to-do list

Like everyone else venting his personal emotions into the blogosphere, i can get pretty annoyed by my own posting. So much to write and so little content.
It's embarrasing, whence i did post my yesterdays socalled "funny".

Strangely it makes me smile when i reread it, so that it is why i wrote it, to be able to smile. It suffices for me.

I also have a long long long to-do list. Topics in the uncensored sphere i want to touch... are many. I still have to explain the public how it can be the US finds chemicals in a NY UN building (cbp anyone) the day after i publish about their defoliaging campaigns and quoot (the now late) Blix .
It is hard to explain. Why would an insignificant person like me, with no more special traits then anyone else, someone who never has an abrevation noone else knows,someone essentially only contributing new words , sciences and technologys, laying out only concepts of internationalism, mutualism and intrinsica that are now the only handheld to steer the planet (for good or for bad) be sufficiently relevant to make a headline against??

I have no clue. Freedom of expression would leave me in lonely and dull comparison only. That is one thing i just got to explain at some point, but as you can see it does not make sense to me.

So apart from it happening, it never happens. Nextly , yes what nextly...
next on my to do list , should it be human shielding? or deescalating methods of bomb laying, or no,... yet again the clearing up of tribal remains? Should it be my support for musharraf? Or my deceit for benazirs clique?

I should also touch at the myriad of aspects the white neocons destruct that been fine and friendly in my country, my mothertongue.

I should post about how irak will climb up 15 years after now, when there will never be any chance for them to make a development jump again, with evrything destroyed that saddam left, and no more oil. I should post on african unity (one great good thing) and i should suggest someone finds out what necessitated the much larger tutu genocide after they got a beating. (anyone knows why that is acceptable may tell me).

Should i focus on the poor blokes, our multinational shapegoats that are led to chanceless processes in the hague?? Or merely about the fascistoidisation of our society in all its minor aspects. The dull confection dressed grey masses in the trains that haughtily bestare you, because you are obviously no direct servant of the rich , like them.

Should i talk about how people 20 years old are more discriminating, more superficial, and more egoist then in the time i was 20??
I don't know, it is all so sad..
It is more sad then any of you apparently is able to imagine, Noone says it, noone writes it.. so perhaps the thoughts are more complicated then they seem to me.

What i would love, really love to start with, is something of authority of say;)
Something about saying things to authoritys.
(authoritys is the ones legally set to make decissions or regulate public behaviour)

Like i said before.. authoritys will only talk gibberish. So now i move to my next post, a deliberate insult to all policepeople in the world, one in wich i will say how much it is acceptable to rant at them, and i explain how little trust i put in people that can't handle words if they are legislatory armed..
on with that, ah my mind rejoices when i think fo the fresh insults i can make up at the adress of the police.
And it is really elegull, you cant say shit to a dutch cop these days, i hope they fuckin freak their sick minds doubleblind over, after i wrote what they make me write.
raah lovely:)

C.B.P. (Concrete Battlefield Protector)

One of the challenges in archeology is to provide contempairy armies with sufficient room for slaughter. It's a widely apreciated fact you cannot just have a battlefield anywhere. Certain elements of the landscape are naturally prohibitive (such as rivers) but some should not be used as battlefield for historical or even archeological values. Now this is the classic paradox in archeo-genocido-topo-metry,
for wich i thought of a commercial solution , the C.B.P. (Concrete Battlefield Protector) hereof shortly introdused by the handsome CBP.(or cbp in capitals).

The cbp will have your soldiers die with renewed valour, let me explain how this simple principle works. It used to be we send armys to die in desolate, almost virgin places, and in the earlier days that has been a rewarding strategy. Barren land accumulated archeological finds, and as an extra in the pre-industrial situation ecological feedback diminished burial services and grave duty.

I think you get what i am pointing at? In several cases the whole archeological site has been forgotten, wich is good for tourism, because then there can be several , but wich can be a real setback for archeology in the case a posterior battle occupied the same grounds, not only through dillution of the assembly, but through sheer impact events as well.

Allready the medieval knights must have thought of this, hence their chivalric battlegrounds, but in the modern times we have forgotten this exclusive feature of murder: archeological remains.

Through a simple procedure we can reshape the landscape and provide a whole new ground for war... the cbp.

It is a well known militairy fact history repeats itself, soldiers die more readily on the grounds where their forefathers died before them , this made me decide to distribute the cpb concept free of charge, under a fair use policy, (I do expect payment for fraudulent applications on surplus erratic historical battlegrounds though.)


The principle is quitte simple, as soon as we discover a former battlefield, immediate action is required. Since we don't have the methods yet to proof anything conceivably from generalist finds, we have to rest them in peace. For this cpb can function even in wartime.


Modern warfare is very unrewarding to the archeologist, explosives, remain, and fracturise otherways simple evidence, the atmosphere is loaded with mustard and uranium. So that is a no-go area. Cbp serves excellently.

The only requirement for cbp is regular cleansing after battle, not that much after centurys of spilling blood in the sand.

bows gently for gratefull aplause

red wiki, "tot Vrijheidsbezinning"

I found this : http://www.redapollo.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

Redwiki. It is good:D you will be surprised.
Contrary to wikipedia it feels unbiased, that is: biased mostly to daring thought.

