nobel peace prize

there could be a tad of humor involved,

'on second thoughts we should not have given it to obama we should have given it the eu'
so for sake of humor let me assume some objectivity in the (dedicatedly christianly convicted) norwegians.

it is like a bit of good news between the martyrships of malala's and their syrian sistren.
norway is hinting: look people of madrid, spain, italy, and greece, at least you started no civil war.

or it is even better, we, the eu, von rompuy, me and the rest have made the subtlest diplomacy.

apparently rasmussen is not considered a part of eu. norwegian intelligentsia appear convinced pentagon decides the moves and moods of nato.

or we get the nobel peace prize for allways being apt at stating, "we will help you against every agression" after choosing side we are on.

what does it have to do with afghanistan? nothing. ok.. i agree with norway once more, the attacks on iraq and afghanistan are better not considered a part of serious history at all.

finally serbia, it is better if we forget about serbia...

forget about yugoslavia people! its been peace in europe for 50 years!

the one case i am proud of europe in international politics is belorussia,

the exagerated thrill of dethroning one more agricultual slavic nation was toned down and with putin marvelously defusing most of the speculations around missileshields it has all not been so bad.

personally i do not see why did they not exclude the polish?
that near catastrophe was due polish giving in to their inclination to believe anyone english speaking who is not english.

finally gets what is against wahabi's..

vote green!

last election the dutch massively embraced being a 'zwever' (a treehugger)

nevertheless the only option to voice a protest in usia is basically to vote green.

due the grande style of escalating corporate profits managed to spirit away a few zero's after the facts,

indeed one might consider the bald fringe is in the riot, the rest of the world == a bolshevik conspiracy.


so that goes for netherlands the same, there is fringe, conspiracy and green.

there is also pseudo green, (perhaps it ain't and it can go for greener green, however there is the childish factor.

politics is not really childish, ok it is in many respects not in content, it is done very childish but the point is, it is a bad sign.

so after 50% of the people really turned treehugger on the last two days before elections, they didnt vote green.

well didn't, my estimate of seats not rewarded to green hoovers around 10% of populace usually, but there was something of a trend.

for the same reason the lots of talk about "d66" can't be trusted.

people are kind of done with the 'social-democrats' and the everlasting liaisson with the 'not-so-social not-so-democrats.

they fit the profile, ever they did not manage to claim their '66 win. (unrewarded and not substantially claimed tho anecdotical in the 70's still.)

green , it did not manage to bring across the message was actually carried widely.

thats why everyone and their sister voted "sp".

wich means 'social party', in wich the crapitalists suspect enough of a comaprison with 'social democrats'

typical how at-least-pseudo-greener exactly like the bold fringe needs to parasite even the social democrats abb. for credibility, that between.

so people could have voted green. but they do not see a treehugger where there is one, and hugged on.

ofcourse in the most enfuriated anti-sp campaign that was called 'election time', green snowed under.

i don't know, perhaps it is they allow theirselves to be duivendakked?

perhaps it is over afghanistan, where is that P from pacifist?

perhaps it is because 'we' the 'not so very upperclass' people that much supported them tend to make louder, clearer and harder claims?

or because we suffer trying to keep our nation a place worth living in?

nevertheless these are old complaints and have nothing to do with current people so much, nothing even with their calm but somewhat distant campaign.

it feels closer to a life and death experience as to an civilised game over not-so-very-much-pointscoring.
elections like the one of obama made it that relevant.

and what is the afterthought?

apparently our cartoonists and columnnists , and the redactions all lack the talent to get beyond taking personal aims at the women that represented green.

that it is the liberal joy of taking it out on a more righteous policy escapes the public.

had in mind writing about that for days, can't take dutch politics and elections very seriously.

look at it this way, if a multinational like greenpeace is the figurehead of the social democrats, and works together with the 'briberals'(lieberous), at least the whales should not have much to suffer in their quests for employment.

change the world

not a bad idea,

what a mess, today i ran into the predictable angry woman against assange, if you do not know how the case went in sweden it is all very suspect indeed, besides sexcases are creapy anyhow.

apparently the kind of libel never fails to work,
contemplate it, he had sex with two women in sweden.

