbage confirmin such a lack of notion.
but there is more what i wonder about obama in the context, is he also aware of the complexity of the complot behind the deep horizon spill?
he was not asking for much. only a social program and healthcare. voted in on a platform of control of emissions and environmentalism.
they broke her dream. immediatly.
i'll post the pick on my 'strategy' or actually analyses of activism in the public space,
later.
let me first make my point.
a justice, a court, a department of justice, a responsible ministerium or secretariate, state institutions that define peoples lives over few ill disbegotten pennys,
and to mention.. herstorically, or is that herstorykalli?,
that allows their liason in matters misnomed as 'security', responsible for the deaths of thousands of people,
to just destroy the evidence?
that is no justice. that is no democracy. that is no transparance. that is not a party to be serious about.
ACAB
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
leakage
it's crude, it got published, my mum said clinton did not enjoy her transparancy role. dunno about that, i mean if you don't like to be as corrupt as to do sth you rather just not do it isn't;)
'higher' diplomacy ..
that's all very fine and i know little less. in the personal my impressions are not implausible, that's also helpfull. It's weird with ideas, like a famous russian neonazi explained, a jewish mum helps, and blessings and curses work for 7 generations do they?
bugger, people will stop reading, nah that is biases for, to autocensure the biased. as the saying goes, they allways say it themselves;)
funny again intelligence tried that, to have their covers better under by being informed, but it trended to turn the coppers, so they are more easy to catch again.
whats it to be a slave of a system, of any of the intrinsically corrupt policeapparatus, eg.
like hillary, instead of saying the republicans in congress i fear, she plays the masculin hero calling for rudeness and vengeance. the "bad man" to everyones robin.
obama was down for signing (his first? yes i guess) deathpenalty, or so the story goes.
got used to it i guess. in the stronger terms. the clichee, the things you find in dispatches.
okay should i explain what makes a secretary state compromise on her feelings? except money i mean? maybe, but i am not gonna. not interested.
it's not i am gay or sth? you cant be carefull enough with the witchhunt on blowers of every tune. Odinga did that today, and it was enough to tell uganda is seeking that witchhunt as well. go figure what bloodlet is left in the education they lusted. oh well they are in usian peacearmy now so its allright.
it's not the topic, tho, just making a game out of it.
topic is feminism. hillary suits as an intro.
i have been a feminist for as long as i can remember.
i don't know if i have to thank my father for it, he used to shout unreasonably about me, and so did he about feminists (not even sure he did, he did about plenty of people) maybe it wasnt that, but for the idea, so i thought, , hey this is the unreasonable thing. they must as much as me be right to be the target of such rude abuses.
maybe it wsnt it, but maybe it was, my mum was sorttoff a latent feminist for all her life, she went on to be really emancipated, but in familys with jewish roots afaik that is nothing unusual, or at least, she needn't be a feminist for me to be a functional adult in the centre of our cosmosses.
i don't think she sympathised with feminism loudly, but i guess somewhiles she contradicted the big bad dad on the subject, so i knew what it was at. i am not sure, i have no clear emmory on any of this, perhaps i could read before they used the word, in wich case i probably read it in the paper when i was 6, 7 maybe. 6 i bet, i remember the 69 war from the papers.. (the 6 day war in israel, heh i talked about cairo with people, didn't know noone understood that yet. wonder what they thought:D. i understood it:) (believe it or not most people these days probs dont have an idea the two relate or have anything to do with no matter what, dutch politics adults would not usually understand when i was a kid, at home they would, dad to get angry:D)
you see this hasnt much to do with feminism atm, that is because it is a difficult subject.
on that question i'd answer yes, i guess yes i thought my mum needed heaps of it, quite that rather emancipated.
then again i was on her side as a matter of cause wasn't i? i think i told him oncw i agreed with feminism, anyhow i was like that, if i disagreed i made it known in a substantiated perhaps even poetical way to the dad thing, it might hurt me, well i just didn't like injustice.
i flatter myself when i think about what followed, changed the whole parential concept for the freaking world:p
when i was a child, woman had as little to say about a child as in kosovo, fortress hillary kosovo ..
thats usefull to know, in the 1960s the civil codex for parential care was at the level of the sharia.
lol
yes i flatter myself about that. (picasso himself hints he gave away the paintings btw, and if he knew them so well he wouldnt have complained of missing them, screw you rich guys, hand the man his 300 million euro it is worth at least. (i guess tehy'd shoot him shortly after ..)
anyhow picasso tells us somewhere in a interview that he has a surprise waiting, in the sense of paintings of his, still after his death, that it would be good for a laugh:) except that i remember that, it shows i liked art and was apt at ebcoming sth like picasso (good sales, not to much of a job)
ended up i thought other things more relevant and that ended with being a critics and a freewheeling 'analyst'. so what with feminism.
i dont really think as a child i had a the feminist problem much, later it has been very important for me, and allthough my relations with girls were not splendid (wearing glasses being quite a nerd and uhm, i think my mums relgious persevrance of the antisexuality perhaps found fertile ground in the innocent child? my father wouldn't have been to much of a help, so what is callerd in netherlands "het gereformeerden syndroom". i guess, maybe it was even different.
after all i was quite right children dont have that great differences.
my first feminist memory that has made a great impression on me i was perhaps 10 or so, maybe a bit older, even 14, i never hurried in getting old, so i don't know for sure,
i used to sit sometimes in the village in public places, crowded places, in front of the supermarket eg. watching the people go by, it interested me, they knew i liked to do it i think, some asked me why i sat there and looked, i explained, everything was ok. being a boy and having what some boys have i payed some extra attention to girls, can't help it, sometimes i did. not very consciously i think, i just remember them more easily, one day
guess it wasn't the first time i recognised people i had seen before, i recognised the mothers with children, i must have been sitting there for a year :o not allways ofcourse.
they were the girls from past year, i was completely surprised, not that girls got babys, but that it went so quickly, i was shocked actually.
last year they were pretty fine young girls , really young and often really pretty, blond usually, bleeched i know now, some were really pretty, that i could easily remember them for a year.
and now, they were mothers. i wasn't against mothers, but there was a difference, girls had small noses, mothers big. quite a few such differences i had allways seen between girls and mothers,
i don't want to mention them, it would be a row. as i had observed there was nothing positive for the girls to become a mother, not for the girls that. but i had allways assumed it went slowly,
that it would take 6 maybe 10 years, the girls thought of me, i went home, thought of them, thought it exciting they thought of me. still don't know my age at the time 10-13 i think.
i spend time that time watching the people, i spend more time then ever paying attention to young mothers, after i was sure i went, i don't think i ever watched people in the same way again, hardly on the places, in no great amount.
for me it has allways been a part of my feminist inspiration, the idea that that was wrong, that pretty charming happy positive girls in one year were forced to get big noses.
they were not treated right, there really wasn't a way to achieve that without giving someone hardship, an incredible burden to girls wholly unprepared, and no very well treatment besides.
so much was medically obvious.
(i can be a bit quick with my judgements)
perhaps you think it has not been my inspiration but i have never forgotten it.
so when we got that in school it was old news anyway, i think it was mainly treated in the secondairy, 'feminism' i s'pose with it's functional applications it is now more often called emancipation in the compendium, and got changed over to history, that what we don't know about. can know but most don't.
it was in social education. maybe there is a term more close, social history. it told people that you can vote etc. why u can vote, who invented the voting, ofcourse that in netherlands you ended up with really little to say, and the history of that. usefull stuf allthough there is hardly a student , let alone a nut like me, waiting for an extra study.
i liked it. the teacher smelled, allways, someone else must have written that, he allways did.
nice guy btw, i really think i tried to support the ordre in his class, what will he have thought:S.
i stop here or i will become indiscrete. there is not much about that. and i doubt he would mind, i wonder what great job he is smelly at now, if at a school they must have either got him married or cleaned up another way? does it still exist? i wonder, teachers that really smell?
good way to get rid of a dumb job anyhow.
crazy, never thought about what forced him to do this kind of labour, or what allowed him so.
i think i once heard he's a history teacher now, but i am a terrorist you know, he was part of the authoritarian clique, idiots with syndromes like my fathers.
when i asked after him i may even have thought i was politically challenged (quite that),
i wonder whats his syndrome, i thought at some time perhaps korea, he never told, i think he said he hadn't.
i was so small i asked, also not once?
he would buy that kind of stuff you know.
i think perhaps he had'nt been personally active, he said so it correlated with stuff, he kept his uniform, oh i was a child and he explained how mostly for the russians there, he didn't like it, allthough it shaped his life, well it symbolised his failure as a scientist perhaps, because of poverty.
he disliked perhaps even hated weapons, i think he *didn't* carry a weapon. went through the war and all that.
oh yes i realise, his was a child abuse syndrome probably.
k terrible, my post about feminism will still have to wait for some time, will it?
gl so far,
hillary and obama should use the usual facistoid nice pictures a bit more for some reason, or is it to credible to have a crisis as a democrat.(time to do some real bad pictures else bush 'll win the next elections for the reps)
really the only recent nice picture was when the two looked so nice together in the sweet role of wonderfull coordination. glad to see you team yourself better then i do.
saw that picture? the two really being really togetherish over their governing role? hard to explain, obama is quite a great man with knowledge almost like a usual man.
nothing new about the us personal intelligence prop still being for the us personal really is it?
