increasing censoring and nazi prop in netherlands

since ages i know that unwanted opinions are hard to express on the internet, i started this whole blog for it. but being a man of teh people, and in love with humanity i keep trying to contribute a different sound on the internet times and again, if you don't try, you cannot say you have been censored.

so today i went to a dutch site with the pretence that people can contribute again, it is not a very pretty site to visit, but i know the better contributions got deleted before, so it means some people reading it would express more humane things tehn the usual misogenyc, misanthrope nazi shit that is allowed and welcomed by such media without (judging from the terrible phrases i regularly have to see) any criterion. so as long you spout filth, you are welcome to freedom of expression in netherlands.

what are not allowed are critics, or helping people remember what tricks have been played on them before. what is not allowed is to complain about the ruling class and their facilitation of the nazi sound, and hate.

well it means one thing only, we live in a nazi land, on a nazi planet, and there is no good prospects for a humane future. nevertheless, i will try to keep up the voice of reason, you cant say that when i remember my people how a prime minister kept the facts about afghanistan hidden for them for his own profit, i am wrong in blaming him for leading them into war.

teh ver more farfetched and idiotical nazicomments must thus be blamed not on a grow of that kind of hate possesed people, but mere censoring of the nice ones.

crystal dawn

it took some time to find motivation to write anything again. actually i have another blog, where this post could find a place, perhaps, if the modern connotations had not been so strong.





like every day of the human year today is the aniversary of a grande and horrific event: "kristallnacht".

in a way it is surprising it sees such significance, one would think that the verbalisations of the nazi officials, the huge refugee problem that already became apparent in 1938 (the dutch gov. sending back jews into germany, and so did the polish), and the whole dependency of the german rhetorics on anti-judaism had made things obvious by then.

however eg. the new york times there is still excusing the culprit, in the person of goebbels those same days. nothing changed so much since then, nobody bothers about saudi arabia bombing the houthi's, or sri lanka extorting it's infernal wrath on the tamil. when it is about rwanda, there are no such descriptions, of historical events leading up and concerting a genocidal enterprise.

i think i could make an endless list of examples and it would be easy to fetch a mean joke about the actual relevance of the luxury shopping windows that gave it it's name.


but it fascinates me, somehow history takes it as an event of great relevance, wich it was not really, the plans were made, the animosity was fed, and the media collaborated, so much so that the whole actual name"kristallnacht" may well be the persistent name the nazi propaganda itself featured for the event.

not much can be done about that realistically, through the media, and later education the event with all it's sinister connotations has been made to known thus, and known by millions of people, and probably it is best understood when it stays that way.



so about the event, what remains is to realise it was some kind of a shock, in the western world, whilst being confronted however, the major powers stuck to appeasement policy's with germany,
and i think that we learned about it in history lessons for decades has to do with that collective feeling of guilt. people shortly afterthe war remembered this one event much better then much else that happened in the 1930's (let alone 1920's when the nazi's engaged in rather large sacle murder and intimidation). Because.. well because the allied powers were also against communists, because, they also liked to control their populace, because the last thing they wanted was sympathy with the victims of reactionairy's.

and.. like i tried to show with the few examples, nothing really much changed. control of the population, and not having to answer painfull questions are still priority of the states, the nation-states.


actually when afterwards we name the nazi's barbarians, i think rightfully so although it is an insult for the average barbarian, what we forget is how the european media neglected the pligh of the jews, and turned a blind eye on a fascist regime perpetrating the most outrageous things in what was considered one of our civilised nations and capitals.

iotw for contend the other states were just as barbarian. wich is never been more evidently then when sending back the refugee's, but shows best perhaps in their treatment of the many incidents and events leading up to racist extremes of that period.


now "kristallnacht" is a nice point for a case study in this, it shows better then anything else the complicity of the other ruling classes with the german establishment.

allthough the mere context makes a proof rather unneeded, the whole story does have a hero,
his picture is on this article, and.. , and.


the boy in question was the pretext for kristallnacht, in response to his family suffering in the hands of german and a collaborating polish authority's he shot a nazi representative in paris.

for me he is a hero, if people had listened, had taken his life and identity as serious as the first next nazi they met, the whole second world war might not have happened, and surely not have went as easily for the germans, it could also have meant that 1938 had been a turning point in the tolerance for nazism.

unfortunately, that was not the case, the foreign powers proved shocked, that someone with a nazifunction was targetted. the 100s and more dead before that were not weighted, the concentration camps not considered a natural cause for the event, apparently, the european powers were according the anti judaism that manifested in germany so clearly.
(that is my conclusion when looking at the whole period not only this case)

even the jewish counsels accorded the nazi poilicy's, hershel was considered a 'bad guy'.
the jewish counsels actually kept up such arbitrary position throughout the whole period.

only after the war, in word and deed every inch of jewish accomplishment was tainted with loud vocalisations against those events.

for me a proof that no ruling class whatsoever can be trusted to care about the wellbeing (or even lives) of it's dependencee's.

although hershell did not manage to kill an important person, and the person in question was perhaps even liquidated by the same nazi's during transport to germany, he did the one thing every responsible person should, try to stop, even kill the nazi's before they start massacring
to no end.

so i admire him, he did the right thing, and for that was punished by infammation, by the ones that would later sacrifice millions of soldiers and civilians to end on top.

if you want to know about integrity of any ruling class, of their support of the resistance of people against repression , watch hershell grynszpan, and hope you may become like him.


" I must protest so that the whole world hears my protest, and that I will do. "


i can still hear him.

blasted rights

what i feel hurt is hard to describe,

i have felt hurt before, like this, i can feel it in my shoulders, and the sides of my neck feel tense when i try to write. i take a lot of time to tell you this, and my sides, my cheeks, my heart my whole chemical system reacts.

~someone saving my heart here:)~

like i have been crying. and more strange feelings, of narrowness and confining numbness,

i have it on a couple of occasions, but is typical it occurs when i try to write now.
saltI, at some point. the first attack on irak, the creation of the balkan war, brutality in police
and contempt for the law in politics and justice.

trigger that feeling , that make me wonder how we can all escape fascism. the police states that noone wants, and the exploitation through unconstrained financial malversations in the name of capitalist economy(2)(3)

Do you know the word criminalisation?
it is a procedure that can continue for decades, or longer, i don't know. It means to put people in problems, give them faked (and when they get angry real) charges, and tabloidisation.(4)

ofcourse political european fascism these days is semantically non-anti-semitic, but it is the policy's for the people that are anyhow their victims that decide wether they are fascist, oppressive, abusive, and a liar. that need not be heard.

but that is beside the point, because political people are far beneath rights. rights are over the people and people over the rights for that, but political people have a different position with rights and law.

they are far beneath it. law is just and rightfull, housing is a human right.

change is not continuing fascist processes of criminalisation and cowardish backing for nazification that is actually only an extra illusion before admitting the complicity.





(1) why feel hurt through a politics that depends on profiling extremist authorianism.
(2) a few enemy's of the people allways manifest as different games or party's, but condensely their aspects are interdependend components of this arms-trading consumer-capture complex.
it is still the militairy industrial complex. next eg. the usians have a lack(x) in aprehension for
moral aspects in arms industry (and pharmaceutical, bio engineering etc..) in many positions.
this as a result of tabloidisation , so a deep sigh here. anno 2009 of tabloidisation.
(3) empty building 'instead of human rights' to serve a next hypocrit crisis.
(4) and a lot more problems and negative publicity(a). Including endless cases of contempt for the law by any court or jurisdiction. a lot of violence, including rampant escalation, provocation, malversating interference. this is not only a sane tolerant people. we have an active class of oppressors. don't even want to touch on the subject of social function or political motivation. it gets surrealistic when you see the exploit. what an exploit of the masses trauma's.
it is the oppressors telling the people of peace they have managed to make people tolerate hate,
believe hate even. But hah, you should feel the people. 160m or 16b
(a)there is different effects of tabloidisation eg.; negative, extra, etc..sick feeling

rwanda sociocide

hutu oral history

one day the tutsi's came,
(a white cause was to blame)
they lied and
then they beat us
then the white man came, and they
and the tutsis beat us.


simple.. and so on and so on.. untill 1994

okay in 1994.... the tutsi's had many police car
many gun's
helicopter's
machine gun's
normal cars
and

beat the hutu..

can you still follow the story?
all kinds of discriminating laws (truely anchored in colonialist inheritage)
were in place..

nothing special so think the trade partners,

it's like that in kenia isn't it?
and we try to make it like that in south africa.

soo one day through the rise of radio.. and newspapers
and parliaments and as south africa shook of racism,

people shook of racism,

and they knew no way then to kill all the racists that had allways been killing them,

actually,

this is why they say: the revolution kills her own children
but not many people feel it that way.

and yes the first moment it happens, the western world, that has the biggest nukes and tanks
doesn't realise what is happening (oh it is a revolution killing her children)

what was happening is that every tutsi in the whole of rwanda appeared as one that was thoroughly inbred not to ever respect a hutu, that each of them would after be out for revenge,

so many of the tutsi were dangerous to every individual hutu
discriminate against every individual hutu

say that they are better in evrything, and the hutu's very bad,

that it all went wrong,

now one more of the hutu is captured and on trial,
someone that choose his people over the tutsi people,
an intelligent man.

sometimes in such a case, experience tells us, it is better to kill children as well..
otherways foreigners will come and bomb all the nation

to give it to the children, again
so maybe you need an intelligent man

to take care that the tutsi's that will probably
be put back in a position of power

have something to fight over
instead of fighting hutu's

maybe
some hutu's will that way survive



to have it different, we will have to change something about money

you can't change anything about revolution,
because revolution can only live up to existing justice
or create her own.

afghanipakistan

yesterday i finished an old draft, called afghanistan, but for some reason i cannot reset the date. so if you didn't notice, it is at 24 january 2009.