So although i had been warned hardly anyone could hope to pass the censorship of the right line, i started up a contribution.
Someone read it and before i even published it disappeared , all that work for nothing:(

However used as i am to having the works of my mind destroyed i can reconstruct the
intended article here. Fortunately. The unfortunate aspect is i was just introducing a method to keep on writing on the same article forever, thus rewarding it a minor fraction of the attention it deserves.


My first invention was i could "move" the sandbox:test to : kamping "tot Vrijheidsbezinning" and not even risk a talks page.:o

That is fortunate because some people might immediatly want to introduce the modern and 21st century storys about the place, underestimating grossly the effect 1000s of Ka of contemplation had on the local topography. I really don't see why red wiki had to abort this feeble attempt even before birth.

I wasn't jumping into any conclusions yet, merely wondering, if the emptyness of the landscape could have had anything to do with the traditional methods of warfare
of the antagonists of the regionally orbiting people (i quote from head:
"later; when the rich came to extinguish all people" ) , what did i say wrong?
Red wiki? Isn't it what always happened? at this specific locality they came at different moments to extinguish as many as they could, why hide it?

anyway, we are to forget many of the holocausts of the past, when they had not yet succeeded to silence the dissident voice. Ofcourse that babylonic wisdom came to my mind. But what does it have to do with leftish???

mwah...
so much and very little of that.
Anyhow.. I have at least attributed as many words to the "kamping tot vrijheidsbezinning" as i planned for today.

However since my contribution has not been received positively i have conducted a non destructive archeological experiment to make the point that exactly cultural interference can be hardly estimated correctly anymore (at least not in the concerned area) after the 19th century 's blowing up of megalithic structures , in a faint effort to retrieve supposedly lost richess.


here comes:
In the first picture you see a random collection of the famous dutch "tramp stones".
none of them actually derived from the north sea's bassin.
They represent the archeological feature of a "hunebed" in an undisturbed context.


As you can see the magenta arrow is pointing at an undisturbed foliage, and the green arrow is pointing at some items possibly nefariously collected by prehistoric man.

The next fotograph is of a exactly similar location: a "hunebed" for wich netherlands is ultimately famous, however in this instance the hunebed has been blown up 5 years ago.



The magenta arrow is again pointed at a now severely disturbed stratigraphy of the place. The green arrows are pointing at two different items, natural stones that have lost flakes as a result of the explosion ; and modern material disturbing the former archeological context.

Integrity (truth-content)

Very often, when i read a bit about what is going on, and try to collect impressions to shape my observations i feel like fleeing to this place, a personal blog.

I am rather proud of it's name. "Uncensored" and i have seen there is an uncensored in english for almost every language now. A partly shamefull affair.
The israelian uncensored eg ,is mere bigotry, and apparently 100000 people need that charicature to maintain their zionist convulsiveness.

Yes, i reach the conclusion that after the initial invention of the uncensored concept, censors claimed the remaining spaces, blogspots. (this could still be relevant at some point in future).

Anyhow at the israeli uncensored i applied selfcensorship. I am pretty fed up with israelis propagating genocide in response to my having a non-zionist opinion.

That what they do and done to palestineans has all the looks of genocide is a second, and their allies being genocidal state-entity's does not help much either.

Well, i think i can be this direct in this context because of the utter lie in that israeli "uncensored". Uncensored is not the same as promoting a more shizoid approach as your respective governments capitalist interests allow.
That is: "censored".

Still, it is just a notion of integrity so i continue my rant over the falselihood of demologics.

Demologics, the art of providing thought concepts to people to make them believe what is ultimately beneficial for your party, is very much on my mind today.

The fuz over pakistan and irak being the main causes, but the confrontation is everywhere (eg. in the anti-russian spy and other propaganda cases, when the western companys suggest we should trust some capitalist corrupt tax-evader to decide over the future of russians).

Then the french, as having to comply to a blackbox populist like sarkozy.
Europeans have never really been impressed by the french brightness, we don't need this joke to destabilise our friendly relations in europe.

So it is a complot? (yes), that leads to destruction? (yes). Because when this can be done to the french, it can be done to anyone.

I can't even think of a more destructive thought.

A coca-cola puppet, no, that is what we need, just wait and he will start victimising palestineans as a matter of disney-puppet habits.
An ultimate propaganda item is president, someone supporting every egoist, greedy, eurocentric, judeochristian bias, yahoo. Wait and see him rant on everyone else we might possibly still militairy engage in the future.

It gets me sick to think that the people of the world are hussled with this way.
So let's make a move and start looking at say.. irak.

Irak is perfect proof that (always surprising me) people have no opinions of their own.
They don't even have a self definition of theirselves. After you blast the hell out of iraki's they are ready to accept each other as enemys. Not only that, if you tell them they kill another for aforementioned non-ratio, they will do precisely so.

This is so blatantly senseless we have to assume , you , the rest of the world , are just ready to succumb to similar mechanisms. Hence we look onward, and focus our satelite view on pakistan.