ok perhaps a bit distastefull to so much enjoy your righteousness,
one was a parlementarian, an active person in wikileaks according to some sources, that is however if you concern her political background slightly implausible, a small-wrongwing political stream that is ostentiously courting usia. for favor apparently.

what that has to tell us about usian favors:S

money if no worse, we know they party the usual islamist.

it is a very smelly case, the other plaintive redrew to be only few days later redrawn in the case, it seems also there was some art of foreknowledge, that was mostly an impression, it is not a likeable job to dig through articles about sexcases, soon i found out it smelled truely i was satisfied to my knowledge.

we never hear of her, she stays out of the picture , ofcourse 'to spare her feelings' and i care.. but on the other hand i am so informed she was no alien to the practice of having sex with relative strangers.

what an awfully weak case, what is it for major swedish political forces want to push an awfully weak case contrary to the wish of prosecuters?

nuf about it, but that was nerving.

then there is turkey, merkel will notice, in greece it is no surprise,
does not she know the turks have century old cannons along the bosporus that still beat the english in the first world war?

is there any surprise they fire their rounds in every direction, and does she see how right the greek were in spending massively on french and german weapons?

she ought to know greek, sorry turkish, are like that, did not they allways bombard innocent kurd villages, might not what happen, if we are serious about alexander here, if they get through and at the israeli?

assad must seem a blessed man to her today, wonder if she gets von rumpey to smile.

finally convinced of her true german identity that she ofcourse knows of she will have to return from the akropolis and it's desperate decendents,

having changed little but answered the local desire for a show off she had the most painfull experience of her life, if any ueber german really exists it is her, nobody went through that, the woman do all the suffering.

in that sense remarkably greek suddenly remind turks, you see what that occupation did to them, even merkel is needed to save them.

and.. they don't have icons in greece, noone is holy there, so what to do with a woman like that?

we will see tomorrow, greek man are reknownedly attractive.

so on with the turks, i think they are stubby, well the not the ones i like, but if you say: i like turks, i think you mean : i like man stubby.

hardly anyone dares to admit aloud they like turks, it's like saying ' i like big man', a bit odd and people can think something of it.

perhaps that is the problem with the greek, greek are fond of grace, young girls, okay they have their escapades, but not especially with stubby man, certainly not with turks, well unless in greece perhaps.

the greek turks slowly disintegrate, or so we hope, it is what they deserve, you would almost hope they would end greek orthodox in 2300.

it is a beaurifull tradition, we europeans underestimate it, but if you do one step inside greek orthodoxy it is really as if you step into a very old version of the middle ages, pittoresque to no end.

bit like tibet. religion also dictates who gets in hell and who gets a bankaccount in nations like that. usually.

greek orthodox turks would obviously rise higher than a falling star can fall, i must hope not straight into martyrdom, but i do not think greek are greedy.

except perhaps with money, what a farce, people here paying, what they can afford and the greek buying german weapons, ok nuf said.

i suppose that is the problem with the turks? hypnotised by the greek, and northsyrians now have to hear the result, let's hope at least it relieves the kurds in irak and elsewhere.

typical how carefull syria, uh turkey has allways been with artillery and foreign territory, oh well, would it have a do?

the law they have for bombing syria does.. weird that,

what would that law say? alawites are for this year considered damned kurds?

so that is where we are, obama would like to be glad with the escalation, everyone understands, rasmussen talks utter gibberish, for the informed it means, the military don't give a damn, they never, he couldn't be a general, s'pose he is.

if they don't want to give a damn, it's quite a contigency, it means they want the succes , wether for obama or the syrians or mostly theirselves, and they will not probably wait very long to become involved in any escalations.

that climate will be conductive for an ongoing turkish firework wich can be expected to now and then provocate a new mortar round.

since turkish are the most advanced of all ottoman people, they will enjoy the fireworks if for no other reason than to make sure, or at least convince themselves of the enlarged security assad will not have time to think over countermeasures, besides they are sunni.

that is a point, but anyone can be a wahabi anywhere and what is with sunni?

it's a start.
oh yes, it would be nice to follow ban ki moons course and just put a silent end to this very much much to noisy affair. for one thing noone and not assad should get away with calling huge parts of the population terrorist.

please?

a few things to do.

plenty room for overwork.

the very necessary thing to do is write something about the politicised practice of kraken.
the squating (a probable invention of the speculant that word) or kraken of houses. and into the detail how that is different from the occupation of objects for limited purpose (not habitation or regular workspace).