'higher' diplomacy ..
that's all very fine and i know little less. in the personal my impressions are not implausible, that's also helpfull. It's weird with ideas, like a famous russian neonazi explained, a jewish mum helps, and blessings and curses work for 7 generations do they?
bugger, people will stop reading, nah that is biases for, to autocensure the biased. as the saying goes, they allways say it themselves;)
funny again intelligence tried that, to have their covers better under by being informed, but it trended to turn the coppers, so they are more easy to catch again.
whats it to be a slave of a system, of any of the intrinsically corrupt policeapparatus, eg.
like hillary, instead of saying the republicans in congress i fear, she plays the masculin hero calling for rudeness and vengeance. the "bad man" to everyones robin.
obama was down for signing (his first? yes i guess) deathpenalty, or so the story goes.
got used to it i guess. in the stronger terms. the clichee, the things you find in dispatches.
okay should i explain what makes a secretary state compromise on her feelings? except money i mean? maybe, but i am not gonna. not interested.
it's not i am gay or sth? you cant be carefull enough with the witchhunt on blowers of every tune. Odinga did that today, and it was enough to tell uganda is seeking that witchhunt as well. go figure what bloodlet is left in the education they lusted. oh well they are in usian peacearmy now so its allright.
it's not the topic, tho, just making a game out of it.
topic is feminism. hillary suits as an intro.
i have been a feminist for as long as i can remember.
i don't know if i have to thank my father for it, he used to shout unreasonably about me, and so did he about feminists (not even sure he did, he did about plenty of people) maybe it wasnt that, but for the idea, so i thought, , hey this is the unreasonable thing. they must as much as me be right to be the target of such rude abuses.
maybe it wsnt it, but maybe it was, my mum was sorttoff a latent feminist for all her life, she went on to be really emancipated, but in familys with jewish roots afaik that is nothing unusual, or at least, she needn't be a feminist for me to be a functional adult in the centre of our cosmosses.
i don't think she sympathised with feminism loudly, but i guess somewhiles she contradicted the big bad dad on the subject, so i knew what it was at. i am not sure, i have no clear emmory on any of this, perhaps i could read before they used the word, in wich case i probably read it in the paper when i was 6, 7 maybe. 6 i bet, i remember the 69 war from the papers.. (the 6 day war in israel, heh i talked about cairo with people, didn't know noone understood that yet. wonder what they thought:D. i understood it:) (believe it or not most people these days probs dont have an idea the two relate or have anything to do with no matter what, dutch politics adults would not usually understand when i was a kid, at home they would, dad to get angry:D)
you see this hasnt much to do with feminism atm, that is because it is a difficult subject.
on that question i'd answer yes, i guess yes i thought my mum needed heaps of it, quite that rather emancipated.
then again i was on her side as a matter of cause wasn't i? i think i told him oncw i agreed with feminism, anyhow i was like that, if i disagreed i made it known in a substantiated perhaps even poetical way to the dad thing, it might hurt me, well i just didn't like injustice.
i flatter myself when i think about what followed, changed the whole parential concept for the freaking world:p
when i was a child, woman had as little to say about a child as in kosovo, fortress hillary kosovo ..
thats usefull to know, in the 1960s the civil codex for parential care was at the level of the sharia.
lol
yes i flatter myself about that. (picasso himself hints he gave away the paintings btw, and if he knew them so well he wouldnt have complained of missing them, screw you rich guys, hand the man his 300 million euro it is worth at least. (i guess tehy'd shoot him shortly after ..)
anyhow picasso tells us somewhere in a interview that he has a surprise waiting, in the sense of paintings of his, still after his death, that it would be good for a laugh:) except that i remember that, it shows i liked art and was apt at ebcoming sth like picasso (good sales, not to much of a job)
ended up i thought other things more relevant and that ended with being a critics and a freewheeling 'analyst'. so what with feminism.
i dont really think as a child i had a the feminist problem much, later it has been very important for me, and allthough my relations with girls were not splendid (wearing glasses being quite a nerd and uhm, i think my mums relgious persevrance of the antisexuality perhaps found fertile ground in the innocent child? my father wouldn't have been to much of a help, so what is callerd in netherlands "het gereformeerden syndroom". i guess, maybe it was even different.
after all i was quite right children dont have that great differences.
my first feminist memory that has made a great impression on me i was perhaps 10 or so, maybe a bit older, even 14, i never hurried in getting old, so i don't know for sure,
i used to sit sometimes in the village in public places, crowded places, in front of the supermarket eg. watching the people go by, it interested me, they knew i liked to do it i think, some asked me why i sat there and looked, i explained, everything was ok. being a boy and having what some boys have i payed some extra attention to girls, can't help it, sometimes i did. not very consciously i think, i just remember them more easily, one day
guess it wasn't the first time i recognised people i had seen before, i recognised the mothers with children, i must have been sitting there for a year :o not allways ofcourse.
they were the girls from past year, i was completely surprised, not that girls got babys, but that it went so quickly, i was shocked actually.
last year they were pretty fine young girls , really young and often really pretty, blond usually, bleeched i know now, some were really pretty, that i could easily remember them for a year.
and now, they were mothers. i wasn't against mothers, but there was a difference, girls had small noses, mothers big. quite a few such differences i had allways seen between girls and mothers,
i don't want to mention them, it would be a row. as i had observed there was nothing positive for the girls to become a mother, not for the girls that. but i had allways assumed it went slowly,
that it would take 6 maybe 10 years, the girls thought of me, i went home, thought of them, thought it exciting they thought of me. still don't know my age at the time 10-13 i think.
i spend time that time watching the people, i spend more time then ever paying attention to young mothers, after i was sure i went, i don't think i ever watched people in the same way again, hardly on the places, in no great amount.
for me it has allways been a part of my feminist inspiration, the idea that that was wrong, that pretty charming happy positive girls in one year were forced to get big noses.
they were not treated right, there really wasn't a way to achieve that without giving someone hardship, an incredible burden to girls wholly unprepared, and no very well treatment besides.
so much was medically obvious.
(i can be a bit quick with my judgements)
perhaps you think it has not been my inspiration but i have never forgotten it.
so when we got that in school it was old news anyway, i think it was mainly treated in the secondairy, 'feminism' i s'pose with it's functional applications it is now more often called emancipation in the compendium, and got changed over to history, that what we don't know about. can know but most don't.
it was in social education. maybe there is a term more close, social history. it told people that you can vote etc. why u can vote, who invented the voting, ofcourse that in netherlands you ended up with really little to say, and the history of that. usefull stuf allthough there is hardly a student , let alone a nut like me, waiting for an extra study.
i liked it. the teacher smelled, allways, someone else must have written that, he allways did.
nice guy btw, i really think i tried to support the ordre in his class, what will he have thought:S.
i stop here or i will become indiscrete. there is not much about that. and i doubt he would mind, i wonder what great job he is smelly at now, if at a school they must have either got him married or cleaned up another way? does it still exist? i wonder, teachers that really smell?
good way to get rid of a dumb job anyhow.
crazy, never thought about what forced him to do this kind of labour, or what allowed him so.
i think i once heard he's a history teacher now, but i am a terrorist you know, he was part of the authoritarian clique, idiots with syndromes like my fathers.
when i asked after him i may even have thought i was politically challenged (quite that),
i wonder whats his syndrome, i thought at some time perhaps korea, he never told, i think he said he hadn't.
i was so small i asked, also not once?
he would buy that kind of stuff you know.
i think perhaps he had'nt been personally active, he said so it correlated with stuff, he kept his uniform, oh i was a child and he explained how mostly for the russians there, he didn't like it, allthough it shaped his life, well it symbolised his failure as a scientist perhaps, because of poverty.
he disliked perhaps even hated weapons, i think he *didn't* carry a weapon. went through the war and all that.
oh yes i realise, his was a child abuse syndrome probably.
k terrible, my post about feminism will still have to wait for some time, will it?
gl so far,
hillary and obama should use the usual facistoid nice pictures a bit more for some reason, or is it to credible to have a crisis as a democrat.(time to do some real bad pictures else bush 'll win the next elections for the reps)
really the only recent nice picture was when the two looked so nice together in the sweet role of wonderfull coordination. glad to see you team yourself better then i do.
saw that picture? the two really being really togetherish over their governing role? hard to explain, obama is quite a great man with knowledge almost like a usual man.
nothing new about the us personal intelligence prop still being for the us personal really is it?