why not... pakistan,

today i read hizbul al islam is the western allie for south somalia.. because (look it is not my idea to make it this ridiculous) it is now "al queida representative in somalia'.
apparently there used to be another thus labelled..

when usia talks about hizbul in lebanon or palestine.. oj,oj.. meany beastyness nastism is all they have to offer.. but here..

soo, once again a serious problem with many important causes and roots is al kaidaished.

al queda is an usian invention, the first mention of the name is in cia documents about setting up terror attacks to blame cuba. like hamas is first mentioned in israeli notitions.

however it seems it has been drawn from the cupboard more recently then the cuba crisis,
and.. since now we have to read that word in the papers daily, it better gets an explanation.

so: what is an al quada??

firstly every movement of people against repression is often called the "base". like in grass'roots'.

as soon as you want to talk about basic matters, you are 'an al quaida'. the animal cruelty al kaidah, that is against torture of animals, the environment al kajda that thinks a healthy environment is a human right, the baskish al quaeda that speaks baskish, the kurdish al quadai,
that now has a safe haven in irak finally, the irish al queda that is a defaitist movement anouncing peace every 3 months, the myanmar al quajda that wants either uniforms or macdummolds, whenever you are something against it, it is basically the base of your offence.

basic.. al quaidah.

there is a famous writer, who invented an al qaida, "the foundation" that would try to take care for humankind.. for this militarist / capitalist system drives her to the deepest spaces in the universe, but in the end.. they succeed, the ideal human is born, (or perhaps they had a better objective)

I think it is not a coincedence cia took this name to paint an enemy.. the vision of asimov is very powerfull and indeed a organisation that would persecute ideal targets, their greatest fear.

so there you have "al quaidah" or? or should we really make the distinction tribalistically, the south somali al queda, the north somalian el qaida, the east somalian al koueidah. etc???

and when we want to throw a bomb, we just throw it somewhere, and someone would allways be hit that does something capitalism doesn't like.. usually people with ideals are on the receiving side of bombs.

nobel prices

it is not that i think i deserve none, what were they called? mdd's mcc's? the physical price, these i admire.

the chemical price was misplaced, that could only have been a medical price i think. ribosomes? wtf, does it get more biological?

or maybe that was medical after all, can't remember the chemical one then. mcc's that transmit photon into date are chemical to an extend. anyway, the german that double-charged all existing battery's and accu's got his share to , some years ago.

okay that was a chemical price right? mh.. it's pretty physical.. so 7 molecules is chemical, don't some have circular chromosomes and all spiral?

bother aproximations of infinity. 1 photon solar cells.
or perhaps (why not) that is aproximately. next we get charged particle disturbance and we can measure the photon of tomorrow.

it is anyhow wonderfull, so a photon travels aproximately faster then light, and it crosses a scale that is to small for most particles to notice, what is actually smaller? a photon or the vacuum in a H atom or is the vacuum in an U atom actually smaller? maybe it is like with planets, and the vacuum get's smaller over time.

uhm i guess i was supposed to talk about obama here..

nobel peace price, together with Meir, Herschell, Ben gurion, Ohlmert, Abbas, Arafat, the rest of the usian presidents, the ones of egypt since 1945, and aung see kyung, the widow of the prince on the white horse, or?

she's in the news as well, 'coincedentually' today. (1)

must say i witnessed she was peacefull twice, i am not rili interested in her, can't help it, i don't like myths, i don't like capitalist throne candidates, got to distrust them long ago.i don't like usian interference, walt disney politics.

ofcourse like any other militairy rulers the generals in myanmar look like a succesfull circus of clowns. i allways think that when i see the public expressions of militairy rule. yet people with necktie's look horrible as well. obama's necktie's.. aung see kyung ever drafted herself a 10000 euro suit?

did you know neckties originate from the times of the hashashins? that they were a means of escape from liquidation ,the venge of the emperor?
seems usefull, doesn't it?

mm has been usefull a few times in this life. i love obama's neckties, he can wear them with pride. neckties are like a self acclaimed medal, and these days they sometimes come without a belly.

putin's neckties.. oh that's got nothing to do with nobel peace of course.. putin.
ahmedinajad's lack of necktie's? lovely. but i think his skirts are to nice to go with a suit.

fatigue's i like. the picture of chavez(modest, red decorum) or fidel(fatigue's) is not ugly to me.

ofcourse obama doesn't get a peace price for the necktie he wore in japan, (he anyhow opts for imho solidly horrible colour blue a lot),i think he get's it for the missile shield, this is europe after all, many here want peace, cooperation and reconciliation with russia.

or.. or.. is it a another cover-up-israel-war peace price? an exploit of the credibility he earns? a way to tell us that starving gaza for another 40 years to come is good? i don't know about that. i fear it matters a lot, the best reason to give him that price is after all publicitory, we need the disarmament and cooperation, a heap of things are running better then before, and people need to believe that. it must be tempting to reap a profit there.



(1) perhaps i actually think so many 1000's people in a nation deserve one, there is allways a few to deserve it better, so i dislike these choices of the elites.

climate

the media have it the poor nations want "cash" to develop sustainable economy.

if, big *IF* that is about cash, and not funding or refunding, that is a definite no.

experience tells us underdeveoped nations leaders can be trusted with a whole lot of things, but not with "cash"

it is not about cash, it is about scientific exchange, exchange of components, funding of the developments,.. overhere. and support in proven projects (wich could be funding research eg.)overthere.(1)

cash is out of the question. it would be a complete waste and mount up to actual bribery and corruption when the resources continue to be gladly plundered.

so not cash. evrything else, including forms of subsidizing, and financial compensation (but accountable, whence preferably afterwards or in the proces) it is all necessary, but not "cash".

refunding *guarantee's* (that can't be kidnapped with eg. "sanctions", no.) solid guarantee's, ok?

it is hard to estimate what green research can be done productively in poorer and less developed nations, so the technological exchange must be on a non-profit bases,
it will also be hard to find criteria.

for example, for a greener environment almost every soil and geology needs research as to how to best use and ecologically enrich it. this must be held in the perspective of what people actually do with the land, and what they actually develop in the nation. such research can better be done natively. if not only for language.
(2)

otoh in many such nations the attitudes may have to change first. in many nations goes that the poorer, the huger the distance between classes. research done by people with an elitist mind, in area's like these, is almost completely useless.

so to fund research we will have to apply , and get it up to, standards.
both financially, and socially, perhaps even sociographically.

btw in many nations there is not even something like garbage services. especially in remote areas.so there will need to be money (and transparency) to set it up. However the long term effect of such action is allways positive, and by recycling, fractioned collection, (and:P for the capitalist gospel, employment) the cost are not actually very high.(3)

it has been a long time proposed the ecological costs should be in the price to buy a product, since the system allways opted not to, the money will need to be made available now, afterwards, that is also natural.

it is also something we cannot tax other nations, when we ourselves never had to pay that extras. they just would continue to not develop. also not environmentally develop, wich from our unprepared platform appears more costy.

i doubt it is tho. the recycling value of materials, btw. that are used to improve emissions in less developed nations, would remain with the rich nation that offers them. they can then kind of be leased, and like with not providing "cash", it is a measure against corruption.

don't go.. but how can you say poor nations are corrupt? i know because if it is about environment, most all rich people think/thought it is okay to be corrupt, and, because rich people in poor nations time and again have proven to only care about theirselves.

we don't care more, but with a more educated and cultured population base, it is much harder for officials to repress people, and acces public funds.

(not that it doesnt happen on an appaling scale, that would would cover whole underdeveloped nations budgets.)

it is only, i propose measures that would cause something to happen.
i don't distrust one more then the other, i basically distrust all elites.
"for what they are worth".

to examplify, management, heads of resource states, cheney, a lot of elitists in the rich world, take more money then similar people in poor nations. ofcourse such people greed is equal everywhere, so by providing money you would achieve exactly nothing. they all want to be similarly rich as an oil sheik, bill gates, or the head of the next state before something goes to ecology. we call that in dutch: a bottomless pit.


(1) we have a meritocrat option there, and could provide a minimal scientific staff to foreign university's, make it an educational project, make the contacts, and control the funding.

(2) famously traditional , often even almost forgotten) strategy's are often the most promising. and can reveal surprising insights in many other areas.(food, health, climate, history, language etc.) it is probably a good idea to promote and combine such research. these make for not to bad science work btw. a lot of interviewing, fotographing, video can be used, the reward to uncover your own region's particularity's and the satisfaction that more of the knowledge base history and language get preserved. this can also be done in an educational manner,
both organisationally and socially.

(3) i am considering vast rural extends and villages that for example get payed for (some of) their recycling efforts. at least we would recover many more valuable fractions relatively easily. special efforts must be made for chemicals and central collection of the remainder of waste.

ship on an ocean of syrup

poor all of us, what a sticky times we live in. it must be old ideas. i wonder if anyone would still be interested in what is new.

well let me start with guinnee, omg. that's not much, i get the impression camaro and some diplomats tried to get something going, but all(..?!) the opposition, so i suppose the ones handpicket by some, prefer to stay in hiding. yeah maybe they are right. perhaps there should be something more reliable to represent that fabulous, almost untouchable superthing of democrazy.

Just something material, soon as one dictator dies , like in guinnee, the un intervents, they send a concrete election cake for the ppl to chew.

at least they can choose: green , red, pragmatically red, make belief local 1, make belief local 2, something that will be called centrists, and will be right wing, and something that will be called liberals, and will be a party for all the autocrats and promote fascism.

then we can start a credible election fraud before we start killing the people.
okay.. uhm.. killing people.

people died there yes? a whole lot of them, 157 probably. apparently more people have died there that such a number casually occurs. oh wait, it was a dictature..mh?
and the cops and militairy are quite the same people..

i think it doesn't really tell if it is enough to judge camaro here, i just don't know, hirelings..? well it's next door.., and uh.. if i am not mistaken the socalled " democratical opposition" is the dictators bunch, that wouldn't be the great leap ahead either.

it's a terrible number of deaths, and the people should insist on him stepping down,
but there should be the option to vote for his game i guess, and uh... in madagaskar actually all the world cried out the murdering president should stay,

and in yemen? none of them cry out anything about yemen, where there were like 100 deaths on the first day of the offensive 3 weeks ago, ok the magical word iran fell.