however it has to wait, there are a few things going on in actuality, mostly symbolic rubbish, like jp making a row in cooperation with usia against china , close to china , in the chinese sea, playing the taiwan card without telling it is a warlord imperialist remnant, and perhaps not a nation itself at all.

there happen to be original inhabitants on formosa, and they all but perished through the actions of the escaped chinese fascist burocrats (the capitalistr liaisson) of chang kay check.

that they shove under the table, and perhaps it is what is behind most. if anyone but china could claim the islands, chinese presence there and on formosa are a reality since uncounted centurys, it would be this ethnic victim of militarism. the original formosans.

those however happened to be traditionally affiliated with china, so at least the hictorical background could in the storys be more integer.

next there is libya.

the disarmament of revolutionairy militias in a former despot nation is allways a tad worrysome, the traditional occasion to grip the oppressive power is rarely absent.

but i am not so worried, for all i know it is only the better to disarm them, however pictures can be misleading, the media story can easily be a cover for groupings of people already apparent in the gruesome story, and not necessarilly libyans. i would like to know better about teh real situation but i figure it is not so important.

then there is the hollywood-facebook marriage in orchestrated police violence , unfortunately that is the case because the actual damage is nowhere in the dutch media to be found..

nor is the nr of severely injured partygoers.

unfortunately there is nothing real new about it, beating up people perceived as hooligans is standard bussiness for the uniforms involved. it is doubtfull they have any questions about their own attitudes.

however this could be on purpose, creating fake riots by using the severely bludgeoned group of footballsupporters. at least the dismissing and judgemental tone in the dutch news is disturbingly close to other trends to promote police states.
another such painfull and acute reality.

it is much dismissed, but the background of the disturbances ofcourse is a reaction to the control state, even if the whole thing can be orchestrated, or monitored with the facerecognition ready.

that the police makes such a point when they actually (not a first) used excessive violence against what could well, or might well have been just a party makes me wonder if they did not again err. and cause the grieve mostly themselves. like they did with another shootout for wich they are still persecuting another bunch of supposed 'hooligans', that happened to be people who were actually vocal about the amount of interference and harrasment the police anyway delivered to them, and when read well the story even showed a measure of complicence, wether in the organisation of the beachparty or in luring people into crime is not obvious to me.

so that i find silly, even if i find the films like the batman movie shootout disgusting. about this one i can't be sure because i am not familiar with the genre. x party or so.

but it is silly to go on a birthday party with thousands of people it would be better to just organise a party for the people that show up explicitly. (there could be policeinterference for example, making that partyscene, if it is one, look an harrasment for innocent people.

.

there is also the elction theme, yet here they are fake (the counts) biased (the media) and influenced (the many ' (un-)voting aids' that only give rabiatly reactionairy choices and outcomes.

plus that is all just bought, so it is corrupt at it.

they say it is also for belorussia, but it probably ain't, lukashenko will ofcourse burn in hell for locking people up like that, but so will the usual uniform that attacks the poor for the rich.

hard to stop him from there, but it has the looks the people can be fooled just as easily overthere, so they do probably hardly feel disgruntled in statistically significant numbers, so it is about minerals that would be a great attempt on the health of that whole nation and the cheap agricultural produce, plus probably the woods that may by now be the ones closest to europe to remain.

nevertheless i hope they rid that old man, 4 years of anyone suffice to me in the function of president.

not saying that against obama btw. allthough i theoretically think it is a point, it happens to be never a problem when it is about rendering a republican a second term. 8 years is really plenty, what kind of collective inferiority complex you need to allow for more?

the usual;)

anyway, unfortunately that is bussiness as usual, only when there will be real transparance about election procedures and outcomes, and a real independence of media and no scripted biases or wrongwing promotions people outside belorussia should open up.

so i get to the most painfull point, syria.

what a mess, it gets you desperate about islam doesnt it? that tehre are allways the divides and the infighting before they get a chance but usually do't go forward, with selfdetermination.

horrible, religion is a tool to full people, moreso when it is more unitary, perhaps not intentionally, but overhere it works the same, the monolithic bigotry of roman catholisism does indeed allow it to repress people more than does the protestant.