Friday, January 22, 2010
a panic people (5)
(obama)
like i suppose more often you may wonder what has panic ado with obama, well from my standpoints and views, nothing, although that is different with my sympathy for him.
i panic when people undersupport obama.
however that is not the subject, because this is not about individual fears and scares.
what he has to do with panic is at the other side, the industrialists, capitalists and republican panic. and if you make your analyses politically correct, that incorporates a load of people who think they are different for naming themselves a democrat.(1)
so firstly unfortunately but predictably we have seen racial panic, but there has been a lot of bonus panic as well, and there is the insurance lobby panic, the israeli panic in fact panic about evrything capitalists panic about, wich is only one thing, money, a surplus of it.
so if you look at it from my side, it has enough to do with panic to be a topic.
now it get's painfull, because the usian corporations have changed the first amendment, to dehumanize the concept of a person. they have changed it in such a way , that corporations can spend money on political groups (right wing ofcourse, and so far racist apparently) and make the people pay for it through taxdeductions. smart criminals there right? in the congress and corps.
so i panic, because my own dutch legal system has pretty much come to nought. for instance recently i got extra fines (it was the first and last thing the undercovered officer said, except a hidden threat towards my kids) because i was not agreeing, and protested the nazi measure applied to me.
so if you protest against nazi regulations you get extra fines, in all that the police never stuck to a procedure, wich happens to be mostly fake anyway, and bothered much about not speaking the truth. well that is not my law, and when i was younger the dutch law would disallow such infringements on my rights.
(a police repeatedly admitting he fines me for personal or political reasons is called arbitrary punishment, in legal terms)
a similar thing we see all to often, and in the context of obama in usia the rightwing is at great speed destroying the fundamental rights of it's people.
great speed? actually i think the exact same speed, and that is pretty quick. meanwhile in netherlands a procedure against a showcase xenophobiac is much hyped, however, it's a publicity stunt, the man is charged before some superfluous unknown to common people extra chamber, quitte unsimilar with the ease i get extra fines, he is sure to get only publicity.
or the ease 'blitz' justice is adapted, or the ease people get convicted to cheer up public events, or the ease with what our housing right got unrooted, or foreigners expelled, or locked in iron cages on boats, children no exception.(4)
not comparable to the ease with what a next xenophobiac was allowed to fraud for yet another (hirshi ali) that applied under a false name for a refugee status she next denied the others.
and all of that openly, in parliament. the list is near endless.(2) we lost our right on appeal, and police got a right to say they have been indignified, over wich rightwingers have wet dreams as to how high to raise the punishment.
what it means? the attack of rightwingers (in netherlands evrything but the SP) on our fundamental rights is a coordinated affair, against wich neither law nor people have an answer.
once a high judge spoke out, i assumed he would get fired soon, or back out. since this is a banana republic, if he got fired, we have not been told. if he backed out, we have not been shown.
it's the carrot that comes with the whip, to keep the donkeys pulling the carts of the elites treasury. how much worse then this sometimes incapable elite of power inheritants can it get.
not much, that is why what is happening in usia is along the exact same lines.
i have to analyse it myself after all, and i am limited in the nr of dull articles and legal nitpicking over fundamentally flawed ideas i can handle. i get angry or distracted when i see fundamental principles shoved aside for the good of the thickest wallets.
so thats why i keep it plain and say it's the same. like bill clinton produced hillary and bush sr bush jr a similar system is in netherlands still in place, family's occupying high positions in the nation.
ofcourse they are as arrogant to pretend they are suit for such, i differ however. i am not very impressed with the profesionality of it all, not convinced at all of it's legality, and to be straight
the hypocracy in destroying long fought for rights (for example just to target my person either personally or in political aspect) does exactly not translate in competence.
competence would be to improve on existing law and rights, not to try hard as you can to
re-establish totalitarianism. undo rights or turn them into a frankenstein variety of age old traditions. even caesar now appears a more modern ruler then them.
admittedly cultural precautions are being made, recently i read a recence uhm, uh crtic? on a play called caesar and brutus, well one thing it showed and as far as i am concerned the only thing, was a fear for their persona, lex romana or pax romana, whatever they perceive as their enemy (i think lex), they were sculpted like unbeings.
poor obama, poor paniced usians, poor ourselves, were will it lead? military control over scarce food resources for the rich in their bunkers , protected by private army's? like the plugged xenophobiacs in parliament to great cost for the nation?
like our national victim, goatfucker (his words) theo van gogh? that man is the ultimate hero of anyone who knows zilch about the netherlands, surely the propaganda machine is rolling and creating it's disqualifying myths, and believe it or not, obama's good intentions are as much a victim as ours.
(1) for that reason of having two only marginally different interest holders in politics usia is actually straight out *not* a democracy, it is also not a democracy because they believe in personal power for the individual president. it's a republic at best.
(2) irak having no wmd's known to prime minister and the bunch, but the idea still promoted.
(3) wallstreet starting a massive embezzlement and frauding the usian taxpayers out of what was left for their next generation counts.
(4) list can be made much longer
like i suppose more often you may wonder what has panic ado with obama, well from my standpoints and views, nothing, although that is different with my sympathy for him.
i panic when people undersupport obama.
however that is not the subject, because this is not about individual fears and scares.
what he has to do with panic is at the other side, the industrialists, capitalists and republican panic. and if you make your analyses politically correct, that incorporates a load of people who think they are different for naming themselves a democrat.(1)
so firstly unfortunately but predictably we have seen racial panic, but there has been a lot of bonus panic as well, and there is the insurance lobby panic, the israeli panic in fact panic about evrything capitalists panic about, wich is only one thing, money, a surplus of it.
so if you look at it from my side, it has enough to do with panic to be a topic.
now it get's painfull, because the usian corporations have changed the first amendment, to dehumanize the concept of a person. they have changed it in such a way , that corporations can spend money on political groups (right wing ofcourse, and so far racist apparently) and make the people pay for it through taxdeductions. smart criminals there right? in the congress and corps.
so i panic, because my own dutch legal system has pretty much come to nought. for instance recently i got extra fines (it was the first and last thing the undercovered officer said, except a hidden threat towards my kids) because i was not agreeing, and protested the nazi measure applied to me.
so if you protest against nazi regulations you get extra fines, in all that the police never stuck to a procedure, wich happens to be mostly fake anyway, and bothered much about not speaking the truth. well that is not my law, and when i was younger the dutch law would disallow such infringements on my rights.