Very sad profiling, k, yemen. its the same old stupid story, concurence, market, one of the groups has the power, and they love the other nothing. the whatever, huatu?
group is a remnant of a nationalist group that has been engaged by parties to fare war before, for their culture, lands, language, and since they cut all the tree's 1000's of years ago, religion.

that's why a lot of declaredly religious people are so much against green, if we all respected nature there would be no market for religion.
(that's a joke but a political reality)

mh.. iran.. what can i say to bring more attention to my dear iran, ha, did you hear a nucleair physist or some such got abducted/defected? poor guy, wernher von braun avant garde, i guess he gets a nice job.

what is the philosophy behind it, yet another blow to iran, i think . a bit sad and under the guirdle, sticky.

mh next gaza, mitchell has been send to gaza to negotiate,
with a 3 weeks cease fire the israeli's will dare to go to gaza and debate with mitchell on how quickest to solve the blockade, abbas will also be there, but not allowed to leave. for a compromise the israeli envoy's also only get 24h acces.

mh , can't invite abbas. ok will have to do without. i don't mind. well 12 hours should be enough for the israeli's then, it's the security measures that are prohibitive.(big problem in rio as well, but they will put the capitalist representatives on a boat). i forgot to propose to ask the usians to lend us an aircraft carrier for that, so their athletes can train a bit.

no you don't have to thank me mitchell, ask the israeli's to write you a poll and you will think mormon's are real democrats.

k next.. total windpower this year was not as much as has happened before, ok that is coupled with heaps of catastrophic storms, but that does not at all have to do with unpredictable effects of humans destroying the ecosphere, it's a sign capitalism is perfect. mh, that's the economical revenue the capitalists make these days on al jazeera.

but i understand from the wider world most people are really compasionate with nature, earth, and when they have the information, climate and ecology. so perhaps 2009 will bring something good after all,

what we should get in denmark is a cooperation that is both mutual and well i think proportional *is* the best word, proportional.

developing nations get the right to develop their consumption to the same level as usia, (that has been consuming the most for ages), they are obliged however to implement any costefficient innovation. the mutuality being that the developed nations, with their predictable greater reserves of knowledge, material and ghost money are held to exchange such viable technology freely. there will need to be provisions to make it happen. china is somewhat developed, and somewhat organised, but india and many other nations are well behind that by any standard.

so.. then it will be easy, since we have more facility and preparation, more experience with the damage, (so perhaps more expertise to know where to start or what exactly to prevent first) we are a better testingground, as soon as such technology get's available it is our responsability to hand it that huge part of the world we never admitted development.

ofcourse technological exchange in that sense can be all mutual, but you might also want to hand them some "capitalist" advantages for 40 years or so.

ha, did you hear it is now scientific, the heating of the earth's crust is bound to produce earthquake's. it's all so simple, why is it so hard to accept reality for what it is? clear, lovely , simple and infinite.

"blitz" blix' iranium

some or all of you may have heard of hans blix? he's famously the undead post saddam inspector that found nothing. he has an interview on al-jazeera, wich is quitte decent in many respects , still for insiders clearly shows his own position, the usian (as perceived by the uk probably) one. I'll cover that.

here's the video: http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/frostovertheworld/2009/10/200910374842991758.html,
or here : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vfGmS0e0Y4

it is a lot of material and the aproach and questions are to the point..

Obama has asked iran to proof in two weeks it doesn't have nucleair weapons..

i have comments on that, 1: a nation that wants them can obtain nucleair weapons over a period of twenty years. 2: it is not possible to ever proof that without an invasion or some such. 3: perhaps we are all safer when it does have a few.
4: for public knowledge it will not admit such weapons (israel doesn't) 5: it does (most probably) not have the capacity's to build an arsenal 6: taken such arguments into consideration this a dangerous request, requests that cannot be forfilled will lead to baseless reproaches.

Frost introduces by telling about the 6-partite talks. a surprising level of agreement he says "by all accounts" is reached. it is worth noticing that this kind of publicity is naturally meant to provide a positive signal. one might wonder what credit will be given to irans campaign for a nucleair weapons free world...(1)

it also is important to realise that even this bit of aproach, and the contents of this bit of media are facilitated by Obama's will to talk and perhaps even, to disarm. At the moment i do not trust him completely(2), but the argument that major nucleair powers would not hurry disarming in a time of proliferation is natural.

blix is asked for the meaning of progress, he reply's by first stating that the g6 were not asking for very much. only inspections. now that is partial, because they are acually asking a whole lot, and (if they even had to ask? i don't think so) now also immediatly inspections. However he is right in saying it is not that surprising iran agrees to that after announcing the plant.

interestingly that usia was aware of the existence of this plant over at least a month, (it is pretty visible from space) is now kept out of view, at least also by blix.

"the real question is wether iran can be (you say;) dissuaded from continuing an enrichment program"
basically technically not is there? civil nucleair energy necesitates a higher level enrichment then 5%. so abandoning such technological advance would play the whole worlds energy market in the hands of "the lucky few".

the real question is, will israel and iran need to achieve (you say;) parity.

in the context of the indeed mostly old russian proposal,( heh, there is a component of russian greed in the shuttling of material..) he goes into rhetorics, "iranians say they cannot trust anybody" and "it is much cheaper to buy it".

the first is not the actual argument, that centres more about the economic and technological parity.wether it wud be cheaper to buy it very much depends the iranian production methods, if iran manages to sell it, that would definetly be even more profitable, and the rewards of obtaining the technologies and gaining the expertise cannot be estimated yet.

he lauds the talks (and obamashowing some of his affinity with usia and 'the west') they will continue 'for a while 'at any rate'' this is a somewhat sceptical signal, but also apparently he knows (or poses) obama is not intend on running from talks immediatly even advance would be slow or hard.(3)

i myself am quite optimistical of the aproach as well. Keep up the good work blix!.

Blix returns to the point of disuasion. asking wich are the options "carrots" he says
to lead the donkey one way or the other. sanctions or "investments" bluntly put.

well usia, blix, eu, israel, and "the west" , the sanctions are already there, your wild economical attacks on innocents and children are a severe reality of iran, that part took you no long. investments? don't they come with guilt? and loans? with interest and interests? iran wants independence not interference.

blix what kind of commitment to a non-agression status? are you serious blix? come on. words on paper don't guarantee peace, what good has the ink of un resolutions done to the palestineans? a status like the current one? including bombings of iran?
and how about israeli weapons.. ah.. a nucleair free zone in the middle east..
if that loose argument wants some merit it is time to start inspecting israel.

however it is funny, usia that sets no step hardly without israeli permission now puts a nucleair free middle east on the table, i don't know wether to find it desperate or hilarious and i trust it for what the past 50 years have proven this kind of talk and promising. not at all.

some more blackmail, about corporation in afghanistan, libanon and gaza(west bank apparently not negotiable). that is horrible man, is there so much good israel and
usia forbid to happen?

wether iran uses this to drag out the situation. to actually build more centrifuges.
(implying they would be for weapons and not industrially usefull uranium). roundwinded yes, hans. think thoroughly.. what again did israel just offer^^?

the nucleair threat to iran is one of pronouncedly huge proportions, they will need a rocket or 10 to keep israel at bay, and it would work wouldn't it? if in reply to the total destruction of iran the total destruction of the israeli was guaranteed, iran would not anymore be under the threat of nucleair attack and agression. that is the sad of it. and all the use of conflict in the middle east would disappear with it, so we see israel's role in the middle east diminishing. when israel can no longer target anyone with unlimited destruction with impunity, her strongest tool of control has just vanished and (world) peace so bitterly lacking in exactly the middle east muslim lives came closer.

so that is a bit awfull, even hans would agree that a thorough expertise of the material would promote the safety. otoh. perhaps he settles for: any atomic bomb unmade(4) is an actual succes, the pragmatical course.

k he gets partial again next. iran has not ratified extensions to the iaae protocol.
ofcourse he knows, but he doesn't mention,(5) a lot of times actions of usia or israel are based on "not signing ratifications" unratified protocols, this argument is moot.

is there a third plant. i would think so, they must assemble the nukes somewhere, and given earlier attempts, will have taken precautions against further destruction of the civilian programme. otoh i am convinced that if there is such a third plant, usia knows of it's existence and location, and thus israel does as well.

also many nations still have classified nucleair projects, there is almost a tradition of secret plants, why no mention of that ?

remains to say he says there maybe an option of nucleair disarmament in the whole middle east (also referring to israel not wanting 2 neighbours with them), fortunately even here iran has been one step ahead of the blues , by founding her current campaign and aproach of a slogan asking for nucleair disarmament in all the world. a thing najad btw. referred to in his un speech.

conclusions: Blix is not impartial, his attitude towards nucleair weapons is only in so far sincere he would want a world without. but in his rhetorics he underlays the usian diplomatics. he is well informed, knows a few things most of us or i don't.
he is also quite as curious as usia what actually facilitates and comprives these advances in nucleair processing iran have meanwhile shown to deliver.

like with former hints, i won't go into detail. basically they just stem from the patch up procedure: if we are bombed yet we still want to make some how do we do that. and that it is funny when u can produce weapons grade uranium in a pinch, so that nucleair threats against your nation become obsolete.

i think these were the technical specifications of the project;) :P ofcourse unlike
north korea the iranian republic is rich enough and willing to manage the safety requirements.
the iranian talent for process control did the rest.

Last but not least, had i been iran, i would have been willing to buy weapons grade fissile material on any market, and henceforth conduct to rigid protocol certainly.