so it should in a way not be surprising that for sunnis coping with shia tradition is a bit much. you can say european culture featured a similar development when it was about testing the integrity of an obligatory belief.

however somehwo from my protestant background it seems the twenty first century and the digital era, the post nucleairy catastrophy world of the day you just would nto do such a thing.

like making a point about religious traditions, yet in irak they killed people over them a long while.

today obama spoke, 'his last speech before the elections'  it said:S, to the un. about syria and that it should be over, he said more, a few good things i left untouched and some digressing talk about social media, plus the usual terror bs., but teh interesting thing is about syria.

he said we can't allow assad to massacre his people like that. it's hypocrit when maliki does it it is hardly any problem, and erdogan and other turkish were never halted in their attempts on the kurds, but he agree in that with , sigh arab names, brahmini?

the algerian diplomat, who is also lookin tired from the job, it happens that i also agree.

the point that i thought assad would hold up the actions and stop the escalations is longgone, it happened for me at either the fighting for damascus or allepo but the clearest signal is that bombing and artillery are habitually deployed against people in population centra.

you would think by then assad realises he lost the game. what is it about for him really? sectarian strife? or that he is sunk so deep in the moor of political spin he has no way out at all anymore? is it that absolute values in convictions turn people into absolutists even?

hard to answer,

stricly to the point of legal description i honestly fear assad, much like lukashenko, is doing a better job then his usual domestic antagonist but if we take it ideologically, wich is kind of crazy because it is way more of an approach to western then to middle euroasian (russian, socialist) values that assad and baath are making,

for good reason even, human rights and equality, hard to judge if not even freedom should be on that line.

that action has a reaction and since every reaction is an implementation of what traditionally preoccupied people's minds through modern media, the reaction is predictably old-fashioned,

translating to with possibly violent implications and right infringements as part of the packet that appears the safer yet still controlling (elections are fake everywhere) way out, both for the controlfreaks and the people held dumb by assad's regime.

and that is just what happens, vuilence at both sides basically trangressing with ofcourse the crudest side, the one with the heavier arms perpetrating the worst, (that is allways, usia and nato were worse than irakis, worse than koreans, worse than vietnamese and worse than serbians, and with so few somalians looking for exceptions to that rule is useless.)

and so is assad, russia was worse in afghanistan than the cia warlords of the day, the russian allies ended up worse (having the arms), next usia took a turn for the worst and now we have the official afghans that can't anymore be trusted

perhaps a nice model for libya, put everyone into some uniformed service or shoot them? what is the real problem there.... (uniforms)

only individual people can be human, just like a beehive can't be a bee.

so assad should finally be a human and please run, what does putin say, why would we get stuck with assad? is it putin trusts fewer people than even i do?

let's let it slip it can hardly be worse than irak after, find some way out that is quick, political but decisive, not some compromise that would never anymore work.

when it goes on and on like this, when will it end, it would take 20 years to reach a comparable deathtoll as in libya, alltho i think the destruction might become worse.

is it we need a deal that it is not suddenly privatised, in the hands of a happy few and owned by multinationals that intentionally disrespect the quality of life and life ?

then make such a deal.

perchoicement day

"verkiezingsdag"

it was wonderfull, all the good and beautifull of the world sang, sp.

ok there was a soundcar calling us up to vote, that made me think the speaker was a general practitioner,
and not a typical labourer or socialist, but what i really mean is the children sing it.

we vote in a school, a few of the same old faces, jealously guard the ballots and boxes, again , i don't know in what many polling stations, but they did overhere.

the people , we all it seems most of the time, can be really one vibe, logical, in practice sp is the fairest, probably the greenest, the least greedy, loyal, constructively engaged, pretty straight for the most, tolerant, the least repressive, the one developing the more pleasant and healthy labour circumstances,

so an economy that is at least worth partaking, if even not every pile of consumptionwaste can be gold, every environmentally relevant , humanitarian research, pluralistic development projects, basic wage, a minimum income that can almost be survived (crapitalism is a hardy indoctrinator there)

good and somewhat equal healthcare, social programs, they even fete culture(1),

i rili think that car is in front of my door for me specifically, well i got a poster,

abject stance for peace and disarmament. basic, the only one that did not join in the idea that war would be an answer to imganinairy bombings in every train and metro,

perhaps netherlands can be famous for something after this, the sp....

