600000 bullets a day

I rili don't feel like doing this, but here goes some more critics on UN.

What we actually see on play in media and politics these months is something that should stop. Obviously people still have great hopes for a better future of their society's . When kenya happened, and to our not small surprise usia ceded short before actual recidivist genocide, the obvious situation that the palestineans will
be repressed into some support, and last and foremost Obama.

The nepalese elections having delivered a maoist majority is no small surprise in times of electional fraude, that butan abolishes monarchy is always a promise, people are writing constitutions evrywhere, and another 4 million ppl nation, paraquai will enjoy some more freedom and justice. What i think is these are small cookies.

anyway it should not be enough to give up hope, but what stands against it.
Against it stands the usian elections, that as always are turned in a parade of bias and fears. The obvious situation that perhaps not even obama can get the neocons out of irak, the huge problem with foodshortages, and the enduring pressure from the west on africa.

Situations have become rather obsessed. there is a small minority shouting tibet should go above evrything, hardly needed because it would be above evrything anyhow,
the media represent it extremely well. It's obviously as well planned as the games in peking are. Now the tibetans are just having bad luck. they are a usefull pawn
in the hands of the antichinese, happening to be the same that want to stay in irak.

as such they have become a ridicule of international relations, wich is not quite the greatest service their sponsors offered. Then again.. generally spoken you would sympathise with the tibetans, wich could be a reason to voice discontent, i do wonder wat wud happen if usia hosted these games, i fear i would well be willing to disturb their ridiculous flame run. Since china already grants the tibetan province cultural autonomy, asking more would be encrouching on their territorial integrity.

I must say the reports i hear about chinas behaviour in tibet are shocking to my norms, well aware that i am that shocking things like these happen in many places of the world certainly also under usian (and nato, even un) flag.

So its a very hypocrit story to preach independance for tibet, when actually the chinese society as a whole is modernising and the attention at the olympic games could also be a more sincere attempt to promote human rights in general.
I guess that is not on the agenda, becus they are not so sure they want to be pointed at human rights all the next olympics.

Then there is the mugabe affair.
Very long brittain has resisted to let go of zimbabwe before independance. it resulted in one more bloody conflict, that was complicated through SA interference,
special quads of other nations operating, english, fighting, massive human rights infringements (mostly by the whites) and a radiation of civil warlike armed conflicts in the area. Allthough that was ofcourse regionally mutual, in all these cases SA and western foreign policy played a role.

at one point the situation in zim could not anymore be held, and as one of the last it decolonised. Immediatly ridiculous claims were brought by whites who thought they still owned the land and positions they stole. Not only that, sanctions and boykots were brought into effect, and have been there ever since.
Now there is MDC and morgan tsvangirai. He is quite an amable guy himself, however he is representing the obvious surrender option. He is regarded as someone who has close ties to the english, every diplomatic move SA or angola makes shows they are under great international pressure themselves. That means : africa is not decolonised yet, strangely indeed SA better economy hardly helps the poor, and so its hard to sympathise with the opponents of mugabe. It wudnt introduce normal relations with the western world, but assymetrical ones.

Now in the media robert mugabe is depicted as a brute, a hideous dictator and perpetrator of every evil deed and even genocidal actions. His better sides kept in the shadow as ever since independance. The zim people are actually not that excited as we are all made to think. Chances are all this anti mugabe diplomatics are basically spilled on the zim populace and actually more will vote for mugabe.

That besides the camp remains very split, about half of the ppl supporting mugabe, the rest vying for morgan or any iniative. Normalisation of the relations with zimbabwe could also now be done, without morgan tsvangirai. It is very doubtfull if this priority with presidents is so usefull anyhow, considering that a democracy is supposed to be ruled by its parliament.

actually the west says: we want our own dictator there. that is a big risk to take.
Zimbabwe will never be all slave and downtrodden attitude again, and a great change in national politics not rarely escalates into violence.
iotw, if morgan wins he has to take some care in not destroying to much of the existing structures fast or the result will imediatly be a repressive situation.

So thats a dirty case. Tibet is a dirty case, zimbabwe is one, now what is next on the war and hate agenda of the western media....
Ill tell you. it is georgia. The nato has now deployed the un against georgia.
i think its a dirty soup they are steering in, at a dirty time in history.

Baghdad 9th first day of the future?

This post is not anymore up to date.