No matter i will remain a principle opponent of the iranian state as a religious entity, and one upholding a stiff, autocrat, authoritarian system, so do i think that of to many nations that routinely escape suspicion.

the right to doom and threaten other nations and people, (for religious differences should not matter), i grant to noone.

iran and other muslim nations have not been left in peace and quiet, not been free of threat, intimidation and extortion.
we, usia, "the west", israel, have made to many mistakes to claim the right is on our side.
the right is in the middle, justice will not be done by western attitudes and lies nor by islamic authority.

to achieve justice we need (parity and mutuality in) respect, and a love for peace.

it is incredible that ruling classes made such a waste of the love in the hearts of all people.(6)

love.


(1)i noted once before in the blog iran is having a campaign:"nucleair weapons for none, nucleair energy for all". btw. this obviously also translates into: we are held to the same rights and obligations the others adhere to.
(2) the downplaying of the gaza crimes against humanity, (and the unmentioned 'crimes against peace..] report , the conditional aproach (and surrender of abbas) to palestineans, is a bit much to bear. i see that as obama implementing the israeli policy of delay untill nothing is left of the palestineans.
(3) since he knows more of the attitudes and cordiality expressed in the meetings it is a positive signal for that as well.
(4) the "israeli " bomb, the "pakistani" bomb, the "south african" bomb, the "brasilean" bomb, the "english" bomb, the "usian" bomb, etc..
(5) typically "reinform" the iaae of the plans to go ahead with the second plant.
(6) with merely dialectic exceptions.

lithics in guinee

guinee is a french spoken country, in westafrica,a former colony. Last week a huge bloodbath happened there, and it was politically coloured. at first camara, the self appointed president answered questions to 157 dead, but his security forces now tell 50, with the UN mentioning 150, and the general newssources saying 157.

so there is the first problem.. who to believe. mh, for now i go for 157, as that figure has went around a long time without much dispute, but i am all but sure.

the UN is not famously impartial, altho sometimes it tries, and camara and his movement, the army, and perhaps a lot of the people were not exactly the west, france's and europe's ideal choice, after the parting of the last 28 years standing dictator.

i think the west wanted to keep things as they were in guinnee, a dictator, poverty and the usual easy acces to resources, or perhaps even because of the semi-consensus on drugs. anyhow like often in similar cases, (on two sides of teh spectrum, madagascar and honduras) we see a greatfear of foreign elite's that such revolutionairy change of status quo once legitimised might affect themselves.

the result is many a dictator or their sun is held at the helm of many an innocent nation. leading to theatrally predictable poverty and repression and the slower emancipation of many and most.

such was the situation in guinnee. corruption and a small clique enriching itself through the leftovers of the capitalist table and the fee's. corruption widespread,
and as allways when corruption is widespread, repression and a violent police and armed force.

such was the situation in guinnee. albeit that the former dictator apparently had better intentions then it worked out to be at least sometimes. but in reality it was a mess. poverty, lack of elementary neccesity's and infrastructure, and a slow development, healthservice and education. although.. perhaps in education the old regime failed not in every aspect, guineans appear eager to discuss and participate.. but..

after this short history recent history section on with camara.

i think camara compares to o'neil in usia. not the most common of names, but quite so. so there are a lot of camara's around there, in burkina faso, in sierra leone, and in guinnee. His initial commitee counted a few camara's.

yet perhaps that must be forgiven, it appears that the soldiers went for him to "make the change" with finally the dictator dead. so i assume he was in dire need of trustee's and that, wich will turn up in another part of my story here, is of some importance.

i watched a few (they are suspectably incomplete) of the weekly television shows of camara on youtube. That was interesting, he is not easy to follow, and in my mind sometimes outrageous, although i understand he feels a need to stress a strong sentiment of patriotic enterprise, in the attempt to revamp guinnee.

but is it, like he says, and sincerely thinks: 'his guinnee', does he see a guinnee that the rest of them wants? people are not satisfied, and maybe.. it saddens him.
you may ccall it anger him, but he is really appearing to try to motivate the people,
and he is in all his absolute unsuitability for that role, a surprising feature as a television entertainer.

my experience tells me that such naivety is a proof of good (still possibly goofed , but that is not the point) intent.

before i try to relate his message or better put his plans, his nightmare's and visions for you ,

the un was secretly planning a peace mission outside any publicity and he spoke predictably tough,

i must warn you, i am not a proponent of military rule and camara is the better example of why that is so,i am quite sure myself he is playing the wrong card, trying to usurp the power and a throne.

yet i suspect his direct political opponents affiliations.
i even suspect such as foreign sponsored activity's (perhaps also 'well intended')
might play a part, the pressure at first has been obvious and at the moment it is outlandish..(that's why the actual deathtoll makes some difference)

the eu/international patron states have done the following:
they request not only the elections be held at the greatest speed,
(in what definetly must feel as a very unaccomplished situation),
they request none of the ruling commitee participate in the elections,
thus actually forcing camara to participate,
but more importantly: guaranteeing a return to the old practices of corruption and exploitation and a reality of lack of progress.

that.. is not fair, not just and also probably not negotiable.
if the eu does not want any of the commitee to be electible.. apparently they stand a fair chance.. or, the eu knows thatteh one in power will allways cheat elections,
also very probable.

anyhow i advise international channels to keep that in mind if they are sincere in wanting to limit victims, violence and misery in guinnee.

rests me one point, camaras psychology, an interesting one.
after saying i think camara should not grab the power himself, should find other ways to represent the progress he stands for nationally and in a political way, obviously i owe him and you an explanation.

btw what went wrong in guinnee so far is shortly put: you cannot organise any nation in a military way, certainly not when uniforms actually represented the rotten part of your society, institutionally or morally. even if the changes you make are patient, carefull and integer people will misunderstand the military and police context and more importantly neither of the two uniformed groups is ready to perform on such level, in such manner that the people will be able to emotionally associate with that cause. (wich is actually one very heartfelt and militairy wampum but requires a very lancune strategy to have civilians freely, voluntarily and progressively succesfully participate.(1))

okay the juicy part, his character.

this is a dangerous man. he has fought a war for the un. he would probably be dead if he wasn't an officer, and it's like he went through bloody hell. he lives because of his comrades, and i think many of them owed some of their lives to him in return.
he is obviously content (and more subconsciously abhorred by what he witnessed) with the role he played as a soldier. in the army are his friends and in the army he found the determination and sacrifice that inspires him to think his people could use some of that to build up their nation.

he is a dedicated patriot, for reasons i don't completely understand, but one of them is he wants his people to engage and he thinks he has to make those patriotic appeals to 'get them in the mood' . the mood he knows, the mood that worked, the mood that worked for him after years of militairy discipline.
to really know we would need to compare his pre-coup attachment to patriotism outside the army formulas. He may well have understood so much from university as well.

so i take it his patriotism is really born from seeing the people of guinnee suffer.

he is easily agitated, although, not insanely easy, he maintains some control, he is a drill sergeant, when he is angry he is like drill sergeant, spitting patriotic and selfcentered text, apparently trying to convince his public of his quality's, it is quite unseemingly.

yet.. he is naive, he likes to make crazy moves,(for example i see quite some reason in him quareling ungraciously with the german ambassador) he appears actually forgivefull, so what goes wrong?

in one word "front neuroses", or maybe mostly the stress, but he is acting with a personality that encorporates his (ptss) emotions in his energy. he may not know that his military drive, anticipation and experiences shape him so sharply.

I think he doesn't realise that his instrument, the army and suborderly police is unsuit, that they are to destructive a tool to treat his traumatised populace to.

he is not very willing to fire his heroes, the ones he can trust, and they are not unaccustomed to brutal violence. since despite violence and sexual assault he wants to keep them he should put them in other functions and in other places but probably he is (quite also out of despair) in for it 'for the money(2)' now.
so that means he may stick to any ally he can get and burn the bridges with his people while confusing responsability with power.

yet.. with secret un mission going, eu pressure and unreasonable quite even incomprehensable demand. like that no part of the let's call it "reorganising commitee's" could take part in elections and forward their and his course and cause,
let's remain him some benefit of the doubt.

what if none in the world notice when he does that great step first. That he really sidestepped power and the options to dictate or instrument a nation, at some point in the future researchers would still notice. against that ofcourse it is because a word is a word, or the man is not a man, his ideal of a constructive engaged and social advance deserves the kind of support that should at least warrant his group an option of representation. at that point i would dare to ask not for a majority, because obviously the camara politics is in need of development, refinement and facilitation.

it is important that the people of guinnee realise that a health investment of say 6.000.000.000 euro in the health sector of an european nation would surprise noone to a great extend. that the kind of money guinnee neeeds and most probably deserves is ordres bigger then anything that ever seeped through to them.


good luck.

here's a link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yreUZP7BKQk




(1)

musharraf had a better starting situation in the sense that the pakistani's as a whole had by several of their rulers and indeed even the english been more prepared for a 'civilised' state. although the pakistani reality was harsh, the army didn't cary a notion of barbarism or combatism. musharraf had an easier time using the army as a civil instrument because untill that point (afghanistan changed it ofcourse) the militairy was not involved in anything but a supra regional attempt on india that long since had been abandoned and that had such absurd scales and proportions as to remind to napoleontic era battle etc. so the army was very organised in a sense, but directed or trained for a struggle against a heaviky armed force in another great nation. that is a situation completely different from west africa's were most struggle's have been thought internally and much more recently, many more irregular incidents, iwth militia and other poorly armed or militarised factions participating and getting the people on their guards.

