censoring toy.

things are just what they appear to you, if you regard them as things that show themselves to you.

better to consider them things that appear to you to appear the things that they appear.

if then they appear something different then they appear you know what and whatfor they are.

that's with aljazeera's dos for one thing. aljazeera isn't a radical medium, not really.
it is a mainstream outlet, with only moderate emancipatory character.

it is somewhat critical at times, and has a little attention for what you might call 'talk on the street'. it doesn't shun sensationalism really. and most importantly, it is a straightforward tool of bluntly put nato/us/and such opinionism.

so such dos may serve to harness their apparent (..) credibility, if that is the case i would guess the military lobby is having something creeping in their sleeves.

however except for the reference of general say 'worldwide' credibility i didnt get any clear signal.

frost featured a mladic-like character, that wanted his ethnically cleansed territory's cus that's how nato does that, and he is as relevant as 'eastern europe and the baltic states'.

that are cheap sentiments to play. typically he still favours the platform.

~~~~

June

so, back to politics. the greatest news of the day? brazil has a female chief of staff. that is,

there are no words for that,

something has changed. at the best time, (i read a feminist writer is one of her rolemodels..),
to change something.

brazil has recently been one of the more unifying factors in the world. so, that it goes with the fiction or story of a much greater brazil (i agree brazil is great , but that's not much necessary, or perhaps it is), is in one word : great.

she is a woman with a position to change things, like the feminist education of the egypt army,
such stuf.. is plainly juicy. no that is not bad news.

in egypt, i hear.., police and by extension (they are rather a lot more in charge atm.) the army,
in egypt have been prosecuting democrats. well so i hear, other voices say it is not that bad, but i would insist you cannot have any political prosecution in a state like egypt in a time like this.

first you have to regard critically your moral, next you have to make do with the false picture as it was shaped through the regime's forces before, the media haven't hardly dared to give much of the auditing to the public really, the brothers, despite their choosen words, is also a bunch of polarised traditionalists with no great perception. come or go, you don't want your emancipatory forces to burn 'places of worship' or the clients in for therapy.

just like, yeah yesterday i was promoting my freedom, now i am picking on someone else's.

i don't expect this explain anything to anyone, and i wonder how traditionalism would apply any much more this time of the year to shia than to sunni.

even that, is not of much interest, the whole subject of religion, is much like that of sexuality.
the dispute when hardly or mis-understood, has no guarantee to succeed in emancipating a person.

i find that kind of funny.

well i think i need to say that.


----------------
post.
----------------

i tried to publish a small thing on libya on aljazeera (that apparently is under enough of a dos to see favourites whiped and show provider/actually also police screens.

crazy. most of it happened before, for it and a few. wonders about his..

similarly i cant log in to a game i play through a usian server..

anyhow, it's not really the topic.

the piece i posted , i liked it, so here goes:

this seems like a good place to reopen the discussion about revolutions and control. khadaffi is a revolution, a coloured tory(1) in a state of madness, P.E.plenty reason to that, and the grip on infinite fear and incredible fortune. 1 oil for the other, you would wonder who decides for geology. the sneers clichees don't impress anyone ever, and isn't the story of egypt that the eu wants snipers on the roofs to protect her facade of cryptofascists? freedom has a price, i suspect it is called equality.

, now that discussion, allthough 'unclosed' has been dead since 20th of april.
much like any discussion on alJ since they changed the format.

but it didnt get published, i read, well i read what usia had to say after that, and gates,
said "i belief he would have went door to door in benghazi to kill everyone".

well that may be so 'bombing irak to the stone age and stuff"

and it may be gates never saw enough of the news to know noone in the world ever took khadaffi serious, and it may or may not be why they actually have the opportunity to do what they do.

(well enough of an aircontrol situation, see how the opposition is really stronger??)

nope.

and why? because khadaffi is "emancipated" (they could indeed have taken him serious when they didn't that means).

he is not emancipated in every respect, and he is quite silly in his ideas of kings or emperors, he has even been a nato client, but, compared to god knows who and what not and whatever,
still

the kind of person you might want(2) to say: and yet, in a way, in things, he is somewhat emancipated isn't he?

and the thing is, i wonder if you can say that about this gates.

moi.



oh yeah on the down side, even more obscure and outrightly ridiculous administration, railways managing to implicate theirselves all over thoroughly, with their