(a police repeatedly admitting he fines me for personal or political reasons is called arbitrary punishment, in legal terms)
a similar thing we see all to often, and in the context of obama in usia the rightwing is at great speed destroying the fundamental rights of it's people.
great speed? actually i think the exact same speed, and that is pretty quick. meanwhile in netherlands a procedure against a showcase xenophobiac is much hyped, however, it's a publicity stunt, the man is charged before some superfluous unknown to common people extra chamber, quitte unsimilar with the ease i get extra fines, he is sure to get only publicity.
or the ease 'blitz' justice is adapted, or the ease people get convicted to cheer up public events, or the ease with what our housing right got unrooted, or foreigners expelled, or locked in iron cages on boats, children no exception.(4)
not comparable to the ease with what a next xenophobiac was allowed to fraud for yet another (hirshi ali) that applied under a false name for a refugee status she next denied the others.
and all of that openly, in parliament. the list is near endless.(2) we lost our right on appeal, and police got a right to say they have been indignified, over wich rightwingers have wet dreams as to how high to raise the punishment.
what it means? the attack of rightwingers (in netherlands evrything but the SP) on our fundamental rights is a coordinated affair, against wich neither law nor people have an answer.
once a high judge spoke out, i assumed he would get fired soon, or back out. since this is a banana republic, if he got fired, we have not been told. if he backed out, we have not been shown.
it's the carrot that comes with the whip, to keep the donkeys pulling the carts of the elites treasury. how much worse then this sometimes incapable elite of power inheritants can it get.
not much, that is why what is happening in usia is along the exact same lines.
i have to analyse it myself after all, and i am limited in the nr of dull articles and legal nitpicking over fundamentally flawed ideas i can handle. i get angry or distracted when i see fundamental principles shoved aside for the good of the thickest wallets.
so thats why i keep it plain and say it's the same. like bill clinton produced hillary and bush sr bush jr a similar system is in netherlands still in place, family's occupying high positions in the nation.
ofcourse they are as arrogant to pretend they are suit for such, i differ however. i am not very impressed with the profesionality of it all, not convinced at all of it's legality, and to be straight
the hypocracy in destroying long fought for rights (for example just to target my person either personally or in political aspect) does exactly not translate in competence.
competence would be to improve on existing law and rights, not to try hard as you can to
re-establish totalitarianism. undo rights or turn them into a frankenstein variety of age old traditions. even caesar now appears a more modern ruler then them.
admittedly cultural precautions are being made, recently i read a recence uhm, uh crtic? on a play called caesar and brutus, well one thing it showed and as far as i am concerned the only thing, was a fear for their persona, lex romana or pax romana, whatever they perceive as their enemy (i think lex), they were sculpted like unbeings.
poor obama, poor paniced usians, poor ourselves, were will it lead? military control over scarce food resources for the rich in their bunkers , protected by private army's? like the plugged xenophobiacs in parliament to great cost for the nation?
like our national victim, goatfucker (his words) theo van gogh? that man is the ultimate hero of anyone who knows zilch about the netherlands, surely the propaganda machine is rolling and creating it's disqualifying myths, and believe it or not, obama's good intentions are as much a victim as ours.
(1) for that reason of having two only marginally different interest holders in politics usia is actually straight out *not* a democracy, it is also not a democracy because they believe in personal power for the individual president. it's a republic at best.
(2) irak having no wmd's known to prime minister and the bunch, but the idea still promoted.
(3) wallstreet starting a massive embezzlement and frauding the usian taxpayers out of what was left for their next generation counts.
(4) list can be made much longer
Friday, January 16, 2009
He said: "Obama" and the world changed.
Slowly the world is kind of melting, like a new creation, primordial stuff, glowing embers and all, the good thing with politics is you could melt down a planet with no perceivable harm. The bad thing is you don't have to melt down a planet to harm it.
However it can't be helped, the new system just melts the old, my heart get's soft, and i think the whole world will melt. slowly, gently, likely something new will come out of the huge resulting blob of bubblegum like reality.
I like pink bubbegum best. i hope that phase is not to sticky, what will we do with our new rubber reality?
perhaps to remain it flexible, elastically.
what if it rains 365 days? we will make us a huge lake. Thats flexible, the sea floods texas? we'll catch her, well, that s actually destructive.
not a good plan.
in that i am not flexible, i hope people will be like that:" oh wow!"
thats not a good plan
we won't do it.
I think it's the good thing about bad plans, they stand out so much for what they really are. The bad thing is people aren't very used to look out well for them.
That's because we want to be difficult, complicated and fascinating, but our political dimension is really quite lineair.
Like the ancient analogy good-bad, it's materially on the line social-capitalist.
It's a simplification, but a very true one, the choices that may lead to a humane ideal, a human future will be politically social choices, plainly and dumbly put,
the other side of the analogy is also true.
You can perceive the opposite political spectre as ill intended, ill willing, because it is a matter of the social consequences one accepts.
The reason not to go for the good-bad concept is because it is antiquated.
there is moral behaviour, wich should be consistent with human rights, and there is
submoral behaviour , bias, wich is not necessary same as traditional 'bad'.
to me it is obvious the same applies to the lineair political spectrum in every way.
You can say one side is bad, the capitalist one, or you can say it is old fashioned and traditional, and u can also make the point it is inconsistent with human rights.
Unfortunately , because people badly realise this, it is so.
Fortunately, maybe, is that the concept is easy to grasp this way. Changing it for the better means that we , the people, need to have the power, politically this means a future needs a leftwing politics. Because that is , humane, true, and if you want for such traditionally, good.
That's quite simple, so that is good.
However it can't be helped, the new system just melts the old, my heart get's soft, and i think the whole world will melt. slowly, gently, likely something new will come out of the huge resulting blob of bubblegum like reality.
I like pink bubbegum best. i hope that phase is not to sticky, what will we do with our new rubber reality?
perhaps to remain it flexible, elastically.
what if it rains 365 days? we will make us a huge lake. Thats flexible, the sea floods texas? we'll catch her, well, that s actually destructive.
not a good plan.
in that i am not flexible, i hope people will be like that:" oh wow!"
thats not a good plan
we won't do it.
I think it's the good thing about bad plans, they stand out so much for what they really are. The bad thing is people aren't very used to look out well for them.
That's because we want to be difficult, complicated and fascinating, but our political dimension is really quite lineair.
Like the ancient analogy good-bad, it's materially on the line social-capitalist.
It's a simplification, but a very true one, the choices that may lead to a humane ideal, a human future will be politically social choices, plainly and dumbly put,
the other side of the analogy is also true.
You can perceive the opposite political spectre as ill intended, ill willing, because it is a matter of the social consequences one accepts.
The reason not to go for the good-bad concept is because it is antiquated.
there is moral behaviour, wich should be consistent with human rights, and there is
submoral behaviour , bias, wich is not necessary same as traditional 'bad'.
to me it is obvious the same applies to the lineair political spectrum in every way.
You can say one side is bad, the capitalist one, or you can say it is old fashioned and traditional, and u can also make the point it is inconsistent with human rights.
Unfortunately , because people badly realise this, it is so.
Fortunately, maybe, is that the concept is easy to grasp this way. Changing it for the better means that we , the people, need to have the power, politically this means a future needs a leftwing politics. Because that is , humane, true, and if you want for such traditionally, good.
That's quite simple, so that is good.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Gaza
Actually i think this attack on gaza is the israelian way to make sure obama's presidency will not bring world peace, because naturally they have little more to gain from justice. I don't so much belief outside the nationalist propaganda israeli's don't realise the palestinean rockets are a reaction on their actions, no matter how much they will deny that.
Yet it's all they know to talk about, calling it terrorism because that worked before.
Obama for his part has remained silent, i think he hadn't expected this escalation,
because now already rahm turned into a possible liability. otoh we should not forget obama might be in religious odds himself, i dont blame him over churchgoing, but usian churches are amongst the more fundamentalist, so his real thoughts in religious matters may very well be bigotted.
Israeli dogmatics, aka zionism, are anti negroe, so they might want to upset any afroamerican successes beforehand.
That besides the world that voted in obama, or so you want voiced in obama, obviously doesn't sympathise with the israelian method of terrorising the palestineans. They may have thought it was safer to attack now under bush.
An israeli feature of the day is typo lviv, the offspring of violent and rabiate anti arab zionists, raised comfortably in the mansions of the generals.
Well ty[o is a different person from many other israelis, yet her behaviour so far lies completely predictable within the standard israelian politics. Onesided, even deceitfull she says: there is no humanitarian crisis in gaza, just to announce one the next day tho.
Really we should train our memorys to change this worlds vices, so many people have completely forgotten the targetted assasinations, the endless incursions, the artillery bombardments, the ongoing terror of the drones and missiles, etc..
Israelis gladly recognise this fact and hammer on the propagandic statements they by now pressed into most of the worlds duller brains.
Arabs kill another.. they say, or hamas has no right to send rockets, keeping the right to do exactly that as some typical monopolist patent for theirselves.
Endlessly they voice their hatred towards iran, why in fact, it has become so much better and more modern since khomeini passed away and the revolution took root.
I think the reason israel creates all this animosity towards the arab world is fear, they fear an arab world that would be honestly regarded. They need conflicts in arab nations to survive, so they single out arab nation after arab nation for agressive action, they all get their turns, lebanon, syria, iran, and who remembers their polemics and actions against irak? I do..