(2) political economical power, so influence, nepotism and money, he also appearsto have 'the taste of power'. it looks horrible on him.i am not sure if the money part is not pragmatically at least i assume he tells himself it is.

netto gainsees

for some reason, perhaps that nettojahu went to washington to fool good ol' christian (holy man(then))obama, i found some difficulties recently trying to express through internet. not quite deserved where the counterstorm of violent malversations, aka neocon prop. is allowed to use derogative and useless language.

i'll make that point perhaps, second only is the exagerating violence of the several conflicts (actually small). rather onedimentional aproaches are proposed as the background analyses, in every case however at least two party's are involved and concerned, and should be allowed and made to express their opinions and views, like this the riot in sudan, the ongoing campaign in yemen, afghanistan also, somalia , and ofcourse the complexity's around india, and in pakistan are much to eager to escalate.

why? simply put i think one reason is conservatives (armstraders allmost persee)
reason, if you can't win them bomb them. democrats have a harder time solving escalations, so one way to disrupt progress is to scale up local wars.

the other reason is harder to adress because it lays within the country's involved.

the examples are to diverse. for afrika that de grosso modo has a rather wide perspective, the simplifications in press and media are rather disturbing. it is a bit late to want to pick that back up, i would very much consider it pretence,
try to remain a questionmark (if not to big) to both sides, and a need for talk can arrive.
in asia we meet a lot of big and huge nations that are trying to affirm their status.
From a burocrat pov that is not bad, but for the pashtun that are the actual target of the current worldwide terror and smear campaign (no matter they are a bunch of retard old fashioned bastards), for the (poor) people ofcourse it is only a what if..

what if evrything was different. then there is that dirty yemen campaign. the rich nations support yemen's own little ww on terror , because, wow an arab fighting an arab(1), and a shia at it, or something on that line. (no doubt i will come across some al qwaida related reference for them shortly, but never mind.
so that escalation is also not kosher. it is however late to call a halt all at once, that could have been done 3 weeks ago. we should call for the yemen government to behave moderate and respect her civilians granting them equal representation in government and parliament, plus every civil right others in that nation have,(that is not to much).

(1) it is actually the magical word 'terrorist' that allows for the massacre and terror.

a chilly september

the climate appears to have taken a turn for the worse, i think it is not so bad, where we humans are drying out this planet at great speed, when a colder era arrives,
and it is supposed to all have to do with the immense layers of dust we created in the atmosphere, a thing that is not about to stop. so i assume it will get colder after all, i thought the effect would be slow to beat the greenhouse processes, but for some reason at least overhere it is well felt. it has been cloudcovered lately and quite cold. it i is only still to dry, so i assume the average rainfall over the continents is not yet very satisfying. This land does not dry up easily.

since i am quite sure humanity is still raising it's energy consumption i wonder if my idea that a more turbulent weather period would result from such a switch of parameters will come true. for now, and from here it does not really seem so, but i remember the past months have seen quite a series of odd weatherevents.

next there is that with obama (the man must be a saint) the world appears to have entered a more peacfull phase. at least there is not to much sabre ratling against eg. north korea, the south america's, iran or, more oddly nations still struggling for independence more acutely like madagaskar. there have recently been quite a lot of changes of government, after madagaskar at least one african nation revolted, and in gabon a much disputed election favoured the european candidate, setting the imperialists umpteenth sad and distraughtfull example. (no matter he appears a jolly fellow i don't think i found much qualification). in middleamerica, honduras, the settled burocrat was flushed under somewaht suspect circumstances, disturbing some unity in latin america it was regionally not well received, and recent hondurese history gives plenty to worry, yet i think the 'new' people in power in honduras made haste to express their concern with the material development of the latin-middle americans. i just hope they will not again turn their nation into one crowded with contra's and militia's that shoot about at the less armed parts of the populace, and don't reckon it is more then lip-service yet.

the hondurese populace must be considered one still easily fooled, it is very poor, relatively rural, people are maleducated and sometimes unused to see their rights respected, as such media and propaganda have not to hard a target, but you never know, i think it is the old struggle of conservatives for power based on their control of monetary institutions , not in the least internationally. Maybe the people there keep a keener eye. and in the current political and social climate in the south and middle america's it should be quite easy to achieve some progress.
the scenes in honduras were one of mutual protest btw. like we see more often these days , gabon, iran. thailand, georgia, even madagaskar i think, wich was rather unanimously in comparison. there is allways fiji, and tahiti , where macdonalds are for free to make sure there is one population more obese then the usian.

next there is the netanyahu problem, it may be a nice man but in collaborating with the israelian extreme rightwings and fundamentalist there is not much prospect of positive developments, that besides he flies around the world inciting fear and hatred against iran , not succeeding in convincing me or any nucleair agency.

the whole point is that you can hardly have a nucleair chain that provides civil energy, without geting acces to means to build an atomic bomb. (and if iran really was much of a nucleair terrorist it could have easily pulled a dirty trick, but that goes for all western nations and it remains to be seen if they did not.)

that besides iran would really feel more safe with some nukes at it's disposal i think, and that has a lot to do with the hatefull attitudes of amongst israel at times when nucleair energy was not the issue yet also a threat.

so i am a bit worried there, i just hope i can rely on medvedev. china could have a more polar view on the issue, since it is well aware of the destructive effects of religious governance and indoctrination, otoh it has not been confronted on the same geopolitical scale with the results of interference. i think with Nkorea in the focus and a lot to remain proven about tibet, and now some reported tensions with india (wich could be the opposite, india supporting some tensions with china, current india politics appear to warrant that ancient receipe.) so perhaps china is convinced by the simple way out, (other) religious fanatics should not have nucleair weapons.

in north korea i don't think anyone but china or chavez, perhaps myanmar , will achieve much. in the long run when there is not that crazy bias and extreme focus on problems and ideological differences the more natural thing would be a north-south korean emancipation, but for the moment it appears farfetched, so i guess that will also be the northkorean line. in fact northkorea with it's ideological pretentions may be the lesser danger from myanmar, that otoh, is as powerless as can be, and as far i am concerned still on some list of 'easy victims with only some oil'. a funny observation? tabloid level italians nowadays are affirmed that the dubai and other small "despotic" nations 'don't need their oil'..the racists.. how small complots can be big.

uhm, afghanistan. another time.

cowboy beach party

most of u and surely the dutch will know there has been a shoot out on a dutch beach,
it's been *the* major topic here.

unfortunately teh police is obviously not willing to admit or report her own role in it. It has to do with the involvment of undercover agents, and also with the general aproach not to admit mistakes and violence.

On itself this is no unique thing, but there are several reasons why this event is exemplary for netherlands, in it's treatment through the media, and as a signal of the general trend to raise the level of repression.

how that?

well let me tell the story short as i get it,

there is a big event, the police is there uniformed and undercover, it is a party, so initially no political motive would be suspected behind this escalation.
(if it had been a political event, i think it would not have happened because in that case the struggle to rid ourselves from the dangerous interference of undercovers often becomes closer to an exchange, many participants being aware of the inevitability and measure of intolerance they incur.)

however apparently a part of the visitors is on police observation lists the police does not publically admit their 'undercovers' had in that sense been uncovered by the people who (because the background is in repressive thinking) became their victims beforehand.

this means it is time for a little background, metherlands has had very many very huge and crazy party's. i am no big participant but 100000's of ppl have been involved, and 100000s have tried extasy with the obligatory beers. with all these party's little disastrous happened. yet the last couple of years right wing politicians are trying to raise the level of intolerance. 'trying to' being a thorough understatement here, as a repressive measure has often been applied and implemented.(just like now again btw.)

to give a verbose example of this, teh police is not allowed earrings, tattoo's or
piercings anymore.
they are set aside from the people turned into other beings (like a police dog is not rili like a dog) and tought to discriminate over appearance.

set aside in appearance they will seek a justification.. a thing in wich police excells.

so thats the background. not only for me, but for the people who love this kind of party's also, it is not only earrings , but visible in many aspects, for example the quality of available extacy dropped enormously through their abject and insightless policing, and there are plenty new laws that emphasize the distance between human and uniform. So it is all very suspect, from the pov of a 'democrat', an egalitarian or libertarian individual.

i figure the undercoveers have been behaving macho in the mass. they usually do, they cannot resist to toy with their power. being very annoying anyhow, because tehy think they should harras people on the party, but, like with me, i guess in many cases also throughout their lives.

the participations of agents in civil does not have to be the problem i think, it is allways inevitable anyhow, but the actual activity's and consequences for the individual are most agitating. it is your security, health , finances, loves and friendships that are the victim of their interference, so it feels like no measure against it would be completely unjustified,

that besides penal records and probably convictions are used as a tool to disengage individuals from social affairs.

oh well so they got uncovered once more, and very publically, the masses that have no answer to their armed presence do the usual thing, look and push another closer,
with little room the undercovers (obviously some of them former migrants) panic draw their pistols and create a scene the dutch state is now trying to erase from public records, conscience and youtube. mostly because through their chit-chat apparatus alarmed collegues start shooting at some safer place in response to either directed or warningshots.

the mass that these days is somewhat used to intimidation is not greatly impressed. (eg. the 'lie down' ordre is rather hilarious, after the air they (officially!?) shoot at the legs riot? and besides it was much to crowded in the space for anyone but the police to lie down.

the shooting does have some of the desired effect both groups of (undercover , at least one group) escape via their coordination point. the party then ends and the wounded and dead are collected. (not allways in a very smart way, and not very quickly or easily)

However.. sicne there has been this limitation of the joy in partys the past few years, there is an option this is not a coincedence, as a result of the police having a shootout voices now say party's are to dangerous, and a crude implementation of diallowance is immediatly applied. all to readily when the police opens fire and misbehaves in public events the people get the blame, and the actual intentions behind, to limit mobility and freedom of the masses hits in.

as suually noone dares to raise the question or our right to live without interference. the victim's still in the hands of the police , wounded , dead, or observed. the tabloids report (not obviously related) people from minority's with guns, but does not mention such were among the police.

short on health

there's recombinant swineflue, double selling of immunity destroying tamiflue,
next there will be tripleselling.

the other subject, usian health. its got a bad name, eyewitnesses told me the average person there may well need a cart to even do shopping.
so it's not they have it to much, health.

now they all elected O. and he has a plan, was elected with that plan, soemhow the people of usia don't realise they are being distracted by a small minority of utterly well insured private organ reusers? they should raise their voice and support O. for their own sake, instead of giving ear to spooky horrorstorys of tabloid level. What did they vote for? to be fooled again by the first next conservative claimant of (fascistoid) fundamentalist breed? ridiculous, sick.

all the world will need it, and we need it back. gl.

fair trade terrorism

In france i have been checked and searched some uh, 10 or so times in less days, i rili lost count, 7 searches and 1 arrest was the most on 1 day. During two of these events i was told something interesting by the police.

after watching my passports private parts they looked at me cheerfully and said: "ah terrorist"..

some 23 years ago, i found at one of these very early monogreen terminals, i was listed a 'potential terrorist'. it didn't really bother me so much. anyone could be a potential terrorist, and i took it they wanted to merely make a 'politically dissident ' notation. Keep an eye on this guy or something,
they must have been wasting a lot of time that way.