A lively political arena. Now do the pakistanis in general have a trend to a similar useless direction as say the '33r4ki' or french?

Firstly lets state this clear: there is not a single valid reason why basically democracy would work different anywhere in the world then it would in france or the netherlands. So some random figureheads will be awarded for their capitalist loyaltys by safe and influential positions that earn them well enough to keep them in keeping.
We must observe two things,
a) what will pakistanis be manipulated into believing?
b) who do the capitalists behind it want to kill because of this opportunity?

Ofcourse experience in irak has proven islam is so utterly naive you can make it's followers belief anything. Perhaps not coincedentually the muslim identity of pakistan is much underlined these days. (It's quitte a narrowminded focus on religion as is) . Psychologically it gets easier to understand that intrinsic naivety when you realise islam incorporates you from birth. All your live you will be complying to an ordre that is only natural because you had not even an alternative as a baby. This is what makes it hard to have questions to things authorical situations cause.

Apart from this, there is the illiterate syndrome: when people don't read very well we can lie to them on paper. Since they can't even read what lies are commonplace about them, they are not rewarded the authority to react concerning themselves.
So Pakistani illiteracy is a feature that will be promoted in the western mind.
At least even most french can spell their names, so we could get the impression we know better as a side effect.

In the meanwhile in the west, because obviously we cannot honestly speak over situations ourselves, disrupting as it would be for our indoctination,
we forgot people can speak. Let me explain, : you don't need paper to use words.

Conclusion : it is all a matter of desinformation or else we'd know.

treasure tell story

In this world when you are rich you may think of life in terms of facility.
But when you are a poor, you will think of life in terms of piles of garbage.

In the poor role, young off you will notice, how much can you be tied to garbage.
Somehow a lesson must hide inside these heaps of garbage. It would be an important wisdom to uncover obviously. Our humanitarian problem itself is a heap of garbage basically. Uncovering what wastes people on rubbish would explain the mere existence of this pilance of garbage.

There is 2 facts.
1st: the individual is confronted with the refuse of the masses,
2nd : The masses confront the individual with garbage.

Strangely you end up associated with what you dislike the most. And thus, young age, one reaches understanding with the garbage. It is what is left over.

One might think this is something exclusive: "It is like that for me , but not anyone else. Not for the ones that escaped the garbage syndrome". That is not true.

Even the most tidy people basically express their opinions in garbage, and it is fed to the masses, that fear it's syndrome since they are still a baby.

Korea

Recently i reacted to a discussion in al jazeera that has now been closed:0

Usually i don't really look up stuf i wrote all the time, but this was so shocking i was really interested to what point it made for the otherways only symbolically related discussion, kinda in-topic as i was.
Looking it up quitte seriously: where are we now?

Discussion closed. Well,.. well put.:)

For some reason if i react to the korea discussion, feeling empathy for the beautifull woman picture, the weirdest thoughts enter my mind.

Things that i want to write , or even things i don't want to write on al jazeera,
but things that i won't write, probably even if i reply another time on that thread.

Thats why i have an insent for writing here.
how uncensoredly:)

Basically my message would be: All western countrys, all cultures in general have been beating woman for ages, what hypocracy about not hurting woman.

blah blah weak woman , here . blah blah poor woman, innocent woman there, blah blah,
hurting woman everywhere. Thats not a discussion it's a wtc of hypocracy.

If i am not mistaken woman more often function as a bomber pilot then as a fighter pilot. I'd prefer woman did their share in the ongoing violence.

Woman need to change attitude just as awkard and just as much as man, to function in this future. Woman tend to be less apt at gross generalisations, but for what they are, they are none the worse not always.

Anyhow all these beaten up, locked away, de-indivdualised woman don't have an easy time contributing to their potential. That is a good reason to let go of this batch ofcourse, but what does it really matter?

female pilots killed a million afghans? most of them probably civilians,
another million? died for other reasons. Because of hunger, lack of medical care, poverty and further anti-taliban terror. It is not even mentioned in most of the contributions,
i wonder how many koreans died when US attacked afghanistan.. there are many questions , and i have had worrying answers in weird places on some.

So lets guess .. 3? 23?

koreans are a very religious people. Apparently they still live in the mission era, as a matter of facts in PR. To always come in handy.. you know? Handy when you already have the experience how to relate with your consumers of a socalled future in a socalled freedom.

Learn not to keep your big mouth shut

How many languages would feature this expression?

I am so bored with world politics, so much bullshitting and so little progress.
It would be rather easy it seems, to set a number of humanitarian values and to stick to that. Like when a paper would not say unarmed civilians are kidnapped without mentioning real numbers of victimised civilians in afghanistan.

However not much is left to be real. My 'real world picture' is not especially what i call precise. The monetarian world moves its own ways, with what are presumably gross lies over incomes expenses and especially book keeping.

That way the mass is quitte desperate and thinks there are no options, wich reinstitutes rasism on an all but subconscious plan.

sometimes, i said it, i can be really bored, with what we are supposed to call politics.