gun control

well it happened again, a kid shot kids and adults with military weapons.
this time not through re-enacting a hollywood add., only perceivably random.

with societys falling apart due the influence of a policestate that needs us paranoia,
with no jobs but that of uniformed bully driving a human cattle,

it is still hard to make sense of the most recent massacre.
ofcourse it happened in the land of the massacres, it comes as no surprise,
ofcourse it used the kind of semi automatic weapon that recently escaped regulation once over,

and ofcourse we will not know what medicines, what health history, whose diagnoses etc. are behind.

it is hard to understand it would freak people out like this but actually if you have the guts to assume somewhat more of a thoughtprocess in the people involved (the guy, his mum, probably his father as well, professionals) more transpires than you might think.

in these cases usually the perpetrator is perceived as troubled, awkward and remote , but, generally troubled. in these cases noone put a questionmark to their medication, and they get medicins from a time off, the adult personality has not at all shaped yet.

the people are well respected, also for their money, (of all the three other family members socially respected generosity is on record(?)). that some kid wanders aimlessly raises no questions.

so. it leads me to think.

what i think is the blame for the madness, the affliction is usually with the parents. egotism or simple lack of quality of thought, it does not matter. a small young kid is the one labelled 'crazy'. by the only people they can instinctively trust, the parents.

it takes away the responsibility in the family to think over what is really wrong, typically the family did break up at about the point the young man starts to be a medication zombee..

now it is possible that no parent would be prepared to cope with a kid like that, but in such a case simply they should not. the kid will need social development beyond what made him the target for pharmaceutics.

chances, therapy, adapted living, family therapy etc etc. you name it.

the attitude that adults(parents , professionals) are 'normal' and kids can be 'crazy', is what causes this (and every) drama.

the guns are what turns drame into massacre.


-------------------------------------

ps. i could write specifically on autism spectre, and it's perceivable causes (many chemical). i don't, i figure his mum was actually the shouting kind, and after the new healthbill destroyed the young mans identity by shreeking:

" you are just an autist, asperger does not even exist, you are not a genius in disguise!"

no longer the mum of a disguised genius. (ritalin then, turns the unwhily into studious homeworkers) nonsense besides, a diagnosis does not decide someones intelligence.

ripchips

by now most of us will probably be affected,
whatever ripknip, or ripchip, or ripstrip, it rips, and people may be uncarefull and unsuspecting,

by now they noticed, some, maybe all.
certainly the poor and outspoken

the private riptrip of the ripchippers
ripvatisation

gaza opening

the drama unfolded, accusations, blaming and demonisation struck quick and hard,

apparently bombs fell,

after a few days i searched a live stream. it happened that RT had one, it even sometimes showed a different angle , and transmitted pieces arab and chinese negotiations (thx for not translating)

live streams are anyhow a good tool, even if they sometimes have you staring at a still for hours, the situation can only still be manipulated (in the media usually) to a smaller degree.
gaza however almost fits in one camera field.

it was painfully impressive, in no time the high rise stood shaking, and would i post something a bomb would fall.

yet the first thing that occured before the bombs had time to touch the ground was what a terrible nuisance drones are.

outright incredible, i wonder completely how much of this torture the international community so far allowed.

also i wonder , and i have not the faintest, how much the same goes for pakistan and yemen, are these people also bombarded with the noise of traffic jams at high speed mixed with second worldwar aerial warfare of unknown dimension?

an everlasting airbattle? it got me sad and nervous and also ill very soon.

the next night the sound was dimmed to the point of being almost off. and i saw examples of scrambling,
strangely exactly by the parties that we just read were the victim of that practice..

what a surprise (not)

bombs still dropped, very loud ones even, as the building didnt shake they were big. and the drones were there, not probably much more distant.

a next night came, and even if i hated the view i put on the camera again, it went off-air (happens a lot with livecams, the conditions are not rarely suspect)

found another and as it was yesterdaynight, a truce was anounced (moreless the third such attempt, i feared the most)

enormous shooting was the theatre, the groundwar had broke loose, could hardly hear the drones,
claxoning, singing and cheering people made obvious this was probably a celebration,

not so hard to understand they were happy, hanya held a speech, oh i got he was satisfied with results, the air would be cleared, water sourced and borders opened.

he smiled all the way, nah not really, but was he happy!
this was still in arab, and i had seen the scene in gaza, was actually probably still watching it somewhat perplexly, so i took it that he was declaring a farfetched and great victory, wo these horrible costs and losses, only today i understood it got a bit better.