However it got me thinking: "what changed my status?" and i can't rili think of a thing, but one.

years ago when i wanted finally a reward for all the work i done, and some rest instead of the perpetual rage and anger of hunger and denial, i told a judge i would lower the dutch gnp by 10 percent if they wouldn't afford me a decent income. I got a halfdecent one, in a judgement compromising the law. not so strange i that actually had protested that several juridical 'precedents' could be wrought upon one person, got another. so the gnp dropped 10 percent.

heh, in the capitalist world of "free trade", if you are poor and interfere with the roaming of the markets, you are a terrorist.

longterm repression effects

For the moment i am in france, apart from the azerty keyboard i found worse annoyances to cope with,
you name it, guess what happens when you control people, that once crossed streets, identycard's year after year? They get completely confined to the pavement....it will also convince the people police interference has nothing to do with their lives.

well great, as if i hadnt seen that happening in netherlands. It is a bit disencouraging even embarrasing to see people so unprepared to repression they witness all day, get so mad they rather die then take a sane decision.

well maybe it is better that way, at least they will end up doing something even if it is exactly what the cops want. as if that is something revolutionairy new.
abandon your newcomers in the movement, alienating the populace or whatever other macho decissions need to be made to impress on the girls, like talking all day about the favourit fascist propaganda item of the (own) security, as if it matters with a couple of thousand cops constantly patrolling the area.

thats it, i rather wrote about anarchism, yet that subject i feel is hard for me to conclusively cover. i wouldn't want to err with the only political strategy i think promises progress.
i am preparing something tho. look forward to the good news.

what a sad police state this is. people with none of their own time on their own hands won't stand much chance to change their society's . right that dear slaves, is why they have all these job requirements , these restrictions so ready for you, be like the french, walk the pavement shivering over the next time some bunches of bullys go for your identy cards.

mistrust anyone that thinks there are better things to do then banging your head against the walls especially put there to give you that chance. poor cops in the france of sarkotski? no way... they will feel even greater macho's after.

Maybe the next thing i get to hear is that it would be so french, well.. if you never went outside france, yes it is pretty french indeed.

nada

i don't belief anything about these yurpean elections. what? 40% only voters? that can't be true, even in the 2 minutes i spend a percentage of the neighbourhood's electorate was visible, on one other occasion i was the only one not to have voted yet. so thats point one. question: why? answer SP (socialist party).
i bet all the 20 odd percent disappeared voters all voted SP, like last time.
Next the pvdd seems to have made a hit, not unthinkable, according the same logic the dutch vote Socialist Party ( a rather new socialist alternative over the neo liberal) they may opt to vote a greener , and even more obscurable party. (signals pointing to red here).

thats for nr's of voters. it explains sth to the results.

next the rascist party (a deliberate and most hyped conservative ofshoot among many),
is said to have got seats. On the one side obviously the campaign of the multinationals and media to promote rightwing extremism is succeeding in confusing more people, otoh. it is not at all credible such a high number would vote them. The last elections here only a couple of skinheads were willing to publicly celebrate this party's 'succes'. It's actually (sobs) a clear proof whatever signal the populace gives the extremist rightwing "majority" like eg. in italy spain and france, is what is in the make for the dutch.

so the next contemplation should be the counting. This time the vote was on paper.
it kinda cheered me up. but i have a question, is it still only conservative rightwingers with a high income are allowed to count?

next point. In this nation it appears migrant votes are disgarded. (i voted for a female migrant, so i spose i am disgarded for migrantness myself.) This is not a suspicion. It's an awfull certainty. The extend appears to be the full 100%....

i have a remark about this. Where this happens over all of europe, 100% of coloured people in europe have zero percent influence. I start to wonder, how extremely racist are the rich?

My suspicion is the zionist input is toward this trend to create a fake democratic
fascism. Not only for their own repressive values, but just for the fun of giving good people a bad time they are angling for a undeserved solidarity from the left.

I really hate it the public is as stupid as to not realise how impossible all of the results of any elections since 1948 (when woman started to vote wich indeed they don't do as much as man)really are.

I hate it even more , hardly any can be expected from the party's to fight this fight. The conservative ofshoots candidates must have been picked over the socialists
for just one reason. They can be trusted to be hardcore capitalists. next clue to the intentions of the elite.

then there are those prognoses, they are made based upon anonimous (small) towns,
that "have a great correlation to national results"). well that is a nice way to make it appear nothing ever changes!.. *not*

the only such town i ever saw mentioned was poche. extremely. Dutch electorate is very fluid. the jumps and dives have been in the ordre of 10 percent much more often then admitted: "counted".

That is for single towns as well. For citys even.

so its fake.

nada
doom.
100% pure centralist capitalist elite masquerade.
i swear they are trying to beat us into oblivion by humiliation.
no better proof of the intend to turn europe into one big concentration camp.
poor people.

now i hope european unification will not materialise.

oh yes the dutch high court agreed with me about this separation of powers i last mentioned. see how long untill he backs (forever) or gets fired.

ueberheitschmenschen

in what is clinically a set up sequence of regression and degradation of our freedom and justice the recentest escalation is boundless, :S, borderless, it's limits or impacts undefined.

i beg your pardon, acab, cops have a very bad name for accusing people of anything bad for plenty of time, it is a reknown strategy to surpress protests.

individuals as well.

common farkin police intimidation don't you get it sneaky cuntheads?

Ya know the silly's desperate and mad, that usually have a lot of their life spend in prison etc. will wait long before they make good work? It's completely boundless.

if there is no reason of equality, why would you bother about numbers?

That besides the pigs have let all this happen just the same, the breakdown of rights, human rights, any kind of procedings, in well orchestrated fashion , a la forget about how Balkenende screwed the same judeochristian screw to afghanistan and our collective coffin? Well what do you expect from the motherfucking nut shitty violent dickheads? porn all the same. They are among the uggliest tools and gangs of every fascist.

You can't see this as an incident, it is an attempt, the goatfucking von goghs and their prosaic deliberations with it's kind, rests it's rotten fruits,

why bother about the police , the sicko's let it all happen.

congrats uebercohen, i 's pose that idiot that goebbelised our day yesterday at some nonsensical newsbulletin, shares a similar perspective of uebersomethingness.

scooters

I am so angry about something, it influences my whole day. Do other people have that?
I bet. Yet, the objects of my anger deserve no such attention, i never let attacks on my person, or integrity destroy my mindflow in such a way, when it's useless,

So obviously i hardly remembered it and just took it as a token story of the rubbish mentality my fellowcountryman achievements allows.

Myself i was quite conscious of the dangers of traffic. I decided not to drive, and thus not to kill anyone by accident. Not ny their 'fault' nor mine.

These days i made the calculation how much time of my life is wasted by people insisting to endanger my life and others. (you loose 9 days a year on 1 traffic light a day, averagely, because you are all but priviliged as a cyclist.)

For pedestrians it is slightly easier to evade some of the problem, they are not so possesed with keeping set trajectory's. So one might asume that would be more flexible, or at least, appreciated. Apparently it is not even known. Not even realised, by 100 out of 101 drivers that you could let a pedestrian cross. You could surely let a pedestrian cross when you are anyhow about to stop or making no significant extra chance to score your next trafficlight.

It is not so, the more cars a nation has the longer you stand, the riskier the crossing and the people inside are all horror prepared nightmarish tokens of selfindulgence. Quitte ready to run over you would you still dare to cross a street.

elas.

oke i realised that before, what actually happened is oral history, but now today...

so i cross a 10minute-red trafficlight with cars standing still, (without pushing their "wait" button) halfway. The next and last car that is supposed to cross in front of me..
stands still!
oh well i stood still so that on it's own is no surprise. But it stood still on the middle of that crowded crossroad when it could easily pass?!

it was one of these big 4wd cars that would never (it happened to me once a car like that, and in the price class perhaps 3 times in 40 years odd..) stop, if you just want to cross the street. The uneconimical model. I wondered why?

suddenly i realised, it had perceived my action as to free, to easily escaping the hindrance of trafficlights that are not for me.

i stood and thought, but knowing their machinery i knew i would get over safe most probably, so i quickly crossed.

angry.

Martial Law

what is the matter with obama, is he intimidated? blackmailed? just a liar to start with? more of a nitwitz on international politics then we grasp? To busy with social reforms he never had time to have a look into antimilitarism? shocked by the real magnitude of violence and injustice and holing up in a shell that provided apparent safety so far?

The problem with western capitalism is that in it's long boding bankrupcy it has exactly been moving to outright fascist practice in small steps of degradation of human rights, civil right, speicifically individual juridical status. In stead of only trying to make the corporations greater then the individual person, they opt to make the person smaller (in rights ) actively.

Am i far off to think it is a human right to have a civil trial?
that judging by military trials allows for a whole new set of gruesome events?
that the practice of covering up the intrinsic cruelty of controlling the masses will only lead to more scandaleous outrages in secret?

unfortunately i am right, and obama is the noob here. Many people are shocked.

abuse pics

I would like to have surprised you with a nipple pic of my own hands to file this article, i can't help thinking that what nipples are in usia a womans face is when they are required burkhas. a nipple pic might work against both.

anyway i didnt really try and my camera has not been working since it's last ever more expensive accu loader broke down.
after 2 years and 1000s of pics i was under the impression it wasn't as sharp as before anyhow.

abuse pics are hot, the whole world had excitedly been waiting untill the newest hot release of usian state humiliation. and now they don't come..