They founded hamas, subsidised it for being bygotted and religious, now they pretend surprise it turned against them, i bet it was actually conceived the very way.
Divide at impera, so much is obvious for the funding of hamas, and so much is obvious about the entire israelian international politics, that israel creates division when it can.
There is allways a major arab target for israelian prop, sometimes its been syria "syria terrorises lebanon" (who else you might wonder).
Saddam hussein has wmd!
syria has wmd!
Iran has wmd!
we proved it! we bombed them!....(they bombed all 3)
Similarly the palestinean resistance is used to make the point islam is aggressive..
israel assasinated palestineans, so they must be violent... isn't that true?
no, but, who cares, who is paying attention?
Now they have decided to go for the impossible, stop the hamas rocket reaction, oh surely they will eliminate some rockets for some time to come, or even allways,
but they will not break the palestinean spirit anymore, what they have been trying for so long.
I think these 19th century practices against a small overcrowded territory will finally fail to break the palestinean resolve, that has very often been affected by the strategys of division and intimidation.
Israelis think humans are a predictable herd of nay sayers, and by killing enough palestineans there will only remain those with no voiced opinion, with no real ideas, or identity.
They say " we want to change the situation on the ground" (means kill palestinean cadre).
we want a final solution they even said.
eliminate hamas once and for all they started out this adventure, but that i think has already been given up as utterly undoable.
the symptomatic suppression of the mostly symbolic rockets reaction, is what is now the standard claim, it makes me wonder what will come in it's place.
I have the faint hope palestines prepared for this agression and set up many remotely controlled roadside bombs to eliminate the israelian tanks, it woudl force israel to also sacrifice life, lives, and it would hurt them dearly to see some of their sophisticated tools of carnage desinvested.
who knows, israel seems to have lost grip with reality, in recent years, the attack on lebanon, bloody carnage and pollution it may have been, has not led to military succes much, alltho it stopped some rockets coming from lebanon,
the usual downfall of a militairy oppressor goes in small significances, they loose a bit of the war here or there first, and after that a loosing streak will finalise the doom of the agressor, and perhaps israels time has come.
I am glad not to be a palestinean, not to have to encounter the anonymous instruments of terror personally, and i fear for their happiness, their lives, their options, i wouldn't know how to even stand up against drones and missiles, but if they can? However horrible all these events, if they lead to the downgrading of a militairy rule, a militarist policy's, i wouldn't be only sad.
yet i don't like many of the arab governments, many that i do like i have my sidenotes, my remarks ,(i like khadaffi but i hate his grip on power and typical trend to institute a family dynasty.(well so goes for typo, for the bhuttos, for mubarak)
the point there is, two wrongs don't make a right, israel.
good luck all, may this attack on a future of peace and coexistence be defeated in its intends. Let's hope obama won't loose his wits through these escalations, provocations.
Yet it's all they know to talk about, calling it terrorism because that worked before.
Obama for his part has remained silent, i think he hadn't expected this escalation,
because now already rahm turned into a possible liability. otoh we should not forget obama might be in religious odds himself, i dont blame him over churchgoing, but usian churches are amongst the more fundamentalist, so his real thoughts in religious matters may very well be bigotted.
Israeli dogmatics, aka zionism, are anti negroe, so they might want to upset any afroamerican successes beforehand.
That besides the world that voted in obama, or so you want voiced in obama, obviously doesn't sympathise with the israelian method of terrorising the palestineans. They may have thought it was safer to attack now under bush.
An israeli feature of the day is typo lviv, the offspring of violent and rabiate anti arab zionists, raised comfortably in the mansions of the generals.
Well ty[o is a different person from many other israelis, yet her behaviour so far lies completely predictable within the standard israelian politics. Onesided, even deceitfull she says: there is no humanitarian crisis in gaza, just to announce one the next day tho.
Really we should train our memorys to change this worlds vices, so many people have completely forgotten the targetted assasinations, the endless incursions, the artillery bombardments, the ongoing terror of the drones and missiles, etc..
Israelis gladly recognise this fact and hammer on the propagandic statements they by now pressed into most of the worlds duller brains.
Arabs kill another.. they say, or hamas has no right to send rockets, keeping the right to do exactly that as some typical monopolist patent for theirselves.
Endlessly they voice their hatred towards iran, why in fact, it has become so much better and more modern since khomeini passed away and the revolution took root.
I think the reason israel creates all this animosity towards the arab world is fear, they fear an arab world that would be honestly regarded. They need conflicts in arab nations to survive, so they single out arab nation after arab nation for agressive action, they all get their turns, lebanon, syria, iran, and who remembers their polemics and actions against irak? I do..
They founded hamas, subsidised it for being bygotted and religious, now they pretend surprise it turned against them, i bet it was actually conceived the very way.
Divide at impera, so much is obvious for the funding of hamas, and so much is obvious about the entire israelian international politics, that israel creates division when it can.
There is allways a major arab target for israelian prop, sometimes its been syria "syria terrorises lebanon" (who else you might wonder).
Saddam hussein has wmd!
syria has wmd!
Iran has wmd!
we proved it! we bombed them!....(they bombed all 3)
Similarly the palestinean resistance is used to make the point islam is aggressive..
israel assasinated palestineans, so they must be violent... isn't that true?
no, but, who cares, who is paying attention?
Now they have decided to go for the impossible, stop the hamas rocket reaction, oh surely they will eliminate some rockets for some time to come, or even allways,
but they will not break the palestinean spirit anymore, what they have been trying for so long.
I think these 19th century practices against a small overcrowded territory will finally fail to break the palestinean resolve, that has very often been affected by the strategys of division and intimidation.
Israelis think humans are a predictable herd of nay sayers, and by killing enough palestineans there will only remain those with no voiced opinion, with no real ideas, or identity.
They say " we want to change the situation on the ground" (means kill palestinean cadre).
we want a final solution they even said.
eliminate hamas once and for all they started out this adventure, but that i think has already been given up as utterly undoable.
the symptomatic suppression of the mostly symbolic rockets reaction, is what is now the standard claim, it makes me wonder what will come in it's place.
I have the faint hope palestines prepared for this agression and set up many remotely controlled roadside bombs to eliminate the israelian tanks, it woudl force israel to also sacrifice life, lives, and it would hurt them dearly to see some of their sophisticated tools of carnage desinvested.
who knows, israel seems to have lost grip with reality, in recent years, the attack on lebanon, bloody carnage and pollution it may have been, has not led to military succes much, alltho it stopped some rockets coming from lebanon,
the usual downfall of a militairy oppressor goes in small significances, they loose a bit of the war here or there first, and after that a loosing streak will finalise the doom of the agressor, and perhaps israels time has come.
I am glad not to be a palestinean, not to have to encounter the anonymous instruments of terror personally, and i fear for their happiness, their lives, their options, i wouldn't know how to even stand up against drones and missiles, but if they can? However horrible all these events, if they lead to the downgrading of a militairy rule, a militarist policy's, i wouldn't be only sad.
yet i don't like many of the arab governments, many that i do like i have my sidenotes, my remarks ,(i like khadaffi but i hate his grip on power and typical trend to institute a family dynasty.(well so goes for typo, for the bhuttos, for mubarak)
the point there is, two wrongs don't make a right, israel.
good luck all, may this attack on a future of peace and coexistence be defeated in its intends. Let's hope obama won't loose his wits through these escalations, provocations.
Friday, November 7, 2008
terrorism
Jay! 100th post .. congratulations Barak this one is for you..
I witnessed today how barak for the second time to my knowing, used the word terrorist adverbial, 'terrorist groups' it was about iran.
From the iran point of view these people may be "freedom fighters", as *opposed* to terrorist groups.
Now this has to do with credibility fo iran, but let me explain.
In rwanda the us supports basically the tutsi's, these killed a load of hutus in recent years, mostly outside rwanda. Now the government there has a name for their victims..
Usia uses the same word (there).. terrorists.
terrorist don't exist, only in the american dream, and when you talk about a thing that doesn't exist to much, you make it true for yourself,
can we have a president that doesnt want terrorists for once?
cheers!
I witnessed today how barak for the second time to my knowing, used the word terrorist adverbial, 'terrorist groups' it was about iran.
From the iran point of view these people may be "freedom fighters", as *opposed* to terrorist groups.
Now this has to do with credibility fo iran, but let me explain.
In rwanda the us supports basically the tutsi's, these killed a load of hutus in recent years, mostly outside rwanda. Now the government there has a name for their victims..