over the conditions of the cease-fire the borders , water and air, (and a few more i did not understand or hear), and ofcourse the condition of ceasing fire and hostilitys, haniya achieved another thing.

hamas was directly involved in the negotiations.

it means we are making a start with disbanding the practice of criminalising whole populaces, just because some (very rich people) say they can.

a bigger change than that we could have hoped of.

policing syria

how is syria doing?
like a test tube should..

it's incredible, mind boggling, what happens in syria. i have never seen a thing like it in my life. never.

how and what way i look at it, the nr of air missions, the extensity, the damage, lethality, the mess, the resistance, anything, it is sort of incomparable.

i think it beats every other conflict on the excentricity index.

the events are strange, the whole nation rises up peacefully, assad refuses to leave, why should he, europeans still have their medieval kings and queens.

next they resist the european violence, and still assad does not resign peacefully, the european example has taught him in the long run one can frame and fool a populace.

the usians meanwhile are jealous at the emirs' wealth. discrimination is a full-time job there.

the russians, chinese and iranians are desperate, who's next to fall for this mormon bigotry?

the population is caught in between.

and we, the europeans? all we can do is buy, buy the radioactive produce and hope noone will be running out of tungsten.

the european police state is capitalist property

globalisation has led the world to become ever more of an experiment of the rich against the poor.

people and even the whole planets population tested for logic and habitually fail.

the european police state is an example for that, centralist trends, carreer politics, dark rooms, and concerted repression efforts are the ordre of the day.

basically the european populations aim wrong, if they are to improve on their general condition, not the few rich's luxurys and perversions, they will need to get back control of the political instruments.

since that happens to be impossible through policestate supervised 'voting' and 'democracy', people will have to take on other grounds.

get things done on a constitutional level.

it is interesting in that respect how a century old geneva convention still decides hitler's terrorist of that time, are the capitalist' terrorist of today's.

international agreements and guarantees of human rights could iow. be better.

guess what? they will not.

progress in such respects is so slow it is worth coming up with an example why.



in the 1950's a structural attempt was made to p[rovide social housing, huge appartmentbuildings, mid-high rises and standardised single family homes sprung from the earth and housed 100000s affordably , if modest.

the prices were for some time not bad, the integrated building style  and a-bomb resistant concrete structures offered a resilience unknown before.

however the prices went up. for some time the incomes did, but at the point survivability was in the positive for most, the political urge slipped away and people actually never checked it.

there has not been a grass roots movement defending the principle of social housing. the squatting movement after all also worked with alternative concepts. communal housing, combined working-living. even organic farming and student housing.

now in some 25-30 years these buildings of the 1950s , early 60s were payed for.

but guess what? the prices rose and rose and rose, soon to a point it became obvious people were cashing in a lot on that 'social housing', instead of doing something socially constructive with the money.

at some point the prices rose so high buying houses was actually cheaper. if you were allowed , and since noone would or could pay that for a small appartment like that, the state had to sponsor the incomes of the bogus groups still further.

so now we are in a situation that poor people and the state are sucked dry by a small percentage of the populace , comprising amongst the 'social housing' managements,

so that is why. these useless elitists that only know how to steal, are a bunch of corrupt thiefs.

and that is how europeans have a lot to change in every level of their state, political and burocratical systems
before the necronomy will turn again in something worth living and endurable to regard.

3 short storms

probably small posts run better, at the moment i am so annoyed with a few things i turn to my blog,

best i first speak about the climate change that did it to me.

been paying to much attention to that storm, even as it struck and the catastrophe as it unfolded was screened, litterally when i had seen the eye of the storm , on a webcam, i love webcams, very practicle research tool if often used, not to near it's full potential.

i love live streams, people should really make many live streams, if we had live streams from damascus there would be no more 'impossible to confirm'. less at least.

the point is ofcourse something needs to be happening before it gets really usefull. however if they don't exist i invent them now, live streaming per mobile phone camera. time for a new gadget, the live stream phone standard (...)

some people could have used a stable platform for the camera every now and then.

you know what, i'll give a few more tips. when you are reporting, so when your lifestream is filming something 'newsworthy' or so, try to give some overview now and then, don't allways focus on the subject but show the surroundings, so things get a perspective.

the media does not do that so much, they tend to the opposite, at least 3 different sequences of the fire in newyork i seen were filmed in such a way it reminded more of dresden burning than a small tip of an island. zooming in on exactly the places one could get a full screen of flames it may have impressed many, not me. (the last one i saw showed only flames , yet looking carefully you would see the scale was that of sheds burning, not streets.)