I just hope it doesnt mean every procedure against torture is stopped, and that the courts will have the material available. I don't look forward to seeing the same dirty pics of detainees over and over again, for reference of usian state justice, and of cia practices, i have seen enough.

Did you?

Its time for marocco abuse pics. egypt abuse pics, saudi arab abuse pics, or whatever, iraki, but these prisons keep their secrets very well guarded.

I remember pics of when petraeus took a shia prison, dead and dying everywhere,
tortured people, desperation, it was horrible. And that is the kind of pictures we need to udnerstand what is going on. When these nations publicise their torture in full colour we need new usian abuse pics as well.

usian abuse pics are great, they have a procedure in wich they make photos during torture, the camera specifically aimed at a bodypart (the back) where nothing is
happening, they kick the victyim against the head. That is concerned legal proof in usia. proof that there was no torture.. or ...?

so that is the whole point, as long as the procedures go on, and the jurys and judges can see the material, i don't need extra offical cia sadist porn.

have a nice day.

From Gaza with love

I don't understand why Al Jazeera always makes a great issue when it comes to any religion than Islam ! muslims around the clock are islamising the whole world and Al Jazeera never talks ..... what kind of policy of Media is this !! Let people try and choose whatever they want ... we are in the 21st Centuary and it's shame that many people are still living in 11 Centuary .... the time when no one was allowed to think or criticise the religion or the barbarian regime !
Let's give people all possible choices to choose themselves, and I believe no religion is extremely true religion.
Amer, GAZA, Palestinian Territory

Amen

Witchcraft

here's a nice subject. Al Jazeera is quite constantly campaigning against the belief in witches, as it is still rather common in central africa. Ofcourse i support that fully, the reason they do , i think, is to fight superstition amongst muslims. Koran disallows superstition, denies the existence of anything but the forebearer of science: religion.

I belief only in science and proofs, for the same reason (that one truth can be handed but two are allways unworkable) religion believed in 'god'.
Religion is, 'starting to get the clue science exists' wich makes it funny and paradoxal at times, because the natures of it's universal truths so often contradict reality.

It is a philosophical realisation at the bases of science, that at some point of deduction , your finest resolution, there is only one truth in material matters.
Judaism, protestantism and islam encouraged reading, and thus science, it may even be that among all this superstition the jewish catalogue is still dearest to science.

I don't think they did that as a matter of religious doctrine, (altho perhaps in judaism) , the idea was not to get people to science through religion.(1) Altho in humane and social matters similar moves were made sometimes with more conviction then that. Usual persona in religions or beliefsystems (budhism), tend to be great instigators of scientific advance of the social norms.

Personally i consider that common brilliance. Anyone brilliant would do that.
A lot of geniuses as well, but they tend to be more occupied.

Now what is the funny thing about this story and witchcraft?

that in all these religious doctrinations a fight against superstition was perceived as just.
For that there were two oxymoronic reasons, like more often in this story:
firstly the witchcraft, the collective resource of ancient 'magical' 'etherical' 'spiritual, 'psychological' and jurisprudential knowledge was the enemy of the 'new relighion' that aimed for wordly as much as spiritual power (one reason a modern progressive islam would be so feasible so much of it's target is a political realisation that you might as well politicise the concept muslim),

the other reason is the actual uncontrollable practice of witchcraft has allways scared the enlightened spirits of this planet, and as such influenced religious doctrine. That argument is bit doublehearted tho, it is no doubt only the interaction with religions and technological society that turns traditional 'witchcraft' into the scary fairytale thing priests etc. turned it into.

In dutch witching translates into , doing things very fast and efficiently, the original essence of witchcraft may have been close to that, the best, only, most easy way to do a thing became part of the collective resource of witchcraft.

As such it was a valuable psychological tool indeed , and any missionairy stage had strong reasons to assume these bearers of knowledge had the psychological capacity's to outclass them, preventing their religion to imperialise those masses.

This lead ofcourse to prosecution, eg. of the druids in europe, but famously of healers etc. in colonised nations.

The spanish would kill anyone that disagreed their theology in europe and they made no short work of any other culture. This european tradition was rudely followed by other christians. In principle the koran has similar fundaments for persecution of the native belief laid. If not only through adaption of judaic text.

So you can see for the actual historical powers of that what the perceivedly monotheist churches called witchcraft we have no reference. And that situation is also apparent in the african former colony's.

This is the history of witchcraft, and now i will try to explain how witchcraft cannot be used to the bad of people, the real craft, the ancient one, or the one we reinvent because the ancient one was extinguished, is based on truth, often direct science in fact, more then with any religion. All religions produce a scarier witchcraft then the original one, because they deny the 'craft', the power in people to be so enlightened, to be the truth.

When u see an old man in a reet hut using the same old (christian) words, you should realise that 3000 years ago, he could be an international diplomat, a respected international contact. His relation to his people has not been natural for the past century's because he had not the organisational(social) reward to offer. Like with all people he'd still struggle for dignity, and willing or not, selfinterest.

Ofcourse he knows 'witchcraft' exists, used to exist, he is a part of that tradition,
but the tradition is dead, there was never a big struggle between 'good and bad' witchery in the ancient tradition. When he accuses someone of witchcraft it shows he does not know anymore what it is.

Because every aspect of the human psychology is apt for analyses witchcraft , ancient mystics, people with great talent, i think basically very intelligent, can understand a lot about another person, and that is the only real source of power any witch could have over any other person.
For example, when you understand someone well you may know what they like and take care they meet someone to love. "you made them fall in love".

This can go quite far, the natural evolutionairy cause for witchcraft (and perhaps that is one reason there is so much confusion) is that the community needed a psychological tool to analyse and cope with digressions. If you don't know what is sane, you don't know what is insane.

So you can see in spain, many old lady's sitting in the street taking great care everyone meets somebody to love. Not completely without any selfinterest.
The man tell you they are all witches, and if you ask them why? they will tell you it is because they are smart.

That was the natural situation, everyone is a witch.


(1) It is actually strange about islam that where it is so obvious in all muhammeds intentions he wants to lift all the masses, that the religion as a whole so much embraces the folkloristic arabic aspects that are definetly an adaption both to the local circumstance and the political situation. The message is, even mohammed couldn't say all that he wanted to say, in the ways he wanted to. And with a lot of it has probably been tampered. In fact it is not so hard to reconstruct his real persona and intentions, because most if not all of the influences that shaped the koran can now be historically isolated, and analyses of the person of muhammed is many times more easy (and historically fascinating) then of say Jessayah, or Petrus, Jezus.

yrianoitulover evitcepsrep

Where are we heading. Topics are.. Moldavia,Madagaskar,Taiwan,Georgia.

Not much good news, politics depends on the same old methods. Madagscar is a good illustration, but so is the pro rascism block outside the UN anti racism conference,
last but not least the former popular movement popularly called sect in kenya turned into a sect called maffia, where will it lead. It just shows you should be serious about problems when they pop up, not try to change them in something worse.

India fired the mumbai-1 a spy satelite uniquely quickly prepared by israel.. my my that could have been controversial.. reminds me of georgia.

thats 2 of the subjects. Taiwan. A cry out loud, ridiculous situation, it has a terrible lot of people, well not to many or so, but just that you can predict how
whole classes of oldfashioned oppressors move back to their niches to the cost of the good name of the king, altho apparently it cleans that of thaksin,
i just want to say we need a juridical framework for our revolutions, one btw, that makes they only move forward constitutionally.

Ask Zuma or any other random victim after their career. Not that it shows so nice to be open to the kind of business ..
Well there is allways an other side, that noone cares as much to check. I think they might be people fighting for a cause without the means to really alter the structure of their nations economy, society, relations etc. At least one good reason to be corrupt.

very complicated all. reminds me of taiwan.

Last known subject, Moldavia, at moldavia i think of georgia, because in georgia the left vainly protested against the illigitemate election of saaskvilli. It appeared somewhat illigitemate at the time. However the percentage appeared less off then with the usual elections overhere, or at the time, somewhere else. I really can't remember where allthough i think that protest lead to a situation favourable for 'our side'. Anyway, did i know the man was a sociopath and half a megalomaniac,
no i trusted the georgians to make sense, collectively , to keep some control.

well i think i was wrong in that. And now again i don't like the protests much, i fear they are so to say.. of the saaskvilli side. I would say, for s moldavian this should be susceptibly put.

kind regards to all.

islamania

or is that islamology, i remember i have seen a few islamologists, or their likes, interviewed when sth. was 'hot', i also remember i was not very impressed.

I don't think i remember 1 thing they said. Like most 'specialists' i ever seen on dutch, and with some nuances any yurpean (let alone usian) channel, they were eurocentric without exception. Not surprising perhaps if you see how unique is someone like Noam Chomski. They also seemed obsessed with projecting their version of history upon the other culture. Quite sincerely thinking that what they 'knew' moved the people overthere.

A bit like that man on tv yesterday, that had been measuring Papua's in Nazi style 50years ago, "i was young and 'innocent' then" is what he thought. It shows when you start out without thinking, chances you change that aproach are minor.

He did slip of tongue into the racist jargon of old tho.

The title i choose is because i am an opponent of religion, any, and that alJazeera definetly likes the least in my comments. I really despise religions in most respects.

Simply put i think they served only 1 good cause somewhat,(the moral/social one) and every bad cause there ever was.

The reason for that are both complex and simple. Complex because they are many, and because they pop up evrywhere through history in slightly different situations.
Simple because in essence they are only based on one thing: power.

worldly power, social power, power to instill privilige.
the sociopathic aspect of the individuals in the priest classes is another complication, the power to cure , forgive, and comfort is taken from the individual,
telling people they are basically 'good for nothing' , once you believe that, you will believe evrything.