Usia uses the same word (there).. terrorists.
terrorist don't exist, only in the american dream, and when you talk about a thing that doesn't exist to much, you make it true for yourself,
can we have a president that doesnt want terrorists for once?
cheers!
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
may bug
The coming period i will be less "close" to the news. How that goes? the difference is not so big, usualy it is the historical context and general attitudes that are most telling, however what is a difference, is i don't get that much of a check.
What is actually pictured on youtube about: myanmar, the murder of a joutnalist in gaza, or machinations in SA? etc. are matters i will not pick up in the going.
Well don't worry, youtube that is fascinating for its capacity to bear news, isn't
actually doing it as much, even with AlJ certainly being great in actuality.
Whats happening on the planet? simply put bush is doing its utmost to legitimise any kind of military agression, myanmar, china and iran are the focal enemy's, and perhaps zimbabwe. This is dangerous, and i point it out, because it is closing in to be actuality, have to mention russia, just to be sure, there is a real multipronged attack going on.
Also usia is trying to harbour bases on irak soil forever at this moment in time. For fun value.. you know how many airbases alone usia has there? over 30.
it is about.... oil, all of these nations have essential oilreserves. and somehwat about resources (zim) and regional influence (everywhere).
that means that after a few months of relative calmth the world is again in dangerous waters. Carter re-revealed the obvious israel having nukes, no surprise here, i thought that is known since about 1959.
Iran does have a right and a duty to promote independend nucleair industry, under threat of nucleair attack it will and probabaly has already, build atomic bombs.
It is not all as bad as it seems, Ahmadinajaadh nor the iranians are intend on using them, they are needed as a retaliation strike capacity since usia and its leaders have shown their illiterate capacity to threaten and even use nucleair weaponry.
That said i do underwrite non proliferation, and perhaps so does iran. I am not a muslim (and don't want to be one). The validity of the complaints is unobvious, but ruski will probably, being somewhat intimidated, only react in a pre-putinesque way, being under threat herself it wont give openess or informations since it probably considers itself safer with a strong iran then without one.
The myanmar crisis will play out in a possibly significant way, either help will be offered without the many strings attached, or neocons will seize the opportunity and march in after providing the myanmarese with hostage. The elections results there appear to broadly support the government.
Me, i don't trust elections, but i would guess the "undemocratic" aspect of the new constitution , that the nato-prospected new ruler of the myanmar and her elites, saung the english lady can't become president, didn't suffice as much as the unsubstanciated allegations had months been suggesting. In that sense interesting how this blackmailing through human suffering plays out. throw a coin.
martian exploration: depends. maybe still. concerning they still send no brush to clean the solar panels, nor a cable operated remote, and not expect to survive a winter, i guess not. If this mission is searching for life, i think it is actually ibentarising water resources mostly, it appears to be doing so in a strange location,
a suggested debris field of a waterbearing meteor, however i looked at the fotos, and it is more like a sedementary accumulation that eroded away then needed to be expected. perhaps the landing place was geologically more justified then i had expected. To me it seems they are looking for a relic of live where live could have been a relic, where i would have opted for a more mineral aproach , aiming for eg. carbon if possible, or looking for a relevant layer in a newer tectonic or impact area to find material that has not been exposed for these many millions of years and more. so about the top meter or a bit more of everything on mars can be expected to be completely sterile and chemically changed through cosmic bombardment. only really fresh exposures (of a few million years or so at most) would bear complex organic molecules. in the first 60 cm. anyway.
I don't like football. It's an economic waste and part of a ploy to have the labourers and slaves disregard their own body's and as such impregnate them with a negative vision of their value and quality of life, and as a result that of others.
Irak, important, some creepy thing is going on, usia is trying to push the greenzoners into signing an accord to have usian militairy on iraki soil for indefinite periods of time. Even had the iraki mp not yet been bribed the pressure on them to surrender their nation would be great. That besides usia always manages to get idotic strawman sign ridiculous accords so we can be severely worried about the follow up.
I hope irak shows unity in resisting this masquerade, that perhaps will save history from this next farce, since the green zone does have an interest in not being the legitimate target of every attack in irak.
Obama, obama is doing very well all, however he has to show the world he is willing to try to stop bush and his methods. Usually the democratic candidate, indeed being a malinformed usian, since they live with more lies then we the rest of the world, comes up with some rather crude and expressed geopolitical views that promise to be no great improvement on the situation, Obama is no exception. Fortunately politicians are not held to their promises a lot, but the effect of saying to much when u know to little can be disparaging. Bush has as much as 16 years experiences with promoting political goals quite contrary to mine, and he has not told anyone everything he knows. (nor has the republican administration informed the democrats or populace in every insight they got from the rest of the worlds minds, as an example bush could make a small concession or say a smart thing most ppl know, but not usians, that he has already done like twice and very strategically, (things i react on and have to support him)).
Don't underestimate this. Only when Obama has the nomination changing usia will really start and be important.
Remains to be said i expect clinton to be more of the same indeed. Altho she did campaign in a more politically correct way during bush , i seem to even have overrated her performance in that. The main problem is she is a member of the same clique, she is raised into interests very close to the ones of bush. Obama could offer sth newer and more different then that. If he errs here or there when we start this world anew, it need not be unovercomable, social sturctures are so bad these days the international world is on the risk of collapse. His humanism might easily turn that tide.
enough good advices for Usia.
England, england and teh netherlands are the among the more dangerous nations in the world at the moment. They have alredi a lot of the usian mindset. "we are innocent, starve the beggars". That besides they are the most surveillanced nations. a dutch or english can easily be filmed 8 hours a day and all their communications are tapped and screened routinely. This is called a guiding nation, but actually it is a experiment in control. The dutch are a favourite target in this.
Unfortunately the dutch are not aware they are so relevant, but our values of freedom and tolerance and our average intelligence are high, so what works on us , may also fool a french or italian and most western people.
English are scary, they are so isolated and bigotted i have no clue what they need these cameras for, probably to look what you can incite in crime in a future society of yurpean nitwits. Perhaps it got sth to do with "nobel-price winning peace accords".
(clintonette anyone?).
Censory, censory will continue and be worse the coming month, that is ill boding.
but, ill boding is what the current economical system is, it is not a reason for extra panic on its own. stop that war ppl. we need the precedent of peace.
What is actually pictured on youtube about: myanmar, the murder of a joutnalist in gaza, or machinations in SA? etc. are matters i will not pick up in the going.
Well don't worry, youtube that is fascinating for its capacity to bear news, isn't
actually doing it as much, even with AlJ certainly being great in actuality.
Whats happening on the planet? simply put bush is doing its utmost to legitimise any kind of military agression, myanmar, china and iran are the focal enemy's, and perhaps zimbabwe. This is dangerous, and i point it out, because it is closing in to be actuality, have to mention russia, just to be sure, there is a real multipronged attack going on.
Also usia is trying to harbour bases on irak soil forever at this moment in time. For fun value.. you know how many airbases alone usia has there? over 30.
it is about.... oil, all of these nations have essential oilreserves. and somehwat about resources (zim) and regional influence (everywhere).
that means that after a few months of relative calmth the world is again in dangerous waters. Carter re-revealed the obvious israel having nukes, no surprise here, i thought that is known since about 1959.
Iran does have a right and a duty to promote independend nucleair industry, under threat of nucleair attack it will and probabaly has already, build atomic bombs.
It is not all as bad as it seems, Ahmadinajaadh nor the iranians are intend on using them, they are needed as a retaliation strike capacity since usia and its leaders have shown their illiterate capacity to threaten and even use nucleair weaponry.
That said i do underwrite non proliferation, and perhaps so does iran. I am not a muslim (and don't want to be one). The validity of the complaints is unobvious, but ruski will probably, being somewhat intimidated, only react in a pre-putinesque way, being under threat herself it wont give openess or informations since it probably considers itself safer with a strong iran then without one.
The myanmar crisis will play out in a possibly significant way, either help will be offered without the many strings attached, or neocons will seize the opportunity and march in after providing the myanmarese with hostage. The elections results there appear to broadly support the government.