there are plenty other things i am positively sure the sp has very good ideas about, buy i already voted, can make the point known in a more common way, and there is a lot to add still.


so i observed the 'campaign' a bit. it's no pleasure, i am sorry to say but far more than half of the time the whole media-programming makes no sense at all,

there is a completely distorted and utterly distorting mechanism in place to manipulate people in supposedly behaving in ridiculous ways, iotw a brainwash. the problem is once you do recognise it, and see things more or less for what they really are, the examples are to many, "it is full of crap"

i wrote about examples of it, and spoke about plenty more, and up to the very day today the drill was the same, 99% screentime for the 1%.

still the children sing another song, so reality is that the one percent should learn to cope with 1.5 seats of a say.

that's crazy, when i was really young, i remember to my great surprise i found, if i asked usual people, not millionaires or very old fashioned ones, usually christians, they all voted pvda.

labour party, what my part a ridiculous name, define your socialist struggle as the shaping of a labour class?
i would guess it is not the idea.
anyhow what is escapes me.

labour is a necessary evil, look at the bad backs, the stress (i beg your pardon, mine for example), the actual medical costs, the pollution, dangers, labour is something to treat with care,

labour is also something that everyone says they do, but some people if they do it they might never get dirty, tired or sick, and still they mean they deserve a better pay.

the 1%. oh yes also the relatively wealthy middle classes, that have not the brains to think independendly.
but still, that would make it 8% -10% for the fake freedom party's at the very most.

and people with a heart or mind are actually everywhere, also in the middleclasses.

so it just never computed,

in betweens, and nor did it then, a few early votes, pacifist, communist, i have for a very long time been principal non-voter.

firstly i like the idea that with empty seats the oppressive people will find no opportunity to make new laws for a class society (how so would labour and politics bother employers(2)?)
secondly for a very long time i am of the opinion that integrity can't be expected, has not shown to be a great feature of this system, let alone people in politics would just work from a concept of human rights, equality and against discrimination.
there is a lot to add to the latter, but my "politics" is to work at transparance.

transparance means that all data, all fact are available to the common good. an individual human has human rights, these form, shape, and limit the protection of their privacy, yet for now we can not probably cope with the raw data and should carefully practice.
otoh administrative and digital practice in principle can easily be arranged in perfect transparant manners,

the problem are it ain't.

pollution for example is a problem we can not handle without an utter effort in transparance, and retrieval of data that has been 'destroyed' etc.

back to the topic however, then as a non voter i did actually campaign.
i campaigned for the pacifists, communists, and the early ethic and green partys.

i got loads of responses, only today perhaps people can begin to imagine. it has not only been with the sp that people voted for the campaigns of reason and moderation, just

and i noticed even as a child, it didn't deliver, not the seats it got.
and, there was an obvious and ridiculous process of artificially inflating the wrong-(the 3 times left)wing, their allies and pseudo traditional conservatism (i.e. the 'christian vote')

it was all very diusappointing, if a 100-1 counted for anything, it stayed like that, but the nr. of progressive seats in the parliament only went down.

so: very , very angry i also feel very sad now.

so i should not have to many expectations, not even a donkey trips 3 times over the same stone.

i campaigned so about all my life what i remember for the environment, for social struggles and the emancipation of everyone, and i told people, to vote something if they wanted, even if i did not.

but like so many idealist, getting older you get more desperate, the problems in the world got bigger, (except , cheers to the staff, war the past few years), but the talks to dismiss them manifold and elaborate, with a solid core of stoopit support from people who have no clue at all but to project their fears at any arbitrary enemy, if not even a straight racist stereotype.

perhaps i'll continue later, for now? stemmen is toezwijgen, doe er het zwijgen niet toe, laat je stem niet verloren gaan,

spreek, praat, vertel, neem in vertrouwen, deel mee, stem sp;)

(1) strongly hope people will find new old collective style and new and better acces to the resource of living-working spaces, cultural/political spaces, etc. (
(2) so , no labourers?;)?
.

for crying out loud

for once i will have a post in dutch. the dutch elections are in the make, saying in the coming would be far to much honour, and.. basically i think noone would get a translation done and they would find it hard enough to understand even in dutch what i have to say, so sorry for my foreign readers, a majority i figure, but here we go.