The authority of the person to provide moral change, is limited by the church since ancient days, with mantra's claiming their truth, their justice or good, is the sacred, even only one.

That is because the church does not serve moral advance.
It serves basically her own interest, survival, the priest class, the authority's that depend on the priest and ceremonial wonderdoers, and in all a system that delivers as much of any power it can to the priest class and what has allways been the fertile mix of the upperclass and the priest class. (perhaps jewish can claim cultural coherence but so can gipsy's, judaist system was (for) the exact same purpose))

It used to be many not inheriting nobles went priest, and something of the kind is still happening, fallible upperclass weirdo's need human sheep to make a living.

Some people will scrye for they cannot without faith, but they are without faith?
what do they hope?

Here the christian dominance failed, altho like half of the ppl still knows like whole of the bible to the boring point of being able to deliberate on peculiar detail, just like me, there are also a load of people who rili have no idea,
for whom maria and eve are contemporary's in a cheap SF or fantasy story.

Thats pretty refreshing btw i find. Also we have a great diversion between roman katholics and protestants. The younger generations of protestants , i think deliver the most atheists, even the most budhist, and probably even more muslims then the roman katholics.

The reason is quite simple, katholics belief in devils and a load of other stuf no protestant ever seen or believed in. For them islam or budhism is something from hell. For some odd reason they think their God created most people to live in hell.

anyhow on with the subject, because i think we protestants are the heathens right?
That is the traditional dispute of the savage against the culture btw. for scientific referral.

well in my case it is personal. My grandmum was an ultrastrict ultrareligious 19th century protestant renewer in all her humbleness for the church. (she was absolute in all of that)

oh i remember the antiracism discussion with her emotionally was at the primitive level of religion..at first..

she was so old fashioned that when i think of church i think like the protestant:
burn the catholic churches, burn the idols and the institutes of the pope. But after two century's, i realise not only their holy wickedness, but also the protestant insanity should be critically watched.

unhypocritically regarded. I had that as a child, and it was quite a shock, i didn't like the single bit of it. bah.

I was a spiritual and curious child, so i looked on a lot, what i came to like was zen budhism, because it goes back to the essence, wich is nothing, and that is still the prettiest relation i have with religion.

i also liked bhagwan, for his sincere attempt to transmit what enlightenment begotten
the betrodden path of western lady's and laddy's. I don't doubt he was a light himself. His attendance of the scene on the planet has allways meant a pleasure to me. I hate it he was killed and sincerely suspect the CIA. He had become a very rich and powerfull person, and he was slowly turning into the usian dali lama himself, so i think this is why:

Rather then having a dalai lama and a recognised spiritual leader compromise their state they crucified him. Bhagwan was anti-impi avant la lettre.

His spirit is called osho, but with budha at the table, einstein, obama and kim il sung in mind i don't really need him much. I always went for my own enlightenment, with plenty disregard for any spiritual lead that was recognised.

Honestly i never found enlightenment hard to achieve, i think i was 13 or so when i thought i had it done mostly, ofcourse it kept occupying me for much longer.

for example i remember how carlos castaneda first book strongly structured my spiritual development for years. the 3 enemy's.. i still live like that. so i will tell you.

the idea is the writer, carlos meets an indian spiritual leader, he is a scientist, cultural anthropologist, and fascinated with hallucinogens.
It is known he has done interviews and took trips with several old native americans.
he had to go much down south to find enough cultural coherence to still come in touch with the old story's.

anyhow wether this inspired him, or he really put together this much of the story as he could i cannot judge very well. I think he has allways remained it was rather authentic. The old indian, don juan, tells the following:

to be a free human, so to walk the spiritual path to where the responsibility and sometimes the will of the individual is to walk it, well there are different ways,

Here is the point to stop when you don't. If it is not within your own idea, to
pursue spiritual growth, you don't need to read what follows.(1)









this is a rather dreamy way to put it, you might also say to try to get a maximum practical spiritual reward of your attempts to do the sane thing,

it would be practical wouldn't it? to have a little more of these special powers many of us at least now and then experience. And when you are moreless 'enlightened' anyhow not bothered much by anything, terribly zen, because there is nothing, specifically nothing worth to be bothered about.

okay so this is how you do it.
in 3 simple steps. however, you have to really take these 3 steps.

you have to beat 3 enemy's that is all. It is really easy if you really try.

The first enemy is fear.
listen, because it not just 'fear like that' as if you are watching a horror movie or so. It has a little to do, because it is the fear that would stop you from helping someone who is terribly wounded.
in budhism it is also the first rule,

budha studied totemism, (like i practice islam here;) totems where the better binding aspect of the pashtun at the time. Actually totems still were what kept the pashtun in pakistan, but that besides.

so i figure he came to these 3 rules in the same way as carlos castaneda, he interpreted the old story's in his own words.(without much of the hocus pocus)
at least it was the problem he used to have with tribalism.

in budhism it is called 'expectation'

now u can see fear and expectation have a lot to do with another can you?
if you fear something will happen, it means you are seriously expecting something will happen.

and indeed budha continues to tell that after you conquered your expectations you will stumble upon the next issue.

well so does don juan, and since i remember what he said, but forgot the teachings of budha i think the version of don juan is more comprehensive and to the person.

Budhism these days is also associated with cults, although the whole philosophy is one that stresses the individuals development.
When i was told the teachings of budha i hated religions enough to try and forget them still.

so the enemy that is called fear, is also doubt, will i do this or do that?
the same question is expectation, (either one of the things will happen, but you can also regard it as fear, what will happen if this or that happens.

Now there are two ways to counter fears, The first thing is to think out the line of thought clearly either way. Analyse how each is influenced by fear or expectation.

But this is difficult, you have to be done with prejudices, make beliefs, lies, truths , and a whole lot of things before you can, so similar to budhism tribalism hand s the method.

Fortunately there is a simple and effective method within reach for every human to stop fear . We are not really talking treatment finalised old age chronic patients here, because most people will only learn this with some help of a spiritual leader,
it would require extensive guidance.

But for yourself as an individual you can do a lot if you get the grasp of the story so far.

The method is silencing your internal dialogue. Now most of you, because, will want to , oh i remember how budha calls that now. he calls it 'doubt', go..
i don't have an internal dialogue. you say you don't think at all? (yes../no..)


your internal dialogue is not your second enemy, it's just a hindrance on the path,
the path to 'clear thinking' because that is what happens when you manage to silence your internal dialogue, you will still be able to think, but you will not be influenced by fear (or confusion, doubt, the internal dialogue).

That is a different way of thinking, and allthough the spiritual path allows for illogical steps, these are not something that can't be done without.
So it is a pretty clear way of thinking. i have no way to proof that, except perhaps by attempting to show some clarity of my mind of myself here and there, wich i try.

So how do we stop this internal dialogue? in fact it is by meditation, it is a very easy and unchallenging meditation though, you could do it driving in a bus or train, or sitting anywhere.

It is not advised to do it while driving, because when you are not used to these things they can be quite surprising and it's a bit of a waste when it works well for you if you have to pay much attention to anything else.

i think i could do it on a bicycle tho, when you know yourself a bit better it's not surprising anymore at all, would you have some 'true vision' or so , but perhaps these things can still be shocking when u are unused to it.

the thing is allow none of your own voice. pay attention to your thoughts, unless you practised this before, (eg. through zen budhist meditation) and even then if you are unfamiliar with the method, do you think?
people usually think all the time (i don't think i do). obviously when you think all teh time you have not silenced your internal dialogue. But the best way to clear it, is to recognise it is a dialogue, so that must be the obsession. see that it is a dialogue,

do i do this right? that is a question to yourself, what follows is the other part of your internal dialogue, but because you haven't practised this, it will be confusing at first.

the parts of the dialogue will tell you they are the other. It is because they are based on fear, and you will be inspired by fear to think you can't do without.

anything that is based on fear solely is misleading, there must allways be more,
it is not harmfull at all to quieten your own internal dialogue. It is relaxed.

Do you think because you don't doubt anymore, or because you are not bothering yourself with futile questions anymore you can't think anymore?

one problem with those teachings is any disbeliever can be so ridiculous;)

well succes with that, in the book don juan tells when it works, when u managed, it comes with an audible pang in the neck, and for me it did.

In principle after that you will be different you don't have to quieten your internal dialogue anymore, because you did. Funny but true. You will allways be with the truth. Because you learned to do without the dialogue your thoughts will be clear. In budhism it is called enlightenment, and it is only the first step.

the proces of stopping your internal dialogue doesn't come without stopping your fears. fears include, shame, prejudice, common fears, faillure, your own limitations, looks, modes, other people, evrything.

Think of it this way,

if something is the matter and you (still, accidently , it happened to me i am very non-violent) feel fear, ok no problem, think straight and find a clever way out, don't get overcome with fear it is not about scary or frightening. The method works quite ok with danger, yet that is not how or why you spiritually beat the fear inside your thoughts.

But if you are at home, or at some fine place, why would you bother about for example what other people think? that is definitely fear. That is why looks are more important here then they seem. Caring about looks pretty much means you surely know fear in your thoughts. Wich is one reason why so many of you are far beyond. (and why sanyas wore orange)

oh well
tell me if you had the peng in your neck, and i'll tell you what is your next enemy,
or read those 'lessons of don juan'.



(1) It will not do you any good, it would be 'to much asked' of a usual person, and it is very hard if it is not within the scope of your personality anyhow. I can't imagine i could have done it without the yoga i did between i was 10 and 13 for example, or without my complete hermitism most of my life, the 'stoa' , otoh, there used to be stoicans (omg they are secret..) in greece 3000 years ago, so i am not alone.


i guess they are secret "confidential" because stoa, exactly like al queda is supposed to, means 'base', yeah it's anticapitalist and i suppose as such antizionist but still..
what fucked up. (online dictionairys are still more zionist then the encyclopedia's)