"obliged" (that is fucking forbidden but they did that to me), automatic payment (for a friggin wrong number of coins, in two ways). that apparently they didn't get. for wich "they send me a letter" (that i didnt get).

and another.

completely unknown so far (and i had even forgotten it again) what for. wtf. i know i once went there with someone. fuck off.
well so i know the place , but i have no idea, what it could be about, perhaps usual things (that would be bicycle fines) go through places like that. they had been supposed to take me hostage , and never did (i guess cus it would clear up they did not pay me but stole or so) for a fine,
yet,

they didnt AND send me the letter that they must.

screw them, their own words mean nothing for them.
courts.

(1) didn't post that 'h' anyway.
(2) dunno how if i would overread first and last lines.

Oh a post

pooh, i owe you one, didnt yet really get to , well, there was this nice show on tv. had a decent week besides.

what can i say, it's a steady habit and a hatefull one at it of institutions to release an utmost of administrive restrict on me, for as long as i can remember in fact. well.. perhaps not quite true,

i was on the oddlist of selfshaped personality's on some secondairy school. that was a one thing that made life easier for me then the usual. just for the idea the rest was supposed to be repressed (aka terrorised, intimidated) back into a sheeplike mode of obedience.

these days schools feature abuse (currently in striking denial) and fine you if you or your kid decide it is not the best idea,

for some reason it coincides with, a certain psychiatrisation of the youth, reknownedly as where it first so suited pharmaceutically, just for the idea.

pull on the line that the supposedly guiding nation or perhaps more complementary testing case netherland in fact has the wickiest set of regulations to put individuals under authority of plenty institutions and drawing the line back you might notice something is the matter.

a few things perhaps. however that is not the story.

the story is i am contrary to the slight scraps of apparently formal nonsense i seen, not only stolen from regularly, pretty much every month in the very least, directly, through the electronic bankaccount evryone needs, (sometimes i even think it weird i would have then never received anything there besides, but that has been some time),

no its not all, they tooks the extras so much as everyone else apparently gets, the holliday money,(when the fine was payed allready) allthough 'the (i havent the faintest what for) fine, that 'has been anounced'(but not in the measure carboncopy's or whatever of that exist, i actually never seen anything,

and take it
it just went the same way as when i got my temporary railcard taken (a proof of payment) and never received a new one after payment to follow with more of the same robbery from the railways through again, denying the duration of the word year. (this time after much effort,
taking of 3 months with no reason whatsover the next year).

lol i used to make efforts for small savings, never the fuck understanding why it wouldn't untill i started calculating and remembered so many other of similar experiences. that i rather not remembered it, had i been stupid.

well long story short they don't only do that with payments, fines, income, extra's, saving, returnpayments, bills, apparently any significant acount of money that would come my way, no,

they do that with institutions and services for society as a whole starting with my person,

the first time when i first needed to take care for food for myself, for a whole year.
to my knowledge it had never been denied, and was not yet even legal to apply.

that was a year or so.
i only ate apples. i hate apples, except some tropical ones, and in juicemixes.

i didnt only eat apples, but mostly i ate apples, weeks on end, a whole winter.

well. and so it has ever been when i got into a house , or way of living, whatever, basically when i needed stuf like food. warmth, perhaps not in the least travel costs,

i didnt feel useless or so, or that any of these denying and stealing from evryone and me, (but me first if they saw the chance, and it seems to get me hated) ever did anything remotely as usefull,

so i protested, i even went to court, and lost that. why? as i am often told to have to understand it, for "i have no lawyer".

well if, i would the nitpicky tidstads from lawyers to win a proces about something obviously covered in the most repressive of constitutions, equality, i would need a lawyer, if something that is so obviously clear to me, and that i fortunately showed before a judge earlier, that i have been the individual target time and again of plenty such agression and hate of the rich,
(i think i can improvise at least ten examples without even making notes).

then, i dont need a judge.

than everyone should get a lawyer by law that loves to lick the specific kind of judges ass or whatever it takes, and they should never again bother anyone with any appeal or chance of proces.

nobody would believe that would work, so you can see the argument a judge would need a lawyer to understand a victim, "pukably 'client'". basically you can kiss my ass with your courts.

ya know if i was trying to frame an insurance or so. ok i might get that, but to judge real certain facts for real certain facts, their own fucking documents?

my ass.

pleased, i will soonish, rejoin my blog for the next topic.