Me, i don't trust elections, but i would guess the "undemocratic" aspect of the new constitution , that the nato-prospected new ruler of the myanmar and her elites, saung the english lady can't become president, didn't suffice as much as the unsubstanciated allegations had months been suggesting. In that sense interesting how this blackmailing through human suffering plays out. throw a coin.
martian exploration: depends. maybe still. concerning they still send no brush to clean the solar panels, nor a cable operated remote, and not expect to survive a winter, i guess not. If this mission is searching for life, i think it is actually ibentarising water resources mostly, it appears to be doing so in a strange location,
a suggested debris field of a waterbearing meteor, however i looked at the fotos, and it is more like a sedementary accumulation that eroded away then needed to be expected. perhaps the landing place was geologically more justified then i had expected. To me it seems they are looking for a relic of live where live could have been a relic, where i would have opted for a more mineral aproach , aiming for eg. carbon if possible, or looking for a relevant layer in a newer tectonic or impact area to find material that has not been exposed for these many millions of years and more. so about the top meter or a bit more of everything on mars can be expected to be completely sterile and chemically changed through cosmic bombardment. only really fresh exposures (of a few million years or so at most) would bear complex organic molecules. in the first 60 cm. anyway.
I don't like football. It's an economic waste and part of a ploy to have the labourers and slaves disregard their own body's and as such impregnate them with a negative vision of their value and quality of life, and as a result that of others.
Irak, important, some creepy thing is going on, usia is trying to push the greenzoners into signing an accord to have usian militairy on iraki soil for indefinite periods of time. Even had the iraki mp not yet been bribed the pressure on them to surrender their nation would be great. That besides usia always manages to get idotic strawman sign ridiculous accords so we can be severely worried about the follow up.
I hope irak shows unity in resisting this masquerade, that perhaps will save history from this next farce, since the green zone does have an interest in not being the legitimate target of every attack in irak.
Obama, obama is doing very well all, however he has to show the world he is willing to try to stop bush and his methods. Usually the democratic candidate, indeed being a malinformed usian, since they live with more lies then we the rest of the world, comes up with some rather crude and expressed geopolitical views that promise to be no great improvement on the situation, Obama is no exception. Fortunately politicians are not held to their promises a lot, but the effect of saying to much when u know to little can be disparaging. Bush has as much as 16 years experiences with promoting political goals quite contrary to mine, and he has not told anyone everything he knows. (nor has the republican administration informed the democrats or populace in every insight they got from the rest of the worlds minds, as an example bush could make a small concession or say a smart thing most ppl know, but not usians, that he has already done like twice and very strategically, (things i react on and have to support him)).
Don't underestimate this. Only when Obama has the nomination changing usia will really start and be important.
Remains to be said i expect clinton to be more of the same indeed. Altho she did campaign in a more politically correct way during bush , i seem to even have overrated her performance in that. The main problem is she is a member of the same clique, she is raised into interests very close to the ones of bush. Obama could offer sth newer and more different then that. If he errs here or there when we start this world anew, it need not be unovercomable, social sturctures are so bad these days the international world is on the risk of collapse. His humanism might easily turn that tide.
enough good advices for Usia.
England, england and teh netherlands are the among the more dangerous nations in the world at the moment. They have alredi a lot of the usian mindset. "we are innocent, starve the beggars". That besides they are the most surveillanced nations. a dutch or english can easily be filmed 8 hours a day and all their communications are tapped and screened routinely. This is called a guiding nation, but actually it is a experiment in control. The dutch are a favourite target in this.
Unfortunately the dutch are not aware they are so relevant, but our values of freedom and tolerance and our average intelligence are high, so what works on us , may also fool a french or italian and most western people.
English are scary, they are so isolated and bigotted i have no clue what they need these cameras for, probably to look what you can incite in crime in a future society of yurpean nitwits. Perhaps it got sth to do with "nobel-price winning peace accords".
(clintonette anyone?).
Censory, censory will continue and be worse the coming month, that is ill boding.
but, ill boding is what the current economical system is, it is not a reason for extra panic on its own. stop that war ppl. we need the precedent of peace.
Friday, February 29, 2008
leap year
On a day like this i wonder why humankind has to make her great leaps on the moon.
Although.. all through the world this year things don't go off quite as bad as they could.
I am really proud of odinga, and perhaps even kibaki in Kenya. Knowing the regular superiority complex we must assume Kibaki has something terrible going on inside himself now, an identity crisis. He will no longer be the upper super of the overpeople... well even that you may consider tolerance. Like i said the year starts ok. Usa however is desperately moving to find an enemy the public would agree with.
On us the public rests the responsability not to give in to this landscaping of animositys. Currently we see israel provocating her due with a rising daily deathrate. Many reports how every aspect of palestinean life is frustrated (on water, food, medicins, fuel, humanrights, seep through), and for the critical observer... this time with prone zionist denials.
Obviously usa is looking for an excuse for fraudulent elections, now it shows the world sees no need to trust white woman over black man...
(man this can cost me an election..)
There is only one thing that would really help this world, and it is when people overcome their prejudices. Now the regular usian may think their prejudices are not as bad as say.. pakistani. A dangerous mistake. It's a whole different thing, if you have prejudices over everything the rest of the world is traumatised about, or that people just have a few prejudices becus they know no better and use the handhold to understand a world that is stolen from them.
The prejudice of the oppressor and the prejudice of the victim. Kenya proves once again, how victims overstep huge prejudices to improve on situations. Where the perpetrators usually have a hard time dealing with their insane attitudes.
Now one might think , in usa obama can only win if Usa oversteps so many prejudices..
if this is the case.. Obama lost.
The discussions on eg. Irak, in the usa, show. Not to mention say syria, of wich people know nothing at all in usa (or even eu), or iran is fed to new heights(1). If all else fails they will start a war the public hasn't been thinking over, becus it usually takes the public an age (several years really) to realise an injustice is perpetrated, and not a democratical move.
Whatever is the old object of animosity.. be it cuba or irak or islam or iran or syria or russia even china, is in the focus of new propagandist attacks, desperately looking for an excuse to use and sell weapons, what they are on the ruling republican side. Each and any of the oldys has been the object of vague and rather agressive attempts in the odd two months this year aged.
I am not saying we will have a war, just that some people seem to be really trying.
So why do republicans want a war? Thats easy: if there is a war the coffins drip in. If the coffins drip in , people want peace, that is.. a win. (loosing doesnt usually appeal to a people untill late in a war).
If people want a win you can sell weapons. Not only that, if there is a war (not a failed occupation) the republicans are at the best of their rhetorics. Used as the neocon system is to aim for war, insult other nations, starve them through boykots in such genocidal circumstances, a republican feels like a fish in the water. His words start running, every bit of lies he has been repeating into even his own subconscience becomes usefull and at its hardest to decipher.
If the usians want a chance to win their elections, they should prevent war. If war breaks out, their prejudices will overcome so much of the common sense, that election fraude wouldn't show easily.
So i think now is explained to the world Usa's last two months of sable rattling. Now to explain it to themselves.
I am trying to tell people that their own prejudices are used to sabotage the elections beforehand. That when there is enough of whining over how to solve the disaster in irak, afghanistan, somalia, darfur to name a few, even obama can't have an answer to everything.
The whole constructive aproach has not been used, so the whole world doesn't know what to expect if we would.
Must say Rice did something good in kenya, i feared her visit a bit. She isn't rili diplomatic always, mostly because she is very partial usually. If Kenya was in the ME , her loyalty would have definitily been with Kibaki, being the conservative that she is. So i feared her inbring would destroy far to much of odingas options. Seems not the case.
I am rili glad for annan he can do something else and hopefully less depressing now, he is a somewhat old man after all. Thinking of old man..
I think i will miss fidel, always found him the most sympathic dictator on the planet, since i consider vietnam, afghanistan and irak acts of dictatorship, i hope i tell you something. From that pov. i apreciate what raoul is doing. Ofcourse i trust that he will know well what fidel thinks, and that perhaps the change will be easier through that. Otoh... raoul is an old human at 76 (so is mccain.. so is hillary), just like honestly it seems mugabe is to old now and should at least consider to have his economically valuable presidency a ceremonial function.
Many people that rule nations are old, and usually actually it is not a great help.
(Kibaki is old).
No matter if these old people (like some) still relate to ww2, or the predigital era, the time isn't standing still. We now don't so much have power blocks that strive for dominance, we have a wide open pretty informable world where it becomes more and more obvious that complete cooperation is the only way out. That there actually even isn't so much room for personal enrichment as it might seem.(2)
That we don't want to buy more hate the communist crap, or democracy is good wars, bs all that.