Due to unforeseen circumstances, the procedure is postponed for an unknown period, presumably not ggoing to happen at all who would celebrate a 5 year occupation 5 months off.
I guess some time will be spend ny sadr on working on the arbitrage proposal in between, i start to wonder what is true about the news what sadr said, reminds me a bit of western media 'knowing' far away elections results. today i saw the rather contrary statements of a disarmament agreement, and the wish to be guaranteed from us strikes.

There's an impressive pile of bumps and notches on the plan, and it is essential it stays completely transparant in its fundamental(s). Otoh. it's about a plan for people who's lives are yet hurt disproportionate, certainly not a reason to trust sociological projections, and as such completely independend.

anyhow go ahead still .. read, if u like.




In baghdad the 9th, a million people or more will be on the march for peace.
(if they let them i guess)
Okay a peace that they like, but still peace. Perhaps it will be many more.
Allthough.. baghdad is all split up in tiny pieces through concrete walls and roadblocks, its hard to be sure they could get through. There is also a risk of provocations by authoritys or attacks (by rabiate antishias uncovered in the surge)

Actually i think there is a small chance the sunni will overcome their fear, the kurds will send a delegation or two , and the badr , baath and even secular iraqi represent. When the people can overcome still more fears then that, it could be sunni and shia would do the jolly partying through the street thing together once again.

That would be ideal. Also for Sadr;) with the provincial elections ahead, checking against sadr would become like finding a roofpane in a blind wall;)

Just joking. It would be ideal for sadr, but he deserves it a bit. If iraki is a failed state? topple that government. There is an end to argument. Irak is a failed state, in so far that it's inhabitants have a reason to resist it.

The badr faction that is infamous amongst usian for being 'independence minded',
whatever that apparently means in their confused minds(1), would be better to join in, after all they want an independend and united irak in parliament as well do they?
Reconciliation with the madhi army, sadr movement and madhi ideology should be a part of the process, it is not the worst moment for that, as they have shown they are ready to negotiate violence. Waiting longer in this exact situation would always create new wounds.
what do you think?

Yankee go home!

(1) some 'post' greenzone military police state as far as i see the reach of their future there, but i am not very sure many of them are aware of that.

Good simple lesson, one way to not stop genocides is to go out for revenge on the associated faction of the dictator u remove.

Month of the 9th

This post is not anymore up to date.

Due to unforeseen circumstances, my patient, well informed and friendly lawyer got a flue, the procedure is postponed for an unknown period, presumably months.
I suppose i could spend some time on working on the arbitrage proposal in between,
when i wrote this piece yesterday, i thought i should have been more stipulative and exact, less just giving the vague idea..

There's an impressive pile of bumps and notches on the plan, and it is essential it stays completely transparant in its fundamental(s). Otoh. it's about a plan for people who's lives are yet hurt disproportionate, certainly not a reason to trust sociological projections, and as such completely independend.

anyhow go ahead still .. read, if u like.


last year 9-september my house was robbed and broken into by the cops. the 9th there will be a procedure where i will refuse to admit to such unpolitical, oddly founded, ill interpreted, badly abused, intend of the dutch state (and a relatively big part of its government) to satisfy the need of their populace for a more tolerant and decriminalising, instead of criminalising, aproach on drugs specifically and the shortcomings and related downfall of legal quality in general.

Elas, tseems even my inbox, isn't safe i cant give u the due time and place just yet.
Unfortunately really working at the case made me feel severely ill, i actually had rather a bad week after i tried even once. That combined with the absolute certainty about the accesibillity of all my digital produce and communications make i hardly want to write anything about this case on the computer as i fear the procedure may be more psychologically ready to nullify my very reasonable arguments.

I don't exactly expect cooperation, and i have no idea in what set up i have landed precisely. It's hardly plausible that a hammering kind of do the right cases in the wrong kind of way person, would be so open to critics on the validity of her actual functioning. Let alone that it would actually initiate the compensation of what they done wrong. My doubts over it are severe at the least.

That's why i plan to state very explicitly that every piece of the procedings against my person is invalid and that it is not acceptable that such a heap of rubbish and perhaps some gossip would suffice to standardly punish and verdict someone. Let alone in a construct that is either suit for judging parking cases, or otherways abused for so much more things then i might imagine, only the thought of it would be to much to cope to be locked in such a fake trial.. standardly.