ongewoon, al twee, drie dagen laat ik mijn humeur, en soms de sfeer verpesten door aandacht te geven aan de nederlandse politieke kampagne. meestal ontloop ik de publiciteit omdat ik er al vele jaren de buik van vol heb, en ook deze keer duurde het minder dan een minuut tot ik half kotsent het eerste 'debat' ontvluchtte en de frisse lucht opzocht.

dat blijft, bijna elk gesprek en debat, op tv, daar vind het allemaal plaats, ontvlucht ik regelmatig. het lijkt er niet op dat ik daardoor een draad in het verhaal mis.

het is duidelijk een schijnverhaal. ondanks dat ik denk dat mijn openheid ervoor zorgt dat de stemverdelers hun onkiese wijze van kies ontstemmen en stem onwijzeren in het negatieve zullen bijdraaien vanwege mijn openheid, de fakto dus intimidatie en willekeur, de fascisten nog meer stem te geven, volgen hier wat argumenten voor de mate van hypokritie en mediaspin die er heersen,
mediaspin beste nederlandse lezers betekent overigens verdraaing van het verhaal, niet het beter uit doen komen.

het viel niet meteen op maar voordat ik het hele debat zag of zelfs maar een flits ervan was me al honderden malen op allerlei wijzen ingeprent dat roemer het verloren had,

eerst was dat geloofwaardig, iedereen kan er wat minder uit komen in een debat, roemer is niet erg fel, interrumpeert weinig, laat de minst verdienstelijke nog uitspreken en is zelf ook niet helemaal vreemd aan het soort naijver dat mensen ten onrechte en publiek over mijn woorden doet vallen, zonder dat daar overigens tegenover staat dat ik ook maar een schijn van verweer heb tegen dat mediageweld.

echter na twee avonden van allesbehalve indrukwekkende shots van de andere klandidaten die in scherpzinnigheid veel maar in matigheid weinig te wensen overlieten en zonder enig woord of kommentaar van roemer (waarschijnlijk de grootste partij en in ieder geval bij de top 3, zelfs bij de bewerkte uitslagen die nederland kenmerken)

begon ik toch te vermoeden dat het anders zat. ik heb nog een dag moeten wachten tot hij persoonlijk ergens een zegje deed, extreem rechts(en) en zeer extreem rechts waren dus al tot treurens toe in beeld geweest...

wat hij tot dan toe echter wel gezegd bleek te hebben was sympathieker en helaas ook spontaner dan de andere kandidaten...

ik was al ge-alarmeerd, talloze onzinnige prognoses volgen elkaar op, polls in nederland gebruiken vaste lijsten van ' betrouwbare' doorsnee burgers, politiemensen en informanten dus, en geven dientengevolge een zeer gedehumaniseerde indruk van de nederlandse bevolking.

maar er worden ook verhaaltjes die even leugenachtig als onvoorspelbaar zijn aan vastgeknoopt.

een enorme hoeveelheid nederlanders zouden hun keuze bijvoorbeeld nog niet bepaald hebben, dat moet dan verklaren dat het resultaat in niets zal lijken op wat er voor en na de kampagne aan de hand is.

om dat argument kracht bij te zetten een voorbeeld.

in een van de programmas komt een halflang gehaarde blonde knul voor, een die kennelijk een toekomst in de politiek aangeplant wordt, want ik heb hem wel eens eerder een kont zien likken,

die kwam met de volgende even brilliante als absolute onwaarheid,
 (oh er wordt veel gehackt in mijn tekst) al die nog niet besloten kiezers , kennelijk 40 procent of meer als we hen geloven zouden, zouden nog 6 zetels tussen de sociaaldemokraten en de socialisten te verdelen betekenen..

want alleen tussen die twee partijen zou die (kennelijk dus 2 procent) 'zwevende kiezers' nog kiezen

het is al wiskundige onzin, een statistiese onmogelijkheid, maar het kan nog erger,

in het volgende debat was het toch wel weer zo dat de onder de politie immens grote aanhang van de antisemitiese vreemdelingenhaat partij in polls te kennen had gegeven  toch te twijfelen tussen jawel, een van deze twee nog 6 zetels verdelende partijleiders en een van de extreem fascistoide kopstukken nog om de aanhang van de fascist streden.(1)


dat leugenachtige knulletje mag van mij dan ook bij voorbaat weg uit de positie in de nederlands politiek die zijn pappa (vermoed ik) voor hem gepland heeft.
geld is machtig en tv tijd is alles...