In anarchist circles (and no we don't usually kill another, if the murderer of Seveke was an anarchist in that time he would supposedly have been better informed about trauma induced in people through police infiltration, then this), they say something funny about democracy, but i can't quite remember.
It's about that you let a whole bunch of stupid or uninformed people decide over something, more usually then not they will reach the wrong decission.
Used as such (what conservatives do) democracy actually equals fascism. Where some supposedly superior elite is allowed to use the masses as slaves.
Worst of all is conservative forces always use this argument to paralyse political processes beforehand.
And this my friends is what we can expect to see happen in the usian political debate. Poor Obama, anything he is even allowed to say will be compromising.
I think he does very well in his campaigning. I also so think our best chances are in his honest aproach on changes. By stressing changes he will have more options open, i also wouldn't know exactly what to do in Irak with Obama in charge on Usa side.
Noone does, the discussion would be completely different, i am very sure. At least the blogosphere might come up with a couple of surprises. Otoh people in irak are more aware then any Usa is all but intend to leave.
So if anything is supposed to change, Obama will need to leave many options open.
The rest of the world is pretty cynical about usa by now.
happy leaping
(1) in the case of iran i wonder if the suggested weapongrade uranium isn't the 1 or so percent that naturally exists in refined uranium. I think it is. Putins contribution sheds some doubt on that, but lets be fair, putin is trying to legalise his own election result, he and bush share an interest for once.
(2) In terms of ecological footprints, it is very hard in a western context to get under 100.. wich is that you use 100% of what you could use and still have neutral ecological impact. It means that you use over 100 some people will have nothing.
Lets assume lich people only buy a house twice as big, they will never stay under 100.
Someone somewhere, will have to try to live under subsistence level, and perhaps several.
That would be twice a rather small house. Best i did was 101, i am a vegetarian, almost greedy with electrical power, with no car, little flights and hardly luxury.
would you have a car you are probably at 110 immediatly, 1 other person would lack 10percent of what they needed to even be happy.
Although.. all through the world this year things don't go off quite as bad as they could.
I am really proud of odinga, and perhaps even kibaki in Kenya. Knowing the regular superiority complex we must assume Kibaki has something terrible going on inside himself now, an identity crisis. He will no longer be the upper super of the overpeople... well even that you may consider tolerance. Like i said the year starts ok. Usa however is desperately moving to find an enemy the public would agree with.
On us the public rests the responsability not to give in to this landscaping of animositys. Currently we see israel provocating her due with a rising daily deathrate. Many reports how every aspect of palestinean life is frustrated (on water, food, medicins, fuel, humanrights, seep through), and for the critical observer... this time with prone zionist denials.
Obviously usa is looking for an excuse for fraudulent elections, now it shows the world sees no need to trust white woman over black man...
(man this can cost me an election..)
There is only one thing that would really help this world, and it is when people overcome their prejudices. Now the regular usian may think their prejudices are not as bad as say.. pakistani. A dangerous mistake. It's a whole different thing, if you have prejudices over everything the rest of the world is traumatised about, or that people just have a few prejudices becus they know no better and use the handhold to understand a world that is stolen from them.
The prejudice of the oppressor and the prejudice of the victim. Kenya proves once again, how victims overstep huge prejudices to improve on situations. Where the perpetrators usually have a hard time dealing with their insane attitudes.
Now one might think , in usa obama can only win if Usa oversteps so many prejudices..
if this is the case.. Obama lost.
The discussions on eg. Irak, in the usa, show. Not to mention say syria, of wich people know nothing at all in usa (or even eu), or iran is fed to new heights(1). If all else fails they will start a war the public hasn't been thinking over, becus it usually takes the public an age (several years really) to realise an injustice is perpetrated, and not a democratical move.
Whatever is the old object of animosity.. be it cuba or irak or islam or iran or syria or russia even china, is in the focus of new propagandist attacks, desperately looking for an excuse to use and sell weapons, what they are on the ruling republican side. Each and any of the oldys has been the object of vague and rather agressive attempts in the odd two months this year aged.
I am not saying we will have a war, just that some people seem to be really trying.
So why do republicans want a war? Thats easy: if there is a war the coffins drip in. If the coffins drip in , people want peace, that is.. a win. (loosing doesnt usually appeal to a people untill late in a war).
If people want a win you can sell weapons. Not only that, if there is a war (not a failed occupation) the republicans are at the best of their rhetorics. Used as the neocon system is to aim for war, insult other nations, starve them through boykots in such genocidal circumstances, a republican feels like a fish in the water. His words start running, every bit of lies he has been repeating into even his own subconscience becomes usefull and at its hardest to decipher.
If the usians want a chance to win their elections, they should prevent war. If war breaks out, their prejudices will overcome so much of the common sense, that election fraude wouldn't show easily.
So i think now is explained to the world Usa's last two months of sable rattling. Now to explain it to themselves.
I am trying to tell people that their own prejudices are used to sabotage the elections beforehand. That when there is enough of whining over how to solve the disaster in irak, afghanistan, somalia, darfur to name a few, even obama can't have an answer to everything.
The whole constructive aproach has not been used, so the whole world doesn't know what to expect if we would.
Must say Rice did something good in kenya, i feared her visit a bit. She isn't rili diplomatic always, mostly because she is very partial usually. If Kenya was in the ME , her loyalty would have definitily been with Kibaki, being the conservative that she is. So i feared her inbring would destroy far to much of odingas options. Seems not the case.
I am rili glad for annan he can do something else and hopefully less depressing now, he is a somewhat old man after all. Thinking of old man..
I think i will miss fidel, always found him the most sympathic dictator on the planet, since i consider vietnam, afghanistan and irak acts of dictatorship, i hope i tell you something. From that pov. i apreciate what raoul is doing. Ofcourse i trust that he will know well what fidel thinks, and that perhaps the change will be easier through that. Otoh... raoul is an old human at 76 (so is mccain.. so is hillary), just like honestly it seems mugabe is to old now and should at least consider to have his economically valuable presidency a ceremonial function.
Many people that rule nations are old, and usually actually it is not a great help.
(Kibaki is old).
No matter if these old people (like some) still relate to ww2, or the predigital era, the time isn't standing still. We now don't so much have power blocks that strive for dominance, we have a wide open pretty informable world where it becomes more and more obvious that complete cooperation is the only way out. That there actually even isn't so much room for personal enrichment as it might seem.(2)
That we don't want to buy more hate the communist crap, or democracy is good wars, bs all that.
In anarchist circles (and no we don't usually kill another, if the murderer of Seveke was an anarchist in that time he would supposedly have been better informed about trauma induced in people through police infiltration, then this), they say something funny about democracy, but i can't quite remember.
It's about that you let a whole bunch of stupid or uninformed people decide over something, more usually then not they will reach the wrong decission.
Used as such (what conservatives do) democracy actually equals fascism. Where some supposedly superior elite is allowed to use the masses as slaves.
Worst of all is conservative forces always use this argument to paralyse political processes beforehand.
And this my friends is what we can expect to see happen in the usian political debate. Poor Obama, anything he is even allowed to say will be compromising.
I think he does very well in his campaigning. I also so think our best chances are in his honest aproach on changes. By stressing changes he will have more options open, i also wouldn't know exactly what to do in Irak with Obama in charge on Usa side.
Noone does, the discussion would be completely different, i am very sure. At least the blogosphere might come up with a couple of surprises. Otoh people in irak are more aware then any Usa is all but intend to leave.
So if anything is supposed to change, Obama will need to leave many options open.
The rest of the world is pretty cynical about usa by now.
happy leaping
(1) in the case of iran i wonder if the suggested weapongrade uranium isn't the 1 or so percent that naturally exists in refined uranium. I think it is. Putins contribution sheds some doubt on that, but lets be fair, putin is trying to legalise his own election result, he and bush share an interest for once.
(2) In terms of ecological footprints, it is very hard in a western context to get under 100.. wich is that you use 100% of what you could use and still have neutral ecological impact. It means that you use over 100 some people will have nothing.
Lets assume lich people only buy a house twice as big, they will never stay under 100.
Someone somewhere, will have to try to live under subsistence level, and perhaps several.
That would be twice a rather small house. Best i did was 101, i am a vegetarian, almost greedy with electrical power, with no car, little flights and hardly luxury.
would you have a car you are probably at 110 immediatly, 1 other person would lack 10percent of what they needed to even be happy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
wanted terrorist: name silencer aka stealotron
Through lies and fraud this one is managed to rob 1000000s of the fruits of their work and their voice