Anyhow once bfore i threatened i would drop 10 percent of the dutch national income in a year if they would not reward me somewhat proportionally, wich didnt happen.
Accept that the BNP did happen. And i think.. a court would have registered a thing like that. I very much wonder if they understand i am worth more then 11 million still.

hi judge..
oh yes on now with the real event for that day.
So apart from that bragging smells i don't find it easy to come up with all the thousands of right examples where the law got abused to impose a conservative legislature after in this case even a progressive intend, and that court and justice is dependend. Namely dependend with the conservatism.

Well ofcourse such a thing wouldn't only show in a minor case, for a minor court,
nevertheless the nr of victims easiliest shows in these minor cases. It has actually hit 10000s perhaps even 100000s of the poorest and underpriviliged dutch.

And i am talking about this exact single law that is now being jeered on me.
Such injustice be it that it sometimes happens in matters that would hardly make an international scene, is hard to bear, and the most loathsome to fight. It's called: institutionalisation if you work that the wrong way, you will ever fight the same lost post with less result. That is the reasonm o took this rather great and large topic. Homegorwn marihuana. When my mind is already for a long time on just screwing them over one of their attrocious attacks of justice or their absolute attitudes
in implementing the most idiocrous jurisdiction that doesn't stand the light of a not exactly specialised person , and basically doesn;t do that in any respect or aspect. This is a good case, whatever i win i win for thousands of people, and i decided to put the most absurd claims i dared to show that they should care, and for having to voice my general opinion that ridiculous claims are to often rewarded in a ridiculous (and political , even military context.

Its a kind of paradox for them, that they are better of if they pay me a lot for negating this blatant piece of obstructive conservatist jurisprudence back to a workable prepostion. The actual claims are: 11 million for me, and 1.5 billion to be put in a fund to promote the trade and use of drugs.

Basically the fund is meant as a start to give people more rights for healthservice adequate representation for the law etc. etc. even if they are in conflict with the law. Wich is why the scope is so limited. within the amount there is some space to
organise a paralel to legal structure, but initially the only outside task i want to put to the organisation specifically is to register and file the endless possible direct conflicts of law and justice and open up a route for any well founded anti-legal claims, to be immediatly aprehended by a large and in as far as could be made possible international context. Wich might perhaps give us an solution to the dillema of juriprudence in legislature.
However such a kind of advocatury (lawyer) standard is way to much to task an organisation with that has the task to set right the wrong done, compensate the poorest of ones so strucken, index the actual effects it had, and come with better and more workable justice and anti-crime strategy's then before.

It will be a long time with a lot of work, wich it from the perspective of a lawyer would be anyway. Obviously such a structure with this funding would have a limited possibillity to temper drugstrade and crime. For example by finding a better definition to solve the 'aching to racism, ala wilders' inequal distribution of prisoners among colours.

Anyway such an organisation could only function if it has the very conscious intend to double legislature. Thats why we might as well start with a straightforward aproach. The better aproach to drugs is a positive one, and organisation that would want to promote that and the trades of such aproaches is better of with a name that says it all. A revolutionairy name to be reminded of her criminal intend to do right.
Even if the "rights" would stop to do wrong.

worst enemy of peace, put an end to the nato

Maybe i am suspect, and maybe the nato is actually my favourite instrument of torture, sure they put a show for that. It's logical, nato is the greatest tool to make an impression. Anything wrong, send in the nato, bomb the scene, and everyone knows where we actually stand. Great material.. pah, i think i can destroy most of the worlds armies and airforces using just robots, through.... the nato.
Unfortunately every usefull tool gets abused.

The nato as it existed has always deprived us of the option to think or trade peacefully with the east. The sovjet union and china. However after the warshaw pact was abolished, the opposing army of the dark, remained.

Having outlived it's doubtfull purpose the nato shines as an instrument of repression, cruelty and injustice. It's conspirative nature made it a handy tool in the hands of ppl who think the world is a thing you can toll when you have the biggest gun.

After the first amazement, when it appeared the east was ready to lack animosity, soon nato turned an evil eye on new purpose, new tasks. We now see an organisation that existed to destroy a mythological enemy, bussy creating and destroying new, and obviously weaker ones.

Meanwhile the misty deals over weapons reel while i write, or talk to a friend.
Nato is the iron fist that shows us every time this world is not our own, and so are not our governments.

whatever rocks your boat. al Jazeera

This is meant to be a critic on reporting on alJ.