ja ik kan in meer detail schrijven, de verwildering krampachtig vasthoudend aan een droom van een enkel door 1 ondernemer beheerst nederland, de inmiddels konservatieve d66ers, die al nooit echt vernieuwend waren worden nu links genoemd, hoewel dan niet betrokken bij het extreem rechts fiasko toch een onterecht kompliment, doen het zogenaamd goed (geen wonder de stem onwijzers en onkiezers worden met hun domme en eenzijdige vragen stelselmatig geplugged, er klan immers toch geen linkse partij uitkomen wat je ook invult.

inderdaad mensen die daarop vertrouwen om een beeld te vormen zouden geen stemrecht moeten hebben. helaas is een groot deel zo dom.

hoewel elke rechtste rukker bij voorbaat door de media verontschuldigd wordt voor het niet nakomen van afspraken zijn de holle en loze beloften natuurlijk toonaangevend in dat soort manipulatie instrumenten.

dan is er de 'wonderlijk opkomende pvda, toegegeven denk ik dat ze voor een wat oorspronkelijker en inhoudelijker beleid (dat van de sp dus), de juiste man gekozen hebben, toch is hij (zijn eigen woorden) " een politikus " dat was in de kontext van iemand die na de verkiezingen het programma wegkiepert om een salarisschaal te stijgen.

ook dat kan bij de sp niet (die hebben een vast inkomen ongeacht positie)

roemer wil wel graag regeren en heeft een hoop wijwater klaar staan om door de rode wijn te gieten, jammer, met zo weinig beelden van hem en zo een negatieve beeldvorming (zijn optreden moet gezien de afwezigheid van shots die zijn matige optreden zelfs enigszins konden staven juist foutloos geweest zijn) zou hij zelf ook in kunnen zien dat politiek 'niet zo werkt' en dat het iig. na de verkiezingen vroeg genoeg is om kompromissen te beloven.

wat me persoonlijk nog vrij hoog zit dat ik recent op het gebruik van het woord 'maar' en in het duits áber' ben aangesproken terwijl ik dat toch in geen enkel geval op zo'n korte zin heb doen volgen als ik nu dagelijks gebeuren zie.

dan is er rutte, een sympathieke latex koning als ik het goed begrijp, die op zich een plaatsje in de kamer wel verdient, maar helaas voor een partij werkt waar geen normaal (minimum, laag of midden inkomen) iets aan heeft.

pechtold van d66, maakt op mij weinig indruk, ik vind hem nerveus, al denk ik dat hij in staat is een gesprek in het engels of duits te voeren, vraag ik me van roemer wel een beetje af, en ik bied de sp dan ook bij deze nog eens mijn hulp aan.

het cda, het cda heeft alleen gewonnen in verkiezingen waar ik me vooraf aan schadenfreude schuldig maakte (tegen de islamse sharia mag dat natuurlijk wel)
dat doe ik nu dus maar niet, ben het volledig met moskowitz eens dat dat zalvende en belerende enorm afstotelijk is.

dan is er groen links, een partij waar ik jaren met suukses voor gekampaigned heb, doe ik niet meer, oorlog met afghanistan ging me net zoveel te ver, heel groen links stond ook nog te gillen dat dat niet kon, verraad pleeg je maar zo vaak.

het nooit opgeeiste groenlinkse sukses is dan ook kennelijk iets van het verleden.
dat we massaal naar de sp stapten is in de huidige prognosis en statistieken ook al geen kind van de rekening, zelfs dat kan agnes toch eisen.

kom op dus, groen links laat wat zien, een procent van het lef van jullie gemiddelde aanhang zou genoeg zijn.

nou roemer, ik heb geschreeuwd, begin ook wat te doen;) (valt mee hoor, hij is te lief maar weert zich met de gebruikelijk verve).

en diederik, als ik nou zou geloven dat de pvda voor het eerst sinds 1968 en eigenlijk sinds 1920 echt voor de arbeiders zou opkomen dan zou ik dit nog meer van harte ondersteunen, nu denk ik zonder de spiegel van de sp wordt het zeker niets, en ermee is het nog de vraag.