so citizen reporting could distinguish itself in that respect.

for another example we got an aereal view of houses, impacted by beachsand, the houses were all well btw, masses of slightly damaged houses and beachsand, here and there a boat between the houses.

you have to take very good care to register the few seconds in the ten minutes that the sea is visible at the usual distance of 10 mtr from the first row of houses to know the sand ought to almost be there, and you have to know these luxury beachvillas have channels between and near them not to be surprised at the boats. (i pitty haiti more)

that kind of thing, would be better if registered by citizen reporting. it can also be valuable to get a better picture of the whole, insurance companys or state and ofcourse private persons have much better proof for the scale and reality of events.

scientifically pictures that show the surroundings and scales, realistically, no matter how dramatically (or not) that provide maximum information are ofcourse the more valuable as well.

an example in historic research is that in all the warpropaganda from the second ww, it are the smallest details that are the most revealing, many okish documentarys spend huge effort to find that one picture of a certain model tank or airplane, and when it is about the holocaust the few accidental or sometimes private shots of populations and their situation are among the more visual of available proofs.

so it is historically prooven one has to film that way, and tv will not do it, media will expressly not show the scales, exagerate the detail, and hide what is unwanted.

one lifestream that showed a lot of wild waves and water ahead of the storm went out of the air when it really struck, the sometimes life reports that far gave some indications of things happening that we do not see in the media, 'coincedentually' as it happened the reporting voices didn't transpond and the clues were in mere syllables, look look you see the m.. kgggt kgggt lagging camera, and ofcourse people have to take good care with wiring, zooms back in on bent lamppole.

really funny how during the hour ahead of the storms main impact every reporter (on cnn's stream and maybe not every, but that i seen) stood next to some broken bend or dead lamppost,
i wondered if they purposedly damaged them.

so some of the reporting was actually shocking. saw some what seemed a nuclear rocket battery (a small one 6 cars) or maybe not nucleair, just ahead of the ducks on the interstate 21. (1)


(so that's how ducks safe theirselves, we'd been wondering) after that i didnt retrieve that specific camera, wich was quite boring but had some update on events , most of them going unnoticed in other media.

like one report many , many (did i hear 4000) had to wade for their lives, an horrific scene?? they obviously regretted not being there to film it and tried on for atlantic. but sold the ducks to foxnews.

apparently obamas advises were being headed though. no casualtys we know of from atlantic.

thought for myself , he made them swim in the right direction and see how great it helps.
coincedentually the bulk of the victims we hear of are in the states unprepared for the worst, further from the coast.

in that aspect perhaps it would have been good to show the wider public a bit more of that reality of crashing trees.

didn't cope with the climate thing yet, a un food security research concerned with warming (wich is only one small aspect of climate change) suggests cassave and bananas would replace potatoes, and cowpea could replace soya, only for that to happen the temperature change is on the ordre of ten degrees or so...
they never admitted more than 1.5C in a century but they plan the emergency to grow bananas for potatoes, talking censury...




(1) there has been one more hurricane that i wondered if they had nuked it, but i could not tell what that was, i never thought of it again untill this stream.

nobel peace prize

there could be a tad of humor involved,

'on second thoughts we should not have given it to obama we should have given it the eu'
so for sake of humor let me assume some objectivity in the (dedicatedly christianly convicted) norwegians.

it is like a bit of good news between the martyrships of malala's and their syrian sistren.
norway is hinting: look people of madrid, spain, italy, and greece, at least you started no civil war.

or it is even better, we, the eu, von rompuy, me and the rest have made the subtlest diplomacy.

apparently rasmussen is not considered a part of eu. norwegian intelligentsia appear convinced pentagon decides the moves and moods of nato.

or we get the nobel peace prize for allways being apt at stating, "we will help you against every agression" after choosing side we are on.

what does it have to do with afghanistan? nothing. ok.. i agree with norway once more, the attacks on iraq and afghanistan are better not considered a part of serious history at all.

finally serbia, it is better if we forget about serbia...

forget about yugoslavia people! its been peace in europe for 50 years!

the one case i am proud of europe in international politics is belorussia,

the exagerated thrill of dethroning one more agricultual slavic nation was toned down and with putin marvelously defusing most of the speculations around missileshields it has all not been so bad.

personally i do not see why did they not exclude the polish?
that near catastrophe was due polish giving in to their inclination to believe anyone english speaking who is not english.

finally gets what is against wahabi's..