I am not much of a media freak, so this basically about the content of the your views page and the actual articles. Sometimes i watch a vid, a report, or a thematic one, but i don't have the media experience to compare them to anything.
Generally spoken the way alJ works with videos on inet, and with you tube, is sympathic. At least the subjects appear to be of more quality then the usual medias, and not rarely the report and way of journalism.

Thats why in alJ articles there is a lot of unexpected to be found. Reporters are almost always on spot, or none farther of then other journalists.
However...i do notice a trend also on alJ to disturb the news. well not really the news only mayb.. but its backgrounds. it goes like this:

alJ has a dedication to informing, and as such often they go into great detail repeating the background of a situation. A thing btw. you may notice many other newspapers articles do. They use something close to mantras. Wen something happens,
the official variety of the context and history is donned at us endless numbers of times.
Usually you can just skip such matters. No need to read something you read 10 times before. Sometimes its even usefull, like for example trying to memorise political players and partys names in otherways remote and little highlighted nations. Sometimes its plain boring. I think everyone knows by now Bush attacked saddam over faked allegations of wmd (the last thing they might not repeat just as often).

However apparently it is also an instrument of indoctrination.
It appears the storys are not only undercooled at times, they also change. although the story has been repeated a 100 times before, certain detail never emerges, outside specific articles, certain (unwanted by the west) detail even disappear from the callroll. So at most every article on many subjects you get a summing up of a history that gets less complete, less complex and less true over time.

I don't read european media all that much to check if they use the same mechanism. For one thing because their endless repeating of brainless slogans and oneliners to excuse her political and warry behaviour abound just bores me of the pages.

Maybe it's just that i care about alJ, that makes me notice.
However i sometimes think the indoctrination can become extreme, although i do dislike the dutch papers desinforming, i see less of a structure in destroying the detail from the general report. Ofcourse we are alredi more badly informed then muslims need be. I can see the ruling system would see slightly less need in dutch media.

Paradoxally i think alJ is a professional journalists attempt to bring a better reporting, altho commercial or publicationary interests apparently do stand in also their way.

It is strange that such a well meant attempt can only be made with a relatively high level of censory and arbitrage. Not very hopegiving in fact.

So thats with the articles. I think it is my responsability to let ppl know, that alJ is among the first to be subject to mediastrategy, and the creation of blank spaces in our memory, if so told, ordered , forced, or even payed?

Partly it is pragmatically ofcourse, however the pretence of giving the other news, "more of the news", also makes it a very powerfull instrument in this respect.
I fear almost the only reason alJ can exist is it complies.

So thats for the articles, and some of it i only noticed recently.. perhaps the policy has (like once before) changed, for a more paranoid line. Either through extern pressure or through intern complacity or just because we notice it less when it goes slowly.


Your Views:

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B84B85E3-7E69-4D79-8121-746EBEA7B304.htm

Then on with you views part. I still like this a lot, even tho i am censored at times (and worse at points)The reason to like it are the contributions from everywhere, and a few tough people that just like me always keep an eye on whats going on in a more independend way. Often its not so much good but at least then you get a pretty clear picture of what the antagonists say.

I being an anti-repression person, am often on one of the sides in a debate.
It's still better then to always do the arguments on your own. Actually its quite a soap. Apparently iraki contributions tend to be censored recently, must be they don't at all agree to anything usian , i think.
It can't be they constantly invoke prophets and deity only, cus firstly it still happens (for different gods), and secondly alJ doesnt hesitate to publish as defiling , hatemongering, scournfull and cursing posts of zionists. (I must add superfluously, and sometimes their opponents.)

Zionism is a great thing when censoring me from alJ. I had posts censored over
the corridor through israel plan, wich annoyed me, because its such a good thoughts experiment. I am not sure my post about the "least efficient economy" ((US) and her economical "enemies" was published. And i am sure on at least one occasion a specific anti-governmental remark , that wouldn't flatter israel was left out.

Wich also happened yesterday. Yesterday i wrote concerning the arab plan to park a contingent "peace"soldiers in gaza, that it might be fairer to consider burdening also the jews with an army to feed.
Just that part , what lights out the hypocracy of targetted attacks, decimating hamas supporters etc. was left out. The world remains a view that palestineans need pacifying.

and that is ... al jazeera, thought you might want to know.