tja wat blijft over, 50 plus (stem sp denk ik) dierenpartij (stem groen links , vis niet in elkaars water , een quote)

sopn, prima maar vraag me af of er een zetel van komt, piratenpartij, prima behalve dat je privacy anders spelt namelijk: transparantie. (lijkt dus ook een kryptofascist)

er is ook nog een kandidaat die ik een zetel wel gun, degeen wiens poster verboden is,

belangrijk vind ik dat verder niet, maar als het niet zo zou kosten om verdeeldheid te accepteren zou ik hem er graag bij hebben,

wat blijft er dan nog over?

eigenlijk dit : stem sp. voor een inhoudelijk progressiever en beter beleid, en

stem sp, voor iedereen zonder topinkomen,

met de pvda als twijfelgeval is de rest vooral dienaar van het geld.
pvda is als het ware een flexibele werknemer, en de fnv opschuiven richting pvda? voorzover dat zelfs maar zou kunnen, kan je de fnv net zo goed afschuiven.

nou ja het was ook een idee uit de ultrakonservatieve hoek.

sp-ers, houwen zo! doe hou, uh houdoe bedoel ik. 

(1) de meeste hypothetiese aanhangers van de extreemrechtse partijen (vvd , verwildering, en cda) zijn namelijk arm, en zouden er dus honderden keren verstandiger aan doen sp of zelfs pvda te kiezen, groenlinks is ook leuk maar die keuze te verklaren is te intellektueel en niet een prioriteit nu.

time to think about the children

it is usual to sacrifice the innocent, just to get a war going.

no matter i think martha wellhorn , names:S, a tad naive, she surely has influenced usian public opinion so much it is hard to distinguish where she is carbon copy and where she is original, this happened in vietnam,

refugees where made to have an ugly live, just so people would not want to be refugee.

as if anyone wanted that. yet the bombs still drove them out.

now we see outrages like: lebanon tells syrians they can only stay for two weeks, reminds me of how the dutch monarchy send the jews back into germany,

or turkey 'turkey does not have any more capacity' , preparing the turkish to project their own wealth gap on the syrian victims of a some dictator wannabe monarch.

so what is behind? simple, the many thousands in fear for their lives will add to the 'inhumane suffering in assads syria', because.. well they just can't escape..
it already happened that turkey send back 1000s.

and then? then it is time to blame assad..

oh i support obama, don,t go chemical or biological on them putin, uh assad,
i promise i cry wolf. then again, we will not get that verified will we? (in between a 1000 images i did not see a verified statement or count)

it remains obscure to me why assad still can't be droned.. well obviously they do not want the association on their own skins, the hill-billy,s.

elections? we see a lot of illegitimate (what a word) interference here, as much as the clandestine interference obviously from and too the con's.

similarly to that ron paul got no media attention whatsoever, so that nobody will have to wonder if he would get "his" votes, and similar to that i have not seen anyone in their sane minds support santorium or wosname,ron should have known , it happened exactly last time.

i still really wonder if it is obama who thinks he needs a timeout.
i could allow him so much if he had that in the open, not like ,they need the farce for me next, though it could be exciting to see if he, the big o, would live to see that better day , when the realitys of ecocatatstrophe will finally dismantle the fraudulent banking mechanism and squandering profits of ecologic destruction.

the people give small rise to worry.. what worrys me most is.. the blame game.

however if marihuana is legalised at least the people of the future have a chance not to be complicit in the pharmaceutical destruction, even if the sp projects the case like if they are addicted to cocaine.

(everything is ok if just it remains to blame)

but, it is simple, i made clear in the national elections of the dutch, not coincedentually ofcourse coinciding with the overly brazen fascist-wing campaigns of the billionaires, saving a dollar in a dime, would very probably have no better option than this: sp, and as it still not allowed a war, still not prescribed murder, disrespect and agression, nothing very much changed,

since i am the publisher, i wonder: what about the children?

and since i quite agree chaos is the creative principle, adriaan will have to wait,

but it is fascinating. the face of truth in the absence of fear, and how i would work hard but not to any sudden sacrifice, behind those fogs of war.

sp. let's not get deluded that we are hoovering, anywhere but in the public eye, the tv cameras.
to make a protest count we have to make it heard.